Bay . Area . United . Against . War
|
||
|
BAUAW NEWSLETTER Subscribe/Unsubscribe
Saturday, September 23, 2006
BAUAW NEWSLETTER - SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 2006
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Before You Enlist Excellent flash film that should be shown to all students. http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=ZFsaGv6cefw ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THIS JUST IN! MORE OF THE SAME! THE WORLD CAN'T WAIT, OCT 5 PERMITS BEING STALLED! OPEN LETTER TO CITY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS By Bonnie Weinstein Gavin Newsom gavin.newsom@sfgov.org San Francisco Board of Supervisors board.of.supervisors@sfgov.org Sandy Lee sandy.lee@parks.sfgov.org Cindy Shamban cindy.shamban@sfmta.com;sfgov.org/dpt Crystal Stewart crystal.stewart@sfgov.org Heather Fong heather.fong@sfgov.org Dear City Government Officials and Interested Parties: The World Can't Wait group, sf@worldcantwait.org, has applied for permits to rally at Justin Herman Plaza at noon, OCT 5 to march on Market Street to a main rally with prominent speakers at 4PM in Union Square, and then to march back to Justin Herman Plaza for the all-night vigil to to demonstrate as part of the national day of mass resistance against the war called with actions across the country. The San Francisco Police Department has denied the march permit. The SF Recreation and Parks Department is responsible for permits at the sites and has not yet granted them. Again, the San Francisco City Government has denied the right to free speech and assembly to voices of resistance and opposition to the policies of this government. The bloodbath in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Lebanon, Haiti-- in nations around the world is continuing thanks to this hideous and corrupt government, the government of the United States, responsible for terror around the world. I do not support this government. It is corrupt, vicious and out to defend the wealthy at the expense of the planet itself--anything for the almighty dollar and the power it buys. I do not agree with everything that The World Can't Wait group has to say --we have friendly debates frequently--but I insist that they have the right to say it! The right to free speech and assembly is meaningless if the government at any level--city, state or federal--has the right to deny permits for no reason or dictate when and where we are allowed to demonstrate. Our group, People United for General and Unconditional Amnesty for All, was also denied our right to free speech and assembly-- based upon false statements made by the Police Department. I got an apology about one of the false statements but still, we were denied our permits and were subject to police intimidation. A large number of police were present at the time and location of our planned event last Saturday, Sept. 16th prepared to stop us if we attempted to use amplified sound or take to the street. With our permit denied we knew we would endanger many people if we tried to go ahead with our plans so we altered them to comply with the law. Which is why we tried to get permits in the first place. So that we could advertise a peaceful and legal rally. We arrive the day of our planned rally with a bullhorn to inform the community that the rally permits were denied and why. We handed out explanatory flyers to those who would take them and went ahead with our modest list of speakers. We then peacefully marched on the sidewalk to the Mission Police Station--the location of the source of the false statements --where we formed an orderly picket line for about an hour. We are very proud that we did this. And, we will not let this issue go. WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROTEST THE GOVERNMENT AND THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO SILENCE US! NOT ALLOWING PERMITS AND DENYING US THE RIGHT TO AMPLIFIED SOUND IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO EXACT HUGE FEES FROM PEOPLE IN ORDER JUST TO APPLY FOR PERMITS (We had to come up with over $700.00 just for the permits. We found we couldn't afford to rent a flatbed truck or any speakers so decided to just use our own speaker and speak from a milk-carton-type platform. The City couldn't even allow this!) FREE SPEECH IS FOR EVERYONE RICH OR POOR! WAVE THE FEES FOR POOR GROUPS WHO HAVE NO MEANS OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT. EVERY PERMIT APPLIED FOR MUST BE GRANTED UNLESS THERE IS A DAMNED GOOD REASON. The news of this and the city's insistence that A.N.S.W.E.R. pay tens of thousands of dollars in fines for posting information up in the community--a centuries-long practice of free speech and mass communication among the poor--among those without the billions of advertising dollars to spend--is already spreading shockwaves throughout the community. News of these permit denials and the harassment of A.N.S.W.E.R. Will serve to expose the real nature of the city government. What do we call a state that allows the Police to determine when, where, how and if an opposition demonstration can take place? We call that a Police State! What do we call those who do not stand up against this injustice? I can think of a few choice words. Why is it that the Zionists are afforded a location directly in front of antiwar protests? Why do the Right to Lifers get a police escort in a solidly pro-choice city? Why are mainstream politicians or even corporations catered to routinely with street closures, giant stages, sound systems, etc. when a small group of immigrants who wanted to use a small sound system and a very short street closure from Mission to Bartlett Streets on 24th Street for a total of two hours on one day was met with a show of force at both the ISCOTT hearing and at the location the demonstration was to take place--to see to it that it would not take place. How much money in Police overtime did we, the taxpayers, have to pay in order to squelch this small expression of free speech and assembly? How much to harass A.N.S.W.E.R.? The whole community witnessed what happened to the People United for General and Unconditional Amnesty for All on September 16th at 24th and Mission Street. The whole community notice the police show of force! The community also noticed a small but brave group of people who carried on as best we could with our rally. Standing on the lamp post on the corner and having our rally anyway with an ineffective bullhorn. The flyers, signs, posters and banners we carried and handed out said it all! The whole community also watched as this same small, gutsy group of about 50 people march to the Mission Police Station at 17th and Valencia and picketed them in protest of their denial of our permits. WE DEMAND YOU SEE TO IT THAT "THE WORLD CAN'T WAIT" PERMITS ARE GRANTED IMMEDIATELY! AND IMMEDIATELY DISMISS ALL OF A.N.S.W.E.R.'S FINES AND MAKE REPARATIONS TO THEM FOR THE HARASSMENT THEY HAVE HAD TO DEAL WITH! WE, AGAIN, ALSO DEMAND THAT OUR PERMIT FEES BE RETURNED TO US SINCE OUR PERMIT WAS DENIED UNDER FALSE PRETENCIS. You can't pick and choose who can demonstrate. That is not your prerogative if we are to claim to have freedom of speech and assembly. WE DEMAND OUR RIGHTS! Bonnie Weinstein People United For a General and Unconditional Amnesty Barrio Unido Por una Amnistia General e Incondicional 474 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Contact Persons: Cristina Gutierrez: 415-431-9925 Bonnie Weinstein: 415-824-8730 www.bauaw.org Text of flyer handed out Sept. 15th to the community: POLICE DENY PERMITS TO THE IMMIGRANTS OF THE PEOPLE UNITED PREVENTING US FROM ORGANIZING IN OUR OWN NEIGHBORHOOD IN ORDER TO DEMAND UNCONDITIONAL AND GENERAL AMNESTY The People United has been engaged in the application process since May 10th in order to celebrate our national holidays and find a real solution to our problems as immigrants and specifically for undocumented immigrants. The police have completely blocked all of the attempts we have made in having an assembly in our own neighborhood. There has been no possible negotiation, and furthermore the police had lied at the public hearing in order to deny us our permits. WHY? Because The People United is the only organization in San Francisco led by immigrants! Not by the sons of immigrants. Not by any democratic nor republican parties. Not by any so called left organizations or parties who claim they want to save us but won't listen to our demands. Not by organizations that receive governmental monies or who receive salaries in order to supposedly help us immigrants get papers. Not by democratic or republican parties who see us as their future votes. NO! We are a group of immigrants who demand a general and unconditional amnesty for all, we are not talking about using our people to go vote and elect people who never fulfill their promises. We denounce our governments of Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Colombia, Peru, etc., for not providing jobs in our countries and forcing us to leave them. We denounce the government of the United States for being an accomplice with the government of our countries. They work together to bring us here as a cheap source of labor and many times we are forced to become scabs. We denounce the government of the United States for planning disenfranchisement and dehumanization keeping us as an army of unemployed with no rights to health, education, or dignity. We denounce all the political parties and organizations that look at us as objects in order to achieve their political and economic needs and they deny us the right to organize ourselves and represent our own struggle. We denounce the police for the constant abuse of our people of which the negation of this permit of this assembly is just one more. Immigrant brothers and sisters, unite in the struggle for our rights and the general and unconditional amnesty for all!!!! MEETING Date: Thursday, September 21st Place: 474 Valencia St. Time: 7pM ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- QUOTE OF THE DAY: In an interview in March 1995 entitled, "Jesse Helms: Setting the Record Straight" that appeared in the Middle East Quarterly, Helms said, "I have long believed that if the United States is going to give money to Israel, it should be paid out of the Department of Defense budget. My question is this: If Israel did not exist, what would U.S. defense costs in the Middle East be? Israel is at least the equivalent of a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Middle East. Without Israel promoting its and America's common interests, we would be badly off indeed." (Jesse Helms was the senior senator from North Carolina and the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at the time.) http://www.meforum.org/article/244 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- !VIVA FIDEL! LONG LIVE FIDEL! LONG LIVE THE CUBAN REVOLUTION! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Harvest Time By Bonnie Weinstein Congress is postponing decisions about immigrant rights legislation until after the elections. They say they don't want to antagonize the Latino community before elections. But there is another reason. It's harvest time! They need thousands of immigrant workers to harvest the nations crops. They are not worried about antagonizing Latino's-it's America's agribusiness they don't want to upset. Clearly they don't want to deport all immigrants, they just want to be able to terrorize them into submission. What many American-born workers don't realize is that this threat will be extended to them as well-not deportation, of course-but the threat of being out of a job if they stand up for their rights. What are the common dangers that we face? At the stroke of a bosses pen we can be fired and find ourselves without a livelihood. Throughout America factories are being closed down and re-built in countries that force workers to live as slaves while a bonanza of U.S, tax-free, corporate profits flows freely across all borders and into the bosses' pockets. An even more sinister danger is the lure of U.S. Military service. All of our children and especially the children of undocumented workers are in danger of being used as cannon fodder to maintain the power and wealth of America's corporations. The Military is entrenched in our public schools. They don't go to the schools of the wealthy. To the children of immigrants they promise citizenship and to the children of poor, American workers they promise college and a career. But it does no good to become a citizen after you are dead and it's hard to have a career with half of your brain or body missing in action! On Tuesday, November 14th at 7:00 P.M., the San Francisco Board of Education will vote on whether to phase out the Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps-a military recruitment program for the High Schools. We must be there in force to see that they do so immediately, and that they rid the schools of all military recruiters! It is up to us so please come! That's Tuesday, November 14, 7:00 P.M., at 555 Franklin Street, First Floor. You can call the day before and the day of the meeting to get on the speakers list: 415-241-6427. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- WE EXTEND OUR SOLIDARITY TO A.N.S.W.E.R. IN THEIR STRUGGLE AGAINST THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO WHO, ACTING AS A BODY, ARE INCREASINGLY LIMITING OUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH (INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO POST PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS--A CENTURIES OLD TRADITION OF MASS COMMUNICATION FOR THE POOR) AND THE RIGHT TO FREE ASSEMBLY! Paid advertising in the mass media is prohibitive. Only those with millions of dollars to spend for advertising are allowed a public voice. Right here in San Francisco the fees for permits have skyrocketed and the permit process is long and complicated. The permit application for DPT is 17 pages long and full of rules and regulations that must be followed. And both the City and County and the ACLU have agreed that while we have the right to free speech, the City and County does, indeed, have the right to say when and where we may or may not exercise it. WE SAY NO! THE CITYS' OBLIGATION IS TO MAKE SURE OUR RIGHT TO ORGANIZE, PUBLICIZE AND PROTEST IS PROTECTED! AND THAT OUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH AND THE RIGHT TO HAVE DIRECT CONTACT WITH OUR OWN CONSTITUENCY IS GUARANTEED! We must be able to post public events, and hold public events where the people are. The San Francisco Police Department routinely protects the rights of the Zionists when they want to hold counter-demonstrations to our Antiwar actions. They also protect the "Right to Lifers" when they want to march down San Francisco's Embarcadero--HERE IN SAN FRANCISCO--A PRO-CHOICE CITY! The San Francisco Police Department goes all out to accommodate them! WHY NOT US! RESCHEDULED: ANSWER Postering Case Hearing We are appealing for your support as our free speech lawsuit against the San Francisco Department of Public Works (DPW) reaches a critical stage. As you may be aware from articles that have recently appeared in the Bay Guardian, the SF Weekly and elsewhere, the DPW is attempting to impose fines that now total more than $45,000 against the local ANSWER Coalition for postering violations. We just received word that the hearing for the ANSWER postering case has been put off for 2 weeks. The new date of the hearing is Thurs. Sept. 28, 9:30am at Superior Court, 400 McAllister St. (corner Polk St., SF), 3rd Floor, Dept. 302. If you can, please join us at the hearing two weeks from today to show your support. If you would like to read a copy of attorney Ben Rosenfeld’s reply to the city's response to our lawsuit, which summarizes the main points of our position, please contact us at 415-821-6545 or answer@actionsf.org. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- STOP THE WAR! BRING ALL THE TROOPS HOME NOW! MONEY FOR HUMAN NEEDS NOT WAR! MARCH AND RALLY SATURDAY, 10/28 (TIME AND LOCATION TBA) ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THIS JUST IN: ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- The Democratic Party's redevelopment plan is stopped by Petition campaign until 2000! House Speaker Pelosi's, the Board of Supervisor's, and the Mayor's plans to help the housing profiteers is stopped. "The Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Area, passed on by the Board of Supervisors 7-4 , and signed into law by the Mayor on June 1, 2006, is now officially suspended pending an election at which the voters will be given the opportunity to decide. The election will most likely take place during a normally scheduled general election in 2007." SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 Just before 5 pm today, Tuesday, September 12, 2006, John Arntz, Director of Elections for the City and County of San Francisco officially certified that the REFERENDUM PETITION opposing the creation of a Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Area as successful. The Department of Elections found that more than the minimum number of 21,615 valid signatures were submitted by Petition sponsors. Sponsors had submitted in excess of 33,000 signatures on August 30th, 2006 after a 90 day signature gathering drive. San Francisco has not seen a successful referendum petition drive in decades. A referendum allows San Francisco voters to decide on the merits of legislation passed by the Board of Supervisors. WHAT THIS MEANS: The Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Area, passed on by the Board of Supervisors 7-4 , and signed into law by the Mayor on June 1, 2006, is now officially suspended pending an election at which the voters will be given the opportunity to decide. The election will most likely take place during a normally scheduled general election in 2007. SUPPORTES HAIL VICTORY: Petition supporters hailed the results as a victory for democracy and echoed their campaign slogan "Let the Voters Decide! Petition supporter , Willie Ratcliff,publisher of the Bayview Newspaper said "This special interest legislation was never about the benefiting the community. Now ,finally, the will of the voters can be expressed democratically, at the ballot." CONTACT FOR FURTHER INFO: Brian Murphy O'Flynn 415-867-4370 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- SCROLL DOWN TO READ: EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ARTICLES IN FULL LINKS ONLY ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Free the Cuban Five! September 23, 2006 Washington, DC Breaking News... On Aug. 9, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued its en banc decision denying a new trial to the Cuban Five. On August 10, the National Committee to Free the Cuban Five, together with the National Lawyers Guild, sponsored an emergency press conference in Washington in response to the decision. A partial transcript to that press conference, in English and Spanish, is here. A March on the White House will be held on September 23 to continue to press forward with efforts to free the Five. We urge all supporters to make every effort to join us on that march. A public demonstration of support for the Five, and outrage at their continued imprisonment, has never been more vital. Details of the march are found at the website below. Join us in Washington on Sept. 23! Free the Cuban Five! http://www.freethefive.org/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- IRAN WAR PERIL — EX-CIA MAN’S SF TALK SEPT. 24 The "threat" from Iran: Are mushroom clouds ahead? Ray McGovern, a CIA analyst for 27 years, addresses that issue at 12:45 p.m. Sunday, September 24, in the First Unitarian Universalist Church (Starr King Room), Franklin and Geary Streets, San Francisco. McGovern will touch on Iraq too: "How we got in and how we get out." Last May in Atlanta, national TV networks showed him accusing Defense Secretary Rumsfeld of prewar lying about supposed Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. McGovern founded Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity. He served the Central Intelligence Agency from the Kennedy Administration to that of George H. W. Bush. Awarded an Intelligence Commendation Medal, he returned it following the revelations of torture. There will be a question period until about 2 p.m. Optional lunch (bring it or buy it) precedes the program at 12:15. Cosponsors are the church’s World Community Advocates and the War and Law League (WALL). Following the program, WALL conducts its biennial meeting. It is a nonpartisan, all-volunteer, San Francisco-based group that opposes presidential wars and aims at the rule of law in U.S. foreign affairs. Public transit to the Unitarian Church includes Muni's 47 and 49 bus lines on Van Ness Avenue, one block east of Franklin, and the 38-Geary bus(which connects with BART at the Montgomery Street Station). For further information: (415) 738-8298 or (415) 564-2083; warandlaw@yahoo.com; http://warandlaw.org. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THE DECLARATION OF PEACE “WITNESS TO PEACE: PROTEST AND CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE TO SAVE THE LIVES OF OUR CHILDREN” ANOTHER WORLD IS POSSIBLE! Meet at Military Recruiting Office Monday, September 25, 2006, 4:00 P.M.-6:00 P.M. Stonestown Ocean Recruiting Station 561 Buckingham Way (Across the street from the mall.) Eyes Wide Open Boots and Shoes Exhibit: The Numbers Increase The Declaration of Peace The Declaration of Peace (www.declarationofpeace.org) is a nationwide campaign to establish a concrete and rapid plan for peace in Iraq. In August and September Congressional visits have urged our Members of Congress to sign on to end this militaristic adventure in Iraq. IF CONSCIENCE LEADS YOU, TRAIN AND JOIN WITH ACTIVISTS OF FAITH IN A NON VIOLENT ACTION TO END MILITARISM AND THE WAR IN IRAQ PREPARATION AND TRAININGS September 23, Saturday 1-5 p.m. Non-Violence Training, San Francisco First Unitarian Universalist Society, 1187 Franklin Street at Geary Get information as it develops. Contact Sandra Schwartz at (415) 565-0201 x 24 or email sschwartz@afsc.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Mass March & Rally Wednesday, Sept. 27, 2006 the 40th anniversary of the 1966 Hunters Point Uprising On Sept. 27, 1966, Matthew Johnson, 16, was fatally shot in the back by SFPD, and the people rose up in rage only to be put down by National Guard troops and tanks called in by City Hall. On Sept. 27, 1966, we demand that City Hall reinstate our referendum petition signed by over 33,000 San Franciscans to stop the Redevelopment land grab and "re-peopling" of Bayview Hunters Point. For 40 years, we've demanded no more police brutality living wage jobs, especially on City construction the right to develop our own community Don't let City Hall shoot us in the back again! Gather 3:30 Third St. & Williams March to Rally at Third & Palou Tell City Hall Hands off Hunters Point! We shall not be moved! Sponsored by Defend Bayview Hunters Point Coalition: San Francisco Bay View National Black Newspaper, POWER, ACORN, Environmental Justice Advocacy & many more. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "No Thanks Bechtel!" ...for the Iraq war ...for undermining democracy ...for sick Iraqi children ...for destruction of the environment ...for nuclear weapons Join us! Wednesday, Sept 27, 4:00 PM Bechtel Corporate Headquaters, 50 Beale St, San Francisco Half a block east from Embarcadero BART DECLARE Peace - an end to war and war profiteering! For more info on this event, please contact Lacy MacAuley at Butterfly@Lacy.com. For more info on Declaration of Peace, including a full calendar of events, please visit: http://www.declarationofpeace.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- WHY DOES PROP 85 ENDANGER TEEN SAFETY Dear Health Care Activist, Parents care most about keeping their teenagers safe. That means always safe, even if they feel they can’t talk to their parents about an unplanned pregnancy. Parental notification laws cause young women to delay seeking medical care. When desperate teenagers turn to back-alley abortions many will suffer serious injuries and some will die. You are invited to our Saturday, September 30 health care meeting on "Why Proposition 85 is bad for our health." The 3pm meeting will be 4760 Mission in San Francisco, between Ocean and Geneva at Russia. It is 5 blocks from the Balboa BART station. Proposition is 85 is a re-run of the 2004 ballot initiative, Proposition 73. Groups in opposition to prop 85 include: The California Federation of Labor, The California Medical Association, The California Academy of Family Physicians, The California Nurses Association, American Academy of Pediatrics-California District, The Adolescent Health Collaborative, Health Care of All, The League of Women Voters, and Planned Parenthood. The State AFL-CIO at its July convention voted to oppose this attack on reproductive rights. Don Bechler Chair - California Universal Health Care Organizing Project Chair - Health Care for All - San Francisco chapter 415-695-7891 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Brian Ashley will report on the new stage of the struggle for liberation in South Africa October 1, 2006 2:00 PM - 5:00 PM Refreshments @ 2:00 PM Brian to speak @ 3:00 PM Q & A to follow Hosted By Alice & Frank Fried 742 Palmera Court Alameda, CA 94501 510.769.0599 About Brian Ashley: Brian Ashley has been an activist in the South African liberation struggle having gone into exile in Zimbabwe in 1984. He is the founder and director of the Alternative Information and Development Centre, AIDC, a radical advocacy NGO mobilising against neoliberal globalisation and its impact in South Africa and Southern Africa. He helped form the Jubilee 2000 anti- debt movement in South Africa and the global Jubilee South movement that fights against debt domination by the International Financial Institutions and the G8 countries. He is active in the World Social Forum representing AIDC on the WSF International Council and the African Social Forum Council. He is also a leading member of the Palestinian Solidarity Committee. Apart from being active in a number of social movements in SA he is a board member of the Congress of South African Trade Unions, COSATU led Working Partnerships Research and Education Agency. A collection will be taken to support South African Solidarity Work Frank Fried ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Urgent call from October 22 Coalition against Police Brutality, SF October 22 Coalition against Police Brutality, Repression and Criinalization of a generation National Day of Protest, March and Rally in SF, Planning NO MORE STOLEN LIVES ! NO MAS VIDAS ROBADAS ! Contact: mesha Monge-Irizarry Idriss Stelley Foundation (415) 595-8251 24HR Bilingual Spa. Crisis line iolmisha@cs. com How: Already involved are : October 22 Bay Area, Idriss Stelley Foundation, SF CEDP (Campaign to End the Death Penalty, ISO (International Socialist Organization, Bay Area), Bay Area Families of Victims and Survivors of Police brutality, Code Pink http://www.october22.org/ GET INVOLVED: To join our mailing list, please write to: sf1022-talk-subscribe@lists.riseup.net ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- U.S. Out of Iraq Now! We Are the Majority! End Colonial Occupation from Iraq, to Palestine, Haiti, and Everywhere! October 28 National Day of Action Locally Coordinated Anti-War Protests from Coast to Coast Vote With Your Feet … and Your Voices, and Banners, and Signs! Let Every Politician Feel the Power of the People! http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?abbr=ANS_&page=NewsArticle&id=7836 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- October 28 National Day of Action Locally Coordinated Anti-War Protests from Coast to Coast Vote With Your Feet … and Your Voices, and Banners, and Signs! Let Every Politician Feel the Power of the People! http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?abbr=ANS_&page=NewsArticle&id=7836 http://www.actionsf.org/ http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?abbr=ANS_&page=NewsArticle&id=7869 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- End Canada's Occupation of Afghanistan! Call for action on October 28, 2006 This call for a pan-Canadian day of action, co-signed by the Canadian Peace Alliance, the Canadian Islamic Congress, the Canadian Labour Congress and the Montreal coalition Echec a la Guerre, is being distributed and discussed at the World Peace Forum now taking place in Vancouver. -SV The Collectif Échec à la guerre, Canadian Peace Alliance, the Canadian Labour Congress, and the Canadian Islamic Congress are jointly calling for a pan- Canadian day of protest this October 28th, 2006, to bring Canadian troops home from Afghanistan. On that day, people all across the country will unite to tell Stephen Harper that we are opposed to his wholehearted support for Canadian and U.S. militarism. This October marks the fifth anniversary of the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and the people of that country are still suffering from the ravages of war. Reconstruction in the country is at a standstill and the needs of the Afghan people are not being met. The rule of the new Afghan State, made up largely of drug running warlords, will not realize the democratic aspirations of the people there. In fact, according to Human Rights Watch reports, the human rights record of those warlords in recent years has not been better than the Taliban. We are told that the purpose of this war is to root out terrorism and protect our societies, yet the heavy-handed approach of a military occupation trying to impose a US-friendly government on the Afghan people will force more Afghans to become part of the resistance movement. It will also make our societies more -- not less -- likely to see terrorist attacks. No discussion on military tactics in the House of Commons will change that reality. Indeed, violence is increasing with more attacks on both coalition troops and on Afghan civilians. While individual Canadian soldiers may have gone to Afghanistan with the best of intentions, they are operating under the auspices of a US-led state building project that cares little or the needs of the Afghan people. US and Canadian interests rest with the massive $3.2 billion Trans Afghan Pipeline (TAP) project, which will bring oil from the Caspian region through southern Afghanistan (where Canada is stationed) and onto the ports of Pakistan. It has been no secret that the TAP has dominated US foreign policy towards Afghanistan for the last decade. Now Canadian oil and gas corporations have their own interests in the TAP. Over the last decade, the role of the Canadian Armed Forces abroad has changed, and Canadian foreign policy has become a replica of the US empire-building rhetoric. The end result of this process is now plain to see with the role of our troops in Southern Afghanistan, with the enormous budget increases for war expenditures and "security," with the Bush-style speeches of Stephen Harper, and with the fear campaigns around "homegrown terrorism" to foster support for those nefarious changes. It is this very course that will get young Canadian soldiers killed, that will endanger our society and consume more and more of its resources for destruction and death in Afghanistan. We demand a freeze in defense and security budgets until an in-depth public discussion is held on those issues across Canada. The mission in Afghanistan has already cost Canadians more than $4 billion. That money could have been used to fund human needs in Canada or abroad. Instead it is being used to kill civilians in Afghanistan and advance the interests of corporations. On October 28th, stand up and be counted. Canadian Troops Out of Afghanistan Now! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- San Francisco Board of Education Meeting Tuesday, November 14th, 7PM 555 Franklin Street, 1st Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 415/241-6427 The Board will vote on a resolution to phase out JROTC. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Close the SOA and Change Oppressive U.S. Foreign Policy Nov. 17-19, 2006 - Converge on Fort Benning, Georgia People's Movements across the Americas are becoming increasingly more powerful. Military "solutions" to social problems as supported by institutions like the School of the Americas were unable to squash their voices, and the call for justice and accountability is getting louder each day. Add your voice to the chorus, demand justice for all the people of the Americas and engage in nonviolent direct action to close the SOA and change oppressive U.S. foreign policy. With former SOA graduates being unmasked in Chile, Argentina, Colombia, Paraguay, Honduras, and Peru for their crimes against humanity, and with the blatant similarities between the interrogation methods and torture methods used at Abu Ghraib and those described in human rights abuse cases in Latin America, the SOA/WHINSEC must be held accountable! Visit http://www.soaw.org to learn more about the November Vigil, hotel and travel information, the November Organizing Packet, and more. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Shop for a Donation at Al-Awda! Interested in furthering your knowledge about Palestine and its people? Want to help make the Palestinian Right to Return a reality? Looking for ways to show your support for Palestine and Palestinian refugees? Why not shop for a donation at Al-Awda http://al-awda.org/shop.html and help support a great organization and cause!! Al-Awda offers a variety of educational materials including interesting and unique books on everything from oral histories, photo books on Palestinian refugees, to autobiographies, narratives, political analysis, and culture. We also have historical maps of Palestine (in Arabic and English), educational films, flags of various sizes, and colorful greeting cards created by Palestinian children. You can also show your support for a Free Palestine, and wear with pride, great looking T-shirts, pendants, and a variety of Palestine pins. Shop for a Donation at Al-Awda! Visit http://al-awda.org/shop.html for these great items, and more! The Educational Supplies Division Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition PO Box 131352 Carlsbad, CA 92013, USA Tel: 760-685-3243 Fax: 360-933-3568 E-mail: info@al-awda.org WWW: http://al-awda.org Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition (PRRC), is a broad- based, non-partisan, democratic, and charitable organization of grassroots activists and students committed to comprehensive public education about the rights of all Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and lands of origin, and to full restitution for all their confiscated and destroyed property in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International law and the numerous United Nations Resolutions upholding such rights (see FactSheet). Al-Awda, PRRC is a not for profit tax-exempt educational and charitable 501(c)(3) organization as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of the United States of America. Under IRS guidelines, your donations to Al-Awda, PRRC are tax-deductible. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- IN VOGUE: Unspeakably grotesque, This spread was so galling I felt a primal scream rising inside me. And it was not because I am a woman. The link is http://www.voguevan ity.it/cont/ 060hvg/default. asp The wounds of "western civilization" inflict themselves over and over...unapologetic , shameless...ditto BW http://www.voguevanity.it/cont/060hvg/default.asp ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- A CALL TO SUPPORT THE CASE OF ELVIRA ARELLANO Stand in solidarity with all immigrants, documented and undocumented The IAC urges you to support the case of Elvira Arellano. Elvira is an undocumented worker who is taking a heroic stand against deportations and fighting for her rights. She is a native of Michoacán, Mexico who came to the U.S. like many of the other 12 million undocumented in this country, in search of work and a better life. In 2002, Elvira was detained by Homeland Security agents in an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sweep at O’Hare Airport in Chicago under the guise of allegedly looking for “terrorists”. She was detained by the Department of Homeland Security for using a false social security number on her job at O’Hare. On August 18, 2006 Elvira Arellano and her seven year old son, Saul who is a US citizen, took sanctuary in Adalberto United Methodist Church in Chicago instead of reporting for deportation, primarily because Saul has health problems. She has pledged to live indefinitely in the church until granted a reprieve. Elvira is a well known activist, representing many families in Congressional hearings and speaking on behalf of immigrant rights. She worked to organize in July 2005 a march of 50,000 for immigrant rights in Chicago, and went on a hunger strike to support workers who were picked up by ICE prior to the historic May 1st boycott in 2006. Arellano was a founder of both La Familia Latina Unida and the Coalition of African Arab Asian European and Latino Immigrants of Illinois (CAAAELII). The case of Elvira Arellano is a just case Elvira Arellano has become the symbol of resistance to the heartless and callous deportations that are sweeping the country. Despite a legislative standstill in Congress, not only are deportations escalating, local officials around the nation are implementing de facto immigration policy that amount to a witch-hunt against immigrants. A case in point is the anti-immigrant ordinance that passed in July in Hazelton, PA. Due to her heroic stand, a group of Black ministers spoke last week at Adalberto Methodist of the comparisons of Arellano to Rosa Parks. Reverend Albert Tyson said he hopes “their support would increase the bonds between Latinos and African- Americans.” At the meeting Arellano said, “I don’t only speak for me and my son, but for millions of families like mine.” Supporters from the predominantly Puerto Rican neighborhood chanted, “Luchando mano y mano, Boriqua y Mexicano!” (“Fighting hand in hand, Puerto Rican and Mexican!”) Elvira Arellano is the perfect example that the anti-immigrant hysteria sweeping the country is an inhumane situation that has become intolerable. The human rights of immigrants are being cruelly violated under the guise of fighting terrorism or stopping “illegal” immigration. In fact, no human being is illegal and whether in the U.S. documented or undocumented, immigrants have a right to live in peace, without fear of evictions from their homes or the country. How you can help Elvira: 1. Write letters to Illinois Senators Richard Durbin and Barack Obama as well as your own legislator urging them to prevent her deportation. For Senator Durbin visit: http://durbin.senate.gov/contact.cfm#contact For Senator Obama: http://obama.senate.gov/contact/index.php 2. Send Letters to the Chicago Sun Times and the Chicago Tribune asking them to stop demonizing Elvira as well as all immigrants. Their emails are letters@suntimes.com and ctc-tribletter@tribune.com. 3. Send letters of support directly to Elvira at the organization she works with and who has been spearheading her support, Sin Fronteras at Centro Sin Fronteras 2300 S. Blue Island Ave., Chicago IL 60608 or visit the website: www.legalizationyes.com For Spanish speakers visit: www.legalizacionsi.com ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- TWO AMICUS BRIEFS FILED FOR MUMIA ABU-JAMAL WITH THE 3RD CIRCUIT FEDERAL APPEALS COURT IN JULY 2006 These pdf files can be found on Michael Schiffmann's web site at: http://againstthecrimeofsilence.de/english/copy_of_mumia/legalarchive/ The first brief is from the National Lawyers Guild. The second brief is from the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Howard Keylor For the Labor Action Committee to Free Mumia Abu-Jamal www.laboractionmumia.org. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- SIR! NO SIR! I urge everyone to get a copy of "Sir! No Sir!" at: http://www.sirnosir.com/ It is an extremely informative and powerful film of utmost importance today. I was a participant in the anti-Vietnam war movement. What a powerful thing it was to see troops in uniform leading the march against the war! If you would like to read more here are two very good publications: Out Now!: A Participant's Account of the Movement in the United States Against the Vietnam War by Fred Halstead (Hardcover - Jun 1978) and: GIs speak out against the war;: The case of the Ft. Jackson 8; by Fred Halstead (Unknown Binding - 1970). Both available at: http://www.amazon.com/gp/search/103-1123166-0136605?search-alias=books&rank=+availability,-proj-total-margin&field-author=Fred%20Halstead In solidarity, Bonnie Weinstein ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Endorse the following petition: Don't Let Idaho Kill Endangered Wolves Target: Fish and Wildlife Service Sponsor: Defenders of Wildlife http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/664280276?z00m=99090&z00m=99090<l=1155834550 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THIS JUST IN: THE KPFA PROGRAM COUNCIL HAS TURNED DOWN THE SHOW! SUPPORT "TAKING AIM" produced by Ralph Schoenman and Mya Shone. LET KPFA KNOW WE ARE DISAPPOINTED! To contact KPFA PROGRAM COUNCIL email: programcouncil@lists.kpfa.org KPFA's Tracy Rosenberg voted to air "Taking Aim" and we commend her for it. You can thank her by writing her at: tracyrose@gmail.com In solidarity, Bonnie Weinstein Here's my letter to the KPFA Program Council:: To: KPFA PROGRAM COUNCIL programcouncil@lists.kpfa.org KPFA RADIO Re: "Taking Aim" Dear Council Members, We are very disappointed that KPFA decided not to air the extremely important show, "Taking Aim" produced by Ralph Schoenman and Mya Shone. Of course, we are also disappointed by your reluctance to air a PSA for a rally to defend death row inmate, renowned commentator, leader and writer, Mumia Abu-Jamal, because the group that sponsored the rally was not a 501c3, non-profit, semi-corporation. I am happy to say that I did hear it announced in the Community Calendar during Denis Bernstein's "Flashpoints," Thursday evening, 9/14, the day before the rally. But I'm sorry to say that I did not hear the PSA. God only knows, the downtrodden need a public voice more than ever. Organizers are not even allowed to post up posters and announcements anymore in San Francisco. A.N.S.W.E.R. is currently in a battle over the right to practice this centuries-old custom of "posting up" for meetings, marches and rallies--historically one of the only venues of mass communication freely available to the poor. "Taking Aim" is a program that express that public voice. KPFA is also supposed to express that public voice. Now is not the time to silence it! Please reconsider your decision not to air "Taking Aim." And end the prohibition against airing the PSAs of non-501c3 groups and organizations--after all, aren't they the grass roots of the matter? Sincerely, Bonnie Weinstein, www.bauaw.org 415-824-8730 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- END ALL U.S. AID TO ISRAEL! Stop funding Israel's war against Palestine Complete the form at the website listed below with your information. Personalize the message text on the right with your own words, if you wish. Click the Next Step button to send your letter to these decision makers: President George W. Bush Vice President Richard 'Dick' B. Cheney Your Senators Your Representative Go here to register your outrage: https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Advocacy? JServSessionIdr003=cga2p2o6x1.app2a&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=177 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Idriss Stelley Foundation is in critical financial crisis, please help ! ISF is in critical financial crisis, and might be forced to close its doors in a couple of months due to lack of funds to cover DSL, SBC and utilities, which is a disaster for our numerous clients, since the are the only CBO providing direct services to Victims (as well as extended failies) of police misconduct for the whole city of SF. Any donation, big or small will help us stay alive until we obtain our 501-c3 nonprofit Federal Status! Checks can me made out to ISF, ( 4921 3rd St , SF CA 94124 ). Please consider to volunteer or apply for internship to help covering our 24HR Crisis line, provide one on one couseling and co facilitate our support groups, M.C a show on SF Village Voice, insure a 2hr block of time at ISF, moderate one of our 26 websites for ISF clients ! http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeo9ewi/idrissstelleyfoundation/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/isf23/ Report Police Brutality 24HR Bilingual hotline (415) 595-8251 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Justice4Asa/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Appeal for funds: Dahr Jamail's Iraq Dispatches Visit the Dahr Jamail Iraq website http://dahrjamailiraq.com Request for Support Dahr Jamail will soon return to the Middle East to continue his independent reporting. As usual, reporting independently is a costly enterprise; for example, an average hotel room is $50, a fixer runs $50 per day, and phone/food average $25 per day. Dahr will report from the Middle East for one month, and thus needs to raise $5,750 in order to cover his plane ticket and daily operating expenses. A rare opportunity has arisen for Dahr to cover several stories regarding the occupation of Iraq, as well as U.S. policy in the region, which have been entirely absent from mainstream media. With the need for independent, unfiltered information greater than ever, your financial support is deeply appreciated. Without donations from readers, ongoing independent reports from Dahr are simply not possible. All donations go directly towards covering Dahr's on the ground operating expenses. (c)2006 Dahr Jamail. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- New Flash Film From Young Ava Over At 'Peace Takes Courage' http://www.peacetakescourage.com/page-blog.htm http://letter.cf.huffingtonpost.com/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Save the Lebanese Civilians Petition http://epetitions.net/julywar/index.php http://donations.tayyar.org/ To The Concerned Citizen of The World: http://epetitions.net/julywar/index.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Legal update on Mumia Abu-Jamal’s case Excerpts from a letter written by Robert R. Bryan, the lead attorney for death row political prisoner, Mumia Abu-Jamal. ...On July 20, 2006, we filed the Brief of Appellee and Cross Appellant, Mumia Abu-Jamal, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Philadelphia. http://www.workers.org/2006/us/mumia-0810/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Today in Palestine! For up to date information on Israeli's brutal attack on human rights and freedom in Palestine and Lebanon go to: http://www.theheadlines.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- For a great car magnet--a black ribbon with the words, "Bring the troops home now!" written in red, and it also comes in a lapel pin!--go to: (Put out by A.N.S.W.E.R.) https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Ecommerce?store_id=1621 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF ZIONISM BY RALPH SCHOENMAN Essential reading for understanding the development of Zionism and Israel in the service of British and USA imperialism. The full text of the book can be found for free at: http://www.marxists.de/middleast/schoenman/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- JOIN THE LYNNE STEWAR DEFENSE For those of you who don't know who Lynne Stewart is, go to www.lynnestewart.org and get acquainted with Lynne and her cause. Lynne is a criminal defense attorney who is being persecuted for representing people charged with heinous crimes. It is a bedrock of our legal system that every criminal defendant has a right to a lawyer. Persecuting Lynne is an attempt to terrorize and intimidate all criminal defense attorneys in this country so they will stop representing unpopular people. If this happens, the fascist takeover of this nation will be complete. We urge you all to go the website, familiarize yourselves with Lynne and her battle for justice www.lynnestewart.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- NATIONAL COMMITTEE TO FREE THE CUBAN FIVE Comité Nacional por la Libertad de los Cinco Cubanos Who are the Cuban Five? The Cuban Five are five Cuban men who are in U.S. prison, serving four life sentences and 75 years collectively, after being wrongly convicted in U.S. federal court in Miami, on June 8, 2001. They are Gerardo Hernández, Ramón Labañino, Antonio Guerrero, Fernando González and René González. The Five were falsely accused by the U.S. government of committing espionage conspiracy against the United States, and other related charges. But the Five pointed out vigorously in their defense that they were involved in monitoring the actions of Miami-based terrorist groups, in order to prevent terrorist attacks on their country of Cuba. The Five’s actions were never directed at the U.S. government. They never harmed anyone nor ever possessed nor used any weapons while in the United States. The Cuban Five’s mission was to stop terrorism For more than 40 years, anti-Cuba terrorist organizations based in Miami have engaged in countless terrorist activities against Cuba, and against anyone who advocates a normalization of relations between the U.S. and Cuba. More than 3,000 Cubans have died as a result of these terrorists’ attacks. Gerardo Hernández, 2 Life Sentences Antonio Guerrero, Life Sentence Ramon Labañino, Life Sentence Fernando González, 19 Years René González, 15 Years Free The Cuban Five Held Unjustly In The U.S.! http://www.freethefive.org/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Eyewitness Account from Oaxaca A website is now being circulated that has up-to-date info and video that can be downloaded of the police action and developments in Oaxaca. For those who have not seen it elsewhere, the website is: www.mexico.indymedia.org/oaxaca http://www.mexico.indymedia.org/oaxaca ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- REMINDER TO ALL GROUPS: BE SURE AND POST ALL ACTIONS AND EVENTS TO WWW.INDYBAY.ORG TO REACH THE MOST PEOPLE AGAINST THE WAR IN THE BAY AREA! http://www.indybay.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Iraq Body Count For current totals, see our database page. http://www.iraqbodycount.net/press/pr13.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- The Cost of War [Over three-hundred-billion so far...bw] http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "The Democrats always promise to help workers, and the don't! The Republicans always promise to help business, and the do!" - Mort Sahl ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Emilano Zapata ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Join the Campaign to Shut Down the Guantanamo Torture Center Go to: http://www.shutitdown.org/ to send a letter to Congress and the White House: Shut Down Guantanamo and all torture centers and prisons. A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition Act Now to Stop War & End Racism http://www.ANSWERcoalition.org http://www.actionsf.org sf@internationalanswer.org 2489 Mission St. Rm. 24 San Francisco: 415-821-6545 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Great Counter-Recruitment Website http://notyoursoldier.org/article.php?list=type&type=14 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- DEFEND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND CIVIL RIGHTS! Last summer the U.S. Border Patrol arrested Shanti Sellz and Daniel Strauss, both 23-year-old volunteers assisting immigrants on the border, for medically evacuating 3 people in critical condition from the Arizona desert. Criminalization for aiding undocumented immigrants already exists on the books in the state of Arizona. Daniel and Shanti are targeted to be its first victims. Their arrest and subsequent prosecution for providing humanitarian aid could result in a 15-year prison sentence. Any Congressional compromise with the Sensenbrenner bill (HR 4437) may include these harmful criminalization provisions. Fight back NOW! Help stop the criminalization of undocumented immigrants and those who support them! For more information call 415-821- 9683. For information on the Daniel and Shanti Defense Campaign, visit www.nomoredeaths.org. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- FYI According to "Minimum Wage History" at http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/anth484/minwage.html " "Calculated in real 2005 dollars, the 1968 minimum wage was the highest at $9.12. "The 8 dollar per hour Whole Foods employees are being paid $1.12 less than the 1968 minimum wage. "A federal minimum wage was first set in 1938. The graph shows both nominal (red) and real (blue) minimum wage values. Nominal values range from 25 cents per hour in 1938 to the current $5.15/hr. The greatest percentage jump in the minimum wage was in 1950, when it nearly doubled. The graph adjusts these wages to 2005 dollars (blue line) to show the real value of the minimum wage. Calculated in real 2005 dollars, the 1968 minimum wage was the highest at $9.12. Note how the real dollar minimum wage rises and falls. This is because it gets periodically adjusted by Congress. The period 1997-2006, is the longest period during which the minimum wage has not been adjusted. States have departed from the federal minimum wage. Washington has the highest minimum wage in the country at $7.63 as of January 1, 2006. Oregon is next at $7.50. Cities, too, have set minimum wages. Santa Fe, New Mexico has a minimum wage of $9.50, which is more than double the state minimum wage at $4.35." ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- NO BORDERS! NO WALLS! NO FENCES! GENERAL AMNESTY FOR ALL! OUR HOMELAND IS WHERE WE LIVE! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- REPEAL THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT IN 2007! Check out: 10 EXCELLENT REASONS NOT TO JOIN THE MILITARY http://www.10reasonsbook.com/ Public Law print of PL 107-110, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 [1.8 MB] http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html Also, the law is up before Congress again in 2007. See this article from USA Today: Bipartisan panel to study No Child Left Behind By Greg Toppo, USA TODAY February 13, 2006 http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-02-13-education-panel_x.htm ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies http://www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/declaration.html http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/decind.html http://www.usconstitution.net/declar.html http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805195.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Bill of Rights http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805182.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- ARTICLES IN FULL: ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 1) Hezbollah Chief Leads Huge Rally By JOHN O’NEIL September 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/world/middleeast/23lebanoncnd.html?hp&ex=1158984000&en=fea12c38b110044b&ei=5094&partner=homepage 2) Insurance Horror Stories By PAUL KRUGMAN September 22, 2006 http://select.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/opinion/22krugman.html?hp 3) Hugo Chavez Speech at United Nations NewsMax.com Wires Wednesday, Sept. 20, 2006 PRESIDENT CHAVEZ DELIVERS REMARKS AT THE U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 SPEAKER: HUGO CHAVEZ, PRESIDENT OF VENEZUELA http://www.newsmax.com/scripts/printer_friendly.pl?page=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/9/20/123752.shtml 4) Mariela Castro: "I am proud of my father " Fernán González BBC Mundo, Havana A CUBANEWS TRANSLATION BY ANA PORTELA Edited by Walter Lippmann http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs955.html 5) PERMANENT MISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA TO THE UNITED NATIONS DRAFT SPEECH BY ESTEBAN LAZO, HEAD OF THE CUBAN DELEGATION TO THE 61st SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, NEW YORK United Nations website http://www.un.org/webcast/ga/61/pdfs/cuba-e.pdf Text covnersion by NY Transfer News 315 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10016 Tel: 212-689-7215 * Fax: 212-689-9073 email: publicrelations@cubanmission.com 6) AP Propaganda About Iraq By Dahr Jamail t r u t h o u t | Perspective Friday 22 September 2006 http://dahrjamailiraq.com 7) Pickers Are Few, and Growers Blame Congress By JULIA PRESTON September 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/washington/22growers.html?ex=1159156800&en=07122ee1139ef2b6&ei=5087%0A 8) Billionaires Only Occupy Forbes 400 List By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 6:30 a.m. ET http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Forbes-400.html 9) America's 400 Richest Edited by Matthew Miller and Tatiana Serafin 09.21.06, 6:00 PM ET http://www.forbes.com/2006/09/21/americas-400-richest-biz_cx_mm_06rich400_0921richintro.html 10) Off the Charts What’s a Couple of Hundred Trillion When You’re Talking Derivatives? By FLOYD NORRIS September 23, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/business/23charts.html?adxnnl=6&adxnnlx=1159027325-6IAu68axWRTicEnv+8kGMQ 11) Solidarity in New York with Cuban delegation Havana. September 22, 2006 http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2006/septiembre/vier22/40solidar-i.html 12) Line drawn on immigration legislation Newsom, Yee slam federal attempts as discriminatory Leslie Fulbright, Chronicle Staff Writer [NOTE: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is actively at work in San Francisco deporting hundreds of undocumented workers--perhaps not with the help of city employees but, right under their noses. I send this out as a reminder of what was promised noting that the city government only promised not to aid ICE in it's assault against the basic human rights of undocumented workers, not to stop it. Currently, the City Government is standing by and not saying a word about it. We have received many personal reports of such deportations, firings, evictions, etc., happening in San Francisco. There have been incidents of workers, upon going to collect their pay, instead get ICE brought down upon them. What is the City Government going to do about this?....bw] Saturday, April 8, 2006 http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/04/08/BAGGII5THL1.DTL 13) Turning Back the Clock on Rape New York Times Editorial September 23, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/opinion/23sat1.html?hp ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 1) Hezbollah Chief Leads Huge Rally By JOHN O’NEIL September 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/world/middleeast/23lebanoncnd.html?hp&ex=1158984000&en=fea12c38b110044b&ei=5094&partner=homepage [Photo with the article shows what looks like over a million people waving the yellow flag of Hezbollah in the midst of ruined Lebanon...bw] The leader of Hezbollah, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, told the crowd at a giant open-air rally in Beirut today that the militant group had more than 20,000 rockets, and made clear that it would not disarm, despite the requirements of a United Nations cease-fire accord. Mr. Nasrallah declared that the group “has recovered all its organizational and military capabilities,” and “is stronger than it was before July 12,” the day the war with Israel began, according to Reuters. The rally was the first time Mr. Nasrallah has appeared in public since before the war. He also called for replacing Lebanon’s current pro-Western government with a new government of national unity, as Hezbollah seeks to capitalize on what he described today as “a divine, historic and strategic victory over Israel and the United States.” Mr. Nasrallah told the crowd, which filled a vast space cleared from the rubble left by Israel’s bombing raids, that he had decided to appear in person only half an hour before the start of the rally. “Standing here before you,” he said, “incurs dangers on you and me.” Israeli officials have made clear that they consider Mr. Nasrallah a legitimate target. Some 4,000 rockets fired over the border into Israel by Hezbollah during the 34-day war killed 43 civilians and wounded more than 2,000. Asked on Thursday by Israel’s Channel 10 television if Mr. Nasrallah would be a target if he appeared at the rally, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert replied: “And you think, that if he was, I would tell you — and tell him?” But Mr. Nasrallah directed as much or more of his wrath today at the United States as at Israel, and declared that “your resistance and steadfastness” has “opened the eyes of the world.” The United Nations ceasefire that halted the fighting on Aug. 14th called for, among other things, the disarmament of Hezbollah to give the fragile Lebanese government a monopoly on armed force within the country. Secretary General Kofi Annan has made it clear since then that he expects the disarmament to come only as part of a political settlement within Lebanon, saying that disarming Hezbollah would not be part of the mandate of the international force being deployed along the border with Israel. Israeli officials said after the fighting ended that Hezbollah’s stockpile of long-range weapons had been diminished, and that the danger posed by its remaining short-range Katyusha rockets was limited by the clearing of a zone south of the Litani River, about 15 miles from the border. Since the ceasefire, the Israelis have focused on trying to make sure that Hezbollah does not receive new shipments of smuggled arms from Iran and Syria, considered by Israel and the United States to be the militant group’s prime sponsors. But Mr. Nasrallah’s declaration of the group’s renewed strength seemed to leave little prospect of any voluntary disarmament. In contrast to the understated tone he took in his appearances on Hezbollah television during the war, his speech today, portions of which were broadcast by CNN, was an angry declaration of victory. It met with prolonged cheers from the crowd, with many people waving the militant group’s yellow flag. Since the fighting ended on Aug. 14th, Hezbollah has tried to build on the increase in popular support that was a side-effect of Israel’s widespread bombing campaign, which killed more than 1,200 Lebanese, mostly civilians. Its leaders recently called for a government of national unity to replace the mainly pro-Western, anti-Syrian March 14 coalition now in power. The coalition, which gave Hezbollah a share in government, won a slim majority in elections last spring. Some Lebanese have criticized Hezbollah for its role in the start of the war, which was touched off by a cross-border raid in which militants seized two Israeli soldiers. Shortly after the war’s end, Mr. Nasrallah said in a televised address that the raid a miscalculation, and that he would not have ordered the raid if he had known how fierce the response from Israel would be. But today he said that part of the Israeli and American plan had been to set the rest of Lebanon against Hezbollah by inflicting widespread punishment. “They thought that we would be divided,” he said. “It’s not a victory for a party or a group, it’s a victory for the people of Lebanon.” Mr. Nasrallah called the conflict “an American war,” saying that the United States had made Israel’s attacks possible by providing arms, planning and diplomatic support. He said the war came to and end not because of the suffering of the Lebanese or any weakness on the part of Hezbollah, but because “the Zionists realized that if it continued it would be a catastrophe.” “The Americans agreed to stop the war, not for the women, not for the children of the Lebanese — they stopped the war for Israel,” he said. He said the Bush administration had allowed the war to go forward as part of the plan to create “a new Middle East.” “This Middle East was illegitimate,” he said, and its defeat has become an inspiration “for people who fight for their freedom and dignity” around the world. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 2) Insurance Horror Stories By PAUL KRUGMAN September 22, 2006 http://select.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/opinion/22krugman.html?hp “When Steve and Leslie Shaeffer’s daughter, Selah, was diagnosed at age 4 with a potentially fatal tumor in her jaw, they figured their health insurance would cover the bulk of her treatment costs.” But “shortly after Selah’s medical bills hit $20,000, Blue Cross stopped covering them and eventually canceled her coverage retroactively.” So begins a recent report in The Los Angeles Times titled “Sick but Insured? Think Again,” which offers a series of similar horror stories, and suggests that these stories represent a growing trend: more and more health insurers are finding ways to yank your insurance when you get sick. This trend helps explain something that has been puzzling me: why is the health insurance industry growing rapidly, even as it covers fewer Americans? Between 2000 and 2005, the number of Americans with private health insurance coverage fell by 1 percent. But over the same period, employment at health insurance companies rose a remarkable 32 percent. What are all those extra employees doing? Now we know at least part of the answer: they’re working harder than ever at identifying people who really need medical care, and ensuring that they don’t get it. In the past, they mainly concentrated on screening out applicants likely to get sick. Now, it seems, they’re also devoting a lot of effort to finding pretexts for revoking insurance after they’ve already granted it. They typically do this by claiming that they weren’t notified about some pre-existing condition, even if the insured wasn’t aware of that condition when he or she bought the policy. Welcome to the ugly world of American health care economics. Health care is poised to become America’s largest industry. Employment in manufacturing, which once dominated the economy, has fallen 18 percent since 2000, to 14.2 million. Meanwhile, employment in the private health services industry has risen 16 percent, to 12.6 million. Another 1.3 million people are employed at government hospitals. So we’re quickly approaching the point at which more Americans will be employed delivering health care than are employed producing manufactured goods. Yet even as health care becomes the core of the American economy, our system of paying for health care remains sick, and is getting sicker. Because everyone faces some risk of incurring huge medical costs, only the superrich can afford to be without health insurance. Yet private insurers try to refuse coverage to those most likely to need it, and deny payment whenever they can get away with it. The point isn’t that they’re evil or greedy (although you do wonder how the people who cut off the Schaeffers can look themselves in the mirror). The fact is that cruelty and injustice are the inevitable result of the current rules of the game. Blue Shield of California is a nonprofit insurance provider, yet as a spokesman put it, if his organization doesn’t follow the for-profit practice of selectively covering only the healthiest people, “we will end up with all the high-risk people.” Now, before you panic about the state of your own coverage, you should know that the horror stories in The Los Angeles Times article all involve individual insurance; if your coverage comes via your employer, you’re reasonably secure against sudden cancellation. But employment-based insurance is in rapid decline, as employers balk at the cost and more and more companies adopt Wal-Mart-style minimal-benefit policies. That’s why many people are turning to individual insurance — only to find out, in some cases, that they didn’t get what they thought they paid for. And here’s the thing: it’s all unnecessary. Every other wealthy nation manages to provide almost all its citizens with guaranteed health insurance, while spending less on health care than we do. And there’s no mystery why: we’re paying the price for pointless, destructive reliance on private insurers. Medicare, which is a universal health insurance program for older Americans, spends less than 2 cents of every dollar on administrative costs, leaving 98 cents to pay for medical care. By contrast, private insurance companies spend only around 80 cents of each dollar in premiums on medical care; much of the remaining 20 cents is spent denying insurance to those who need it. If we had a universal system — Medicare for everyone — there would be no more horror stories like those reported by The Los Angeles Times. And we’d almost certainly spend less on health care than we do now. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 3) Hugo Chavez Speech at United Nations NewsMax.com Wires Wednesday, Sept. 20, 2006 PRESIDENT CHAVEZ DELIVERS REMARKS AT THE U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 SPEAKER: HUGO CHAVEZ, PRESIDENT OF VENEZUELA http://www.newsmax.com/scripts/printer_friendly.pl?page=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/9/20/123752.shtml "Representatives of the governments of the world, good morning to all of you. First of all, I would like to invite you, very respectfully, to those who have not read this book, to read it. Noam Chomsky, one of the most prestigious American and world intellectuals, Noam Chomsky, and this is one of his most recent books, 'Hegemony or Survival: The Imperialist Strategy of the United States.'" [Holds up book, waves it in front of General Assembly.] "It's an excellent book to help us understand what has been happening in the world throughout the 20th century, and what's happening now, and the greatest threat looming over our planet. The hegemonic pretensions of the American empire are placing at risk the very survival of the human species. We continue to warn you about this danger and we appeal to the people of the United States and the world to halt this threat, which is like a sword hanging over our heads. I had considered reading from this book, but, for the sake of time," [flips through the pages, which are numerous] "I will just leave it as a recommendation. It reads easily, it is a very good book, I'm sure Madame [President] you are familiar with it. It appears in English, in Russian, in Arabic, in German. I think that the first people who should read this book are our brothers and sisters in the United States, because their threat is right in their own house. The devil is right at home. The devil, the devil himself, is right in the house. "And the devil came here yesterday. Yesterday the devil came here. Right here." [crosses himself] "And it smells of sulfur still today." Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the president of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world. Truly. As the owner of the world. I think we could call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday's statement made by the president of the United States. As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world. An Alfred Hitchcock movie could use it as a scenario. I would even propose a title: "The Devil's Recipe." As Chomsky says here, clearly and in depth, the American empire is doing all it can to consolidate its system of domination. And we cannot allow them to do that. We cannot allow world dictatorship to be consolidated. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): The world parent's statement -- cynical, hypocritical, full of this imperial hypocrisy from the need they have to control everything. They say they want to impose a democratic model. But that's their democratic model. It's the false democracy of elites, and, I would say, a very original democracy that's imposed by weapons and bombs and firing weapons. What a strange democracy. Aristotle might not recognize it or others who are at the root of democracy. What type of democracy do you impose with marines and bombs? The president of the United States, yesterday, said to us, right here, in this room, and I'm quoting, "Anywhere you look, you hear extremists telling you can escape from poverty and recover your dignity through violence, terror and martyrdom." Wherever he looks, he sees extremists. And you, my brother -- he looks at your color, and he says, oh, there's an extremist. Evo Morales, the worthy president of Bolivia, looks like an extremist to him. The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It's not that we are extremists. It's that the world is waking up. It's waking up all over. And people are standing up. I have the feeling, dear world dictator, that you are going to live the rest of your days as a nightmare because the rest of us are standing up, all those who are rising up against American imperialism, who are shouting for equality, for respect, for the sovereignty of nations. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): Yes, you can call us extremists, but we are rising up against the empire, against the model of domination. The president then -- and this he said himself, he said: "I have come to speak directly to the populations in the Middle East, to tell them that my country wants peace." That's true. If we walk in the streets of the Bronx, if we walk around New York, Washington, San Diego, in any city, San Antonio, San Francisco, and we ask individuals, the citizens of the United States, what does this country want? Does it want peace? They'll say yes. But the government doesn't want peace. The government of the United States doesn't want peace. It wants to exploit its system of exploitation, of pillage, of hegemony through war. It wants peace. But what's happening in Iraq? What happened in Lebanon? In Palestine? What's happening? What's happened over the last 100 years in Latin America and in the world? And now threatening Venezuela -- new threats against Venezuela, against Iran? He spoke to the people of Lebanon. Many of you, he said, have seen how your homes and communities were caught in the crossfire. How cynical can you get? What a capacity to lie shamefacedly. The bombs in Beirut with millimetric precision? CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): This is crossfire? He's thinking of a western, when people would shoot from the hip and somebody would be caught in the crossfire. This is imperialist, fascist, assassin, genocidal, the empire and Israel firing on the people of Palestine and Lebanon. That is what happened. And now we hear, "We're suffering because we see homes destroyed.' The president of the United States came to talk to the peoples -- to the peoples of the world. He came to say -- I brought some documents with me, because this morning I was reading some statements, and I see that he talked to the people of Afghanistan, the people of Lebanon, the people of Iran. And he addressed all these peoples directly. And you can wonder, just as the president of the United States addresses those peoples of the world, what would those peoples of the world tell him if they were given the floor? What would they have to say? And I think I have some inkling of what the peoples of the south, the oppressed people think. They would say, "Yankee imperialist, go home." I think that is what those people would say if they were given the microphone and if they could speak with one voice to the American imperialists. And that is why, Madam President, my colleagues, my friends, last year we came here to this same hall as we have been doing for the past eight years, and we said something that has now been confirmed -- fully, fully confirmed. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): I don't think anybody in this room could defend the system. Let's accept -- let's be honest. The U.N. system, born after the Second World War, collapsed. It's worthless. Oh, yes, it's good to bring us together once a year, see each other, make statements and prepare all kinds of long documents, and listen to good speeches, like Abel's (ph) yesterday, or President Mullah's (ph). Yes, it's good for that. And there are a lot of speeches, and we've heard lots from the president of Sri Lanka, for instance, and the president of Chile. But we, the assembly, have been turned into a merely deliberative organ. We have no power, no power to make any impact on the terrible situation in the world. And that is why Venezuela once again proposes, here, today, 20 September, that we re-establish the United Nations. Last year, Madam, we made four modest proposals that we felt to be crucially important. We have to assume the responsibility our heads of state, our ambassadors, our representatives, and we have to discuss it. The first is expansion, and Mullah (ph) talked about this yesterday right here. The Security Council, both as it has permanent and non-permanent categories, (inaudible) developing countries and LDCs must be given access as new permanent members. That's step one. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): Second, effective methods to address and resolve world conflicts, transparent decisions. Point three, the immediate suppression -- and that is something everyone's calling for -- of the anti-democratic mechanism known as the veto, the veto on decisions of the Security Council. Let me give you a recent example. The immoral veto of the United States allowed the Israelis, with impunity, to destroy Lebanon. Right in front of all of us as we stood there watching, a resolution in the council was prevented. Fourthly, we have to strengthen, as we've always said, the role and the powers of the secretary general of the United Nations. Yesterday, the secretary general practically gave us his speech of farewell. And he recognized that over the last 10 years, things have just gotten more complicated; hunger, poverty, violence, human rights violations have just worsened. That is the tremendous consequence of the collapse of the United Nations system and American hegemonistic pretensions. Madam, Venezuela a few years ago decided to wage this battle within the United Nations by recognizing the United Nations, as members of it that we are, and lending it our voice, our thinking. Our voice is an independent voice to represent the dignity and the search for peace and the reformulation of the international system; to denounce persecution and aggression of hegemonistic forces on the planet. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): This is how Venezuela has presented itself. Bolivar's home has sought a nonpermanent seat on the Security Council. Let's see. Well, there's been an open attack by the U.S. government, an immoral attack, to try and prevent Venezuela from being freely elected to a post in the Security Council. The imperium is afraid of truth, is afraid of independent voices. It calls us extremists, but they are the extremists. And I would like to thank all the countries that have kindly announced their support for Venezuela, even though the ballot is a secret one and there's no need to announce things. But since the imperium has attacked, openly, they strengthened the convictions of many countries. And their support strengthens us. Mercosur, as a bloc, has expressed its support, our brothers in Mercosur. Venezuela, with Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, is a full member of Mercosur. And many other Latin American countries, CARICOM, Bolivia have expressed their support for Venezuela. The Arab League, the full Arab League has voiced its support. And I am immensely grateful to the Arab world, to our Arab brothers, our Caribbean brothers, the African Union. Almost all of Africa has expressed its support for Venezuela and countries such as Russia or China and many others. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): I thank you all warmly on behalf of Venezuela, on behalf of our people, and on behalf of the truth, because Venezuela, with a seat on the Security Council, will be expressing not only Venezuela's thoughts, but it will also be the voice of all the peoples of the world, and we will defend dignity and truth. Over and above all of this, Madam President, I think there are reasons to be optimistic. A poet would have said "helplessly optimistic," because over and above the wars and the bombs and the aggressive and the preventive war and the destruction of entire peoples, one can see that a new era is dawning. As Sylvia Rodriguez (ph) says, the era is giving birth to a heart. There are alternative ways of thinking. There are young people who think differently. And this has already been seen within the space of a mere decade. It was shown that the end of history was a totally false assumption, and the same was shown about Pax Americana and the establishment of the capitalist neo-liberal world. It has been shown, this system, to generate mere poverty. Who believes in it now? What we now have to do is define the future of the world. Dawn is breaking out all over. You can see it in Africa and Europe and Latin America and Oceanea. I want to emphasize that optimistic vision. We have to strengthen ourselves, our will to do battle, our awareness. We have to build a new and better world. Venezuela joins that struggle, and that's why we are threatened. The U.S. has already planned, financed and set in motion a coup in Venezuela, and it continues to support coup attempts in Venezuela and elsewhere. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): President Michelle Bachelet reminded us just a moment ago of the horrendous assassination of the former foreign minister, Orlando Letelier. And I would just add one thing: Those who perpetrated this crime are free. And that other event where an American citizen also died were American themselves. They were CIA killers, terrorists. And we must recall in this room that in just a few days there will be another anniversary. Thirty years will have passed from this other horrendous terrorist attack on the Cuban plane, where 73 innocents died, a Cubana de Aviacion airliner. And where is the biggest terrorist of this continent who took the responsibility for blowing up the plane? He spent a few years in jail in Venezuela. Thanks to CIA and then government officials, he was allowed to escape, and he lives here in this country, protected by the government. And he was convicted. He has confessed to his crime. But the U.S. government has double standards. It protects terrorism when it wants to. And this is to say that Venezuela is fully committed to combating terrorism and violence. And we are one of the people who are fighting for peace. Luis Posada Carriles is the name of that terrorist who is protected here. And other tremendously corrupt people who escaped from Venezuela are also living here under protection: a group that bombed various embassies, that assassinated people during the coup. They kidnapped me and they were going to kill me, but I think God reached down and our people came out into the streets and the army was too, and so I'm here today. But these people who led that coup are here today in this country protected by the American government. And I accuse the American government of protecting terrorists and of having a completely cynical discourse. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): We mentioned Cuba. Yes, we were just there a few days ago. We just came from there happily. And there you see another era born. The Summit of the 15, the Summit of the Nonaligned, adopted a historic resolution. This is the outcome document. Don't worry, I'm not going to read it. But you have a whole set of resolutions here that were adopted after open debate in a transparent matter -- more than 50 heads of state. Havana was the capital of the south for a few weeks, and we have now launched, once again, the group of the nonaligned with new momentum. And if there is anything I could ask all of you here, my companions, my brothers and sisters, it is to please lend your good will to lend momentum to the Nonaligned Movement for the birth of the new era, to prevent hegemony and prevent further advances of imperialism. And as you know, Fidel Castro is the president of the nonaligned for the next three years, and we can trust him to lead the charge very efficiently. Unfortunately they thought, "Oh, Fidel was going to die." But they're going to be disappointed because he didn't. And he's not only alive, he's back in his green fatigues, and he's now presiding the nonaligned. So, my dear colleagues, Madam President, a new, strong movement has been born, a movement of the south. We are men and women of the south. With this document, with these ideas, with these criticisms, I'm now closing my file. I'm taking the book with me. And, don't forget, I'm recommending it very warmly and very humbly to all of you. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): We want ideas to save our planet, to save the planet from the imperialist threat. And hopefully in this very century, in not too long a time, we will see this, we will see this new era, and for our children and our grandchildren a world of peace based on the fundamental principles of the United Nations, but a renewed United Nations. And maybe we have to change location. Maybe we have to put the United Nations somewhere else; maybe a city of the south. We've proposed Venezuela. You know that my personal doctor had to stay in the plane. The chief of security had to be left in a locked plane. Neither of these gentlemen was allowed to arrive and attend the U.N. meeting. This is another abuse and another abuse of power on the part of the Devil. It smells of sulfur here, but God is with us and I embrace you all. May God bless us all. Good day to you. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 4) Mariela Castro: "I am proud of my father " Fernán González BBC Mundo, Havana A CUBANEWS TRANSLATION BY ANA PORTELA Edited by Walter Lippmann http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs955.html Mariela Castro is the daughter of the interim Cuban president, Raul Castro and director of the National Center for Sexual Education in this country. For the past few years she has been noted for defending the rights of sexual minorities. In an interview with BBC Mundo, in her office of Havana, in an old house in the Vedado neighborhood, she talks of her relationship with her father, of her family life and work she does, which is not always easy. What is your father like? My Dad, not Raúl Castro, is marvelous (she smiles), he is very active, very caring, always interested in us. I remember, when I was little, that I managed to be taken to school holding his hand, like other parents, walking the six blocks and waiting for the morning formation (with all the teachers and students before classes that almost always had an ideological teaching). He is a father that always has surprises. One thing that I liked very much is that my father is a very loving, very romantic and passionate person with my Mom (Vilma Espín, president of the Cuban Women‚s Federation). They have transmitted a great stability. They taught us to love, to be romantic, to believe in people, even if they may disappoint us. They taught us many important values. Often we said that we didn‚t want him to continue with his public responsibilities because we wanted him closer. We wanted to be with him. We understood the responsibility he had to assume because, once you take a revolutionary course, you can‚t say "well, I'm going home. So long. That's your problem." That is also a great responsibility. Like Garibaldi. He forged Italian unity and then said, "chao, it yours now" and left. That was a great lack of historical responsibility. They were not like that. That must be admired but it means that we will not be with him as often that we want. But we are also proud of how he is, as a human being, of how he as assumed his public responsibility and how he has had the honesty to assume his errors when he identifies them, which is the majority of times. He has a great experience in collective work, in boosting collective creation in leading because he does not feel omnipotent, because he is not self-satisfied. The Cuban people have confidence in him, not because he has a magic wand, something no one has. It is a great effort, a great exercise in creativity, of a collective will to create a more just and fairer society in such a poor country such as Cuba with so few material resources, under the hostility of the most powerful empire in all of history. History fascinates him. He is very well versed in universal and Cuban history. It helps him to understand Cuban reality and tries to push forward. He will follow the strategy of the Revolution which will, collectively, continue to strengthen and actions will be identified for Cuban society to advance, like a sovereign state. What do you remember most about your father? His joy, his congeniality, his jokes and his affection. He has been very affectionate with all of us. He is very reserved in his public life but, privately, he is fascinating. Let‚s talk about your work as director of the Cuban Center of Sexual Education. What made you decide to work for the rights of transvestites, the transsexuals, and homosexuals in Cuba? I was working here as the director of the center. I think it was about 2004 when a group of transvestites, transsexuals came. Some were patients, others collaborators here in the center, in educational work. Some were not, but many were prostitutes and wanted support of our institution because they had problems with the police here in Havana, not in other parts of the country. There was an event here in Havana, around La Rampa, the Malecon (seaside walk) where many people with different sexual preferences met and engaged in prostitution. But they disturbed the neighbors. If they had exercised prostitution without disturbing the neighbors...That implied harassment of tourists who complained. There was a meeting of the Young Communist League in Havana who complained to the government. They said that measures had to be taken because the families felt infringed upon and tourists also. Instead of taking a more logical measure, the decision of the police was to arrest anyone who looked like a transvestite, transsexual or anything that looked strange, arbitrary, absurd. Of course, they came to demand their rights because I don't know if you have noticed, we Cubans have a strong sense of justice and fight when we have to and we accept when we feel that we must accept. That's why I say, Why is Fidel here? Why do people want him here... because the day that the people don't want him here he won't be. That happened with this subject. They spoke of everything bothering them. I asked if I could tape what they had said to prepare a report. And that's what I did, a short report so they could read it over rapidly and then a longer one with many annexes. That is how a national strategy came about for attention to transsexuals with an integral vision since 1979 which was created by my mother, Vilma Espín, president of the Cuban Women's Federation. What we did was to broaden this work, to enrich it. Since the transvestites and transsexuals asked my help I got seriously involved in this. I have studied these subjects to have background then, in the end, I am doing my PhD on the subject. How long will it be in Cuba to achieve total respect for the rights of homosexuals? I don't know, I don't know how long and I would like to know. At first I was very passionate about it and understood that I was killing myself and that everything had a process, that it took time; it has to be moved, to boost it. It is, precisely, what I am doing to prevent this process from taking too long but to make it shorter. Do you think these problems are institutional or about machismo in society or a combination of both? A combination of both. They are socio-cultural and historical and, of course; they are visible because human beings with the same conditioning make institutions. That is why it has an educational, massive and very important component. We are even carrying out a very important study on representations of transexuality; to carry out educational campaigns to teach society to respect these people and respect their rights. Of course, everyone is going to compare what happens now with what happened in the sixties when homosexuals were sent to work camps or the UMAP. Why do you think this happened? It was like what happened in other places only that Cuba is more visible because it was during the Cold War and war had to be waged against Cuba, on anything where Cuba made a mistake. This was happening everywhere in different ways and continues to happen, even in developed countries. What happens is that it doesn't transcend. I know about it because that is my work and I know groups in Europe who denounce the violation of the rights of these people. I know of parents of transsexuals in England who call for the respect of the rights of transsexuals because their sons have been physically beaten. There are hate crimes that are sexually orientated. This doesn't exist in Cuba. The Cuban population is much more respectful of differences than in other places, I don't know why. I don't know if it's the "conga" (always willing to have a party), that's the way we are. When I'm afraid I will find a very strong resistance, I find a high degree of sensibility in the Cuban population. Do you think that perception about homosexuals in Cuban society has changed, lately? I think so; it has changed very much. Also, because there is no longer a hostile policy, because we also talk of those subjects in social communication media. This makes people think, to reflect upon and that homosexuals and lesbians express their sexual orientation like everyone else in the world, without fears although this does not mean that there may be persons who are afraid because it very difficult to feel different. I think that it is the same thing that happens with Blacks in a racist society or to women in a society that discriminates against her. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 5) PERMANENT MISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA TO THE UNITED NATIONS DRAFT SPEECH BY ESTEBAN LAZO, HEAD OF THE CUBAN DELEGATION TO THE 61st SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, NEW YORK United Nations website http://www.un.org/webcast/ga/61/pdfs/cuba-e.pdf Text covnersion by NY Transfer News 315 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10016 Tel: 212-689-7215 * Fax: 212-689-9073 email: publicrelations@cubanmission.com Madame President, Mr. Secretary General, Your Excellencies: A mere four days ago, the 14th Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement held in Cuba was concluded. Today, I speak on behalf of the Movement's Chairman, President Fidel Castro, fulfilling our obligation to inform this Assembly of the main decisions agreed on at the Summit Conference held in Havana. As First Vice-President of the Councils of State and Ministers of the Republic of Cuba, Razl Castro said in his opening speech: "The current international situation, characterised by the one superpower's irrational attempts to control the world, aided by its allies, shows that we need to be increasingly united In defence of the principles and purposes upon which the Non-Aligned Movement was established, which are those enshrined In the international law and the Charter of the United Nations." While the founding of the Movement was necessary more than four decades ago, its continued relevance in today's world is beyond doubt. The NAM Summit held in Cuba was an indisputable success, in spite of the threats and pressures of those who oppose the unity and common efforts of the countries of the South. The Summit saw high levels of participation, both in terms of the number of countries which attended the conference and that of Heads of State or Government. Profound and fruitful debates were held, in an atmosphere of true understanding, unity and cohesion, which allowed for the adoption of documents of crucial importance to the future of the Non-Aligned Movement. As the new Chairman, Cuba was given clear mandates and an action program which shall govern its activities as head of the Movement. As a result of the Summit, the Non-Aligned Movement has been strengthened and, consequently, so has the political unity of the countries of the South. The diverse and heterogeneous nature of the Movement's membership, far from weakening it, constitutes its essential strength. These features have allowed for the creation of solid consensuses that are a positive contribution to our efforts to overcome the many and serious challenges humanity faces today. The commendable work of Malaysia as the Movement's Chairman over the last three years was acknowledged at the Summit. There was no cause of or demand by a South country which was not duly considered by or which did not meet with the support of the Movement. The urgent need to make progress in the defense of multilateralism, to demand respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all States and ensure the full realization of our peoples' right to development and peace were ratified at the Summit as the Movement's principles. The Heads of State or Government decided to work to suppress acts of aggression and other actions contrary to the preservation of peace and to encourage the peaceful settlement of international conflicts. The Summit called on all nations to abstain from the use of force or from threatening to use force against the territorial integrity or independence of any State. Participating nations promoted the development of relations of friendship based on respect towards the principle of equal rights and the will of all peoples to struggle against foreign occupation. They urged nations to extend international cooperation with a view to overcoming the serious economic, social, cultural and humanitarian challenges that face the world and to promote respect towards the human rights and fundamental liberties of all and for the benefit of all. The fundamental and inalienable right of all peoples to self-determination was reaffirmed in Havana. Non-Aligned countries agreed that world peace and security are today more imperiled than ever as a result, among other factors, of the growing trend of the most powerful States to resort to unilateral measures and to the threat of preemptive wars. The Movement's commitment to general and complete disarmament and nuclear disarmament in particular, under strict and efficient international monitoring, was underscored. The Summit also reaffirmed the basic and inalienable right of all States to research, development, production and the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, and to be free from any kind of discrimination in this connection, in conformity with their respective international obligations. In addition to this, the Summit clearly and firmly pronounced itself against terrorism, double standards in international relations, coercive unilateral measures against any nation, "regime change" policies and the failure of developed countries to fulfill their commitments in economic and social areas. The Heads of State or Government of the Movement reaffirmed their hope to live in a peaceful world in which all nations have the right to a better future and a fair and equitable world order based on the sustainable development of all nations. They affirmed that, in its current form, globalization perpetuates and even exacerbates the marginalization of the countries of the South, and demanded that it be radically transformed into a positive force for change, for the benefit of all peoples. Participants reaffirmed the right of the Palestinian people to have their own State and condemned the government of Israel for the new wave of crimes and massacres in Gaza and other occupied territories. They also vigorously condemned Israel's merciless acts of aggression against Lebanon and the serious violations of this nation's sovereignty and territorial integrity. The people and government of Bolivia, facing attempts aimed at destabilizing the country instigated by external forces, met with a gesture of support and solidarity from the Summit. The process which is underway in that sister nation, aimed at guaranteeing the real rights of all Bolivians and at securing full national control over the country's natural resources, was offered solid support. The Movement considered, with great concern, the aggressive policies and the intensification of actions aimed at undermining the stability of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and expressed support for the inalienable right of the Venezuelan people to determine its form of government and choose its economic, political and social system, free from foreign intervention, subversion, coercion or restrictions of any kind. Non-Aligned countries undertook to promote and participate in a true process of democratization and reform of the United Nations to put behind the anti-democratic impositions and practices of the Security Council and to give the General Assembly its due decisive role, in conformity with the roles and powers described in the UN Charter. I have mentioned only a few examples of the positions adopted at the Summit held in Havana, with respect to the most diverse issues on the international agenda. The documents adopted shall be offcially distributed to all UN member States. A number of the decisions adopted at the Summit shall soon be put into practice in this Session of the General Assembly. Madame President: Cuba is aware of the immense responsibility inherent in presiding over the Non-Aligned Movement in one of the most difficult times In human history, when we face more inequality and injustice than ever before. We shall not rest in our efforts to have the Movement occupy the place it can and must occupy in the international arena, in keeping not only with its broad membership of 118 countries, nearly two-thirds of the UN membership, but also of its history on behalf of the loftiest causes. On inaugurating the 6th Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement 27 years ago, President Fidel Castro expressed: "The struggle for peace and for a just economic order, and a workable solution to the pressing problems that weigh on our peoples is, in our opinion, increasingly becoming the main question posed to Movement of Non-Aligned Countries. "Peace, and the immense risks that threaten it, are not something that should be left exclusively in the hands of the big military Powers. Peace is possible, but world peace can only be assured to the extent that all countries are consciously determined to fight for it -- peace, not just for a part of the world, but for all peoples." Days later, in this same hall, on reporting on that Summit, President Fidel Castro expressed: "The sounds of weapons, of threatening language, and of prepotent behavior in the international arena must cease. "Enough of the illusion that the problems of the world can be solved by nuclear weapons. Bombs may kill the hungry, the sick, and the ignorant, but they cannot kill hunger, disease, and ignorance. Nor can they kill the righteous rebellion of the peoples." The countries of the South shall work, united, for justice, peace and the development of our nations and the entire World, convinced that a better world is possible if we all struggle for it. Madame President: I would now like to say a few words on behalf of the people and government of Cuba. Our people's exercise of its right to self-determination faces new threats. The Bush administration has stepped up its brutally hostile measures against Cuba with new economic sanctions which further intensify the longest blockade human history has known. More severe reprisals are also being taken against those who have business dealings with Cuba from other nations, and financial transactions with our country are viciously persecuted. The very government of the United States recognizes that it is spending more, today, in persecuting and punishing those who have business dealings with Cuba than in monitoring the finances of those who attacked the Twin Towers. This past June, the Bush administration approved the second version of its most recent plan of aggression and domination against our country, aimed not only at overthrowing the Revolution but also at destroying the Cuban nation. In violation of international norms and laws, an unprecedented build-up in the financial and material support to subversive actions aimed at overthrowing the constitutional order freely chosen by the Cuban people is being promoted. The abovementioned anti-Cuban plan contains a chapter, which is being held in secret. The antecedents of these decisions are the covert actions undertaken against the Cuban revolution, which include mercenary invasions, terrorists actions, the introduction of plagues and epidemics into the country and over 600 plots to assassinate Fidel. Thousands of Cubans have lost their lives or have been maimed for life as a result of this criminal policy. At the height of hypocrisy and irresponsibility, the government of the United States tolerates the presence of and protects the terrorists who plan new actions against our people on US soil. While maneuvering to free the murderers responsible for monstrous crimes, such as the notorious international terrorist and CIA agent Luis Posada Carriles, whom they refuse to extradite to Venezuela, it illegally and unjustly keeps five courageous anti-terrorist Cuban activists in prison. But, in spite of these acts of aggression and the criminal blockade, the Cuban people shall never be defeated. Cuba's internationalist efforts continue unhindered. More than 30,000 Cuban doctors and other health professionals are saving lives in 68 different countries today; we are participating in the struggle against illiteracy in several continents; we are developing a plan to train 100,000 doctors for the Third World and we are helping hundreds of thousands of people in many countries regain their sight through Operation Miracle. With these efforts, we are but fulfilling our fundamental duty to aid all of the peoples of the world. Your Excellencies: Cuba is making progress and shall continue to face the future with optimism and unity. Its educated and hard-working people, to whom the homeland is humanity, shall struggle hand in hand with the peoples you represent for the right to live in peace, justice and dignity for all. Thank you, very much. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 6) AP Propaganda About Iraq By Dahr Jamail t r u t h o u t | Perspective Friday 22 September 2006 http://dahrjamailiraq.com "But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought." -George Orwell On Monday, September 18, Associated Press (AP) ran a story titled, "Iraqi tribes fight Insurgency" http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060918/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_tribes At first glance, the average reader cannot be blamed for thinking that this is a story about how tribes in Iraq have decided to take up arms against the "insurgency." The reader certainly cannot be blamed for thinking this, because the first paragraph in the AP story reads, "Tribes in one of Iraq's most volatile provinces have joined together to fight the insurgency there, and they have called on the government and the US-led military coalition for weapons, a prominent tribal leader said Monday." Allow me to pause here and address the use of the word "insurgent." According to Webster's Third New International Dictionary, an insurgent is "a person who rises in revolt against civil authority or an established government: [a] rebel." This of course begs the existence of a legitimately elected government that the "insurgent" rises in revolt against, which in Iraq we do not have. How is it possible to have a legitimate government in a country that was first illegally invaded and today is illegally occupied? Yet, AP uses the word unquestioningly. The story continues: "Tribal leaders and clerics in Ramadi, the capital of violent Anbar province, met last week and have set up a force of about 20,000 men 'ready to purge the city of these infidels,' Sheik Fassal al-Guood, a prominent tribal leader from Ramadi, told the Associated Press, referring to the insurgents. 'People are fed up with the acts of those criminals who take Islam as a cover for their crimes,' he said. 'The situation in the province is unbearable, the city is abandoned, most of the families have fled the city and all services are poor.' Al-Guood said 15 of the 18 tribes in Ramadi 'have sworn to fight those who are killing Sunnis and Shiites and they established an armed force of about 20,000 young men ready to purge the city from those infidels.'" At this point, either the author of this AP story, or the editor, or both, rightly assume that the reader is not aware that Sheik Fassal al-Guood tried to lead the local resistance against the occupation in Ramadi, but turned against the same resistance group when its members rejected him as a leader because they considered him a corrupt thief. Nor is the reader aware that today, Sheikh Fassal al-Guood lives in the "Green Zone" and happily talks to reporters from behind the concrete blast walls, and that his power in Al-Anbar now equals exactly nothing. I contacted author and media critic Norman Solomon and asked him what he thought of this AP story. "The holes in this story beg for questions that it does not raise, much less answer," he wrote. "For instance: What are the past, present and hoped-for financial relationships between the quoted 'tribal leader' on the one hand and the US and Iraqi governments on the other? Are there any indications that money has changed hands? Is a mercenary arrangement being set up? Is this part of the Bush administration's strategy to get more Iraqis to kill each other rather than have Iraqis killing American troops - aka 'As the Iraqis stand up, we'll stand down?' Isn't there a good chance that such arrangements will actually fuel civil war in Iraq rather than douse its already horrific flames?" He continued, "So, this AP story agreeably paraphrases an official from the US-backed Iraqi government's Defense Ministry as saying that 'Iraqi security forces had met with tribal leaders and had agreed to cooperate in combating violence.' But how will they be 'combating violence?' With massive violence, of course, although the article doesn't say so. Many sources are available to make such a point, but in this story AP availed itself of none of them." Solomon, a nationally-syndicated columnist on media and politics who is also the founder and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy, a national consortium of policy researchers and analysts, had this to say about why AP might get away with this type of "reportage" as consistently as it does: "AP is providing the kind of coverage that it and other mainstream US media outlets have provided in the past. The coverage does not seem conspicuously shoddy to most readers because it fits in with previous shoddy reportage. From all appearances, this AP article is based on statements from four sources - and each of them is in line with US government policies. There's one tribal leader from Ramadi who is seeking large quantities of material aid from the US and the Iraqi government; there are two spokespeople for that Iraqi government; and there's a general from the US military. That all four would present a similar picture of events is not surprising. But for an article to rely on only those sources is stenography for one side of the conflict - which should not be confused with journalism." It is also important for the reader to note that, according to an August US Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, of 1,666 bombs exploded in Iraq in July, 90% were aimed at US-led forces. Along with this fact, attacks against US forces have increased dramatically in recent months, and the US military itself has admitted that less than 6% of the attacks against them are from foreign fighters (i.e., "terrorists"). Thus, at least 94% of all attacks against US forces in Iraq are from the Iraqi Resistance, as opposed to "terrorists." It is time, too, that readers of mainstream news knew that any "tribal meeting" that discusses fighting "the insurgents" is currently being held secretly inside American military bases or inside the "green zone." Iraqi people who are trying to lead that operation are well known to Al-Anbar citizens. These leaders did succeed in some cases in recruiting certain groups to fight resistance fighters by paying considerable sums of money, but it was only temporary success. A case in point would be Al-Qa'im last spring. A tribal fight occurred between local resistance fighters. Sheik Osama al-Jadaan was involved in engineering it by paying members of his tribe to take up arms against local resistance groups. Yet this conflict was settled, and when it was, al-Jadaan had to flee to the "green zone." He lived there for a short time before his work as a collaborator with occupation forces caught up with him, and he was killed in Baghdad. Yet the AP story has this to say about al-Jadaan: "In late May, a prominent Sunni Arab tribal leader, Sheik Osama al-Jadaan, who provided fighters to help battle al-Qaeda in Anbar, was assassinated in Baghdad." There are the usual token scraps of truth in the AP story, lending it a hue of credibility. The story quotes a US military spokesperson who goes out on a limb to say that tribal leaders in Anbar "very much want to see security brought back to that area." Another scrap of truth came earlier in the story where Al-Guood is quoted as saying that most of the tribes of Ramadi "have sworn to fight those who are killing Sunnis and Shiites and they established an armed force of about 20,000 young men ready to purge the city from those infidels." This is true throughout Iraq, where even the US military has documented several cases of resistance groups fighting foreign terror groups that have infiltrated Iraq's porous borders in order to carry out attacks against Iraqi civilians. The most disconcerting portion of this AP story, however, is the melding of the word "insurgent" with the word "terrorist." Clearly there is a flippancy, and I believe a malicious intent in this misuse. I have witnessed this melding repeated in AP stories from Iraq in which "insurgent" replaces "terrorist." We can see the melding in a recent AP story http://www.newspress.com/Top/Article/article.jsp?Section=WORLD&ID=564808338794480636 which states: "Attacks against US troops have increased following a call earlier this month from al-Qaeda in Iraq's leader to target American forces, the top US military spokesman said Wednesday." Another example of this melding is in an AP story from September 17th about Bilal Hussein, an Iraqi citizen of Fallujah who has been held by the US military without charges for five months. Part of the story http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060917/ap_on_re_mi_ea/photographer_detained reads, "The military said Hussein was captured with two insurgents, including Hamid Hamad Motib, an alleged leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq." Regarding the reference to al-Qaeda (read "terrorism"), Solomon had this to say: "The word 'terrorism' is clearly a pejorative. And it's an unwritten rule of US media coverage that the 'terrorism' label can only be used, or quoted with credence being given to the sources, if 'terrorism' applies to murderous violence opposed by the US government - in contrast to murderous violence inflicted or otherwise supported by the US government, in which case that violence is routinely presumed to be positive." It is a melding that has the power to change minds. A melding that may have prompted Orwell to say, "... language can also corrupt thought." It is important to note that the board of directors of AP is composed of 22 newspaper and media executives that include the CEOs and presidents of ABC, McClatchy, Hearst, Tribune and the Washington Post. Two of the directors are members of very conservative policy councils that include the Hoover Institute. The Hoover Institute is a Republican policy research center that has been referred to as "Bush's brain trust." Its fellows include Condoleezza Rice and Newt Gingrich, a Distinguished Visiting Fellow, along with George Shultz. Douglas McCorkindale, also on the board of directors at AP, is on the board of Lockheed Martin, the world's largest defense contract company. One does not require crystals to see that the board of AP displays a clear tilt toward right-wing conservative views, and comprises representatives of a huge corporate media network of the largest publishers in the US. It is not difficult to demolish the myth of the liberal media and its prominent arms like AP. *Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. *- George Orwell (c)2006 Dahr Jamail. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 7) Pickers Are Few, and Growers Blame Congress By JULIA PRESTON September 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/washington/22growers.html?ex=1159156800&en=07122ee1139ef2b6&ei=5087%0A LAKEPORT, Calif. — The pear growers here in Lake County waited decades for a crop of shapely fruit like the one that adorned their orchards last month. “I felt like I went to heaven,” said Nick Ivicevich, recalling the perfection of his most abundant crop in 45 years of tending trees. Now harvest time has passed and tons of pears have ripened to mush on their branches, while the ground of Mr. Ivicevich’s orchard reeks with rotting fruit. He and other growers in Lake County, about 90 miles north of San Francisco, could not find enough pickers. Stepped-up border enforcement kept many illegal Mexican migrant workers out of California this year, farmers and labor contractors said, putting new strains on the state’s shrinking seasonal farm labor force. Labor shortages have also been reported by apple growers in Washington and upstate New York. Growers have gone from frustrated to furious with Congress, which has all but given up on passing legislation this year to create an agricultural guest-worker program. Last week, 300 growers representing every major agricultural state rallied on the front lawn of the Capitol carrying baskets of fruit to express their ire. This year’s shortages are compounding a flight from the fields by Mexican workers already in the United States. As it has become harder to get into this country, many illegal immigrants have been reluctant to return to Mexico in the off-season. Remaining here year-round, they have gravitated toward more stable jobs. “When you’re having to pay housing costs, it’s very difficult to survive and wait for the next agricultural season to come around,” said Jack King, head of national affairs for the California Farm Bureau Federation. California farms employ at least 450,000 people at the peak of the harvest, with farm workers progressing from one crop to the next, stringing together as much as seven months of work. Growers estimate the state fell short this harvest season by 70,000 workers. Joe Bautista, a labor contractor from Stockton who brings crews to Lake County, said about one-third of his regular workers stayed home in Mexico this year, while others were caught by the Border Patrol trying to enter the United States. With fewer workers, Mr. Bautista fell behind in harvests near Sacramento and arrived weeks late in Lake County. “There was a lot of pressure on the contractors,” he said. “But there is only so much we can do. There wasn’t enough labor.” For years, economists say, California farmers have been losing their pickers to less strenuous, more stable and sometimes higher-paying jobs in construction, landscaping and tourism. “If you want another low-wage job, you can work in a hotel and not die in the heat,” said Marc Grossman, the spokesman for the United Farm Workers of America. The union calculates that up to 15 percent of California’s farm labor force leaves agriculture each year. As they sum up this season’s losses, estimated to be at least $10 million for California pear farmers alone, growers in the state mainly blame Republican lawmakers in Washington for stalling immigration legislation that would have addressed the shortage by authorizing a guest-worker program for agriculture. Many growers, a dependably Republican group, said they felt betrayed. “After a while, you get done being sad and start being really angry,” said Toni Scully, a lifelong Republican whose family owns a pear-packing operation in Lake County. “The Republicans have given us a lot of lip service, and our crops are hanging on the trees rotting.” Tons more pears that were harvested were rejected by Mrs. Scully’s packing plant because they were picked too late. The rejects were dumped in a farm lot, mounds of pungent fruit swarming with bees, left to be eaten by deer. “The anthem about the fruited plain,” Mrs. Scully said sadly, “I don’t think this is what they had in mind.” Some economists and advocates for farm workers say the labor shortages would ease if farmers would pay more. Lake County growers said that pickers’ pay was not low — up to $150 a day — and that they had been ready to pay even more to save their crops. “I would have raised my wages,” said Steve Winant, a pear grower whose 14-acre orchard is still laden with overripe fruit. “But there weren’t any people to pay.” The tightening of the border with Mexico, begun more than a decade ago but reinforced since May with the deployment of 6,000 National Guard troops, has forced California growers to acknowledge that most of their workers are illegal Mexican migrants. The U.F.W. estimates that more than 90 percent of the state’s farm workers are illegal. Most California growers gave up years ago on recruiting workers through the seasonal guest-worker program currently in place. Known as H-2A, the program requires employers to prove they tried to find American workers and to apply well in advance for relatively small contingents of foreign workers for fixed time periods. “Our experience with the current H-2A program has been a nightmare,” said Luawanna Hallstrom, general manager of Harry Singh & Sons, a vine-ripe tomato grower based in Oceanside, near San Diego. Ms. Hallstrom said her company tried to use the program in the months after the Sept. 11 attacks, when security checks forced it to fire illegal migrant employees who were working in tomato fields on a military base. Her company lost $2.5 million on that 2001 crop, she said. Over the years, occasional programs to draw American workers to the harvests have failed. “Americans do not raise their children to be farm workers,” Ms. Hallstrom said. The failure of Congress to approve a new guest-worker program surprised California growers because a proposal that the Senate passed stemmed from a rare agreement between growers’ organizations, the U.F.W. and other advocates for farm workers, and legislators ranging from conservative Republicans to liberal Democrats. Known as AgJobs, the proposal would create a new temporary-resident status for seasonal farm workers and give them the chance to become permanent residents if they work intensively in agriculture for at least three years. It was included in a bill that passed the Senate in May. The House has passed several bills focused on border security, and has avoided negotiations with the Senate on a broader immigration overhaul. [Three of the House bills were passed Thursday.] Mr. Ivicevich, a 69-year-old family farmer, is not given to displays of emotion. But he paused for a moment, overwhelmed, as he stood among trees sagging with pears that oozed when he squeezed them. His nighttime sleep, in his cottage among his 122 acres of orchards, is disrupted by the thud of dropping fruit and the cracking of branches. For decades, Mr. Ivicevich said, migrant pickers would knock on his door asking for work climbing his picking ladders. Then about five years ago they stopped knocking, and he turned to a labor contractor to muster harvest crews. This year, elated, he called the contractor in early August. Pears must be picked green and quickly packed and chilled, or they go soft in shipping. “Then I called and I called and I called,” Mr. Ivicevich said. The picking crew, which he needed on Aug. 12, arrived two weeks late and 15 workers short. He lost about 1.8 million pounds of pears. His neighbor, Mr. Winant, standing in his drooping orchard with his hands sunk in his jeans pockets, said he would rather bulldoze the pear trees than start preparing them for a new season. “It’s like a death, like a son died,” said Mr. Winant, 45, who cares for the small orchard himself during the winter. “You work all year and then see your work go to ground. I want to pull them out because of the agony. It’s just too hard to take.” ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 8) Billionaires Only Occupy Forbes 400 List By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 6:30 a.m. ET http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Forbes-400.html NEW YORK (AP) -- For the first time, Forbes magazine's list of the 400 richest Americans consists exclusively of people worth $1 billion or more. As a group, the people who made the rankings released Thursday are worth a record $1.25 trillion, compared with $1.13 trillion last year. In the billionaire-athon, casino magnate Sheldon Adelson pole- vaulted to No. 3 from 15 in last year's ranking, finishing behind the mainstays at Nos. 1 and 2: Microsoft Corp. founder Bill Gates and Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Adelson is now estimated to have $20.5 billion, Buffett $46 billion and Gates $53 billion. Gates has held the No. 1 spot for the last 13 years while Buffett has been No. 2 every year since 1994 except 2000, when Larry Ellison of Oracle Corp. held that spot. Adelson's expanding net worth is related in no small part to his decision to open a casino two years ago on the island of Macau, an emerging gambling haven off the southeastern coast of China. Profits are growing rapidly thanks to the Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s Macau casino. Adelson personally and through family trusts controls 70 percent of the company, Las Vegas Sands spokesman Ron Reese said. Forbes estimates Adelson earned about $1 million an hour over the past two years. In the second quarter alone, the Sands Macau property saw net revenue jump to $310.4 million, up from $205.1 million a year ago. To tap the demand from gamblers in Asia going forward, the Sands Corp. plans a second property on Macau and a casino in Singapore. The two Google Inc. founders were also big earners. Sergey Brin and Larry Page gained about $13 million a day over the last two years, according to Forbes. That puts them in 12th and 13th place, up from a tie at 16th place last year. Page and Brin also share the distinction of being, at 33 years old, the two youngest people on the list and two of only eight who are younger than 40. The list was led off by technologists, such as Gates, Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, Dell Inc.'s Michael Dell and Ellison, and rounded out by five members of the Walton clan who have fortunes amassed from sales by the world's largest retailer. Ellison, with $19.5 billion, moved to fourth place from fifth, while Allen, last year's No. 3, was fifth this year with $16 billion. Dell fell to a tie at ninth place from fourth in last year's list; he is worth $15.5 billion Adelson's ascension knocks Helen Walton, the wife of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. founder Sam Walton, into 11th place with a net worth of $15.3 billion. Her children, Jim, S. Robson and Alice, and Christy Walton, the widow of her son John, ranked in the bottom half of the top 10 this year. Each was worth between $15.5 billion and $15.7 billion, Forbes reported. Martha Stewart, founder of the eponymous Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc., fell off the list completely, as she lost $395 million over the past year. The biggest number of people on the list live in California, which houses 90 of the 400, and another 44 live in New York City. On the Net: Forbes.com list of 400 richest Americans: www.forbes.com/400richest ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 9) America's 400 Richest Edited by Matthew Miller and Tatiana Serafin 09.21.06, 6:00 PM ET http://www.forbes.com/2006/09/21/americas-400-richest-biz_cx_mm_06rich400_0921richintro.html A nine-figure fortune won’t get you much mention these days, at least not on these pages. This year, for the first time, everyone in The Forbes 400 has at least $1 billion. The collective net worth of the nation’s wealthiest climbed $120 billion, to $1.25 trillion. Surging real estate, oil and other asset prices paved the way for 28 new members. Developer John P. Manning used political savvy to build a $1.1 billion fortune in part by brokering low-income housing projects. Chesapeake Energy founders Aubrey McClendon and Tom L. Ward are two of the oil fortunes added to the list. Pouring 40 million caffeinated drinks a week landed Starbucks honcho Howard Schultz on our list of America’s 400 richest. Manny Mashouf placed his skimpy women’s wear on TV shows like Party of Five and Ally McBeal; today he has a $1.5 billion fortune in Bebe clothing stores. Also gracing our list for the first time are Lehman Brothers Chief Richard Fuld ($1 billion), hedge fund manager David E. Shaw ($1 billion), mutual fund guru Jonathan Lovelace Jr. ($1.1 billion), Houston Rockets owner Leslie Alexander ($1.2 billion), leveraged buyout tycoon Leon Black ($2 billion), Google veteran Omid Kordestani ($1.9 billion), Colony Capital’s Thomas Barrack ($1 billion), New York City real estate moguls Stephen Ross ($2.5 billion) and Tamir Sapir ($2 billion), and the husband-and- wife computer chip team of Weili Dai ($1 billion) and Sehat Sutardja ($1 billion). Black Entertainment Television founder Robert Johnson, who rebuilt his fortune with investments in real estate and restaurants, is among the 14 returnees to this year’s list. Netscape pioneer James Clark is another retread; he reinvested his tech proceeds into Miami condos and construction outfit Hyperion Development Group following the burst of the tech bubble six years ago. Also returning is Little Caesar’s founder Michael Ilitch ($1.5 billion), car dealership owner Robert Friedkin ($1.2 billion), investors J. Christopher Flowers ($1.2 billion) and Alfred P. West ($1.2 billion), and banking and real estate maven Paul M. Milstein ($3.5 billion). Once again the biggest gainer is casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, with a net worth up $9 billion. Adelson’s Las Vegas Sands stock is up 125% since its public offering in December 2004. He has made almost $1 million an hour since the 2004 Forbes 400 list was published. Another big gainer is Warren Buffett, who added $6 billion. That wealth, and the rest of what he has accumulated as a value investor, will be given away, mostly to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Eight members of last year’s list died, including investor Preston Tisch, Grey Goose vodka creator Sidney Frank, and James and Margaret Cargill, two cousins who inherited a stake in the world’s largest commodities company from William W. Cargill. Thirty-four people couldn’t keep up or gave their money away. They include leveraged buyout tycoon Theodore Forstmann, poultryman Donald Tyson, real estate investors John Arrillaga and Richard Peery, and fashionista Richard Hayne. Husband-and-wife banking team Herbert and Marion Sandler dropped from our rankings after giving away more than $1 billion combined to charity. Reported by: Emily Douglas, Elyse Graham and Duncan Greenberg with Christopher Helman and Adam Kemezis. Additional reporting by: David Armstrong, Victoria Murphy Barret, William P. Barrett, _Erika Brown, Monte Burke, Kerry A. Dolan, Tim Doyle, Jonathan Fahey, Allison Fass, Stephane Fitch, Elizabeth Gregory, Miriam Gottfried, Emily Lambert, Michael Maiello, Peter Newcomb, Deborah Orr, Matthew Rand, Amanda Schupak, Matthew Swibel, Mark Tatge and David Whelan, Art direction: Charles A. Brucaliere_Photo Editor: Gail Toivanen, Database: Mitchel Rand ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 10) Off the Charts What’s a Couple of Hundred Trillion When You’re Talking Derivatives? By FLOYD NORRIS September 23, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/business/23charts.html?adxnnl=6&adxnnlx=1159027325-6IAu68axWRTicEnv+8kGMQ Everett McKinley Dirksen, the Senate Republican leader in the 1950’s, is supposed to have said, “A billion here and a billion there, and pretty soon you’re talking real money.” What would he have thought of derivatives today? The International Swaps and Derivatives Association, a trade group, reported this week that the outstanding nominal value of swaps and derivatives at the end of June was $283.2 trillion. Compare that with the combined gross domestic product of the United States, the European Union, Canada, Japan and China, which is about $34 trillion. The total value of all homes in the United States is about the same amount. To be sure, notional value is an exaggerated term as it greatly overstates the amount at risk in many contracts. But the growth rate is real, and in the fastest-growing area of swaps — credit default swaps — notional value is closer to the amount at risk, because such swaps promise to make up the losses if a borrower defaults on the notional amount. The value of outstanding credit default swaps doubles every year — a trend that must eventually stop — and now equals $26 trillion. That is about the same as the total amount of bond debt in the United States, and corporate debt, on which most credit swaps are traded, comes to just $5.2 trillion. The credit derivatives cover the risks of default by individual companies, and offer insurance against default for bond indexes and specified bond portfolios. The growth of the market has forced the swaps and derivatives association to change the way its credit swaps work. It used to be that if a company defaulted, the writer of a credit swap would have to pay par value for the bond he had guaranteed, and could then sell the bond to reduce his losses. But in some cases defaults led to bond rallies, as those who had purchased credit swaps scrambled to get bonds to deliver. Now traders can choose cash settlements, with the amounts to be paid determined through auctions. Until 1997, the association provided separate numbers on currency and interest rate contracts, but innovations blurred the distinction between those categories, and now it publishes a combined total. At the end of June, the figure was $250.8 trillion, up 25 percent over the previous 12 months. Growth in that market slowed markedly early in this decade, as worldwide markets cooled, and there was even one annual decline, from mid-2000 to mid-2001. But growth picked up in 2002 as economies began to recover. The volume outstanding of equity derivatives is rising by about 30 percent a year, and now totals $5.6 trillion. It could go farther, with world stock market capitalization now about $41 trillion, according to Standard & Poor’s. Robert Pickel, the chief executive of the association, said that the growth in derivatives enables “more and more firms to benefit from these risk management tools.” On the other hand, the situation allows more and more traders to load up on risk if they choose, and hedge funds have become major derivatives traders. The combination of large unregulated hedge funds trading ever larger amounts of unregulated derivatives in nontransparent markets makes some people nervous. But so far, anyway, little is being done to change the situation, and nothing devastating has happened to markets. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 11) Solidarity in New York with Cuban delegation Havana. September 22, 2006 http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2006/septiembre/vier22/40solidar-i.html NEW YORK, September 21—The Cuban delegation participating in the 61st Session of the UN General Assembly, led by Vice President of the Council of State Esteban Lazo Hernández, was warmly received with messages of solidarity in an enthusiastic public welcome in the historically Black community of Harlem. “We know that this neighborhood is the cradle of solidarity with the Cuban revolution,” said Lazo, who is also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of Cuba, referring to the welcome that the people of Harlem gave President Fidel Castro in September 1960 in response to the hostility surrounding his first visit to the United Nations. During the solidarity event at the Church of the Intercession that attracted an overflow crowd, Reverend Lucius Walker, executive director of the Pastors for Peace organization, said that Cuba deserves gratitude. “We thank Cuba for the doctors and specialists that it was willing to send to the aid of the victims of Hurricane Katrina, an offer that the Bush government did not accept,” he said. Walker also expressed his thanks for the 110 young medical students from the United States studying in Cuba without charge. In her turn, Heidi Bogosian, executive director of the National Lawyers Guild, highlighted the case of the Cuban Five, unjustly incarcerated in U.S. prisons because of their activities to prevent acts of terrorism. The crowd of supporters burst into cheers when Cuban Foreign Minister Felipe Pérez Roque said that President Fidel Castro was in full recovery. In his turn, Vice President Esteban Lazo qualified as immoral the prison terms handed down to the five Cuban patriots and noted that it is further evidence of the U.S. imperialist government’s hatred of the Cuban Revolution. During the solidarity event, Lazo was approached by a group of young people who wanted to send greetings to Fidel for his 80th birthday. The occasion was an opportunity for the member of the Political Bureau to recount the political trajectory of President Fidel Castro. “The first to be in the trenches is Fidel,” Lazo said to applause, PL reported. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 12) Line drawn on immigration legislation Newsom, Yee slam federal attempts as discriminatory Leslie Fulbright, Chronicle Staff Writer [NOTE: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is actively at work in San Francisco deporting hundreds of undocumented workers--perhaps not with the help of city employees but, right under their noses. I send this out as a reminder of what was promised noting that the city government only promised not to aid ICE in it's assault against the basic human rights of undocumented workers, not to stop it. Currently, the City Government is standing by and not saying a word about it. We have received many personal reports of such deportations, firings, evictions, etc., happening in San Francisco. There have been incidents of workers, upon going to collect their pay, instead get ICE brought down upon them. What is the City Government going to do about this?....bw] Saturday, April 8, 2006 http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/04/08/BAGGII5THL1.DTL A cross-section of elected officials, religious leaders and immigrant -rights advocates in San Francisco is vowing not to comply with proposed legislation that would criminalize living in the United States illegally and make helping undocumented immigrants a felony. Mayor Gavin Newsom said the city will not cooperate with any federal attempt to criminalize illegal immigration. "This is a city of refuge," Newsom said at a press conference Thursday. "San Francisco stands in strong opposition of the rhetoric coming out of Washington, D.C." San Francisco's 17-year-old status as a "city of refuge" remains in effect, the mayor said, meaning that city employees cannot work with federal authorities to enforce U.S. immigration law. The Board of Supervisors passed a resolution this month that expands the city's position, barring any assistance in enforcing proposed criminal provisions in federal immigration law. Assemblyman Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, on Friday announced a new multifaith delegation of Bay Area religious leaders to protest the proposed legislation, which, he said, "not only unfairly discriminates against many people in our community, but it criminalizes churches, mosques and temples for the good work they are doing." Yee said he has drafted a state resolution to declare California's opposition to "such anti-immigrant, anti-worker federal legislation." The bill drawing fire, passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in December, criminalizes "illegal presence" in the United States and the provision of any kind of aid to illegal immigrants. It also proposes building new fences along 700 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border, requiring businesses to verify the status of workers, restricting court review of immigration decisions to a single jurisdiction and deputizing local sheriffs along the border to arrest illegal immigrants. A big concern is the section that would make it criminal to aid undocumented immigrants, which some immigrant rights groups say could be translated into handing out groceries at a food bank, providing medical care or babysitting. Immigration reform has been the subject of intense debate over the past two weeks as the U.S. Senate considers its own proposal. The Senate's bill, which didn't pass before a recess Friday, is much less punitive and provides a path to legal residency for many illegal immigrants. While the two drastically different approaches are debated, fear remains in immigrant communities that undocumented residents could be considered felons, as well as the people who help them. "The way the House bill is written, doctors providing medical care could be put in jail," said Philip Hwang, an attorney with San Francisco's Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights. "This is of tremendous concern to our office, to the community and throughout California." Cities throughout the state -- including San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego -- instituted sanctuary laws in the 1980s that prevent city employees from asking immigration status or cooperating with federal officials attempting to enforce federal laws. San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris recently signed a newspaper ad denouncing "anti-immigrant proposals." "The D.A. opposes any measure that would criminalize assisting immigrants," said Bilen Mesfin, a spokeswoman for the district a ttorney's office. "We are a sanctuary city, a city of refuge, and we always will be." Eileen Hurst, a spokeswoman for the San Francisco Sheriff's Department, said her office is currently bound by the sanctuary ordinance, but that could change with new legislation. "It is highly speculative at this point," Hurst said. "If it passed, we would seek the advice of the city attorney in implementing it." Some church leaders who provide services to immigrants have been vocal in their opposition as well. The Rev. Kay Jorgensen of the First Unitarian Universalist Society of San Francisco said, "Immigrants are contributing to the health and well-being of our communities, while living under the pressures of immigration laws that threaten their own well-being. "People of faith must break down the barriers that cause poverty and suffering, not to help build them through harsh legislation." Staff writer Rachel Gordon contributed to this story. E-mail Leslie Fulbright at lfulbright@sfchronicle.com. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 13) Turning Back the Clock on Rape New York Times Editorial September 23, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/opinion/23sat1.html?hp In recent decades, women’s advocates and human rights activists have made huge progress on the issues of rape and sexual assault — in the United States and globally. Both crimes are now more powerfully defined in state and federal laws. In international law, where rape and sexual assault have long been classified as torture and war crimes, the world has begun to accept the importance of enforcement. In 1998, a tribunal convicted a paramilitary chief for watching one of his men rape a woman in Serbia. A year ago, the world rose up in outrage when United Nations peacekeepers raped women in Congo. You’d think this was a settled issue. But it’s been opened up again in the bill on jailing, interrogating and trying terror suspects that President Bush is trying to ram through Congress in a pre-election rush. Both the White House and Senate versions contain provisions on rape and sexual assault that turn back the clock alarmingly. They are among the many flaws that must be fixed before Congress can responsibly pass this legislation. Rape, sexual assault and sexual abuse are mentioned twice in the bill — once as crimes that could be prosecuted before military tribunals if committed by an “illegal enemy combatant,” and once as “grave breaches” of the Geneva Conventions that could be prosecuted as war crimes if committed by an American against a detainee. But in each case, the wording creates new and disturbing loopholes. In the bill, rape is narrowly defined as forced or coerced genital or anal penetration. It utterly leaves out other acts, as well as the notion that sex without consent is also rape, as defined by numerous state laws and federal law. That is the more likely case in a prison, where a helpless inmate would be unlikely to resist the sexual overtures of a guard or interrogator. The section on sexual abuse requires that the act include physical contact. Thus it might not include ordering a terrified female prisoner to strip and dance, which happened in Rwanda, or compelling a male prisoner to strip and wear women’s underwear on his head, or photographing naked prisoners piled together, both of which happened at Abu Ghraib. Rhonda Copelon, a professor of law at the City University of New York who was an author of the international law on rape as a war crime, says the bill also could make it impossible to prosecute rape or sexual assault as torture, because the definition of torture in the legislation requires proof of specific intent to commit the crime. Motive is very hard to prove in cases of rape or sexual assault. Experts on sexual violence fear that the intent is to absolve American soldiers and their commanders from prosecution for deeds that have occurred since Sept. 11. Ms. Copelon also points out that the United States has been trying for years to write a specific intent requirement into international law on torture. The co-authors of the bill, Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, did not respond to questions about the section. But it does not really matter. This language simply needs to be changed, and Senators McCain and Graham should do it. If not, Democrats should insist on this among many other changes they should be demanding before agreeing to a vote on the prison measure. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- LINKS ONLY ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Detainee Deal Comes With Contradictions By ADAM LIPTAK September 23, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/us/23legal.html?hp&ex=1159070400&en=48fa1d71c13d8435&ei=5094&partner=homepage Decline in Gas Prices Isn’t Buoying Detroit By NICK BUNKLEY September 23, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/business/23gas.html?ref=business Capital Punishment: DNA Tests Prove Justice Has Failed http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-08.htm Toxic Shock: How Western Rubbish is Destroying Africa http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-09.htm Restraining Order against Bush Denied http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-01.htm 60 Years to Restore the Ozone Layer Over Antarctica http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-02.htm UN Finds Baghdad Toll Far Higher Than Cited http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-03.htm Arctic Thaw Opens Passage to Pole http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-04.htm Army on Pace to Meet Year's Recruiting Goal By Ann Scott Tyson Washington Post Staff Writer Saturday, September 9, 2006; Page A09 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/08/AR2006090801534.html?nav=rss_nation FOCUS | US Threatened to Bomb Pakistan Back to Stone Age http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092206Z.shtml FOCUS | US Threatened to Bomb Pakistan Back to Stone Age Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf said the US threatened to bomb his country back to the Stone Age if he did not assist the administration's war on terrorism. The threat was delivered after the attacks of September 11, 2001, by Richard L. Armitage, then deputy secretary of state, to Musharraf's intelligence director, the Pakistani leader told CBS's "60 Minutes" for Sunday's broadcast. http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092206Z.shtml The 'King Coal' 'Robber Barons' are Decapitating Mountains! http://www.ilovemountains.org/cost_of_coal/87 British Science Group Says Exxon Misrepresents Climate Issues By HEATHER TIMMONS September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/business/21green.html House Panel Approves Wiretapping Bill By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS The House Intelligence Committee approved by voice vote a bill that would put into law the Bush administration’s program of wiretapping without warrants. The sponsor, Representative Heather A. Wilson, Repubican of New Mexico, had rewritten the measure to make it more to Mr. Bush’s liking. The Judiciary Committee later endorsed a similar version, by 20 to 16. But Ms. Wilson’s revision, likely to draw Mr. Bush’s support, is the bill that probably will make it to the full House. Under her bill, the president may conduct the secret surveillance only under specific conditions. For example, the president must notify Congress within five days of authorizing the surveillance, name the entity that poses the threat and state the reason for believing the attack is imminent. September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/washington/21brfs-007.html More Small Women’s Colleges Opening Doors to Men By DIANA JEAN SCHEMO (On a lamp post next to Ginger Worden, interim president of Randolph- Macon Woman's College (now including men,) was a hand-made sign that read, "Well behaved women rarely make history." The sign was a remnant from a student protest of the college's decision to let men attend.) September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/education/21women.html?ref=us Over the Roar of Protesters, Hungary’s Leader Tries to Talk Politics By JUDY DEMPSEY International Herald Tribune September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/europe/21hungary.html Measures Seek to Restrict Detainees’ Access to Courts By NEIL A. LEWIS and KATE ZERNIKE September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/washington/21habeas.html?hp&ex=1158897600&en=00bf4cedca2834dd&ei=5094&partner=homepage Suits Say U.S. Impeded Audits for Oil Leases By EDMUND L. ANDREWS September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/business/21royalty.html?hp&ex=1158897600&en=6a768e6c6f4a155a&ei=5094&partner=homepage Only 25% in Poll Approve of the Congress By ADAM NAGOURNEY and JANET ELDER September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/us/politics/21poll.html?hp&ex=1158897600&en=ef00c357f1e7980c&ei=5094&partner=homepage When Is Thin Too Thin? By ERIC WILSON September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/fashion/21MODELS.html?_r=1&8dpc&oref=slogin At U.N., Chavez Calls Bush 'The Devil' By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 1:45 p.m. ET September 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-UN-Venezuela.html?hp&ex=1158811200&en=525846319c57aae6&ei=5094&partner=homepage FOCUS | Senate Bill on Torture and Detention Faces GOP Filibuster http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092006Z.shtml Pension Fund Tallies Losses and Rethinks Its Strategy By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH September 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/business/20pension.html Gaza: The children killed in a war the world doesn't want to know about By Donald Macintyre In Rafah Published: 19 September 2006 http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article1619227.ece G.M. Talked With Ford About Merger, Report Says By NICK BUNKLEY September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/business/19auto.html States Await Ruling on Use of Lethal Injection By ABBY GOODNOUGH September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/us/19death.html?ref=us Sarah Olson | Lieutenant Watada Faces New Charges http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/091806A.shtml Canadians Fault U.S. for Its Role in Torture Case By IAN AUSTEN September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/world/americas/19canada.html?_r=1&oref=slogin On India’s Farms, a Plague of Suicide By SOMINI SENGUPTA September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/world/asia/19india.html?hp&ex=1158724800&en=ce312104d42deb70&ei=5094&partner=homepage Deadly harvest: The Lebanese fields sown with cluster bombs Lebanese villagers must risk death in fields 'flooded' with more than a million Israeli cluster bombs - or leave crops to rot By Patrick Cockburn in Nabatiyeh Published: 18 September 2006 http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article1616665.ece U.S.-Mexico border fencing passes House - again Republican Congress votes to build wall of shame National Immigrant Solidarity Network The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday (9/14) voted in favor of building a fence along portions of the border with Mexico, the Secure Fence Act (H.R. 6061), this is no doubt a racist anti- immigrant bill, the vote had more to do with election year politics than solving immigration issues. September 15, 2006 http://www.immigrantsolidarity.org/ Iraq to Seal Off Baghdad Next Month By EDWARD WONG BAGHDAD, Iraq, Sept. 15 — The Iraqi government plans to seal off Baghdad next month by ringing it with a series of trenches and setting up dozens of traffic checkpoints to control movement in and out of the city of seven million people, an Interior Ministry spokesman said today. September 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/world/middleeast/16iraqcnd.html?hp&ex=1158379200&en=e07a513eed965c9f&ei=5094&partner=homepage Ford Takes New Steps to Cut Costs By MICHELINE MAYNARD DEARBORN, Mich., Sept. 15 — The Ford Motor Company said today that it would cut 10,000 more salaried jobs, close two more factories and eliminate its stock dividend, as the latest steps in a broad overhaul of its business that it calls the Way Forward. September 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/business/16fordcnd.html?hp&ex=1158379200&en=e3f03a9c648efed4&ei=5094&partner=homepage Ford to Offer Buyouts By REUTERS Filed at 1:25 a.m. ET DETROIT (Reuters) - Ford Motor Co. will offer buyout packages of up to $140,000 to all of the more than 75,000 workers at its U.S. plants, the United Auto Workers union said on Thursday, a day before the automaker details a revised turnaround plan in response to slumping sales. September 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-autos-ford-buyout.html?_r=1&oref=slogin Daimler Seeks Partners in China to Build Cars By KEITH BRADSHER BEIJING, Sept. 15 — DaimlerChrysler is in talks with companies in China and elsewhere for the export of subcompact cars to North America, the company chairman, Dieter Zetsche, said here today. The company has concluded that it cannot build its own subcompact cars in North America cheaply enough to make money on them, and must import them instead, Mr. Zetsche said. September 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/business/16chinacnd.html
Friday, September 22, 2006
BAUAW NEWSLETTER - FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2006
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Hugo Chavez is interviewed tonight, Friday, 9/22, by Tavis Smiley on his show on PBS (at midnight I believe) and again on his PRI radio show this weekend: http: //www.tavistalks.com/TTcom/TSradio/index.html www.marxmail.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Before You Enlist Excellent flash film that should be shown to all students. http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=ZFsaGv6cefw ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THIS JUST IN! MORE OF THE SAME! THE WORLD CAN'T WAIT, OCT 5 PERMITS BEING STALLED! OPEN LETTER TO CITY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS By Bonnie Weinstein Gavin Newsom gavin.newsom@sfgov.org San Francisco Board of Supervisors board.of.supervisors@sfgov.org Sandy Lee sandy.lee@parks.sfgov.org Cindy Shamban cindy.shamban@sfmta.com;sfgov.org/dpt Crystal Stewart crystal.stewart@sfgov.org Heather Fong heather.fong@sfgov.org Dear City Government Officials and Interested Parties: The World Can't Wait group, sf@worldcantwait.org, has applied for permits to rally at Justin Herman Plaza at noon, OCT 5 to march on Market Street to a main rally with prominent speakers at 4PM in Union Square, and then to march back to Justin Herman Plaza for the all-night vigil to to demonstrate as part of the national day of mass resistance against the war called with actions across the country. The San Francisco Police Department has denied the march permit. The SF Recreation and Parks Department is responsible for permits at the sites and has not yet granted them. Again, the San Francisco City Government has denied the right to free speech and assembly to voices of resistance and opposition to the policies of this government. The bloodbath in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Lebanon, Haiti-- in nations around the world is continuing thanks to this hideous and corrupt government, the government of the United States, responsible for terror around the world. I do not support this government. It is corrupt, vicious and out to defend the wealthy at the expense of the planet itself--anything for the almighty dollar and the power it buys. I do not agree with everything that The World Can't Wait group has to say --we have friendly debates frequently--but I insist that they have the right to say it! The right to free speech and assembly is meaningless if the government at any level--city, state or federal--has the right to deny permits for no reason or dictate when and where we are allowed to demonstrate. Our group, People United for General and Unconditional Amnesty for All, was also denied our right to free speech and assembly-- based upon false statements made by the Police Department. I got an apology about one of the false statements but still, we were denied our permits and were subject to police intimidation. A large number of police were present at the time and location of our planned event last Saturday, Sept. 16th prepared to stop us if we attempted to use amplified sound or take to the street. With our permit denied we knew we would endanger many people if we tried to go ahead with our plans so we altered them to comply with the law. Which is why we tried to get permits in the first place. So that we could advertise a peaceful and legal rally. We arrive the day of our planned rally with a bullhorn to inform the community that the rally permits were denied and why. We handed out explanatory flyers to those who would take them and went ahead with our modest list of speakers. We then peacefully marched on the sidewalk to the Mission Police Station--the location of the source of the false statements --where we formed an orderly picket line for about an hour. We are very proud that we did this. And, we will not let this issue go. WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROTEST THE GOVERNMENT AND THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO SILENCE US! NOT ALLOWING PERMITS AND DENYING US THE RIGHT TO AMPLIFIED SOUND IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO EXACT HUGE FEES FROM PEOPLE IN ORDER JUST TO APPLY FOR PERMITS (We had to come up with over $700.00 just for the permits. We found we couldn't afford to rent a flatbed truck or any speakers so decided to just use our own speaker and speak from a milk-carton-type platform. The City couldn't even allow this!) FREE SPEECH IS FOR EVERYONE RICH OR POOR! WAVE THE FEES FOR POOR GROUPS WHO HAVE NO MEANS OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT. EVERY PERMIT APPLIED FOR MUST BE GRANTED UNLESS THERE IS A DAMNED GOOD REASON. The news of this and the city's insistence that A.N.S.W.E.R. pay tens of thousands of dollars in fines for posting information up in the community--a centuries-long practice of free speech and mass communication among the poor--among those without the billions of advertising dollars to spend--is already spreading shockwaves throughout the community. News of these permit denials and the harassment of A.N.S.W.E.R. Will serve to expose the real nature of the city government. What do we call a state that allows the Police to determine when, where, how and if an opposition demonstration can take place? We call that a Police State! What do we call those who do not stand up against this injustice? I can think of a few choice words. Why is it that the Zionists are afforded a location directly in front of antiwar protests? Why do the Right to Lifers get a police escort in a solidly pro-choice city? Why are mainstream politicians or even corporations catered to routinely with street closures, giant stages, sound systems, etc. when a small group of immigrants who wanted to use a small sound system and a very short street closure from Mission to Bartlett Streets on 24th Street for a total of two hours on one day was met with a show of force at both the ISCOTT hearing and at the location the demonstration was to take place--to see to it that it would not take place. How much money in Police overtime did we, the taxpayers, have to pay in order to squelch this small expression of free speech and assembly? How much to harass A.N.S.W.E.R.? The whole community witnessed what happened to the People United for General and Unconditional Amnesty for All on September 16th at 24th and Mission Street. The whole community notice the police show of force! The community also noticed a small but brave group of people who carried on as best we could with our rally. Standing on the lamp post on the corner and having our rally anyway with an ineffective bullhorn. The flyers, signs, posters and banners we carried and handed out said it all! The whole community also watched as this same small, gutsy group of about 50 people march to the Mission Police Station at 17th and Valencia and picketed them in protest of their denial of our permits. WE DEMAND YOU SEE TO IT THAT "THE WORLD CAN'T WAIT" PERMITS ARE GRANTED IMMEDIATELY! AND IMMEDIATELY DISMISS ALL OF A.N.S.W.E.R.'S FINES AND MAKE REPARATIONS TO THEM FOR THE HARASSMENT THEY HAVE HAD TO DEAL WITH! WE, AGAIN, ALSO DEMAND THAT OUR PERMIT FEES BE RETURNED TO US SINCE OUR PERMIT WAS DENIED UNDER FALSE PRETENCIS. You can't pick and choose who can demonstrate. That is not your prerogative if we are to claim to have freedom of speech and assembly. WE DEMAND OUR RIGHTS! Bonnie Weinstein People United For a General and Unconditional Amnesty Barrio Unido Por una Amnistia General e Incondicional 474 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Contact Persons: Cristina Gutierrez: 415-431-9925 Bonnie Weinstein: 415-824-8730 www.bauaw.org Text of flyer handed out Sept. 15th to the community: POLICE DENY PERMITS TO THE IMMIGRANTS OF THE PEOPLE UNITED PREVENTING US FROM ORGANIZING IN OUR OWN NEIGHBORHOOD IN ORDER TO DEMAND UNCONDITIONAL AND GENERAL AMNESTY The People United has been engaged in the application process since May 10th in order to celebrate our national holidays and find a real solution to our problems as immigrants and specifically for undocumented immigrants. The police have completely blocked all of the attempts we have made in having an assembly in our own neighborhood. There has been no possible negotiation, and furthermore the police had lied at the public hearing in order to deny us our permits. WHY? Because The People United is the only organization in San Francisco led by immigrants! Not by the sons of immigrants. Not by any democratic nor republican parties. Not by any so called left organizations or parties who claim they want to save us but won't listen to our demands. Not by organizations that receive governmental monies or who receive salaries in order to supposedly help us immigrants get papers. Not by democratic or republican parties who see us as their future votes. NO! We are a group of immigrants who demand a general and unconditional amnesty for all, we are not talking about using our people to go vote and elect people who never fulfill their promises. We denounce our governments of Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Colombia, Peru, etc., for not providing jobs in our countries and forcing us to leave them. We denounce the government of the United States for being an accomplice with the government of our countries. They work together to bring us here as a cheap source of labor and many times we are forced to become scabs. We denounce the government of the United States for planning disenfranchisement and dehumanization keeping us as an army of unemployed with no rights to health, education, or dignity. We denounce all the political parties and organizations that look at us as objects in order to achieve their political and economic needs and they deny us the right to organize ourselves and represent our own struggle. We denounce the police for the constant abuse of our people of which the negation of this permit of this assembly is just one more. Immigrant brothers and sisters, unite in the struggle for our rights and the general and unconditional amnesty for all!!!! MEETING Date: Thursday, September 21st Place: 474 Valencia St. Time: 7pM ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- QUOTE OF THE DAY: In an interview in March 1995 entitled, "Jesse Helms: Setting the Record Straight" that appeared in the Middle East Quarterly, Helms said, "I have long believed that if the United States is going to give money to Israel, it should be paid out of the Department of Defense budget. My question is this: If Israel did not exist, what would U.S. defense costs in the Middle East be? Israel is at least the equivalent of a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Middle East. Without Israel promoting its and America's common interests, we would be badly off indeed." (Jesse Helms was the senior senator from North Carolina and the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at the time.) http://www.meforum.org/article/244 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- !VIVA FIDEL! LONG LIVE FIDEL! LONG LIVE THE CUBAN REVOLUTION! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Harvest Time By Bonnie Weinstein Congress is postponing decisions about immigrant rights legislation until after the elections. They say they don't want to antagonize the Latino community before elections. But there is another reason. It's harvest time! They need thousands of immigrant workers to harvest the nations crops. They are not worried about antagonizing Latino's-it's America's agribusiness they don't want to upset. Clearly they don't want to deport all immigrants, they just want to be able to terrorize them into submission. What many American-born workers don't realize is that this threat will be extended to them as well-not deportation, of course-but the threat of being out of a job if they stand up for their rights. What are the common dangers that we face? At the stroke of a bosses pen we can be fired and find ourselves without a livelihood. Throughout America factories are being closed down and re-built in countries that force workers to live as slaves while a bonanza of U.S, tax-free, corporate profits flows freely across all borders and into the bosses' pockets. An even more sinister danger is the lure of U.S. Military service. All of our children and especially the children of undocumented workers are in danger of being used as cannon fodder to maintain the power and wealth of America's corporations. The Military is entrenched in our public schools. They don't go to the schools of the wealthy. To the children of immigrants they promise citizenship and to the children of poor, American workers they promise college and a career. But it does no good to become a citizen after you are dead and it's hard to have a career with half of your brain or body missing in action! On Tuesday, November 14th at 7:00 P.M., the San Francisco Board of Education will vote on whether to phase out the Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps-a military recruitment program for the High Schools. We must be there in force to see that they do so immediately, and that they rid the schools of all military recruiters! It is up to us so please come! That's Tuesday, November 14, 7:00 P.M., at 555 Franklin Street, First Floor. You can call the day before and the day of the meeting to get on the speakers list: 415-241-6427. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- WE EXTEND OUR SOLIDARITY TO A.N.S.W.E.R. IN THEIR STRUGGLE AGAINST THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO WHO, ACTING AS A BODY, ARE INCREASINGLY LIMITING OUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH (INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO POST PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS--A CENTURIES OLD TRADITION OF MASS COMMUNICATION FOR THE POOR) AND THE RIGHT TO FREE ASSEMBLY! Paid advertising in the mass media is prohibitive. Only those with millions of dollars to spend for advertising are allowed a public voice. Right here in San Francisco the fees for permits have skyrocketed and the permit process is long and complicated. The permit application for DPT is 17 pages long and full of rules and regulations that must be followed. And both the City and County and the ACLU have agreed that while we have the right to free speech, the City and County does, indeed, have the right to say when and where we may or may not exercise it. WE SAY NO! THE CITYS' OBLIGATION IS TO MAKE SURE OUR RIGHT TO ORGANIZE, PUBLICIZE AND PROTEST IS PROTECTED! AND THAT OUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH AND THE RIGHT TO HAVE DIRECT CONTACT WITH OUR OWN CONSTITUENCY IS GUARANTEED! We must be able to post public events, and hold public events where the people are. The San Francisco Police Department routinely protects the rights of the Zionists when they want to hold counter-demonstrations to our Antiwar actions. They also protect the "Right to Lifers" when they want to march down San Francisco's Embarcadero--HERE IN SAN FRANCISCO--A PRO-CHOICE CITY! The San Francisco Police Department goes all out to accommodate them! WHY NOT US! RESCHEDULED: ANSWER Postering Case Hearing We are appealing for your support as our free speech lawsuit against the San Francisco Department of Public Works (DPW) reaches a critical stage. As you may be aware from articles that have recently appeared in the Bay Guardian, the SF Weekly and elsewhere, the DPW is attempting to impose fines that now total more than $45,000 against the local ANSWER Coalition for postering violations. We just received word that the hearing for the ANSWER postering case has been put off for 2 weeks. The new date of the hearing is Thurs. Sept. 28, 9:30am at Superior Court, 400 McAllister St. (corner Polk St., SF), 3rd Floor, Dept. 302. If you can, please join us at the hearing two weeks from today to show your support. If you would like to read a copy of attorney Ben Rosenfeld’s reply to the city's response to our lawsuit, which summarizes the main points of our position, please contact us at 415-821-6545 or answer@actionsf.org. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- STOP THE WAR! BRING ALL THE TROOPS HOME NOW! MONEY FOR HUMAN NEEDS NOT WAR! MARCH AND RALLY SATURDAY, 10/28 (TIME AND LOCATION TBA) ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THIS JUST IN: ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- The Democratic Party's redevelopment plan is stopped by Petition campaign until 2000! House Speaker Pelosi's, the Board of Supervisor's, and the Mayor's plans to help the housing profiteers is stopped. "The Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Area, passed on by the Board of Supervisors 7-4 , and signed into law by the Mayor on June 1, 2006, is now officially suspended pending an election at which the voters will be given the opportunity to decide. The election will most likely take place during a normally scheduled general election in 2007." SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 Just before 5 pm today, Tuesday, September 12, 2006, John Arntz, Director of Elections for the City and County of San Francisco officially certified that the REFERENDUM PETITION opposing the creation of a Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Area as successful. The Department of Elections found that more than the minimum number of 21,615 valid signatures were submitted by Petition sponsors. Sponsors had submitted in excess of 33,000 signatures on August 30th, 2006 after a 90 day signature gathering drive. San Francisco has not seen a successful referendum petition drive in decades. A referendum allows San Francisco voters to decide on the merits of legislation passed by the Board of Supervisors. WHAT THIS MEANS: The Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Area, passed on by the Board of Supervisors 7-4 , and signed into law by the Mayor on June 1, 2006, is now officially suspended pending an election at which the voters will be given the opportunity to decide. The election will most likely take place during a normally scheduled general election in 2007. SUPPORTES HAIL VICTORY: Petition supporters hailed the results as a victory for democracy and echoed their campaign slogan "Let the Voters Decide! Petition supporter , Willie Ratcliff,publisher of the Bayview Newspaper said "This special interest legislation was never about the benefiting the community. Now ,finally, the will of the voters can be expressed democratically, at the ballot." CONTACT FOR FURTHER INFO: Brian Murphy O'Flynn 415-867-4370 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- SCROLL DOWN TO READ: EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ARTICLES IN FULL LINKS ONLY ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Free the Cuban Five! September 23, 2006 Washington, DC Breaking News... On Aug. 9, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued its en banc decision denying a new trial to the Cuban Five. On August 10, the National Committee to Free the Cuban Five, together with the National Lawyers Guild, sponsored an emergency press conference in Washington in response to the decision. A partial transcript to that press conference, in English and Spanish, is here. A March on the White House will be held on September 23 to continue to press forward with efforts to free the Five. We urge all supporters to make every effort to join us on that march. A public demonstration of support for the Five, and outrage at their continued imprisonment, has never been more vital. Details of the march are found at the website below. Join us in Washington on Sept. 23! Free the Cuban Five! http://www.freethefive.org/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- IRAN WAR PERIL — EX-CIA MAN’S SF TALK SEPT. 24 The "threat" from Iran: Are mushroom clouds ahead? Ray McGovern, a CIA analyst for 27 years, addresses that issue at 12:45 p.m. Sunday, September 24, in the First Unitarian Universalist Church (Starr King Room), Franklin and Geary Streets, San Francisco. McGovern will touch on Iraq too: "How we got in and how we get out." Last May in Atlanta, national TV networks showed him accusing Defense Secretary Rumsfeld of prewar lying about supposed Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. McGovern founded Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity. He served the Central Intelligence Agency from the Kennedy Administration to that of George H. W. Bush. Awarded an Intelligence Commendation Medal, he returned it following the revelations of torture. There will be a question period until about 2 p.m. Optional lunch (bring it or buy it) precedes the program at 12:15. Cosponsors are the church’s World Community Advocates and the War and Law League (WALL). Following the program, WALL conducts its biennial meeting. It is a nonpartisan, all-volunteer, San Francisco-based group that opposes presidential wars and aims at the rule of law in U.S. foreign affairs. Public transit to the Unitarian Church includes Muni's 47 and 49 bus lines on Van Ness Avenue, one block east of Franklin, and the 38-Geary bus(which connects with BART at the Montgomery Street Station). For further information: (415) 738-8298 or (415) 564-2083; warandlaw@yahoo.com; http://warandlaw.org. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THE DECLARATION OF PEACE “WITNESS TO PEACE: PROTEST AND CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE TO SAVE THE LIVES OF OUR CHILDREN” ANOTHER WORLD IS POSSIBLE! Meet at Military Recruiting Office Monday, September 25, 2006, 4:00 P.M.-6:00 P.M. Stonestown Ocean Recruiting Station 561 Buckingham Way (Across the street from the mall.) Eyes Wide Open Boots and Shoes Exhibit: The Numbers Increase The Declaration of Peace The Declaration of Peace (www.declarationofpeace.org) is a nationwide campaign to establish a concrete and rapid plan for peace in Iraq. In August and September Congressional visits have urged our Members of Congress to sign on to end this militaristic adventure in Iraq. IF CONSCIENCE LEADS YOU, TRAIN AND JOIN WITH ACTIVISTS OF FAITH IN A NON VIOLENT ACTION TO END MILITARISM AND THE WAR IN IRAQ PREPARATION AND TRAININGS September 23, Saturday 1-5 p.m. Non-Violence Training, San Francisco First Unitarian Universalist Society, 1187 Franklin Street at Geary Get information as it develops. Contact Sandra Schwartz at (415) 565-0201 x 24 or email sschwartz@afsc.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "No Thanks Bechtel!" ...for the Iraq war ...for undermining democracy ...for sick Iraqi children ...for destruction of the environment ...for nuclear weapons Join us! Wednesday, Sept 27, 4:00 PM Bechtel Corporate Headquaters, 50 Beale St, San Francisco Half a block east from Embarcadero BART DECLARE Peace - an end to war and war profiteering! For more info on this event, please contact Lacy MacAuley at Butterfly@Lacy.com. For more info on Declaration of Peace, including a full calendar of events, please visit: http://www.declarationofpeace.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- WHY DOES PROP 85 ENDANGER TEEN SAFETY Dear Health Care Activist, Parents care most about keeping their teenagers safe. That means always safe, even if they feel they can’t talk to their parents about an unplanned pregnancy. Parental notification laws cause young women to delay seeking medical care. When desperate teenagers turn to back-alley abortions many will suffer serious injuries and some will die. You are invited to our Saturday, September 30 health care meeting on "Why Proposition 85 is bad for our health." The 3pm meeting will be 4760 Mission in San Francisco, between Ocean and Geneva at Russia. It is 5 blocks from the Balboa BART station. Proposition is 85 is a re-run of the 2004 ballot initiative, Proposition 73. Groups in opposition to prop 85 include: The California Federation of Labor, The California Medical Association, The California Academy of Family Physicians, The California Nurses Association, American Academy of Pediatrics-California District, The Adolescent Health Collaborative, Health Care of All, The League of Women Voters, and Planned Parenthood. The State AFL-CIO at its July convention voted to oppose this attack on reproductive rights. Don Bechler Chair - California Universal Health Care Organizing Project Chair - Health Care for All - San Francisco chapter 415-695-7891 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Brian Ashley will report on the new stage of the struggle for liberation in South Africa October 1, 2006 2:00 PM - 5:00 PM Refreshments @ 2:00 PM Brian to speak @ 3:00 PM Q & A to follow Hosted By Alice & Frank Fried 742 Palmera Court Alameda, CA 94501 510.769.0599 About Brian Ashley: Brian Ashley has been an activist in the South African liberation struggle having gone into exile in Zimbabwe in 1984. He is the founder and director of the Alternative Information and Development Centre, AIDC, a radical advocacy NGO mobilising against neoliberal globalisation and its impact in South Africa and Southern Africa. He helped form the Jubilee 2000 anti- debt movement in South Africa and the global Jubilee South movement that fights against debt domination by the International Financial Institutions and the G8 countries. He is active in the World Social Forum representing AIDC on the WSF International Council and the African Social Forum Council. He is also a leading member of the Palestinian Solidarity Committee. Apart from being active in a number of social movements in SA he is a board member of the Congress of South African Trade Unions, COSATU led Working Partnerships Research and Education Agency. A collection will be taken to support South African Solidarity Work Frank Fried ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Urgent call from October 22 Coalition against Police Brutality, SF October 22 Coalition against Police Brutality, Repression and Criinalization of a generation National Day of Protest, March and Rally in SF, Planning NO MORE STOLEN LIVES ! NO MAS VIDAS ROBADAS ! Contact: mesha Monge-Irizarry Idriss Stelley Foundation (415) 595-8251 24HR Bilingual Spa. Crisis line iolmisha@cs. com How: Already involved are : October 22 Bay Area, Idriss Stelley Foundation, SF CEDP (Campaign to End the Death Penalty, ISO (International Socialist Organization, Bay Area), Bay Area Families of Victims and Survivors of Police brutality, Code Pink http://www.october22.org/ GET INVOLVED: To join our mailing list, please write to: sf1022-talk-subscribe@lists.riseup.net ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- U.S. Out of Iraq Now! We Are the Majority! End Colonial Occupation from Iraq, to Palestine, Haiti, and Everywhere! October 28 National Day of Action Locally Coordinated Anti-War Protests from Coast to Coast Vote With Your Feet … and Your Voices, and Banners, and Signs! Let Every Politician Feel the Power of the People! http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?abbr=ANS_&page=NewsArticle&id=7836 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- October 28 National Day of Action Locally Coordinated Anti-War Protests from Coast to Coast Vote With Your Feet … and Your Voices, and Banners, and Signs! Let Every Politician Feel the Power of the People! http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?abbr=ANS_&page=NewsArticle&id=7836 http://www.actionsf.org/ http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?abbr=ANS_&page=NewsArticle&id=7869 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- End Canada's Occupation of Afghanistan! Call for action on October 28, 2006 This call for a pan-Canadian day of action, co-signed by the Canadian Peace Alliance, the Canadian Islamic Congress, the Canadian Labour Congress and the Montreal coalition Echec a la Guerre, is being distributed and discussed at the World Peace Forum now taking place in Vancouver. -SV The Collectif Échec à la guerre, Canadian Peace Alliance, the Canadian Labour Congress, and the Canadian Islamic Congress are jointly calling for a pan- Canadian day of protest this October 28th, 2006, to bring Canadian troops home from Afghanistan. On that day, people all across the country will unite to tell Stephen Harper that we are opposed to his wholehearted support for Canadian and U.S. militarism. This October marks the fifth anniversary of the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and the people of that country are still suffering from the ravages of war. Reconstruction in the country is at a standstill and the needs of the Afghan people are not being met. The rule of the new Afghan State, made up largely of drug running warlords, will not realize the democratic aspirations of the people there. In fact, according to Human Rights Watch reports, the human rights record of those warlords in recent years has not been better than the Taliban. We are told that the purpose of this war is to root out terrorism and protect our societies, yet the heavy-handed approach of a military occupation trying to impose a US-friendly government on the Afghan people will force more Afghans to become part of the resistance movement. It will also make our societies more -- not less -- likely to see terrorist attacks. No discussion on military tactics in the House of Commons will change that reality. Indeed, violence is increasing with more attacks on both coalition troops and on Afghan civilians. While individual Canadian soldiers may have gone to Afghanistan with the best of intentions, they are operating under the auspices of a US-led state building project that cares little or the needs of the Afghan people. US and Canadian interests rest with the massive $3.2 billion Trans Afghan Pipeline (TAP) project, which will bring oil from the Caspian region through southern Afghanistan (where Canada is stationed) and onto the ports of Pakistan. It has been no secret that the TAP has dominated US foreign policy towards Afghanistan for the last decade. Now Canadian oil and gas corporations have their own interests in the TAP. Over the last decade, the role of the Canadian Armed Forces abroad has changed, and Canadian foreign policy has become a replica of the US empire-building rhetoric. The end result of this process is now plain to see with the role of our troops in Southern Afghanistan, with the enormous budget increases for war expenditures and "security," with the Bush-style speeches of Stephen Harper, and with the fear campaigns around "homegrown terrorism" to foster support for those nefarious changes. It is this very course that will get young Canadian soldiers killed, that will endanger our society and consume more and more of its resources for destruction and death in Afghanistan. We demand a freeze in defense and security budgets until an in-depth public discussion is held on those issues across Canada. The mission in Afghanistan has already cost Canadians more than $4 billion. That money could have been used to fund human needs in Canada or abroad. Instead it is being used to kill civilians in Afghanistan and advance the interests of corporations. On October 28th, stand up and be counted. Canadian Troops Out of Afghanistan Now! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- San Francisco Board of Education Meeting Tuesday, November 14th, 7PM 555 Franklin Street, 1st Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 415/241-6427 The Board will vote on a resolution to phase out JROTC. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Close the SOA and Change Oppressive U.S. Foreign Policy Nov. 17-19, 2006 - Converge on Fort Benning, Georgia People's Movements across the Americas are becoming increasingly more powerful. Military "solutions" to social problems as supported by institutions like the School of the Americas were unable to squash their voices, and the call for justice and accountability is getting louder each day. Add your voice to the chorus, demand justice for all the people of the Americas and engage in nonviolent direct action to close the SOA and change oppressive U.S. foreign policy. With former SOA graduates being unmasked in Chile, Argentina, Colombia, Paraguay, Honduras, and Peru for their crimes against humanity, and with the blatant similarities between the interrogation methods and torture methods used at Abu Ghraib and those described in human rights abuse cases in Latin America, the SOA/WHINSEC must be held accountable! Visit http://www.soaw.org to learn more about the November Vigil, hotel and travel information, the November Organizing Packet, and more. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Shop for a Donation at Al-Awda! Interested in furthering your knowledge about Palestine and its people? Want to help make the Palestinian Right to Return a reality? Looking for ways to show your support for Palestine and Palestinian refugees? Why not shop for a donation at Al-Awda http://al-awda.org/shop.html and help support a great organization and cause!! Al-Awda offers a variety of educational materials including interesting and unique books on everything from oral histories, photo books on Palestinian refugees, to autobiographies, narratives, political analysis, and culture. We also have historical maps of Palestine (in Arabic and English), educational films, flags of various sizes, and colorful greeting cards created by Palestinian children. You can also show your support for a Free Palestine, and wear with pride, great looking T-shirts, pendants, and a variety of Palestine pins. Shop for a Donation at Al-Awda! Visit http://al-awda.org/shop.html for these great items, and more! The Educational Supplies Division Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition PO Box 131352 Carlsbad, CA 92013, USA Tel: 760-685-3243 Fax: 360-933-3568 E-mail: info@al-awda.org WWW: http://al-awda.org Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition (PRRC), is a broad- based, non-partisan, democratic, and charitable organization of grassroots activists and students committed to comprehensive public education about the rights of all Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and lands of origin, and to full restitution for all their confiscated and destroyed property in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International law and the numerous United Nations Resolutions upholding such rights (see FactSheet). Al-Awda, PRRC is a not for profit tax-exempt educational and charitable 501(c)(3) organization as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of the United States of America. Under IRS guidelines, your donations to Al-Awda, PRRC are tax-deductible. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- IN VOGUE: Unspeakably grotesque, This spread was so galling I felt a primal scream rising inside me. And it was not because I am a woman. The link is http://www.voguevan ity.it/cont/ 060hvg/default. asp The wounds of "western civilization" inflict themselves over and over...unapologetic , shameless...ditto BW http://www.voguevanity.it/cont/060hvg/default.asp ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- A CALL TO SUPPORT THE CASE OF ELVIRA ARELLANO Stand in solidarity with all immigrants, documented and undocumented The IAC urges you to support the case of Elvira Arellano. Elvira is an undocumented worker who is taking a heroic stand against deportations and fighting for her rights. She is a native of Michoacán, Mexico who came to the U.S. like many of the other 12 million undocumented in this country, in search of work and a better life. In 2002, Elvira was detained by Homeland Security agents in an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sweep at O’Hare Airport in Chicago under the guise of allegedly looking for “terrorists”. She was detained by the Department of Homeland Security for using a false social security number on her job at O’Hare. On August 18, 2006 Elvira Arellano and her seven year old son, Saul who is a US citizen, took sanctuary in Adalberto United Methodist Church in Chicago instead of reporting for deportation, primarily because Saul has health problems. She has pledged to live indefinitely in the church until granted a reprieve. Elvira is a well known activist, representing many families in Congressional hearings and speaking on behalf of immigrant rights. She worked to organize in July 2005 a march of 50,000 for immigrant rights in Chicago, and went on a hunger strike to support workers who were picked up by ICE prior to the historic May 1st boycott in 2006. Arellano was a founder of both La Familia Latina Unida and the Coalition of African Arab Asian European and Latino Immigrants of Illinois (CAAAELII). The case of Elvira Arellano is a just case Elvira Arellano has become the symbol of resistance to the heartless and callous deportations that are sweeping the country. Despite a legislative standstill in Congress, not only are deportations escalating, local officials around the nation are implementing de facto immigration policy that amount to a witch-hunt against immigrants. A case in point is the anti-immigrant ordinance that passed in July in Hazelton, PA. Due to her heroic stand, a group of Black ministers spoke last week at Adalberto Methodist of the comparisons of Arellano to Rosa Parks. Reverend Albert Tyson said he hopes “their support would increase the bonds between Latinos and African- Americans.” At the meeting Arellano said, “I don’t only speak for me and my son, but for millions of families like mine.” Supporters from the predominantly Puerto Rican neighborhood chanted, “Luchando mano y mano, Boriqua y Mexicano!” (“Fighting hand in hand, Puerto Rican and Mexican!”) Elvira Arellano is the perfect example that the anti-immigrant hysteria sweeping the country is an inhumane situation that has become intolerable. The human rights of immigrants are being cruelly violated under the guise of fighting terrorism or stopping “illegal” immigration. In fact, no human being is illegal and whether in the U.S. documented or undocumented, immigrants have a right to live in peace, without fear of evictions from their homes or the country. How you can help Elvira: 1. Write letters to Illinois Senators Richard Durbin and Barack Obama as well as your own legislator urging them to prevent her deportation. For Senator Durbin visit: http://durbin.senate.gov/contact.cfm#contact For Senator Obama: http://obama.senate.gov/contact/index.php 2. Send Letters to the Chicago Sun Times and the Chicago Tribune asking them to stop demonizing Elvira as well as all immigrants. Their emails are letters@suntimes.com and ctc-tribletter@tribune.com. 3. Send letters of support directly to Elvira at the organization she works with and who has been spearheading her support, Sin Fronteras at Centro Sin Fronteras 2300 S. Blue Island Ave., Chicago IL 60608 or visit the website: www.legalizationyes.com For Spanish speakers visit: www.legalizacionsi.com ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- TWO AMICUS BRIEFS FILED FOR MUMIA ABU-JAMAL WITH THE 3RD CIRCUIT FEDERAL APPEALS COURT IN JULY 2006 These pdf files can be found on Michael Schiffmann's web site at: http://againstthecrimeofsilence.de/english/copy_of_mumia/legalarchive/ The first brief is from the National Lawyers Guild. The second brief is from the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Howard Keylor For the Labor Action Committee to Free Mumia Abu-Jamal www.laboractionmumia.org. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- SIR! NO SIR! I urge everyone to get a copy of "Sir! No Sir!" at: http://www.sirnosir.com/ It is an extremely informative and powerful film of utmost importance today. I was a participant in the anti-Vietnam war movement. What a powerful thing it was to see troops in uniform leading the march against the war! If you would like to read more here are two very good publications: Out Now!: A Participant's Account of the Movement in the United States Against the Vietnam War by Fred Halstead (Hardcover - Jun 1978) and: GIs speak out against the war;: The case of the Ft. Jackson 8; by Fred Halstead (Unknown Binding - 1970). Both available at: http://www.amazon.com/gp/search/103-1123166-0136605?search-alias=books&rank=+availability,-proj-total-margin&field-author=Fred%20Halstead In solidarity, Bonnie Weinstein ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Endorse the following petition: Don't Let Idaho Kill Endangered Wolves Target: Fish and Wildlife Service Sponsor: Defenders of Wildlife http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/664280276?z00m=99090&z00m=99090<l=1155834550 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THIS JUST IN: THE KPFA PROGRAM COUNCIL HAS TURNED DOWN THE SHOW! SUPPORT "TAKING AIM" produced by Ralph Schoenman and Mya Shone. LET KPFA KNOW WE ARE DISAPPOINTED! To contact KPFA PROGRAM COUNCIL email: programcouncil@lists.kpfa.org KPFA's Tracy Rosenberg voted to air "Taking Aim" and we commend her for it. You can thank her by writing her at: tracyrose@gmail.com In solidarity, Bonnie Weinstein Here's my letter to the KPFA Program Council:: To: KPFA PROGRAM COUNCIL programcouncil@lists.kpfa.org KPFA RADIO Re: "Taking Aim" Dear Council Members, We are very disappointed that KPFA decided not to air the extremely important show, "Taking Aim" produced by Ralph Schoenman and Mya Shone. Of course, we are also disappointed by your reluctance to air a PSA for a rally to defend death row inmate, renowned commentator, leader and writer, Mumia Abu-Jamal, because the group that sponsored the rally was not a 501c3, non-profit, semi-corporation. I am happy to say that I did hear it announced in the Community Calendar during Denis Bernstein's "Flashpoints," Thursday evening, 9/14, the day before the rally. But I'm sorry to say that I did not hear the PSA. God only knows, the downtrodden need a public voice more than ever. Organizers are not even allowed to post up posters and announcements anymore in San Francisco. A.N.S.W.E.R. is currently in a battle over the right to practice this centuries-old custom of "posting up" for meetings, marches and rallies--historically one of the only venues of mass communication freely available to the poor. "Taking Aim" is a program that express that public voice. KPFA is also supposed to express that public voice. Now is not the time to silence it! Please reconsider your decision not to air "Taking Aim." And end the prohibition against airing the PSAs of non-501c3 groups and organizations--after all, aren't they the grass roots of the matter? Sincerely, Bonnie Weinstein, www.bauaw.org 415-824-8730 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- END ALL U.S. AID TO ISRAEL! Stop funding Israel's war against Palestine Complete the form at the website listed below with your information. Personalize the message text on the right with your own words, if you wish. Click the Next Step button to send your letter to these decision makers: President George W. Bush Vice President Richard 'Dick' B. Cheney Your Senators Your Representative Go here to register your outrage: https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Advocacy? JServSessionIdr003=cga2p2o6x1.app2a&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=177 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Idriss Stelley Foundation is in critical financial crisis, please help ! ISF is in critical financial crisis, and might be forced to close its doors in a couple of months due to lack of funds to cover DSL, SBC and utilities, which is a disaster for our numerous clients, since the are the only CBO providing direct services to Victims (as well as extended failies) of police misconduct for the whole city of SF. Any donation, big or small will help us stay alive until we obtain our 501-c3 nonprofit Federal Status! Checks can me made out to ISF, ( 4921 3rd St , SF CA 94124 ). Please consider to volunteer or apply for internship to help covering our 24HR Crisis line, provide one on one couseling and co facilitate our support groups, M.C a show on SF Village Voice, insure a 2hr block of time at ISF, moderate one of our 26 websites for ISF clients ! http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeo9ewi/idrissstelleyfoundation/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/isf23/ Report Police Brutality 24HR Bilingual hotline (415) 595-8251 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Justice4Asa/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Appeal for funds: Dahr Jamail's Iraq Dispatches Visit the Dahr Jamail Iraq website http://dahrjamailiraq.com Request for Support Dahr Jamail will soon return to the Middle East to continue his independent reporting. As usual, reporting independently is a costly enterprise; for example, an average hotel room is $50, a fixer runs $50 per day, and phone/food average $25 per day. Dahr will report from the Middle East for one month, and thus needs to raise $5,750 in order to cover his plane ticket and daily operating expenses. A rare opportunity has arisen for Dahr to cover several stories regarding the occupation of Iraq, as well as U.S. policy in the region, which have been entirely absent from mainstream media. With the need for independent, unfiltered information greater than ever, your financial support is deeply appreciated. Without donations from readers, ongoing independent reports from Dahr are simply not possible. All donations go directly towards covering Dahr's on the ground operating expenses. (c)2006 Dahr Jamail. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- New Flash Film From Young Ava Over At 'Peace Takes Courage' http://www.peacetakescourage.com/page-blog.htm http://letter.cf.huffingtonpost.com/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Save the Lebanese Civilians Petition http://epetitions.net/julywar/index.php http://donations.tayyar.org/ To The Concerned Citizen of The World: http://epetitions.net/julywar/index.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Legal update on Mumia Abu-Jamal’s case Excerpts from a letter written by Robert R. Bryan, the lead attorney for death row political prisoner, Mumia Abu-Jamal. ...On July 20, 2006, we filed the Brief of Appellee and Cross Appellant, Mumia Abu-Jamal, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Philadelphia. http://www.workers.org/2006/us/mumia-0810/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Today in Palestine! For up to date information on Israeli's brutal attack on human rights and freedom in Palestine and Lebanon go to: http://www.theheadlines.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- For a great car magnet--a black ribbon with the words, "Bring the troops home now!" written in red, and it also comes in a lapel pin!--go to: (Put out by A.N.S.W.E.R.) https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Ecommerce?store_id=1621 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF ZIONISM BY RALPH SCHOENMAN Essential reading for understanding the development of Zionism and Israel in the service of British and USA imperialism. The full text of the book can be found for free at: http://www.marxists.de/middleast/schoenman/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- JOIN THE LYNNE STEWAR DEFENSE For those of you who don't know who Lynne Stewart is, go to www.lynnestewart.org and get acquainted with Lynne and her cause. Lynne is a criminal defense attorney who is being persecuted for representing people charged with heinous crimes. It is a bedrock of our legal system that every criminal defendant has a right to a lawyer. Persecuting Lynne is an attempt to terrorize and intimidate all criminal defense attorneys in this country so they will stop representing unpopular people. If this happens, the fascist takeover of this nation will be complete. We urge you all to go the website, familiarize yourselves with Lynne and her battle for justice www.lynnestewart.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- NATIONAL COMMITTEE TO FREE THE CUBAN FIVE Comité Nacional por la Libertad de los Cinco Cubanos Who are the Cuban Five? The Cuban Five are five Cuban men who are in U.S. prison, serving four life sentences and 75 years collectively, after being wrongly convicted in U.S. federal court in Miami, on June 8, 2001. They are Gerardo Hernández, Ramón Labañino, Antonio Guerrero, Fernando González and René González. The Five were falsely accused by the U.S. government of committing espionage conspiracy against the United States, and other related charges. But the Five pointed out vigorously in their defense that they were involved in monitoring the actions of Miami-based terrorist groups, in order to prevent terrorist attacks on their country of Cuba. The Five’s actions were never directed at the U.S. government. They never harmed anyone nor ever possessed nor used any weapons while in the United States. The Cuban Five’s mission was to stop terrorism For more than 40 years, anti-Cuba terrorist organizations based in Miami have engaged in countless terrorist activities against Cuba, and against anyone who advocates a normalization of relations between the U.S. and Cuba. More than 3,000 Cubans have died as a result of these terrorists’ attacks. Gerardo Hernández, 2 Life Sentences Antonio Guerrero, Life Sentence Ramon Labañino, Life Sentence Fernando González, 19 Years René González, 15 Years Free The Cuban Five Held Unjustly In The U.S.! http://www.freethefive.org/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Eyewitness Account from Oaxaca A website is now being circulated that has up-to-date info and video that can be downloaded of the police action and developments in Oaxaca. For those who have not seen it elsewhere, the website is: www.mexico.indymedia.org/oaxaca http://www.mexico.indymedia.org/oaxaca ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- REMINDER TO ALL GROUPS: BE SURE AND POST ALL ACTIONS AND EVENTS TO WWW.INDYBAY.ORG TO REACH THE MOST PEOPLE AGAINST THE WAR IN THE BAY AREA! http://www.indybay.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Iraq Body Count For current totals, see our database page. http://www.iraqbodycount.net/press/pr13.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- The Cost of War [Over three-hundred-billion so far...bw] http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "The Democrats always promise to help workers, and the don't! The Republicans always promise to help business, and the do!" - Mort Sahl ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Emilano Zapata ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Join the Campaign to Shut Down the Guantanamo Torture Center Go to: http://www.shutitdown.org/ to send a letter to Congress and the White House: Shut Down Guantanamo and all torture centers and prisons. A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition Act Now to Stop War & End Racism http://www.ANSWERcoalition.org http://www.actionsf.org sf@internationalanswer.org 2489 Mission St. Rm. 24 San Francisco: 415-821-6545 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Great Counter-Recruitment Website http://notyoursoldier.org/article.php?list=type&type=14 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- DEFEND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND CIVIL RIGHTS! Last summer the U.S. Border Patrol arrested Shanti Sellz and Daniel Strauss, both 23-year-old volunteers assisting immigrants on the border, for medically evacuating 3 people in critical condition from the Arizona desert. Criminalization for aiding undocumented immigrants already exists on the books in the state of Arizona. Daniel and Shanti are targeted to be its first victims. Their arrest and subsequent prosecution for providing humanitarian aid could result in a 15-year prison sentence. Any Congressional compromise with the Sensenbrenner bill (HR 4437) may include these harmful criminalization provisions. Fight back NOW! Help stop the criminalization of undocumented immigrants and those who support them! For more information call 415-821- 9683. For information on the Daniel and Shanti Defense Campaign, visit www.nomoredeaths.org. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- FYI According to "Minimum Wage History" at http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/anth484/minwage.html " "Calculated in real 2005 dollars, the 1968 minimum wage was the highest at $9.12. "The 8 dollar per hour Whole Foods employees are being paid $1.12 less than the 1968 minimum wage. "A federal minimum wage was first set in 1938. The graph shows both nominal (red) and real (blue) minimum wage values. Nominal values range from 25 cents per hour in 1938 to the current $5.15/hr. The greatest percentage jump in the minimum wage was in 1950, when it nearly doubled. The graph adjusts these wages to 2005 dollars (blue line) to show the real value of the minimum wage. Calculated in real 2005 dollars, the 1968 minimum wage was the highest at $9.12. Note how the real dollar minimum wage rises and falls. This is because it gets periodically adjusted by Congress. The period 1997-2006, is the longest period during which the minimum wage has not been adjusted. States have departed from the federal minimum wage. Washington has the highest minimum wage in the country at $7.63 as of January 1, 2006. Oregon is next at $7.50. Cities, too, have set minimum wages. Santa Fe, New Mexico has a minimum wage of $9.50, which is more than double the state minimum wage at $4.35." ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- NO BORDERS! NO WALLS! NO FENCES! GENERAL AMNESTY FOR ALL! OUR HOMELAND IS WHERE WE LIVE! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- REPEAL THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT IN 2007! Check out: 10 EXCELLENT REASONS NOT TO JOIN THE MILITARY http://www.10reasonsbook.com/ Public Law print of PL 107-110, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 [1.8 MB] http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html Also, the law is up before Congress again in 2007. See this article from USA Today: Bipartisan panel to study No Child Left Behind By Greg Toppo, USA TODAY February 13, 2006 http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-02-13-education-panel_x.htm ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies http://www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/declaration.html http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/decind.html http://www.usconstitution.net/declar.html http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805195.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Bill of Rights http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805182.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- ARTICLES IN FULL: ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 1) Hezbollah Chief Leads Huge Rally By JOHN O’NEIL September 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/world/middleeast/23lebanoncnd.html?hp&ex=1158984000&en=fea12c38b110044b&ei=5094&partner=homepage 2) Insurance Horror Stories By PAUL KRUGMAN September 22, 2006 http://select.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/opinion/22krugman.html?hp 3) Hugo Chavez Speech at United Nations NewsMax.com Wires Wednesday, Sept. 20, 2006 PRESIDENT CHAVEZ DELIVERS REMARKS AT THE U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 SPEAKER: HUGO CHAVEZ, PRESIDENT OF VENEZUELA http://www.newsmax.com/scripts/printer_friendly.pl?page=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/9/20/123752.shtml 4) Mariela Castro: "I am proud of my father " Fernán González BBC Mundo, Havana A CUBANEWS TRANSLATION BY ANA PORTELA Edited by Walter Lippmann http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs955.html 5) PERMANENT MISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA TO THE UNITED NATIONS DRAFT SPEECH BY ESTEBAN LAZO, HEAD OF THE CUBAN DELEGATION TO THE 61st SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, NEW YORK United Nations website http://www.un.org/webcast/ga/61/pdfs/cuba-e.pdf Text covnersion by NY Transfer News 315 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10016 Tel: 212-689-7215 * Fax: 212-689-9073 email: publicrelations@cubanmission.com 6) AP Propaganda About Iraq By Dahr Jamail t r u t h o u t | Perspective Friday 22 September 2006 http://dahrjamailiraq.com ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 1) Hezbollah Chief Leads Huge Rally By JOHN O’NEIL September 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/world/middleeast/23lebanoncnd.html?hp&ex=1158984000&en=fea12c38b110044b&ei=5094&partner=homepage [Photo with the article shows what looks like over a million people waving the yellow flag of Hezbollah in the midst of ruined Lebanon...bw] The leader of Hezbollah, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, told the crowd at a giant open-air rally in Beirut today that the militant group had more than 20,000 rockets, and made clear that it would not disarm, despite the requirements of a United Nations cease-fire accord. Mr. Nasrallah declared that the group “has recovered all its organizational and military capabilities,” and “is stronger than it was before July 12,” the day the war with Israel began, according to Reuters. The rally was the first time Mr. Nasrallah has appeared in public since before the war. He also called for replacing Lebanon’s current pro-Western government with a new government of national unity, as Hezbollah seeks to capitalize on what he described today as “a divine, historic and strategic victory over Israel and the United States.” Mr. Nasrallah told the crowd, which filled a vast space cleared from the rubble left by Israel’s bombing raids, that he had decided to appear in person only half an hour before the start of the rally. “Standing here before you,” he said, “incurs dangers on you and me.” Israeli officials have made clear that they consider Mr. Nasrallah a legitimate target. Some 4,000 rockets fired over the border into Israel by Hezbollah during the 34-day war killed 43 civilians and wounded more than 2,000. Asked on Thursday by Israel’s Channel 10 television if Mr. Nasrallah would be a target if he appeared at the rally, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert replied: “And you think, that if he was, I would tell you — and tell him?” But Mr. Nasrallah directed as much or more of his wrath today at the United States as at Israel, and declared that “your resistance and steadfastness” has “opened the eyes of the world.” The United Nations ceasefire that halted the fighting on Aug. 14th called for, among other things, the disarmament of Hezbollah to give the fragile Lebanese government a monopoly on armed force within the country. Secretary General Kofi Annan has made it clear since then that he expects the disarmament to come only as part of a political settlement within Lebanon, saying that disarming Hezbollah would not be part of the mandate of the international force being deployed along the border with Israel. Israeli officials said after the fighting ended that Hezbollah’s stockpile of long-range weapons had been diminished, and that the danger posed by its remaining short-range Katyusha rockets was limited by the clearing of a zone south of the Litani River, about 15 miles from the border. Since the ceasefire, the Israelis have focused on trying to make sure that Hezbollah does not receive new shipments of smuggled arms from Iran and Syria, considered by Israel and the United States to be the militant group’s prime sponsors. But Mr. Nasrallah’s declaration of the group’s renewed strength seemed to leave little prospect of any voluntary disarmament. In contrast to the understated tone he took in his appearances on Hezbollah television during the war, his speech today, portions of which were broadcast by CNN, was an angry declaration of victory. It met with prolonged cheers from the crowd, with many people waving the militant group’s yellow flag. Since the fighting ended on Aug. 14th, Hezbollah has tried to build on the increase in popular support that was a side-effect of Israel’s widespread bombing campaign, which killed more than 1,200 Lebanese, mostly civilians. Its leaders recently called for a government of national unity to replace the mainly pro-Western, anti-Syrian March 14 coalition now in power. The coalition, which gave Hezbollah a share in government, won a slim majority in elections last spring. Some Lebanese have criticized Hezbollah for its role in the start of the war, which was touched off by a cross-border raid in which militants seized two Israeli soldiers. Shortly after the war’s end, Mr. Nasrallah said in a televised address that the raid a miscalculation, and that he would not have ordered the raid if he had known how fierce the response from Israel would be. But today he said that part of the Israeli and American plan had been to set the rest of Lebanon against Hezbollah by inflicting widespread punishment. “They thought that we would be divided,” he said. “It’s not a victory for a party or a group, it’s a victory for the people of Lebanon.” Mr. Nasrallah called the conflict “an American war,” saying that the United States had made Israel’s attacks possible by providing arms, planning and diplomatic support. He said the war came to and end not because of the suffering of the Lebanese or any weakness on the part of Hezbollah, but because “the Zionists realized that if it continued it would be a catastrophe.” “The Americans agreed to stop the war, not for the women, not for the children of the Lebanese — they stopped the war for Israel,” he said. He said the Bush administration had allowed the war to go forward as part of the plan to create “a new Middle East.” “This Middle East was illegitimate,” he said, and its defeat has become an inspiration “for people who fight for their freedom and dignity” around the world. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 2) Insurance Horror Stories By PAUL KRUGMAN September 22, 2006 http://select.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/opinion/22krugman.html?hp “When Steve and Leslie Shaeffer’s daughter, Selah, was diagnosed at age 4 with a potentially fatal tumor in her jaw, they figured their health insurance would cover the bulk of her treatment costs.” But “shortly after Selah’s medical bills hit $20,000, Blue Cross stopped covering them and eventually canceled her coverage retroactively.” So begins a recent report in The Los Angeles Times titled “Sick but Insured? Think Again,” which offers a series of similar horror stories, and suggests that these stories represent a growing trend: more and more health insurers are finding ways to yank your insurance when you get sick. This trend helps explain something that has been puzzling me: why is the health insurance industry growing rapidly, even as it covers fewer Americans? Between 2000 and 2005, the number of Americans with private health insurance coverage fell by 1 percent. But over the same period, employment at health insurance companies rose a remarkable 32 percent. What are all those extra employees doing? Now we know at least part of the answer: they’re working harder than ever at identifying people who really need medical care, and ensuring that they don’t get it. In the past, they mainly concentrated on screening out applicants likely to get sick. Now, it seems, they’re also devoting a lot of effort to finding pretexts for revoking insurance after they’ve already granted it. They typically do this by claiming that they weren’t notified about some pre-existing condition, even if the insured wasn’t aware of that condition when he or she bought the policy. Welcome to the ugly world of American health care economics. Health care is poised to become America’s largest industry. Employment in manufacturing, which once dominated the economy, has fallen 18 percent since 2000, to 14.2 million. Meanwhile, employment in the private health services industry has risen 16 percent, to 12.6 million. Another 1.3 million people are employed at government hospitals. So we’re quickly approaching the point at which more Americans will be employed delivering health care than are employed producing manufactured goods. Yet even as health care becomes the core of the American economy, our system of paying for health care remains sick, and is getting sicker. Because everyone faces some risk of incurring huge medical costs, only the superrich can afford to be without health insurance. Yet private insurers try to refuse coverage to those most likely to need it, and deny payment whenever they can get away with it. The point isn’t that they’re evil or greedy (although you do wonder how the people who cut off the Schaeffers can look themselves in the mirror). The fact is that cruelty and injustice are the inevitable result of the current rules of the game. Blue Shield of California is a nonprofit insurance provider, yet as a spokesman put it, if his organization doesn’t follow the for-profit practice of selectively covering only the healthiest people, “we will end up with all the high-risk people.” Now, before you panic about the state of your own coverage, you should know that the horror stories in The Los Angeles Times article all involve individual insurance; if your coverage comes via your employer, you’re reasonably secure against sudden cancellation. But employment-based insurance is in rapid decline, as employers balk at the cost and more and more companies adopt Wal-Mart-style minimal-benefit policies. That’s why many people are turning to individual insurance — only to find out, in some cases, that they didn’t get what they thought they paid for. And here’s the thing: it’s all unnecessary. Every other wealthy nation manages to provide almost all its citizens with guaranteed health insurance, while spending less on health care than we do. And there’s no mystery why: we’re paying the price for pointless, destructive reliance on private insurers. Medicare, which is a universal health insurance program for older Americans, spends less than 2 cents of every dollar on administrative costs, leaving 98 cents to pay for medical care. By contrast, private insurance companies spend only around 80 cents of each dollar in premiums on medical care; much of the remaining 20 cents is spent denying insurance to those who need it. If we had a universal system — Medicare for everyone — there would be no more horror stories like those reported by The Los Angeles Times. And we’d almost certainly spend less on health care than we do now. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 3) Hugo Chavez Speech at United Nations NewsMax.com Wires Wednesday, Sept. 20, 2006 PRESIDENT CHAVEZ DELIVERS REMARKS AT THE U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 SPEAKER: HUGO CHAVEZ, PRESIDENT OF VENEZUELA http://www.newsmax.com/scripts/printer_friendly.pl?page=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/9/20/123752.shtml "Representatives of the governments of the world, good morning to all of you. First of all, I would like to invite you, very respectfully, to those who have not read this book, to read it. Noam Chomsky, one of the most prestigious American and world intellectuals, Noam Chomsky, and this is one of his most recent books, 'Hegemony or Survival: The Imperialist Strategy of the United States.'" [Holds up book, waves it in front of General Assembly.] "It's an excellent book to help us understand what has been happening in the world throughout the 20th century, and what's happening now, and the greatest threat looming over our planet. The hegemonic pretensions of the American empire are placing at risk the very survival of the human species. We continue to warn you about this danger and we appeal to the people of the United States and the world to halt this threat, which is like a sword hanging over our heads. I had considered reading from this book, but, for the sake of time," [flips through the pages, which are numerous] "I will just leave it as a recommendation. It reads easily, it is a very good book, I'm sure Madame [President] you are familiar with it. It appears in English, in Russian, in Arabic, in German. I think that the first people who should read this book are our brothers and sisters in the United States, because their threat is right in their own house. The devil is right at home. The devil, the devil himself, is right in the house. "And the devil came here yesterday. Yesterday the devil came here. Right here." [crosses himself] "And it smells of sulfur still today." Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the president of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world. Truly. As the owner of the world. I think we could call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday's statement made by the president of the United States. As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world. An Alfred Hitchcock movie could use it as a scenario. I would even propose a title: "The Devil's Recipe." As Chomsky says here, clearly and in depth, the American empire is doing all it can to consolidate its system of domination. And we cannot allow them to do that. We cannot allow world dictatorship to be consolidated. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): The world parent's statement -- cynical, hypocritical, full of this imperial hypocrisy from the need they have to control everything. They say they want to impose a democratic model. But that's their democratic model. It's the false democracy of elites, and, I would say, a very original democracy that's imposed by weapons and bombs and firing weapons. What a strange democracy. Aristotle might not recognize it or others who are at the root of democracy. What type of democracy do you impose with marines and bombs? The president of the United States, yesterday, said to us, right here, in this room, and I'm quoting, "Anywhere you look, you hear extremists telling you can escape from poverty and recover your dignity through violence, terror and martyrdom." Wherever he looks, he sees extremists. And you, my brother -- he looks at your color, and he says, oh, there's an extremist. Evo Morales, the worthy president of Bolivia, looks like an extremist to him. The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It's not that we are extremists. It's that the world is waking up. It's waking up all over. And people are standing up. I have the feeling, dear world dictator, that you are going to live the rest of your days as a nightmare because the rest of us are standing up, all those who are rising up against American imperialism, who are shouting for equality, for respect, for the sovereignty of nations. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): Yes, you can call us extremists, but we are rising up against the empire, against the model of domination. The president then -- and this he said himself, he said: "I have come to speak directly to the populations in the Middle East, to tell them that my country wants peace." That's true. If we walk in the streets of the Bronx, if we walk around New York, Washington, San Diego, in any city, San Antonio, San Francisco, and we ask individuals, the citizens of the United States, what does this country want? Does it want peace? They'll say yes. But the government doesn't want peace. The government of the United States doesn't want peace. It wants to exploit its system of exploitation, of pillage, of hegemony through war. It wants peace. But what's happening in Iraq? What happened in Lebanon? In Palestine? What's happening? What's happened over the last 100 years in Latin America and in the world? And now threatening Venezuela -- new threats against Venezuela, against Iran? He spoke to the people of Lebanon. Many of you, he said, have seen how your homes and communities were caught in the crossfire. How cynical can you get? What a capacity to lie shamefacedly. The bombs in Beirut with millimetric precision? CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): This is crossfire? He's thinking of a western, when people would shoot from the hip and somebody would be caught in the crossfire. This is imperialist, fascist, assassin, genocidal, the empire and Israel firing on the people of Palestine and Lebanon. That is what happened. And now we hear, "We're suffering because we see homes destroyed.' The president of the United States came to talk to the peoples -- to the peoples of the world. He came to say -- I brought some documents with me, because this morning I was reading some statements, and I see that he talked to the people of Afghanistan, the people of Lebanon, the people of Iran. And he addressed all these peoples directly. And you can wonder, just as the president of the United States addresses those peoples of the world, what would those peoples of the world tell him if they were given the floor? What would they have to say? And I think I have some inkling of what the peoples of the south, the oppressed people think. They would say, "Yankee imperialist, go home." I think that is what those people would say if they were given the microphone and if they could speak with one voice to the American imperialists. And that is why, Madam President, my colleagues, my friends, last year we came here to this same hall as we have been doing for the past eight years, and we said something that has now been confirmed -- fully, fully confirmed. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): I don't think anybody in this room could defend the system. Let's accept -- let's be honest. The U.N. system, born after the Second World War, collapsed. It's worthless. Oh, yes, it's good to bring us together once a year, see each other, make statements and prepare all kinds of long documents, and listen to good speeches, like Abel's (ph) yesterday, or President Mullah's (ph). Yes, it's good for that. And there are a lot of speeches, and we've heard lots from the president of Sri Lanka, for instance, and the president of Chile. But we, the assembly, have been turned into a merely deliberative organ. We have no power, no power to make any impact on the terrible situation in the world. And that is why Venezuela once again proposes, here, today, 20 September, that we re-establish the United Nations. Last year, Madam, we made four modest proposals that we felt to be crucially important. We have to assume the responsibility our heads of state, our ambassadors, our representatives, and we have to discuss it. The first is expansion, and Mullah (ph) talked about this yesterday right here. The Security Council, both as it has permanent and non-permanent categories, (inaudible) developing countries and LDCs must be given access as new permanent members. That's step one. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): Second, effective methods to address and resolve world conflicts, transparent decisions. Point three, the immediate suppression -- and that is something everyone's calling for -- of the anti-democratic mechanism known as the veto, the veto on decisions of the Security Council. Let me give you a recent example. The immoral veto of the United States allowed the Israelis, with impunity, to destroy Lebanon. Right in front of all of us as we stood there watching, a resolution in the council was prevented. Fourthly, we have to strengthen, as we've always said, the role and the powers of the secretary general of the United Nations. Yesterday, the secretary general practically gave us his speech of farewell. And he recognized that over the last 10 years, things have just gotten more complicated; hunger, poverty, violence, human rights violations have just worsened. That is the tremendous consequence of the collapse of the United Nations system and American hegemonistic pretensions. Madam, Venezuela a few years ago decided to wage this battle within the United Nations by recognizing the United Nations, as members of it that we are, and lending it our voice, our thinking. Our voice is an independent voice to represent the dignity and the search for peace and the reformulation of the international system; to denounce persecution and aggression of hegemonistic forces on the planet. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): This is how Venezuela has presented itself. Bolivar's home has sought a nonpermanent seat on the Security Council. Let's see. Well, there's been an open attack by the U.S. government, an immoral attack, to try and prevent Venezuela from being freely elected to a post in the Security Council. The imperium is afraid of truth, is afraid of independent voices. It calls us extremists, but they are the extremists. And I would like to thank all the countries that have kindly announced their support for Venezuela, even though the ballot is a secret one and there's no need to announce things. But since the imperium has attacked, openly, they strengthened the convictions of many countries. And their support strengthens us. Mercosur, as a bloc, has expressed its support, our brothers in Mercosur. Venezuela, with Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, is a full member of Mercosur. And many other Latin American countries, CARICOM, Bolivia have expressed their support for Venezuela. The Arab League, the full Arab League has voiced its support. And I am immensely grateful to the Arab world, to our Arab brothers, our Caribbean brothers, the African Union. Almost all of Africa has expressed its support for Venezuela and countries such as Russia or China and many others. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): I thank you all warmly on behalf of Venezuela, on behalf of our people, and on behalf of the truth, because Venezuela, with a seat on the Security Council, will be expressing not only Venezuela's thoughts, but it will also be the voice of all the peoples of the world, and we will defend dignity and truth. Over and above all of this, Madam President, I think there are reasons to be optimistic. A poet would have said "helplessly optimistic," because over and above the wars and the bombs and the aggressive and the preventive war and the destruction of entire peoples, one can see that a new era is dawning. As Sylvia Rodriguez (ph) says, the era is giving birth to a heart. There are alternative ways of thinking. There are young people who think differently. And this has already been seen within the space of a mere decade. It was shown that the end of history was a totally false assumption, and the same was shown about Pax Americana and the establishment of the capitalist neo-liberal world. It has been shown, this system, to generate mere poverty. Who believes in it now? What we now have to do is define the future of the world. Dawn is breaking out all over. You can see it in Africa and Europe and Latin America and Oceanea. I want to emphasize that optimistic vision. We have to strengthen ourselves, our will to do battle, our awareness. We have to build a new and better world. Venezuela joins that struggle, and that's why we are threatened. The U.S. has already planned, financed and set in motion a coup in Venezuela, and it continues to support coup attempts in Venezuela and elsewhere. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): President Michelle Bachelet reminded us just a moment ago of the horrendous assassination of the former foreign minister, Orlando Letelier. And I would just add one thing: Those who perpetrated this crime are free. And that other event where an American citizen also died were American themselves. They were CIA killers, terrorists. And we must recall in this room that in just a few days there will be another anniversary. Thirty years will have passed from this other horrendous terrorist attack on the Cuban plane, where 73 innocents died, a Cubana de Aviacion airliner. And where is the biggest terrorist of this continent who took the responsibility for blowing up the plane? He spent a few years in jail in Venezuela. Thanks to CIA and then government officials, he was allowed to escape, and he lives here in this country, protected by the government. And he was convicted. He has confessed to his crime. But the U.S. government has double standards. It protects terrorism when it wants to. And this is to say that Venezuela is fully committed to combating terrorism and violence. And we are one of the people who are fighting for peace. Luis Posada Carriles is the name of that terrorist who is protected here. And other tremendously corrupt people who escaped from Venezuela are also living here under protection: a group that bombed various embassies, that assassinated people during the coup. They kidnapped me and they were going to kill me, but I think God reached down and our people came out into the streets and the army was too, and so I'm here today. But these people who led that coup are here today in this country protected by the American government. And I accuse the American government of protecting terrorists and of having a completely cynical discourse. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): We mentioned Cuba. Yes, we were just there a few days ago. We just came from there happily. And there you see another era born. The Summit of the 15, the Summit of the Nonaligned, adopted a historic resolution. This is the outcome document. Don't worry, I'm not going to read it. But you have a whole set of resolutions here that were adopted after open debate in a transparent matter -- more than 50 heads of state. Havana was the capital of the south for a few weeks, and we have now launched, once again, the group of the nonaligned with new momentum. And if there is anything I could ask all of you here, my companions, my brothers and sisters, it is to please lend your good will to lend momentum to the Nonaligned Movement for the birth of the new era, to prevent hegemony and prevent further advances of imperialism. And as you know, Fidel Castro is the president of the nonaligned for the next three years, and we can trust him to lead the charge very efficiently. Unfortunately they thought, "Oh, Fidel was going to die." But they're going to be disappointed because he didn't. And he's not only alive, he's back in his green fatigues, and he's now presiding the nonaligned. So, my dear colleagues, Madam President, a new, strong movement has been born, a movement of the south. We are men and women of the south. With this document, with these ideas, with these criticisms, I'm now closing my file. I'm taking the book with me. And, don't forget, I'm recommending it very warmly and very humbly to all of you. CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): We want ideas to save our planet, to save the planet from the imperialist threat. And hopefully in this very century, in not too long a time, we will see this, we will see this new era, and for our children and our grandchildren a world of peace based on the fundamental principles of the United Nations, but a renewed United Nations. And maybe we have to change location. Maybe we have to put the United Nations somewhere else; maybe a city of the south. We've proposed Venezuela. You know that my personal doctor had to stay in the plane. The chief of security had to be left in a locked plane. Neither of these gentlemen was allowed to arrive and attend the U.N. meeting. This is another abuse and another abuse of power on the part of the Devil. It smells of sulfur here, but God is with us and I embrace you all. May God bless us all. Good day to you. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 4) Mariela Castro: "I am proud of my father " Fernán González BBC Mundo, Havana A CUBANEWS TRANSLATION BY ANA PORTELA Edited by Walter Lippmann http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs955.html Mariela Castro is the daughter of the interim Cuban president, Raul Castro and director of the National Center for Sexual Education in this country. For the past few years she has been noted for defending the rights of sexual minorities. In an interview with BBC Mundo, in her office of Havana, in an old house in the Vedado neighborhood, she talks of her relationship with her father, of her family life and work she does, which is not always easy. What is your father like? My Dad, not Raúl Castro, is marvelous (she smiles), he is very active, very caring, always interested in us. I remember, when I was little, that I managed to be taken to school holding his hand, like other parents, walking the six blocks and waiting for the morning formation (with all the teachers and students before classes that almost always had an ideological teaching). He is a father that always has surprises. One thing that I liked very much is that my father is a very loving, very romantic and passionate person with my Mom (Vilma Espín, president of the Cuban Women‚s Federation). They have transmitted a great stability. They taught us to love, to be romantic, to believe in people, even if they may disappoint us. They taught us many important values. Often we said that we didn‚t want him to continue with his public responsibilities because we wanted him closer. We wanted to be with him. We understood the responsibility he had to assume because, once you take a revolutionary course, you can‚t say "well, I'm going home. So long. That's your problem." That is also a great responsibility. Like Garibaldi. He forged Italian unity and then said, "chao, it yours now" and left. That was a great lack of historical responsibility. They were not like that. That must be admired but it means that we will not be with him as often that we want. But we are also proud of how he is, as a human being, of how he as assumed his public responsibility and how he has had the honesty to assume his errors when he identifies them, which is the majority of times. He has a great experience in collective work, in boosting collective creation in leading because he does not feel omnipotent, because he is not self-satisfied. The Cuban people have confidence in him, not because he has a magic wand, something no one has. It is a great effort, a great exercise in creativity, of a collective will to create a more just and fairer society in such a poor country such as Cuba with so few material resources, under the hostility of the most powerful empire in all of history. History fascinates him. He is very well versed in universal and Cuban history. It helps him to understand Cuban reality and tries to push forward. He will follow the strategy of the Revolution which will, collectively, continue to strengthen and actions will be identified for Cuban society to advance, like a sovereign state. What do you remember most about your father? His joy, his congeniality, his jokes and his affection. He has been very affectionate with all of us. He is very reserved in his public life but, privately, he is fascinating. Let‚s talk about your work as director of the Cuban Center of Sexual Education. What made you decide to work for the rights of transvestites, the transsexuals, and homosexuals in Cuba? I was working here as the director of the center. I think it was about 2004 when a group of transvestites, transsexuals came. Some were patients, others collaborators here in the center, in educational work. Some were not, but many were prostitutes and wanted support of our institution because they had problems with the police here in Havana, not in other parts of the country. There was an event here in Havana, around La Rampa, the Malecon (seaside walk) where many people with different sexual preferences met and engaged in prostitution. But they disturbed the neighbors. If they had exercised prostitution without disturbing the neighbors...That implied harassment of tourists who complained. There was a meeting of the Young Communist League in Havana who complained to the government. They said that measures had to be taken because the families felt infringed upon and tourists also. Instead of taking a more logical measure, the decision of the police was to arrest anyone who looked like a transvestite, transsexual or anything that looked strange, arbitrary, absurd. Of course, they came to demand their rights because I don't know if you have noticed, we Cubans have a strong sense of justice and fight when we have to and we accept when we feel that we must accept. That's why I say, Why is Fidel here? Why do people want him here... because the day that the people don't want him here he won't be. That happened with this subject. They spoke of everything bothering them. I asked if I could tape what they had said to prepare a report. And that's what I did, a short report so they could read it over rapidly and then a longer one with many annexes. That is how a national strategy came about for attention to transsexuals with an integral vision since 1979 which was created by my mother, Vilma Espín, president of the Cuban Women's Federation. What we did was to broaden this work, to enrich it. Since the transvestites and transsexuals asked my help I got seriously involved in this. I have studied these subjects to have background then, in the end, I am doing my PhD on the subject. How long will it be in Cuba to achieve total respect for the rights of homosexuals? I don't know, I don't know how long and I would like to know. At first I was very passionate about it and understood that I was killing myself and that everything had a process, that it took time; it has to be moved, to boost it. It is, precisely, what I am doing to prevent this process from taking too long but to make it shorter. Do you think these problems are institutional or about machismo in society or a combination of both? A combination of both. They are socio-cultural and historical and, of course; they are visible because human beings with the same conditioning make institutions. That is why it has an educational, massive and very important component. We are even carrying out a very important study on representations of transexuality; to carry out educational campaigns to teach society to respect these people and respect their rights. Of course, everyone is going to compare what happens now with what happened in the sixties when homosexuals were sent to work camps or the UMAP. Why do you think this happened? It was like what happened in other places only that Cuba is more visible because it was during the Cold War and war had to be waged against Cuba, on anything where Cuba made a mistake. This was happening everywhere in different ways and continues to happen, even in developed countries. What happens is that it doesn't transcend. I know about it because that is my work and I know groups in Europe who denounce the violation of the rights of these people. I know of parents of transsexuals in England who call for the respect of the rights of transsexuals because their sons have been physically beaten. There are hate crimes that are sexually orientated. This doesn't exist in Cuba. The Cuban population is much more respectful of differences than in other places, I don't know why. I don't know if it's the "conga" (always willing to have a party), that's the way we are. When I'm afraid I will find a very strong resistance, I find a high degree of sensibility in the Cuban population. Do you think that perception about homosexuals in Cuban society has changed, lately? I think so; it has changed very much. Also, because there is no longer a hostile policy, because we also talk of those subjects in social communication media. This makes people think, to reflect upon and that homosexuals and lesbians express their sexual orientation like everyone else in the world, without fears although this does not mean that there may be persons who are afraid because it very difficult to feel different. I think that it is the same thing that happens with Blacks in a racist society or to women in a society that discriminates against her. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 5) PERMANENT MISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA TO THE UNITED NATIONS DRAFT SPEECH BY ESTEBAN LAZO, HEAD OF THE CUBAN DELEGATION TO THE 61st SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, NEW YORK United Nations website http://www.un.org/webcast/ga/61/pdfs/cuba-e.pdf Text covnersion by NY Transfer News 315 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10016 Tel: 212-689-7215 * Fax: 212-689-9073 email: publicrelations@cubanmission.com Madame President, Mr. Secretary General, Your Excellencies: A mere four days ago, the 14th Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement held in Cuba was concluded. Today, I speak on behalf of the Movement's Chairman, President Fidel Castro, fulfilling our obligation to inform this Assembly of the main decisions agreed on at the Summit Conference held in Havana. As First Vice-President of the Councils of State and Ministers of the Republic of Cuba, Razl Castro said in his opening speech: "The current international situation, characterised by the one superpower's irrational attempts to control the world, aided by its allies, shows that we need to be increasingly united In defence of the principles and purposes upon which the Non-Aligned Movement was established, which are those enshrined In the international law and the Charter of the United Nations." While the founding of the Movement was necessary more than four decades ago, its continued relevance in today's world is beyond doubt. The NAM Summit held in Cuba was an indisputable success, in spite of the threats and pressures of those who oppose the unity and common efforts of the countries of the South. The Summit saw high levels of participation, both in terms of the number of countries which attended the conference and that of Heads of State or Government. Profound and fruitful debates were held, in an atmosphere of true understanding, unity and cohesion, which allowed for the adoption of documents of crucial importance to the future of the Non-Aligned Movement. As the new Chairman, Cuba was given clear mandates and an action program which shall govern its activities as head of the Movement. As a result of the Summit, the Non-Aligned Movement has been strengthened and, consequently, so has the political unity of the countries of the South. The diverse and heterogeneous nature of the Movement's membership, far from weakening it, constitutes its essential strength. These features have allowed for the creation of solid consensuses that are a positive contribution to our efforts to overcome the many and serious challenges humanity faces today. The commendable work of Malaysia as the Movement's Chairman over the last three years was acknowledged at the Summit. There was no cause of or demand by a South country which was not duly considered by or which did not meet with the support of the Movement. The urgent need to make progress in the defense of multilateralism, to demand respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all States and ensure the full realization of our peoples' right to development and peace were ratified at the Summit as the Movement's principles. The Heads of State or Government decided to work to suppress acts of aggression and other actions contrary to the preservation of peace and to encourage the peaceful settlement of international conflicts. The Summit called on all nations to abstain from the use of force or from threatening to use force against the territorial integrity or independence of any State. Participating nations promoted the development of relations of friendship based on respect towards the principle of equal rights and the will of all peoples to struggle against foreign occupation. They urged nations to extend international cooperation with a view to overcoming the serious economic, social, cultural and humanitarian challenges that face the world and to promote respect towards the human rights and fundamental liberties of all and for the benefit of all. The fundamental and inalienable right of all peoples to self-determination was reaffirmed in Havana. Non-Aligned countries agreed that world peace and security are today more imperiled than ever as a result, among other factors, of the growing trend of the most powerful States to resort to unilateral measures and to the threat of preemptive wars. The Movement's commitment to general and complete disarmament and nuclear disarmament in particular, under strict and efficient international monitoring, was underscored. The Summit also reaffirmed the basic and inalienable right of all States to research, development, production and the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, and to be free from any kind of discrimination in this connection, in conformity with their respective international obligations. In addition to this, the Summit clearly and firmly pronounced itself against terrorism, double standards in international relations, coercive unilateral measures against any nation, "regime change" policies and the failure of developed countries to fulfill their commitments in economic and social areas. The Heads of State or Government of the Movement reaffirmed their hope to live in a peaceful world in which all nations have the right to a better future and a fair and equitable world order based on the sustainable development of all nations. They affirmed that, in its current form, globalization perpetuates and even exacerbates the marginalization of the countries of the South, and demanded that it be radically transformed into a positive force for change, for the benefit of all peoples. Participants reaffirmed the right of the Palestinian people to have their own State and condemned the government of Israel for the new wave of crimes and massacres in Gaza and other occupied territories. They also vigorously condemned Israel's merciless acts of aggression against Lebanon and the serious violations of this nation's sovereignty and territorial integrity. The people and government of Bolivia, facing attempts aimed at destabilizing the country instigated by external forces, met with a gesture of support and solidarity from the Summit. The process which is underway in that sister nation, aimed at guaranteeing the real rights of all Bolivians and at securing full national control over the country's natural resources, was offered solid support. The Movement considered, with great concern, the aggressive policies and the intensification of actions aimed at undermining the stability of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and expressed support for the inalienable right of the Venezuelan people to determine its form of government and choose its economic, political and social system, free from foreign intervention, subversion, coercion or restrictions of any kind. Non-Aligned countries undertook to promote and participate in a true process of democratization and reform of the United Nations to put behind the anti-democratic impositions and practices of the Security Council and to give the General Assembly its due decisive role, in conformity with the roles and powers described in the UN Charter. I have mentioned only a few examples of the positions adopted at the Summit held in Havana, with respect to the most diverse issues on the international agenda. The documents adopted shall be offcially distributed to all UN member States. A number of the decisions adopted at the Summit shall soon be put into practice in this Session of the General Assembly. Madame President: Cuba is aware of the immense responsibility inherent in presiding over the Non-Aligned Movement in one of the most difficult times In human history, when we face more inequality and injustice than ever before. We shall not rest in our efforts to have the Movement occupy the place it can and must occupy in the international arena, in keeping not only with its broad membership of 118 countries, nearly two-thirds of the UN membership, but also of its history on behalf of the loftiest causes. On inaugurating the 6th Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement 27 years ago, President Fidel Castro expressed: "The struggle for peace and for a just economic order, and a workable solution to the pressing problems that weigh on our peoples is, in our opinion, increasingly becoming the main question posed to Movement of Non-Aligned Countries. "Peace, and the immense risks that threaten it, are not something that should be left exclusively in the hands of the big military Powers. Peace is possible, but world peace can only be assured to the extent that all countries are consciously determined to fight for it -- peace, not just for a part of the world, but for all peoples." Days later, in this same hall, on reporting on that Summit, President Fidel Castro expressed: "The sounds of weapons, of threatening language, and of prepotent behavior in the international arena must cease. "Enough of the illusion that the problems of the world can be solved by nuclear weapons. Bombs may kill the hungry, the sick, and the ignorant, but they cannot kill hunger, disease, and ignorance. Nor can they kill the righteous rebellion of the peoples." The countries of the South shall work, united, for justice, peace and the development of our nations and the entire World, convinced that a better world is possible if we all struggle for it. Madame President: I would now like to say a few words on behalf of the people and government of Cuba. Our people's exercise of its right to self-determination faces new threats. The Bush administration has stepped up its brutally hostile measures against Cuba with new economic sanctions which further intensify the longest blockade human history has known. More severe reprisals are also being taken against those who have business dealings with Cuba from other nations, and financial transactions with our country are viciously persecuted. The very government of the United States recognizes that it is spending more, today, in persecuting and punishing those who have business dealings with Cuba than in monitoring the finances of those who attacked the Twin Towers. This past June, the Bush administration approved the second version of its most recent plan of aggression and domination against our country, aimed not only at overthrowing the Revolution but also at destroying the Cuban nation. In violation of international norms and laws, an unprecedented build-up in the financial and material support to subversive actions aimed at overthrowing the constitutional order freely chosen by the Cuban people is being promoted. The abovementioned anti-Cuban plan contains a chapter, which is being held in secret. The antecedents of these decisions are the covert actions undertaken against the Cuban revolution, which include mercenary invasions, terrorists actions, the introduction of plagues and epidemics into the country and over 600 plots to assassinate Fidel. Thousands of Cubans have lost their lives or have been maimed for life as a result of this criminal policy. At the height of hypocrisy and irresponsibility, the government of the United States tolerates the presence of and protects the terrorists who plan new actions against our people on US soil. While maneuvering to free the murderers responsible for monstrous crimes, such as the notorious international terrorist and CIA agent Luis Posada Carriles, whom they refuse to extradite to Venezuela, it illegally and unjustly keeps five courageous anti-terrorist Cuban activists in prison. But, in spite of these acts of aggression and the criminal blockade, the Cuban people shall never be defeated. Cuba's internationalist efforts continue unhindered. More than 30,000 Cuban doctors and other health professionals are saving lives in 68 different countries today; we are participating in the struggle against illiteracy in several continents; we are developing a plan to train 100,000 doctors for the Third World and we are helping hundreds of thousands of people in many countries regain their sight through Operation Miracle. With these efforts, we are but fulfilling our fundamental duty to aid all of the peoples of the world. Your Excellencies: Cuba is making progress and shall continue to face the future with optimism and unity. Its educated and hard-working people, to whom the homeland is humanity, shall struggle hand in hand with the peoples you represent for the right to live in peace, justice and dignity for all. Thank you, very much. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 6) AP Propaganda About Iraq By Dahr Jamail t r u t h o u t | Perspective Friday 22 September 2006 http://dahrjamailiraq.com "But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought." -George Orwell On Monday, September 18, Associated Press (AP) ran a story titled, "Iraqi tribes fight Insurgency" http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060918/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_tribes At first glance, the average reader cannot be blamed for thinking that this is a story about how tribes in Iraq have decided to take up arms against the "insurgency." The reader certainly cannot be blamed for thinking this, because the first paragraph in the AP story reads, "Tribes in one of Iraq's most volatile provinces have joined together to fight the insurgency there, and they have called on the government and the US-led military coalition for weapons, a prominent tribal leader said Monday." Allow me to pause here and address the use of the word "insurgent." According to Webster's Third New International Dictionary, an insurgent is "a person who rises in revolt against civil authority or an established government: [a] rebel." This of course begs the existence of a legitimately elected government that the "insurgent" rises in revolt against, which in Iraq we do not have. How is it possible to have a legitimate government in a country that was first illegally invaded and today is illegally occupied? Yet, AP uses the word unquestioningly. The story continues: "Tribal leaders and clerics in Ramadi, the capital of violent Anbar province, met last week and have set up a force of about 20,000 men 'ready to purge the city of these infidels,' Sheik Fassal al-Guood, a prominent tribal leader from Ramadi, told the Associated Press, referring to the insurgents. 'People are fed up with the acts of those criminals who take Islam as a cover for their crimes,' he said. 'The situation in the province is unbearable, the city is abandoned, most of the families have fled the city and all services are poor.' Al-Guood said 15 of the 18 tribes in Ramadi 'have sworn to fight those who are killing Sunnis and Shiites and they established an armed force of about 20,000 young men ready to purge the city from those infidels.'" At this point, either the author of this AP story, or the editor, or both, rightly assume that the reader is not aware that Sheik Fassal al-Guood tried to lead the local resistance against the occupation in Ramadi, but turned against the same resistance group when its members rejected him as a leader because they considered him a corrupt thief. Nor is the reader aware that today, Sheikh Fassal al-Guood lives in the "Green Zone" and happily talks to reporters from behind the concrete blast walls, and that his power in Al-Anbar now equals exactly nothing. I contacted author and media critic Norman Solomon and asked him what he thought of this AP story. "The holes in this story beg for questions that it does not raise, much less answer," he wrote. "For instance: What are the past, present and hoped-for financial relationships between the quoted 'tribal leader' on the one hand and the US and Iraqi governments on the other? Are there any indications that money has changed hands? Is a mercenary arrangement being set up? Is this part of the Bush administration's strategy to get more Iraqis to kill each other rather than have Iraqis killing American troops - aka 'As the Iraqis stand up, we'll stand down?' Isn't there a good chance that such arrangements will actually fuel civil war in Iraq rather than douse its already horrific flames?" He continued, "So, this AP story agreeably paraphrases an official from the US-backed Iraqi government's Defense Ministry as saying that 'Iraqi security forces had met with tribal leaders and had agreed to cooperate in combating violence.' But how will they be 'combating violence?' With massive violence, of course, although the article doesn't say so. Many sources are available to make such a point, but in this story AP availed itself of none of them." Solomon, a nationally-syndicated columnist on media and politics who is also the founder and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy, a national consortium of policy researchers and analysts, had this to say about why AP might get away with this type of "reportage" as consistently as it does: "AP is providing the kind of coverage that it and other mainstream US media outlets have provided in the past. The coverage does not seem conspicuously shoddy to most readers because it fits in with previous shoddy reportage. From all appearances, this AP article is based on statements from four sources - and each of them is in line with US government policies. There's one tribal leader from Ramadi who is seeking large quantities of material aid from the US and the Iraqi government; there are two spokespeople for that Iraqi government; and there's a general from the US military. That all four would present a similar picture of events is not surprising. But for an article to rely on only those sources is stenography for one side of the conflict - which should not be confused with journalism." It is also important for the reader to note that, according to an August US Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, of 1,666 bombs exploded in Iraq in July, 90% were aimed at US-led forces. Along with this fact, attacks against US forces have increased dramatically in recent months, and the US military itself has admitted that less than 6% of the attacks against them are from foreign fighters (i.e., "terrorists"). Thus, at least 94% of all attacks against US forces in Iraq are from the Iraqi Resistance, as opposed to "terrorists." It is time, too, that readers of mainstream news knew that any "tribal meeting" that discusses fighting "the insurgents" is currently being held secretly inside American military bases or inside the "green zone." Iraqi people who are trying to lead that operation are well known to Al-Anbar citizens. These leaders did succeed in some cases in recruiting certain groups to fight resistance fighters by paying considerable sums of money, but it was only temporary success. A case in point would be Al-Qa'im last spring. A tribal fight occurred between local resistance fighters. Sheik Osama al-Jadaan was involved in engineering it by paying members of his tribe to take up arms against local resistance groups. Yet this conflict was settled, and when it was, al-Jadaan had to flee to the "green zone." He lived there for a short time before his work as a collaborator with occupation forces caught up with him, and he was killed in Baghdad. Yet the AP story has this to say about al-Jadaan: "In late May, a prominent Sunni Arab tribal leader, Sheik Osama al-Jadaan, who provided fighters to help battle al-Qaeda in Anbar, was assassinated in Baghdad." There are the usual token scraps of truth in the AP story, lending it a hue of credibility. The story quotes a US military spokesperson who goes out on a limb to say that tribal leaders in Anbar "very much want to see security brought back to that area." Another scrap of truth came earlier in the story where Al-Guood is quoted as saying that most of the tribes of Ramadi "have sworn to fight those who are killing Sunnis and Shiites and they established an armed force of about 20,000 young men ready to purge the city from those infidels." This is true throughout Iraq, where even the US military has documented several cases of resistance groups fighting foreign terror groups that have infiltrated Iraq's porous borders in order to carry out attacks against Iraqi civilians. The most disconcerting portion of this AP story, however, is the melding of the word "insurgent" with the word "terrorist." Clearly there is a flippancy, and I believe a malicious intent in this misuse. I have witnessed this melding repeated in AP stories from Iraq in which "insurgent" replaces "terrorist." We can see the melding in a recent AP story http://www.newspress.com/Top/Article/article.jsp?Section=WORLD&ID=564808338794480636 which states: "Attacks against US troops have increased following a call earlier this month from al-Qaeda in Iraq's leader to target American forces, the top US military spokesman said Wednesday." Another example of this melding is in an AP story from September 17th about Bilal Hussein, an Iraqi citizen of Fallujah who has been held by the US military without charges for five months. Part of the story reads, "The military said Hussein was captured with two insurgents, including Hamid Hamad Motib, an alleged leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq." Regarding the reference to al-Qaeda (read "terrorism"), Solomon had this to say: "The word 'terrorism' is clearly a pejorative. And it's an unwritten rule of US media coverage that the 'terrorism' label can only be used, or quoted with credence being given to the sources, if 'terrorism' applies to murderous violence opposed by the US government - in contrast to murderous violence inflicted or otherwise supported by the US government, in which case that violence is routinely presumed to be positive." It is a melding that has the power to change minds. A melding that may have prompted Orwell to say, "... language can also corrupt thought." It is important to note that the board of directors of AP is composed of 22 newspaper and media executives that include the CEOs and presidents of ABC, McClatchy, Hearst, Tribune and the Washington Post. Two of the directors are members of very conservative policy councils that include the Hoover Institute. The Hoover Institute is a Republican policy research center that has been referred to as "Bush's brain trust." Its fellows include Condoleezza Rice and Newt Gingrich, a Distinguished Visiting Fellow, along with George Shultz. Douglas McCorkindale, also on the board of directors at AP, is on the board of Lockheed Martin, the world's largest defense contract company. One does not require crystals to see that the board of AP displays a clear tilt toward right-wing conservative views, and comprises representatives of a huge corporate media network of the largest publishers in the US. It is not difficult to demolish the myth of the liberal media and its prominent arms like AP. *Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. *- George Orwell (c)2006 Dahr Jamail. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- LINKS ONLY ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Capital Punishment: DNA Tests Prove Justice Has Failed http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-08.htm Toxic Shock: How Western Rubbish is Destroying Africa http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-09.htm Restraining Order against Bush Denied http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-01.htm 60 Years to Restore the Ozone Layer Over Antarctica http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-02.htm UN Finds Baghdad Toll Far Higher Than Cited http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-03.htm Arctic Thaw Opens Passage to Pole http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-04.htm Army on Pace to Meet Year's Recruiting Goal By Ann Scott Tyson Washington Post Staff Writer Saturday, September 9, 2006; Page A09 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/08/AR2006090801534.html?nav=rss_nation FOCUS | US Threatened to Bomb Pakistan Back to Stone Age http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092206Z.shtml FOCUS | US Threatened to Bomb Pakistan Back to Stone Age Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf said the US threatened to bomb his country back to the Stone Age if he did not assist the administration's war on terrorism. The threat was delivered after the attacks of September 11, 2001, by Richard L. Armitage, then deputy secretary of state, to Musharraf's intelligence director, the Pakistani leader told CBS's "60 Minutes" for Sunday's broadcast. http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092206Z.shtml The 'King Coal' 'Robber Barons' are Decapitating Mountains! http://www.ilovemountains.org/cost_of_coal/87 British Science Group Says Exxon Misrepresents Climate Issues By HEATHER TIMMONS September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/business/21green.html House Panel Approves Wiretapping Bill By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS The House Intelligence Committee approved by voice vote a bill that would put into law the Bush administration’s program of wiretapping without warrants. The sponsor, Representative Heather A. Wilson, Repubican of New Mexico, had rewritten the measure to make it more to Mr. Bush’s liking. The Judiciary Committee later endorsed a similar version, by 20 to 16. But Ms. Wilson’s revision, likely to draw Mr. Bush’s support, is the bill that probably will make it to the full House. Under her bill, the president may conduct the secret surveillance only under specific conditions. For example, the president must notify Congress within five days of authorizing the surveillance, name the entity that poses the threat and state the reason for believing the attack is imminent. September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/washington/21brfs-007.html More Small Women’s Colleges Opening Doors to Men By DIANA JEAN SCHEMO (On a lamp post next to Ginger Worden, interim president of Randolph- Macon Woman's College (now including men,) was a hand-made sign that read, "Well behaved women rarely make history." The sign was a remnant from a student protest of the college's decision to let men attend.) September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/education/21women.html?ref=us Over the Roar of Protesters, Hungary’s Leader Tries to Talk Politics By JUDY DEMPSEY International Herald Tribune September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/europe/21hungary.html Measures Seek to Restrict Detainees’ Access to Courts By NEIL A. LEWIS and KATE ZERNIKE September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/washington/21habeas.html?hp&ex=1158897600&en=00bf4cedca2834dd&ei=5094&partner=homepage Suits Say U.S. Impeded Audits for Oil Leases By EDMUND L. ANDREWS September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/business/21royalty.html?hp&ex=1158897600&en=6a768e6c6f4a155a&ei=5094&partner=homepage Only 25% in Poll Approve of the Congress By ADAM NAGOURNEY and JANET ELDER September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/us/politics/21poll.html?hp&ex=1158897600&en=ef00c357f1e7980c&ei=5094&partner=homepage When Is Thin Too Thin? By ERIC WILSON September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/fashion/21MODELS.html?_r=1&8dpc&oref=slogin At U.N., Chavez Calls Bush 'The Devil' By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 1:45 p.m. ET September 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-UN-Venezuela.html?hp&ex=1158811200&en=525846319c57aae6&ei=5094&partner=homepage FOCUS | Senate Bill on Torture and Detention Faces GOP Filibuster http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092006Z.shtml Pension Fund Tallies Losses and Rethinks Its Strategy By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH September 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/business/20pension.html Gaza: The children killed in a war the world doesn't want to know about By Donald Macintyre In Rafah Published: 19 September 2006 http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article1619227.ece G.M. Talked With Ford About Merger, Report Says By NICK BUNKLEY September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/business/19auto.html States Await Ruling on Use of Lethal Injection By ABBY GOODNOUGH September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/us/19death.html?ref=us Sarah Olson | Lieutenant Watada Faces New Charges http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/091806A.shtml Canadians Fault U.S. for Its Role in Torture Case By IAN AUSTEN September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/world/americas/19canada.html?_r=1&oref=slogin On India’s Farms, a Plague of Suicide By SOMINI SENGUPTA September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/world/asia/19india.html?hp&ex=1158724800&en=ce312104d42deb70&ei=5094&partner=homepage Deadly harvest: The Lebanese fields sown with cluster bombs Lebanese villagers must risk death in fields 'flooded' with more than a million Israeli cluster bombs - or leave crops to rot By Patrick Cockburn in Nabatiyeh Published: 18 September 2006 http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article1616665.ece U.S.-Mexico border fencing passes House - again Republican Congress votes to build wall of shame National Immigrant Solidarity Network The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday (9/14) voted in favor of building a fence along portions of the border with Mexico, the Secure Fence Act (H.R. 6061), this is no doubt a racist anti- immigrant bill, the vote had more to do with election year politics than solving immigration issues. September 15, 2006 http://www.immigrantsolidarity.org/ Iraq to Seal Off Baghdad Next Month By EDWARD WONG BAGHDAD, Iraq, Sept. 15 — The Iraqi government plans to seal off Baghdad next month by ringing it with a series of trenches and setting up dozens of traffic checkpoints to control movement in and out of the city of seven million people, an Interior Ministry spokesman said today. September 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/world/middleeast/16iraqcnd.html?hp&ex=1158379200&en=e07a513eed965c9f&ei=5094&partner=homepage Ford Takes New Steps to Cut Costs By MICHELINE MAYNARD DEARBORN, Mich., Sept. 15 — The Ford Motor Company said today that it would cut 10,000 more salaried jobs, close two more factories and eliminate its stock dividend, as the latest steps in a broad overhaul of its business that it calls the Way Forward. September 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/business/16fordcnd.html?hp&ex=1158379200&en=e3f03a9c648efed4&ei=5094&partner=homepage Ford to Offer Buyouts By REUTERS Filed at 1:25 a.m. ET DETROIT (Reuters) - Ford Motor Co. will offer buyout packages of up to $140,000 to all of the more than 75,000 workers at its U.S. plants, the United Auto Workers union said on Thursday, a day before the automaker details a revised turnaround plan in response to slumping sales. September 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-autos-ford-buyout.html?_r=1&oref=slogin Daimler Seeks Partners in China to Build Cars By KEITH BRADSHER BEIJING, Sept. 15 — DaimlerChrysler is in talks with companies in China and elsewhere for the export of subcompact cars to North America, the company chairman, Dieter Zetsche, said here today. The company has concluded that it cannot build its own subcompact cars in North America cheaply enough to make money on them, and must import them instead, Mr. Zetsche said. September 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/business/16chinacnd.html
Thursday, September 21, 2006
BAUAW NEWSLETTER - THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2006
THIS JUST IN! MORE OF THE SAME! THE WORLD CAN'T WAIT, OCT 5 PERMITS BEING STALLED! OPEN LETTER TO CITY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS By Bonnie Weinstein Gavin Newsom gavin.newsom@sfgov.org San Francisco Board of Supervisors board.of.supervisors@sfgov.org Sandy Lee sandy.lee@parks.sfgov.org Cindy Shamban cindy.shamban@sfmta.com;sfgov.org/dpt Crystal Stewart crystal.stewart@sfgov.org Heather Fong heather.fong@sfgov.org Dear City Government Officials and Interested Parties: The World Can't Wait group, sf@worldcantwait.org, has applied for permits to rally at Justin Herman Plaza at noon, OCT 5 to march on Market Street to a main rally with prominent speakers at 4PM in Union Square, and then to march back to Justin Herman Plaza for the all-night vigil to to demonstrate as part of the national day of mass resistance against the war called with actions across the country. The San Francisco Police Department has denied the march permit. The SF Recreation and Parks Department is responsible for permits at the sites and has not yet granted them. Again, the San Francisco City Government has denied the right to free speech and assembly to voices of resistance and opposition to the policies of this government. The bloodbath in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Lebanon, Haiti-- in nations around the world is continuing thanks to this hideous and corrupt government, the government of the United States, responsible for terror around the world. I do not support this government. It is corrupt, vicious and out to defend the wealthy at the expense of the planet itself--anything for the almighty dollar and the power it buys. I do not agree with everything that The World Can't Wait group has to say --we have friendly debates frequently--but I insist that they have the right to say it! The right to free speech and assembly is meaningless if the government at any level--city, state or federal--has the right to deny permits for no reason or dictate when and where we are allowed to demonstrate. Our group, People United for General and Unconditional Amnesty for All, was also denied our right to free speech and assembly-- based upon false statements made by the Police Department. I got an apology about one of the false statements but still, we were denied our permits and were subject to police intimidation. A large number of police were present at the time and location of our planned event last Saturday, Sept. 16th prepared to stop us if we attempted to use amplified sound or take to the street. With our permit denied we knew we would endanger many people if we tried to go ahead with our plans so we altered them to comply with the law. Which is why we tried to get permits in the first place. So that we could advertise a peaceful and legal rally. We arrive the day of our planned rally with a bullhorn to inform the community that the rally permits were denied and why. We handed out explanatory flyers to those who would take them and went ahead with our modest list of speakers. We then peacefully marched on the sidewalk to the Mission Police Station--the location of the source of the false statements --where we formed an orderly picket line for about an hour. We are very proud that we did this. And, we will not let this issue go. WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROTEST THE GOVERNMENT AND THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO SILENCE US! NOT ALLOWING PERMITS AND DENYING US THE RIGHT TO AMPLIFIED SOUND IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO EXACT HUGE FEES FROM PEOPLE IN ORDER JUST TO APPLY FOR PERMITS (We had to come up with over $700.00 just for the permits. We found we couldn't afford to rent a flatbed truck or any speakers so decided to just use our own speaker and speak from a milk-carton-type platform. The City couldn't even allow this!) FREE SPEECH IS FOR EVERYONE RICH OR POOR! WAVE THE FEES FOR POOR GROUPS WHO HAVE NO MEANS OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT. EVERY PERMIT APPLIED FOR MUST BE GRANTED UNLESS THERE IS A DAMNED GOOD REASON. The news of this and the city's insistence that A.N.S.W.E.R. pay tens of thousands of dollars in fines for posting information up in the community--a centuries-long practice of free speech and mass communication among the poor--among those without the billions of advertising dollars to spend--is already spreading shockwaves throughout the community. News of these permit denials and the harassment of A.N.S.W.E.R. Will serve to expose the real nature of the city government. What do we call a state that allows the Police to determine when, where, how and if an opposition demonstration can take place? We call that a Police State! What do we call those who do not stand up against this injustice? I can think of a few choice words. Why is it that the Zionists are afforded a location directly in front of antiwar protests? Why do the Right to Lifers get a police escort in a solidly pro-choice city? Why are mainstream politicians or even corporations catered to routinely with street closures, giant stages, sound systems, etc. when a small group of immigrants who wanted to use a small sound system and a very short street closure from Mission to Bartlett Streets on 24th Street for a total of two hours on one day was met with a show of force at both the ISCOTT hearing and at the location the demonstration was to take place--to see to it that it would not take place. How much money in Police overtime did we, the taxpayers, have to pay in order to squelch this small expression of free speech and assembly? How much to harass A.N.S.W.E.R.? The whole community witnessed what happened to the People United for General and Unconditional Amnesty for All on September 16th at 24th and Mission Street. The whole community notice the police show of force! The community also noticed a small but brave group of people who carried on as best we could with our rally. Standing on the lamp post on the corner and having our rally anyway with an ineffective bullhorn. The flyers, signs, posters and banners we carried and handed out said it all! The whole community also watched as this same small, gutsy group of about 50 people march to the Mission Police Station at 17th and Valencia and picketed them in protest of their denial of our permits. WE DEMAND YOU SEE TO IT THAT "THE WORLD CAN'T WAIT" PERMITS ARE GRANTED IMMEDIATELY! AND IMMEDIATELY DISMISS ALL OF A.N.S.W.E.R.'S FINES AND MAKE REPARATIONS TO THEM FOR THE HARASSMENT THEY HAVE HAD TO DEAL WITH! WE, AGAIN, ALSO DEMAND THAT OUR PERMIT FEES BE RETURNED TO US SINCE OUR PERMIT WAS DENIED UNDER FALSE PRETENCIS. You can't pick and choose who can demonstrate. That is not your prerogative if we are to claim to have freedom of speech and assembly. WE DEMAND OUR RIGHTS! Bonnie Weinstein People United For a General and Unconditional Amnesty Barrio Unido Por una Amnistia General e Incondicional 474 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Contact Persons: Cristina Gutierrez: 415-431-9925 Bonnie Weinstein: 415-824-8730 www.bauaw.org Text of flyer handed out Sept. 15th to the community: POLICE DENY PERMITS TO THE IMMIGRANTS OF THE PEOPLE UNITED PREVENTING US FROM ORGANIZING IN OUR OWN NEIGHBORHOOD IN ORDER TO DEMAND UNCONDITIONAL AND GENERAL AMNESTY The People United has been engaged in the application process since May 10th in order to celebrate our national holidays and find a real solution to our problems as immigrants and specifically for undocumented immigrants. The police have completely blocked all of the attempts we have made in having an assembly in our own neighborhood. There has been no possible negotiation, and furthermore the police had lied at the public hearing in order to deny us our permits. WHY? Because The People United is the only organization in San Francisco led by immigrants! Not by the sons of immigrants. Not by any democratic nor republican parties. Not by any so called left organizations or parties who claim they want to save us but won't listen to our demands. Not by organizations that receive governmental monies or who receive salaries in order to supposedly help us immigrants get papers. Not by democratic or republican parties who see us as their future votes. NO! We are a group of immigrants who demand a general and unconditional amnesty for all, we are not talking about using our people to go vote and elect people who never fulfill their promises. We denounce our governments of Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Colombia, Peru, etc., for not providing jobs in our countries and forcing us to leave them. We denounce the government of the United States for being an accomplice with the government of our countries. They work together to bring us here as a cheap source of labor and many times we are forced to become scabs. We denounce the government of the United States for planning disenfranchisement and dehumanization keeping us as an army of unemployed with no rights to health, education, or dignity. We denounce all the political parties and organizations that look at us as objects in order to achieve their political and economic needs and they deny us the right to organize ourselves and represent our own struggle. We denounce the police for the constant abuse of our people of which the negation of this permit of this assembly is just one more. Immigrant brothers and sisters, unite in the struggle for our rights and the general and unconditional amnesty for all!!!! MEETING Date: Thursday, September 21st Place: 474 Valencia St. Time: 7pM ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- QUOTE OF THE DAY: In an interview in March 1995 entitled, "Jesse Helms: Setting the Record Straight" that appeared in the Middle East Quarterly, Helms said, "I have long believed that if the United States is going to give money to Israel, it should be paid out of the Department of Defense budget. My question is this: If Israel did not exist, what would U.S. defense costs in the Middle East be? Israel is at least the equivalent of a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Middle East. Without Israel promoting its and America's common interests, we would be badly off indeed." (Jesse Helms was the senior senator from North Carolina and the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at the time.) http://www.meforum.org/article/244 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- !VIVA FIDEL! LONG LIVE FIDEL! LONG LIVE THE CUBAN REVOLUTION! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Harvest Time By Bonnie Weinstein Congress is postponing decisions about immigrant rights legislation until after the elections. They say they don't want to antagonize the Latino community before elections. But there is another reason. It's harvest time! They need thousands of immigrant workers to harvest the nations crops. They are not worried about antagonizing Latino's-it's America's agribusiness they don't want to upset. Clearly they don't want to deport all immigrants, they just want to be able to terrorize them into submission. What many American-born workers don't realize is that this threat will be extended to them as well-not deportation, of course-but the threat of being out of a job if they stand up for their rights. What are the common dangers that we face? At the stroke of a bosses pen we can be fired and find ourselves without a livelihood. Throughout America factories are being closed down and re-built in countries that force workers to live as slaves while a bonanza of U.S, tax-free, corporate profits flows freely across all borders and into the bosses' pockets. An even more sinister danger is the lure of U.S. Military service. All of our children and especially the children of undocumented workers are in danger of being used as cannon fodder to maintain the power and wealth of America's corporations. The Military is entrenched in our public schools. They don't go to the schools of the wealthy. To the children of immigrants they promise citizenship and to the children of poor, American workers they promise college and a career. But it does no good to become a citizen after you are dead and it's hard to have a career with half of your brain or body missing in action! On Tuesday, November 14th at 7:00 P.M., the San Francisco Board of Education will vote on whether to phase out the Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps-a military recruitment program for the High Schools. We must be there in force to see that they do so immediately, and that they rid the schools of all military recruiters! It is up to us so please come! That's Tuesday, November 14, 7:00 P.M., at 555 Franklin Street, First Floor. You can call the day before and the day of the meeting to get on the speakers list: 415-241-6427. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- WE EXTEND OUR SOLIDARITY TO A.N.S.W.E.R. IN THEIR STRUGGLE AGAINST THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO WHO, ACTING AS A BODY, ARE INCREASINGLY LIMITING OUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH (INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO POST PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS--A CENTURIES OLD TRADITION OF MASS COMMUNICATION FOR THE POOR) AND THE RIGHT TO FREE ASSEMBLY! Paid advertising in the mass media is prohibitive. Only those with millions of dollars to spend for advertising are allowed a public voice. Right here in San Francisco the fees for permits have skyrocketed and the permit process is long and complicated. The permit application for DPT is 17 pages long and full of rules and regulations that must be followed. And both the City and County and the ACLU have agreed that while we have the right to free speech, the City and County does, indeed, have the right to say when and where we may or may not exercise it. WE SAY NO! THE CITYS' OBLIGATION IS TO MAKE SURE OUR RIGHT TO ORGANIZE, PUBLICIZE AND PROTEST IS PROTECTED! AND THAT OUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH AND THE RIGHT TO HAVE DIRECT CONTACT WITH OUR OWN CONSTITUENCY IS GUARANTEED! We must be able to post public events, and hold public events where the people are. The San Francisco Police Department routinely protects the rights of the Zionists when they want to hold counter-demonstrations to our Antiwar actions. They also protect the "Right to Lifers" when they want to march down San Francisco's Embarcadero--HERE IN SAN FRANCISCO--A PRO-CHOICE CITY! The San Francisco Police Department goes all out to accommodate them! WHY NOT US! RESCHEDULED: ANSWER Postering Case Hearing We are appealing for your support as our free speech lawsuit against the San Francisco Department of Public Works (DPW) reaches a critical stage. As you may be aware from articles that have recently appeared in the Bay Guardian, the SF Weekly and elsewhere, the DPW is attempting to impose fines that now total more than $45,000 against the local ANSWER Coalition for postering violations. We just received word that the hearing for the ANSWER postering case has been put off for 2 weeks. The new date of the hearing is Thurs. Sept. 28, 9:30am at Superior Court, 400 McAllister St. (corner Polk St., SF), 3rd Floor, Dept. 302. If you can, please join us at the hearing two weeks from today to show your support. If you would like to read a copy of attorney Ben Rosenfeld’s reply to the city's response to our lawsuit, which summarizes the main points of our position, please contact us at 415-821-6545 or answer@actionsf.org. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- STOP THE WAR! BRING ALL THE TROOPS HOME NOW! MONEY FOR HUMAN NEEDS NOT WAR! MARCH AND RALLY SATURDAY, 10/28 (TIME AND LOCATION TBA) ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THIS JUST IN: ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- The Democratic Party's redevelopment plan is stopped by Petition campaign until 2000! House Speaker Pelosi's, the Board of Supervisor's, and the Mayor's plans to help the housing profiteers is stopped. "The Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Area, passed on by the Board of Supervisors 7-4 , and signed into law by the Mayor on June 1, 2006, is now officially suspended pending an election at which the voters will be given the opportunity to decide. The election will most likely take place during a normally scheduled general election in 2007." SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 Just before 5 pm today, Tuesday, September 12, 2006, John Arntz, Director of Elections for the City and County of San Francisco officially certified that the REFERENDUM PETITION opposing the creation of a Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Area as successful. The Department of Elections found that more than the minimum number of 21,615 valid signatures were submitted by Petition sponsors. Sponsors had submitted in excess of 33,000 signatures on August 30th, 2006 after a 90 day signature gathering drive. San Francisco has not seen a successful referendum petition drive in decades. A referendum allows San Francisco voters to decide on the merits of legislation passed by the Board of Supervisors. WHAT THIS MEANS: The Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Area, passed on by the Board of Supervisors 7-4 , and signed into law by the Mayor on June 1, 2006, is now officially suspended pending an election at which the voters will be given the opportunity to decide. The election will most likely take place during a normally scheduled general election in 2007. SUPPORTES HAIL VICTORY: Petition supporters hailed the results as a victory for democracy and echoed their campaign slogan "Let the Voters Decide! Petition supporter , Willie Ratcliff,publisher of the Bayview Newspaper said "This special interest legislation was never about the benefiting the community. Now ,finally, the will of the voters can be expressed democratically, at the ballot." CONTACT FOR FURTHER INFO: Brian Murphy O'Flynn 415-867-4370 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- SCROLL DOWN TO READ: EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ARTICLES IN FULL LINKS ONLY ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- TWO EVENTS TO PROTEST POLITICAL KILLINGS IN THE PHILIPPINES THURS. SEPT. 21 INTERNATIONAL DAY OF ACTION 4pm, Powell & Market, San Francisco Commemoration of 34th Anniversary of the Declaration of Martial Law & Candle-light March for 750 Killed & Over 100 Disappeared Under US-Arroyo Regime 4:00 pm meet at Powell and Market (North side of Market near Cable Car stop) 4:30 pm March to Philippine Consulate (447 Sutter St. @ Powell) 5:00 pm Speak out and commemorate victims of political killings at Consulate 5:30 pm March to Civic Center to join the Interfaith Candle Light Vigil A Declaration of Peace activity on the occasion of International Peace Day 7:00 PM, Ecumenical Service Bethlehem Lutheran Church, 959-12th St. Oakland, California “Commemorative Night for the victims of political killings and martial law.” ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Celebrate International Peace Day Sep 21 2006 - 7:30am Organization: CodePINK: Women For Peace Contact Name: Sam Joi Contact Email: mzsam@bayareacodepink.org Contact Phone: 510-524-2776 We will celebrate International Peace Day by beginning with a march across the Golden Gate Bridge during early morning rush hour. We will have banners "DECLARE PEACE" and "RISE, WOMEN, RISE" as we march. Wear hot pink, bring noise makers, signs, dress warm! We will meet in both parking lots at the north & south end of the bridge around 7:30a.m. and begin to march at 8:00a.m. We would like this to be a women-led march with our allies joining us. Location North & South Vista Points Parking Lots, Golden Gate Bridge Highway 101 South Parkig lot last SF exit San Francisco & Marin, CA, 94112 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Free the Cuban Five! September 23, 2006 Washington, DC Breaking News... On Aug. 9, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued its en banc decision denying a new trial to the Cuban Five. On August 10, the National Committee to Free the Cuban Five, together with the National Lawyers Guild, sponsored an emergency press conference in Washington in response to the decision. A partial transcript to that press conference, in English and Spanish, is here. A March on the White House will be held on September 23 to continue to press forward with efforts to free the Five. We urge all supporters to make every effort to join us on that march. A public demonstration of support for the Five, and outrage at their continued imprisonment, has never been more vital. Details of the march are found at the website below. Join us in Washington on Sept. 23! Free the Cuban Five! http://www.freethefive.org/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- IRAN WAR PERIL — EX-CIA MAN’S SF TALK SEPT. 24 The "threat" from Iran: Are mushroom clouds ahead? Ray McGovern, a CIA analyst for 27 years, addresses that issue at 12:45 p.m. Sunday, September 24, in the First Unitarian Universalist Church (Starr King Room), Franklin and Geary Streets, San Francisco. McGovern will touch on Iraq too: "How we got in and how we get out." Last May in Atlanta, national TV networks showed him accusing Defense Secretary Rumsfeld of prewar lying about supposed Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. McGovern founded Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity. He served the Central Intelligence Agency from the Kennedy Administration to that of George H. W. Bush. Awarded an Intelligence Commendation Medal, he returned it following the revelations of torture. There will be a question period until about 2 p.m. Optional lunch (bring it or buy it) precedes the program at 12:15. Cosponsors are the church’s World Community Advocates and the War and Law League (WALL). Following the program, WALL conducts its biennial meeting. It is a nonpartisan, all-volunteer, San Francisco-based group that opposes presidential wars and aims at the rule of law in U.S. foreign affairs. Public transit to the Unitarian Church includes Muni's 47 and 49 bus lines on Van Ness Avenue, one block east of Franklin, and the 38-Geary bus(which connects with BART at the Montgomery Street Station). For further information: (415) 738-8298 or (415) 564-2083; warandlaw@yahoo.com; http://warandlaw.org. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THE DECLARATION OF PEACE “WITNESS TO PEACE: PROTEST AND CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE TO SAVE THE LIVES OF OUR CHILDREN” ANOTHER WORLD IS POSSIBLE! Meet at Military Recruiting Office Monday, September 25, 2006, 4:00 P.M.-6:00 P.M. Stonestown Ocean Recruiting Station 561 Buckingham Way (Across the street from the mall.) Eyes Wide Open Boots and Shoes Exhibit: The Numbers Increase The Declaration of Peace The Declaration of Peace (www.declarationofpeace.org) is a nationwide campaign to establish a concrete and rapid plan for peace in Iraq. In August and September Congressional visits have urged our Members of Congress to sign on to end this militaristic adventure in Iraq. IF CONSCIENCE LEADS YOU, TRAIN AND JOIN WITH ACTIVISTS OF FAITH IN A NON VIOLENT ACTION TO END MILITARISM AND THE WAR IN IRAQ PREPARATION AND TRAININGS September 23, Saturday 1-5 p.m. Non-Violence Training, San Francisco First Unitarian Universalist Society, 1187 Franklin Street at Geary Get information as it develops. Contact Sandra Schwartz at (415) 565-0201 x 24 or email sschwartz@afsc.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "No Thanks Bechtel!" ...for the Iraq war ...for undermining democracy ...for sick Iraqi children ...for destruction of the environment ...for nuclear weapons Join us! Wednesday, Sept 27, 4:00 PM Bechtel Corporate Headquaters, 50 Beale St, San Francisco Half a block east from Embarcadero BART DECLARE Peace - an end to war and war profiteering! For more info on this event, please contact Lacy MacAuley at Butterfly@Lacy.com. For more info on Declaration of Peace, including a full calendar of events, please visit: http://www.declarationofpeace.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- WHY DOES PROP 85 ENDANGER TEEN SAFETY Dear Health Care Activist, Parents care most about keeping their teenagers safe. That means always safe, even if they feel they can’t talk to their parents about an unplanned pregnancy. Parental notification laws cause young women to delay seeking medical care. When desperate teenagers turn to back-alley abortions many will suffer serious injuries and some will die. You are invited to our Saturday, September 30 health care meeting on "Why Proposition 85 is bad for our health." The 3pm meeting will be 4760 Mission in San Francisco, between Ocean and Geneva at Russia. It is 5 blocks from the Balboa BART station. Proposition is 85 is a re-run of the 2004 ballot initiative, Proposition 73. Groups in opposition to prop 85 include: The California Federation of Labor, The California Medical Association, The California Academy of Family Physicians, The California Nurses Association, American Academy of Pediatrics-California District, The Adolescent Health Collaborative, Health Care of All, The League of Women Voters, and Planned Parenthood. The State AFL-CIO at its July convention voted to oppose this attack on reproductive rights. Don Bechler Chair - California Universal Health Care Organizing Project Chair - Health Care for All - San Francisco chapter 415-695-7891 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Brian Ashley will report on the new stage of the struggle for liberation in South Africa October 1, 2006 2:00 PM - 5:00 PM Refreshments @ 2:00 PM Brian to speak @ 3:00 PM Q & A to follow Hosted By Alice & Frank Fried 742 Palmera Court Alameda, CA 94501 510.769.0599 About Brian Ashley: Brian Ashley has been an activist in the South African liberation struggle having gone into exile in Zimbabwe in 1984. He is the founder and director of the Alternative Information and Development Centre, AIDC, a radical advocacy NGO mobilising against neoliberal globalisation and its impact in South Africa and Southern Africa. He helped form the Jubilee 2000 anti- debt movement in South Africa and the global Jubilee South movement that fights against debt domination by the International Financial Institutions and the G8 countries. He is active in the World Social Forum representing AIDC on the WSF International Council and the African Social Forum Council. He is also a leading member of the Palestinian Solidarity Committee. Apart from being active in a number of social movements in SA he is a board member of the Congress of South African Trade Unions, COSATU led Working Partnerships Research and Education Agency. A collection will be taken to support South African Solidarity Work Frank Fried ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Urgent call from October 22 Coalition against Police Brutality, SF October 22 Coalition against Police Brutality, Repression and Criinalization of a generation National Day of Protest, March and Rally in SF, Planning NO MORE STOLEN LIVES ! NO MAS VIDAS ROBADAS ! Contact: mesha Monge-Irizarry Idriss Stelley Foundation (415) 595-8251 24HR Bilingual Spa. Crisis line iolmisha@cs. com How: Already involved are : October 22 Bay Area, Idriss Stelley Foundation, SF CEDP (Campaign to End the Death Penalty, ISO (International Socialist Organization, Bay Area), Bay Area Families of Victims and Survivors of Police brutality, Code Pink http://www.october22.org/ GET INVOLVED: To join our mailing list, please write to: sf1022-talk-subscribe@lists.riseup.net ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- U.S. Out of Iraq Now! We Are the Majority! End Colonial Occupation from Iraq, to Palestine, Haiti, and Everywhere! October 28 National Day of Action Locally Coordinated Anti-War Protests from Coast to Coast Vote With Your Feet … and Your Voices, and Banners, and Signs! Let Every Politician Feel the Power of the People! http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?abbr=ANS_&page=NewsArticle&id=7836 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- October 28 National Day of Action Locally Coordinated Anti-War Protests from Coast to Coast Vote With Your Feet … and Your Voices, and Banners, and Signs! Let Every Politician Feel the Power of the People! http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?abbr=ANS_&page=NewsArticle&id=7836 http://www.actionsf.org/ http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?abbr=ANS_&page=NewsArticle&id=7869 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- End Canada's Occupation of Afghanistan! Call for action on October 28, 2006 This call for a pan-Canadian day of action, co-signed by the Canadian Peace Alliance, the Canadian Islamic Congress, the Canadian Labour Congress and the Montreal coalition Echec a la Guerre, is being distributed and discussed at the World Peace Forum now taking place in Vancouver. -SV The Collectif Échec à la guerre, Canadian Peace Alliance, the Canadian Labour Congress, and the Canadian Islamic Congress are jointly calling for a pan- Canadian day of protest this October 28th, 2006, to bring Canadian troops home from Afghanistan. On that day, people all across the country will unite to tell Stephen Harper that we are opposed to his wholehearted support for Canadian and U.S. militarism. This October marks the fifth anniversary of the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and the people of that country are still suffering from the ravages of war. Reconstruction in the country is at a standstill and the needs of the Afghan people are not being met. The rule of the new Afghan State, made up largely of drug running warlords, will not realize the democratic aspirations of the people there. In fact, according to Human Rights Watch reports, the human rights record of those warlords in recent years has not been better than the Taliban. We are told that the purpose of this war is to root out terrorism and protect our societies, yet the heavy-handed approach of a military occupation trying to impose a US-friendly government on the Afghan people will force more Afghans to become part of the resistance movement. It will also make our societies more -- not less -- likely to see terrorist attacks. No discussion on military tactics in the House of Commons will change that reality. Indeed, violence is increasing with more attacks on both coalition troops and on Afghan civilians. While individual Canadian soldiers may have gone to Afghanistan with the best of intentions, they are operating under the auspices of a US-led state building project that cares little or the needs of the Afghan people. US and Canadian interests rest with the massive $3.2 billion Trans Afghan Pipeline (TAP) project, which will bring oil from the Caspian region through southern Afghanistan (where Canada is stationed) and onto the ports of Pakistan. It has been no secret that the TAP has dominated US foreign policy towards Afghanistan for the last decade. Now Canadian oil and gas corporations have their own interests in the TAP. Over the last decade, the role of the Canadian Armed Forces abroad has changed, and Canadian foreign policy has become a replica of the US empire-building rhetoric. The end result of this process is now plain to see with the role of our troops in Southern Afghanistan, with the enormous budget increases for war expenditures and "security," with the Bush-style speeches of Stephen Harper, and with the fear campaigns around "homegrown terrorism" to foster support for those nefarious changes. It is this very course that will get young Canadian soldiers killed, that will endanger our society and consume more and more of its resources for destruction and death in Afghanistan. We demand a freeze in defense and security budgets until an in-depth public discussion is held on those issues across Canada. The mission in Afghanistan has already cost Canadians more than $4 billion. That money could have been used to fund human needs in Canada or abroad. Instead it is being used to kill civilians in Afghanistan and advance the interests of corporations. On October 28th, stand up and be counted. Canadian Troops Out of Afghanistan Now! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- San Francisco Board of Education Meeting Tuesday, November 14th, 7PM 555 Franklin Street, 1st Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 415/241-6427 The Board will vote on a resolution to phase out JROTC. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Close the SOA and Change Oppressive U.S. Foreign Policy Nov. 17-19, 2006 - Converge on Fort Benning, Georgia People's Movements across the Americas are becoming increasingly more powerful. Military "solutions" to social problems as supported by institutions like the School of the Americas were unable to squash their voices, and the call for justice and accountability is getting louder each day. Add your voice to the chorus, demand justice for all the people of the Americas and engage in nonviolent direct action to close the SOA and change oppressive U.S. foreign policy. With former SOA graduates being unmasked in Chile, Argentina, Colombia, Paraguay, Honduras, and Peru for their crimes against humanity, and with the blatant similarities between the interrogation methods and torture methods used at Abu Ghraib and those described in human rights abuse cases in Latin America, the SOA/WHINSEC must be held accountable! Visit http://www.soaw.org to learn more about the November Vigil, hotel and travel information, the November Organizing Packet, and more. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Shop for a Donation at Al-Awda! Interested in furthering your knowledge about Palestine and its people? Want to help make the Palestinian Right to Return a reality? Looking for ways to show your support for Palestine and Palestinian refugees? Why not shop for a donation at Al-Awda http://al-awda.org/shop.html and help support a great organization and cause!! Al-Awda offers a variety of educational materials including interesting and unique books on everything from oral histories, photo books on Palestinian refugees, to autobiographies, narratives, political analysis, and culture. We also have historical maps of Palestine (in Arabic and English), educational films, flags of various sizes, and colorful greeting cards created by Palestinian children. You can also show your support for a Free Palestine, and wear with pride, great looking T-shirts, pendants, and a variety of Palestine pins. Shop for a Donation at Al-Awda! Visit http://al-awda.org/shop.html for these great items, and more! The Educational Supplies Division Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition PO Box 131352 Carlsbad, CA 92013, USA Tel: 760-685-3243 Fax: 360-933-3568 E-mail: info@al-awda.org WWW: http://al-awda.org Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition (PRRC), is a broad- based, non-partisan, democratic, and charitable organization of grassroots activists and students committed to comprehensive public education about the rights of all Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and lands of origin, and to full restitution for all their confiscated and destroyed property in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International law and the numerous United Nations Resolutions upholding such rights (see FactSheet). Al-Awda, PRRC is a not for profit tax-exempt educational and charitable 501(c)(3) organization as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of the United States of America. Under IRS guidelines, your donations to Al-Awda, PRRC are tax-deductible. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- IN VOGUE: Unspeakably grotesque, This spread was so galling I felt a primal scream rising inside me. And it was not because I am a woman. The link is http://www.voguevan ity.it/cont/ 060hvg/default. asp The wounds of "western civilization" inflict themselves over and over...unapologetic , shameless...ditto BW http://www.voguevanity.it/cont/060hvg/default.asp ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- A CALL TO SUPPORT THE CASE OF ELVIRA ARELLANO Stand in solidarity with all immigrants, documented and undocumented The IAC urges you to support the case of Elvira Arellano. Elvira is an undocumented worker who is taking a heroic stand against deportations and fighting for her rights. She is a native of Michoacán, Mexico who came to the U.S. like many of the other 12 million undocumented in this country, in search of work and a better life. In 2002, Elvira was detained by Homeland Security agents in an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sweep at O’Hare Airport in Chicago under the guise of allegedly looking for “terrorists”. She was detained by the Department of Homeland Security for using a false social security number on her job at O’Hare. On August 18, 2006 Elvira Arellano and her seven year old son, Saul who is a US citizen, took sanctuary in Adalberto United Methodist Church in Chicago instead of reporting for deportation, primarily because Saul has health problems. She has pledged to live indefinitely in the church until granted a reprieve. Elvira is a well known activist, representing many families in Congressional hearings and speaking on behalf of immigrant rights. She worked to organize in July 2005 a march of 50,000 for immigrant rights in Chicago, and went on a hunger strike to support workers who were picked up by ICE prior to the historic May 1st boycott in 2006. Arellano was a founder of both La Familia Latina Unida and the Coalition of African Arab Asian European and Latino Immigrants of Illinois (CAAAELII). The case of Elvira Arellano is a just case Elvira Arellano has become the symbol of resistance to the heartless and callous deportations that are sweeping the country. Despite a legislative standstill in Congress, not only are deportations escalating, local officials around the nation are implementing de facto immigration policy that amount to a witch-hunt against immigrants. A case in point is the anti-immigrant ordinance that passed in July in Hazelton, PA. Due to her heroic stand, a group of Black ministers spoke last week at Adalberto Methodist of the comparisons of Arellano to Rosa Parks. Reverend Albert Tyson said he hopes “their support would increase the bonds between Latinos and African- Americans.” At the meeting Arellano said, “I don’t only speak for me and my son, but for millions of families like mine.” Supporters from the predominantly Puerto Rican neighborhood chanted, “Luchando mano y mano, Boriqua y Mexicano!” (“Fighting hand in hand, Puerto Rican and Mexican!”) Elvira Arellano is the perfect example that the anti-immigrant hysteria sweeping the country is an inhumane situation that has become intolerable. The human rights of immigrants are being cruelly violated under the guise of fighting terrorism or stopping “illegal” immigration. In fact, no human being is illegal and whether in the U.S. documented or undocumented, immigrants have a right to live in peace, without fear of evictions from their homes or the country. How you can help Elvira: 1. Write letters to Illinois Senators Richard Durbin and Barack Obama as well as your own legislator urging them to prevent her deportation. For Senator Durbin visit: http://durbin.senate.gov/contact.cfm#contact For Senator Obama: http://obama.senate.gov/contact/index.php 2. Send Letters to the Chicago Sun Times and the Chicago Tribune asking them to stop demonizing Elvira as well as all immigrants. Their emails are letters@suntimes.com and ctc-tribletter@tribune.com. 3. Send letters of support directly to Elvira at the organization she works with and who has been spearheading her support, Sin Fronteras at Centro Sin Fronteras 2300 S. Blue Island Ave., Chicago IL 60608 or visit the website: www.legalizationyes.com For Spanish speakers visit: www.legalizacionsi.com ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- TWO AMICUS BRIEFS FILED FOR MUMIA ABU-JAMAL WITH THE 3RD CIRCUIT FEDERAL APPEALS COURT IN JULY 2006 These pdf files can be found on Michael Schiffmann's web site at: http://againstthecrimeofsilence.de/english/copy_of_mumia/legalarchive/ The first brief is from the National Lawyers Guild. The second brief is from the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Howard Keylor For the Labor Action Committee to Free Mumia Abu-Jamal www.laboractionmumia.org. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- SIR! NO SIR! I urge everyone to get a copy of "Sir! No Sir!" at: http://www.sirnosir.com/ It is an extremely informative and powerful film of utmost importance today. I was a participant in the anti-Vietnam war movement. What a powerful thing it was to see troops in uniform leading the march against the war! If you would like to read more here are two very good publications: Out Now!: A Participant's Account of the Movement in the United States Against the Vietnam War by Fred Halstead (Hardcover - Jun 1978) and: GIs speak out against the war;: The case of the Ft. Jackson 8; by Fred Halstead (Unknown Binding - 1970). Both available at: http://www.amazon.com/gp/search/103-1123166-0136605?search-alias=books&rank=+availability,-proj-total-margin&field-author=Fred%20Halstead In solidarity, Bonnie Weinstein ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Endorse the following petition: Don't Let Idaho Kill Endangered Wolves Target: Fish and Wildlife Service Sponsor: Defenders of Wildlife http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/664280276?z00m=99090&z00m=99090<l=1155834550 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THIS JUST IN: THE KPFA PROGRAM COUNCIL HAS TURNED DOWN THE SHOW! SUPPORT "TAKING AIM" produced by Ralph Schoenman and Mya Shone. LET KPFA KNOW WE ARE DISAPPOINTED! To contact KPFA PROGRAM COUNCIL email: programcouncil@lists.kpfa.org KPFA's Tracy Rosenberg voted to air "Taking Aim" and we commend her for it. You can thank her by writing her at: tracyrose@gmail.com In solidarity, Bonnie Weinstein Here's my letter to the KPFA Program Council:: To: KPFA PROGRAM COUNCIL programcouncil@lists.kpfa.org KPFA RADIO Re: "Taking Aim" Dear Council Members, We are very disappointed that KPFA decided not to air the extremely important show, "Taking Aim" produced by Ralph Schoenman and Mya Shone. Of course, we are also disappointed by your reluctance to air a PSA for a rally to defend death row inmate, renowned commentator, leader and writer, Mumia Abu-Jamal, because the group that sponsored the rally was not a 501c3, non-profit, semi-corporation. I am happy to say that I did hear it announced in the Community Calendar during Denis Bernstein's "Flashpoints," Thursday evening, 9/14, the day before the rally. But I'm sorry to say that I did not hear the PSA. God only knows, the downtrodden need a public voice more than ever. Organizers are not even allowed to post up posters and announcements anymore in San Francisco. A.N.S.W.E.R. is currently in a battle over the right to practice this centuries-old custom of "posting up" for meetings, marches and rallies--historically one of the only venues of mass communication freely available to the poor. "Taking Aim" is a program that express that public voice. KPFA is also supposed to express that public voice. Now is not the time to silence it! Please reconsider your decision not to air "Taking Aim." And end the prohibition against airing the PSAs of non-501c3 groups and organizations--after all, aren't they the grass roots of the matter? Sincerely, Bonnie Weinstein, www.bauaw.org 415-824-8730 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- END ALL U.S. AID TO ISRAEL! Stop funding Israel's war against Palestine Complete the form at the website listed below with your information. Personalize the message text on the right with your own words, if you wish. Click the Next Step button to send your letter to these decision makers: President George W. Bush Vice President Richard 'Dick' B. Cheney Your Senators Your Representative Go here to register your outrage: https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Advocacy? JServSessionIdr003=cga2p2o6x1.app2a&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=177 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Idriss Stelley Foundation is in critical financial crisis, please help ! ISF is in critical financial crisis, and might be forced to close its doors in a couple of months due to lack of funds to cover DSL, SBC and utilities, which is a disaster for our numerous clients, since the are the only CBO providing direct services to Victims (as well as extended failies) of police misconduct for the whole city of SF. Any donation, big or small will help us stay alive until we obtain our 501-c3 nonprofit Federal Status! Checks can me made out to ISF, ( 4921 3rd St , SF CA 94124 ). Please consider to volunteer or apply for internship to help covering our 24HR Crisis line, provide one on one couseling and co facilitate our support groups, M.C a show on SF Village Voice, insure a 2hr block of time at ISF, moderate one of our 26 websites for ISF clients ! http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeo9ewi/idrissstelleyfoundation/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/isf23/ Report Police Brutality 24HR Bilingual hotline (415) 595-8251 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Justice4Asa/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Appeal for funds: Dahr Jamail's Iraq Dispatches Visit the Dahr Jamail Iraq website http://dahrjamailiraq.com Request for Support Dahr Jamail will soon return to the Middle East to continue his independent reporting. As usual, reporting independently is a costly enterprise; for example, an average hotel room is $50, a fixer runs $50 per day, and phone/food average $25 per day. Dahr will report from the Middle East for one month, and thus needs to raise $5,750 in order to cover his plane ticket and daily operating expenses. A rare opportunity has arisen for Dahr to cover several stories regarding the occupation of Iraq, as well as U.S. policy in the region, which have been entirely absent from mainstream media. With the need for independent, unfiltered information greater than ever, your financial support is deeply appreciated. Without donations from readers, ongoing independent reports from Dahr are simply not possible. All donations go directly towards covering Dahr's on the ground operating expenses. (c)2006 Dahr Jamail. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- New Flash Film From Young Ava Over At 'Peace Takes Courage' http://www.peacetakescourage.com/page-blog.htm http://letter.cf.huffingtonpost.com/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Save the Lebanese Civilians Petition http://epetitions.net/julywar/index.php http://donations.tayyar.org/ To The Concerned Citizen of The World: http://epetitions.net/julywar/index.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Legal update on Mumia Abu-Jamal’s case Excerpts from a letter written by Robert R. Bryan, the lead attorney for death row political prisoner, Mumia Abu-Jamal. ...On July 20, 2006, we filed the Brief of Appellee and Cross Appellant, Mumia Abu-Jamal, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Philadelphia. http://www.workers.org/2006/us/mumia-0810/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Today in Palestine! For up to date information on Israeli's brutal attack on human rights and freedom in Palestine and Lebanon go to: http://www.theheadlines.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- For a great car magnet--a black ribbon with the words, "Bring the troops home now!" written in red, and it also comes in a lapel pin!--go to: (Put out by A.N.S.W.E.R.) https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Ecommerce?store_id=1621 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF ZIONISM BY RALPH SCHOENMAN Essential reading for understanding the development of Zionism and Israel in the service of British and USA imperialism. The full text of the book can be found for free at: http://www.marxists.de/middleast/schoenman/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- JOIN THE LYNNE STEWAR DEFENSE For those of you who don't know who Lynne Stewart is, go to www.lynnestewart.org and get acquainted with Lynne and her cause. Lynne is a criminal defense attorney who is being persecuted for representing people charged with heinous crimes. It is a bedrock of our legal system that every criminal defendant has a right to a lawyer. Persecuting Lynne is an attempt to terrorize and intimidate all criminal defense attorneys in this country so they will stop representing unpopular people. If this happens, the fascist takeover of this nation will be complete. We urge you all to go the website, familiarize yourselves with Lynne and her battle for justice www.lynnestewart.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- NATIONAL COMMITTEE TO FREE THE CUBAN FIVE Comité Nacional por la Libertad de los Cinco Cubanos Who are the Cuban Five? The Cuban Five are five Cuban men who are in U.S. prison, serving four life sentences and 75 years collectively, after being wrongly convicted in U.S. federal court in Miami, on June 8, 2001. They are Gerardo Hernández, Ramón Labañino, Antonio Guerrero, Fernando González and René González. The Five were falsely accused by the U.S. government of committing espionage conspiracy against the United States, and other related charges. But the Five pointed out vigorously in their defense that they were involved in monitoring the actions of Miami-based terrorist groups, in order to prevent terrorist attacks on their country of Cuba. The Five’s actions were never directed at the U.S. government. They never harmed anyone nor ever possessed nor used any weapons while in the United States. The Cuban Five’s mission was to stop terrorism For more than 40 years, anti-Cuba terrorist organizations based in Miami have engaged in countless terrorist activities against Cuba, and against anyone who advocates a normalization of relations between the U.S. and Cuba. More than 3,000 Cubans have died as a result of these terrorists’ attacks. Gerardo Hernández, 2 Life Sentences Antonio Guerrero, Life Sentence Ramon Labañino, Life Sentence Fernando González, 19 Years René González, 15 Years Free The Cuban Five Held Unjustly In The U.S.! http://www.freethefive.org/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Eyewitness Account from Oaxaca A website is now being circulated that has up-to-date info and video that can be downloaded of the police action and developments in Oaxaca. For those who have not seen it elsewhere, the website is: www.mexico.indymedia.org/oaxaca http://www.mexico.indymedia.org/oaxaca ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- REMINDER TO ALL GROUPS: BE SURE AND POST ALL ACTIONS AND EVENTS TO WWW.INDYBAY.ORG TO REACH THE MOST PEOPLE AGAINST THE WAR IN THE BAY AREA! http://www.indybay.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Iraq Body Count For current totals, see our database page. http://www.iraqbodycount.net/press/pr13.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- The Cost of War [Over three-hundred-billion so far...bw] http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "The Democrats always promise to help workers, and the don't! The Republicans always promise to help business, and the do!" - Mort Sahl ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Emilano Zapata ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Join the Campaign to Shut Down the Guantanamo Torture Center Go to: http://www.shutitdown.org/ to send a letter to Congress and the White House: Shut Down Guantanamo and all torture centers and prisons. A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition Act Now to Stop War & End Racism http://www.ANSWERcoalition.org http://www.actionsf.org sf@internationalanswer.org 2489 Mission St. Rm. 24 San Francisco: 415-821-6545 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Great Counter-Recruitment Website http://notyoursoldier.org/article.php?list=type&type=14 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- DEFEND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND CIVIL RIGHTS! Last summer the U.S. Border Patrol arrested Shanti Sellz and Daniel Strauss, both 23-year-old volunteers assisting immigrants on the border, for medically evacuating 3 people in critical condition from the Arizona desert. Criminalization for aiding undocumented immigrants already exists on the books in the state of Arizona. Daniel and Shanti are targeted to be its first victims. Their arrest and subsequent prosecution for providing humanitarian aid could result in a 15-year prison sentence. Any Congressional compromise with the Sensenbrenner bill (HR 4437) may include these harmful criminalization provisions. Fight back NOW! Help stop the criminalization of undocumented immigrants and those who support them! For more information call 415-821- 9683. For information on the Daniel and Shanti Defense Campaign, visit www.nomoredeaths.org. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- FYI According to "Minimum Wage History" at http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/anth484/minwage.html " "Calculated in real 2005 dollars, the 1968 minimum wage was the highest at $9.12. "The 8 dollar per hour Whole Foods employees are being paid $1.12 less than the 1968 minimum wage. "A federal minimum wage was first set in 1938. The graph shows both nominal (red) and real (blue) minimum wage values. Nominal values range from 25 cents per hour in 1938 to the current $5.15/hr. The greatest percentage jump in the minimum wage was in 1950, when it nearly doubled. The graph adjusts these wages to 2005 dollars (blue line) to show the real value of the minimum wage. Calculated in real 2005 dollars, the 1968 minimum wage was the highest at $9.12. Note how the real dollar minimum wage rises and falls. This is because it gets periodically adjusted by Congress. The period 1997-2006, is the longest period during which the minimum wage has not been adjusted. States have departed from the federal minimum wage. Washington has the highest minimum wage in the country at $7.63 as of January 1, 2006. Oregon is next at $7.50. Cities, too, have set minimum wages. Santa Fe, New Mexico has a minimum wage of $9.50, which is more than double the state minimum wage at $4.35." ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- NO BORDERS! NO WALLS! NO FENCES! GENERAL AMNESTY FOR ALL! OUR HOMELAND IS WHERE WE LIVE! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- REPEAL THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT IN 2007! Check out: 10 EXCELLENT REASONS NOT TO JOIN THE MILITARY http://www.10reasonsbook.com/ Public Law print of PL 107-110, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 [1.8 MB] http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html Also, the law is up before Congress again in 2007. See this article from USA Today: Bipartisan panel to study No Child Left Behind By Greg Toppo, USA TODAY February 13, 2006 http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-02-13-education-panel_x.htm ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies http://www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/declaration.html http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/decind.html http://www.usconstitution.net/declar.html http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805195.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Bill of Rights http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805182.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- ARTICLES IN FULL: ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 1) Raúl Castro Speaks Out Against U.S. at Summit Talks By MARC LACEY September 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/16/world/americas/16cuba.html 2) Immigration raid cripples Ga. town By RUSS BYNUM, Associated Press Writer Fri Sep 15, 2:13 PM ET http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060915/ap_on_re_us/immigration_aftermath_1 3) Mexico: 1 million strong Convention elects “legitimate government” By Jorge Martin Monday, 18 September 2006 http://www.marxist.com 4) U.S. to Maintain Iraq Force Levels By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 12:37 p.m. ET September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-US-Iraq.html?hp&ex=1158724800&en=52aa0f7e7bbbd51a&ei=5094&partner=homepage 5) Thai Prime Minister Declares State of Emergency By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 12:43 p.m. ET September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Thailand.html?hp&ex=1158724800&en=7088b6ed163114a6&ei=5094&partner=homepage 6) Seeing Huge Losses, Chrysler Slashes Production By MICHELINE MAYNARD September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/business/20autocnd.html?hp&ex=1158724800&en=0774124b74af9322&ei=5094&partner=homepage 7) U.S. Resorting to 'Collective Punishment' Inter Press Service Dahr Jamail and Ali al-Fadhily Dahr Jamail's Iraq Dispatches http://dahrjamailiraq.com 8) Rules for the Real World New York Times Editorial September 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/opinion/20wed1.html?_r=1&oref=slogin 9) Canadian Man Tortured in Syria Wants Explanation From U.S. By IAN AUSTEN http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/world/americas/20canada.html 10) Border Fence Must Skirt Objections From Arizona Tribe By RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD September 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/washington/20fence.html?ref=us 11) Update on Suzanne Swift September 19th, 2006. 101 days since her arrest. formydaughtersuzanne@yahoo.com http://suzanneswift.org/ 12) City Hall declares war on the people of Bayview Hunters Point by Willie Ratcliff sfbayview@lists.riseup.net 13) President Chavez's Speech to the United Nations By: President Hugo Chavez Friday, Sep 16, 2005 http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/print.php?artno=1555 14) Home Raids Provoke Increased Unrest Inter Press Service Dahr Jamail and Ali al-Fadhily Dahr Jamail's Iraq Dispatches http://dahrjamailiraq.com 15) G.O.P. in Senate Narrows Immigration Focus to 700-Mile Fence By CARL HULSE September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/washington/21immig.html?ref=us 16) Many Theories on Income Inequality, but One Answer Lies in Just a Few Places HAL R. VARIAN September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/business/21scene.html 17) IOF Kill 5 Civilians in the Gaza Strip, including 3 Children, & Injures 7 others; Two of the Victims Bled to Death when IOF Prevented Ambulances from Rescuing them September 21, 2006 http://www.pchrgaza.org/files/PressR/English/2006/111-2006.htm ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 1) Raúl Castro Speaks Out Against U.S. at Summit Talks By MARC LACEY September 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/16/world/americas/16cuba.html MEXICO CITY, Sept. 15 — Raúl Castro, who is standing in as Cuba’s leader while his brother, Fidel, recuperates from surgery, railed at the United States during a summit meeting in Havana of nonaligned nations on Friday, urging them to unite against “unacceptable acts of aggression essentially motivated by insatiable appetite for strategic resources.” Mr. Castro’s first public speech since taking power in July was just as stridently anti-Washington as those offered by his elder brother. He spoke of the Bush administration’s “irrational pretensions for world dominance” and called “absurd” its aggressive military spending now that the cold war is over. “With regard to international relations, we are not the decisive force that we could be,” Mr. Castro, 75, told members of the 118-member group of developing nations. “The Non-Aligned Movement now has to wage courageous battles against unilateralism, double standards and the impunity granted to those in power, for a fairer and more equal international order.” The United States declined observer status at the summit meeting. In Miami, however, the Bush administration’s top Cuban-American official, Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, delivered his own rebuke to Cuba’s government. Condemning repression on the island and calling Raúl Castro “simply another military dictator,” Mr. Gutierrez called on Cuba to hold a referendum on its future leadership, a proposal that the Communist government would surely dismiss. “Why not ask the people?” Mr. Gutierrez said at conference on Latin America’s economic future, which attracted leaders from throughout the region. “Let the Cuban people speak. Let the Cuban people determine their own destiny.” Noticeably absent from the fray in Havana was Fidel Castro, 80, who continued his recuperation. Cuban newspaper photographs showed him clad in pajamas while meeting with Secretary General Kofi Annan of the United Nations, and President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela. “Despite the rigor and will with which he pursues his treatment and physical therapy, the doctors have insisted that he continue to rest,” Felipe Pérez Roque, Cuba’s foreign minister, told reporters on Friday. The Non-Aligned Movement began during the cold war, when many nations were firmly allied with either the United States or the Soviet Union. The group has lived on, and now has 118 members that see themselves as the voice for the developing world. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 2) Immigration raid cripples Ga. town By RUSS BYNUM, Associated Press Writer Fri Sep 15, 2:13 PM ET http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060915/ap_on_re_us/immigration_aftermath_1 Trailer parks lie abandoned. The poultry plant is scrambling to replace more than half its workforce. Business has dried up at stores where Mexican laborers once lined up to buy food, beer and cigarettes just weeks ago. This Georgia community of about 1,000 people has become little more than a ghost town since Sept. 1, when federal agents began rounding up illegal immigrants. The sweep has had the unintended effect of underscoring just how vital the illegal immigrants were to the local economy. More than 120 illegal immigrants have been loaded onto buses bound for immigration courts in Atlanta, 189 miles away. Hundreds more fled Emanuel County. Residents say many scattered into the woods, camping out for days. They worry some are still hiding without food. At least one child, born a U.S. citizen, was left behind by his Mexican parents: 2-year-old Victor Perez-Lopez. The toddler's mother, Rosa Lopez, left her son with Julie Rodas when the raids began and fled the state. The boy's father was deported to Mexico. "When his momma brought this baby here and left him, tears rolled down her face and mine too," Rodas said. "She said, `Julie, will you please take care of my son because I have no money, no way of paying rent?'" For five years, Rodas has made a living watching the children of workers at the Crider Inc. poultry plant, where the vast majority of employees were Mexican immigrants. She learned Spanish, and considered many immigrants among her closest friends. She threw parties for their children's birthdays and baptisms. The only child in Rodas' care now, besides her own son, is Victor. Her customers have disappeared. Federal agents also swarmed into a trailer park operated by David Robinson. Illegal immigrants were handcuffed and taken away. Almost none have returned. Robinson bought an American flag and posted it by the pond out front — upside down, in protest. "These people might not have American rights, but they've damn sure got human rights," Robinson said. "There ain't no reason to treat them like animals." The raids came during a fall election season in which immigration is a top issue. Last month, the federal government reported that Georgia had the fastest-growing illegal immigrant population in the country. The number more than doubled from an estimated 220,000 in 2000 to 470,000 last year. This year, state lawmakers passed some of the nation's toughest measures targeting illegal immigrants, and Republican Gov. Sonny Perdue last week vowed a statewide crackdown on document fraud. Other than the Crider plant, there isn't much in Stillmore. Four small stores, a coin laundry and a Baptist church share downtown with City Hall, the fire department and a post office. "We're poor but proud," Mayor Marilyn Slater said, as if that is the town motto. The 2000 Census put Stillmore's population at 730, but Slater said uncounted immigrants probably made it more than 1,000. Not anymore, with so many homes abandoned and the streets practically empty. "This reminds me of what I read about Nazi Germany, the Gestapo coming in and yanking people up," Slater said. Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokesman Marc Raimondi would not discuss details of the raids. "We can't lose sight of the fact that these people were here illegally," Raimondi said. At Sucursal Salina No. 2, a store stocked with Mexican fruit sodas and snacks, cashier Alberto Gonzalez said Wednesday that the owner may shutter the place. By midday, Gonzalez has had only six customers. Normally, he would see 100. The B&S convenience store, owned by Keith and Regan Slater, the mayor's son and grandson, has lost about 80 percent of its business. "These people come over here to make a better way of life, not to blow us up," complained Keith Slater, who keeps a portrait of Ronald Reagan on the wall. "I'm a die-hard Republican, but I think we missed the boat with this one." Since the mid-1990s, Stillmore has grown dependent on the paychecks of Mexican workers who originally came for seasonal farm labor, picking the area's famous Vidalia onions. Many then took year-round jobs at the Crider plant, with a workforce of about 900. Crider President David Purtle said the agents began inspecting the company's employment records in May. They found 700 suspected illegal immigrants, and supervisors handed out letters over the summer ordering them to prove they came to the U.S. legally or be fired. Only about 100 kept their jobs. The arrests started at the plant Sept. 1. Over the Labor Day weekend, agents with guns and bulletproof vests converged on workers' homes after getting the addresses from Crider's files. Antonio Lopez, who came here two years ago from Chiapas, Mexico, and worked at the Crider plant, said agents kicked in his front door. Lopez, 32, and his 15-year-old son were handcuffed and taken by bus to Atlanta with 30 others. Because of the boy, Lopez said, both were allowed to return. In his back pocket, he carries an order to return to Atlanta for a court hearing Feb. 2. But now, "there's no people here and I don't have any work," he said. The poultry plant has limped along with half its normal workforce. Crider increased its starting wages by $1 an hour to help recruit new workers. Stacie Bell, 23, started work canning chicken at Crider a week ago. She said the pay, $7.75 an hour, led her to leave her $5.60-an-hour job as a Wal-Mart cashier in nearby Statesboro. Still, Bell said she felt bad about the raids. "If they knew eventually that they were going to have to do that, they should have never let them come over here," she said. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 3) Mexico: 1 million strong Convention elects “legitimate government” By Jorge Martin Monday, 18 September 2006 http://www.marxist.com A massive National Democratic Convention (CND) met in the centre of Mexico City on Saturday, September 16 and decided to elect "a legitimate government" with Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (the candidate of the left-wing PRD in the July 2nd elections) as its president. This was the culmination of a struggle of more than 2 months against electoral fraud which has put into question all the institutions of Mexico's bourgeois democracy. For 48 days, in the run up to the CND, tens of thousands of AMLO supporters had organised a tent city in the centre of Mexico City, paralysing its main thoroughfares, and millions had participated in massive rallies and daily assemblies (the largest on July 31 with 3 million). The CND was attended by 1,025,724 delegates from all over the country and by tens of thousands of others who had not been officially registered. It is difficult to estimate the size of this massive rally, but it contained anything between 1.5 and 2 million people. In the week prior to the assembly, the Mexican government had tried to prevent it from taking place. September 15 is the traditional day of the "Grito de Dolores" (the shout from Dolores), when the first call for the struggle for independence of Mexico was made by Hidalgo in 1810. Traditionally this is celebrated by the president giving an address from the National Palace in Zocalo Square at midnight on September 15. This is then followed by a military parade on Mexico's Independence day on the 16. The government was threatening to use the army to remove the protesters. Finally, the movement decided to withdraw from the square to allow the military parade to go through, but only after they had taken over the Grito de Dolores. The movement decided to reassemble on the afternoon of the16 for the CND. Showing the weakness of the government, president Fox had to abandon (for the first time in nearly 100 years) any idea of delivering the Grito de Dolores from the Zocalo and fleed to Guanajuato. The official excuse that was given was that intelligences services had information that "groups of PRD radicals were going to kill people". Now even high-ranking officials in the intelligence service are refuting the official government version. The truth is that in Mexico we have quite an unprecedented situation in which the legitimate government of Fox cannot impose its will on the mass movement. Hundreds of thousands rightly saw it as a victory when left-wing Senator Dolores Ibarra and other representatives of the movement celebrated the Grito de Dolores from the Zocalo. The CND started about an hour late, delayed by torrential rain. But more than 1 million delegates who filled the Zocalo and the nearby streets of Pino Suárez, 20 de Noviembre, 16 de Septiembre, Madero and 5 de Mayo, did not move and stood there waiting. They had come to the Zocalo for a reason and they would not be moved by the rain. When the meeting started the first speaker was left-wing writer Elena Poniatowska. She started by mentioning a letter she had received from Cuahtémoc Cárdenas, a former leader of the PRD, in which he advises the movement "not to break the framework of the institutions" by electing Obrador as a "legitimate president". This was received by a roar of disapproval, with the multitude shouting "Traitor! Traitor!". Cárdenas, and many others in the PRD leadership, have openly disassociated themselves from the resistance movement against electoral fraud. As a result, they have gone from being respected leaders (Cárdenas furthermore is related to president Cárdenas who in 1938 nationalised oil), to being widely despised and rightly considered as traitors. Another organisation which has been put to the test by this massive movement is the "Otra Campaña" (the Other Campaign) set up by Subcomandante Marcos and the leaders of the EZLN. By openly advocating abstention from the election campaign which the masses saw as an opportunity to change their lives, they have squandered the support and respect they had amongst the workers and peasants throughout Mexico. The leader of the EZLN is now commonly referred to as Subcomediante Marcos ("subcomedian" instead of "subcommander"). Revolutionary events put all organisations and tendencies to the test, and mistakes are paid dearly by those who fail it. The CND passed a number of resolutions, declaring PAN presidential candidate (who has been declared elected president by the electoral tribunal) as a "usurper" and refusing "to recognise him as a legitimate president of the Republic. A "plan of resistance" was also passed with massive support. This includes a national day of action against the privatisation of energy sources (electricity and oil), a national week of action in defence of free state education in October, and so on. This shows clearly that the character of the movement has gone beyond the question of electoral fraud and the defence of democracy. In fact, this is clearly linked to a rejection of the policies of the right- wing PAN which include the privatisation of Mexico's oil company PEMEX, of the electricity company, the creation of a two-tier higher education system, the destruction of the social security system and the elimination of basic workers' rights enshrined in the Constitution of 1917 during the Mexican Revolution. But the culmination of the CND was when the issue of recognising AMLO as legitimate president was put to the massive meeting. There was a proposal to declare him as "head of the resistance" instead, thus making a concession to the established institutions, but this was rejected out of hand, with a massive majority declaring him "president of the Republic". Crushed against the barriers that created a space for the media in the Zocalo, 84 year old Rafael Pérez Vázqued shouted as loud as he could: "President, he is the president! We have been fighting since the fraud! He was elected and should be president!" It was then decided that AMLO would form a legitimate government and that this would be installed in Mexico City on November 20, Mexico's Revolution Day. After, it was agreed that the highest point of the movement will be a massive mobilisation on December the 1, to "prevent the installation of Calderón as president". Lopez Obrador, in his speech accepting the presidential position, made clear the challenge to the institutions of the ruling class which he described as an "elite block openly composed of the leaders of the PAN and the PRI, the political arm of a small rapacious minority which has caused so much damage to our country". He added that he was proud to be at the head of a "government of the people." Another issue which has fuelled the anger of the masses is the media blockade imposed by the mass media in Mexico (and we should add, also internationally) on the resistance movement. A commission of "journalists in resistance" was set up which immediately demanded the "expropriation of the TV channels", in order to restore "truthful information, free from the interests of the oligarchy". Leaving the meeting of the CND, the masses were jubilant and the mood was one of victory. Thousands left in columns with raised clenched fists shouting "se siente, se siente, tenemos presidente" (you can hear, you can hear, we have a president"). Undoubtedly this movement has strengthened the confidence of the masses in their own strength, particularly after a period in which a series of mass movements against the Fox government had ended up in either victories or at least in a draw. The idea has conquered the imagination of the masses that with direct action in the streets they can fundamentally alter the course of events. Even more than that, the way AMLO has conducted the "information assemblies", has given the mass movement the idea that they are the ones who decide and democratically vote on the proposals for action. However imperfect the democracy of a meeting of 1 million delegates might be (and in effect it became a mass rally rather than a proper convention with delegates and resolutions), the movement feels that they have the power to decide. They will be closely watching what their leaders do, and if they do not do what they expect from them, they will be branded traitors, and the masses will try to replace them with others that reflect more closely their aspirations. A clear challenge to the ruling class and its institutions has been made, and they are clearly afraid of it. Even if they were able to diffuse the movement (and this is not ruled out), the ruling class in Mexico (and its mentors in Washington) are in a very difficult situation. The right-wing government of Fox, which was elected with a sizeable majority, was unable to carry out any of the counter-reforms that the ruling class and US imperialism were asking for. Every single time it was stopped in its tracks by a mass movement of the workers and peasants. The last one was when it attempted to prevent AMLO from standing in the elections. Two million came out onto the streets and Fox had to publicly withdraw the measure. If the Fox government was weak in the face of the mass movement, just imagine how much weaker would be an eventual Calderón government, assuming it can be installed. The ruling class has already started a carefully organised campaign to re-establish the legitimacy of its institutions and to brand AMLO and the movement as dangerous outlaws and radicals. The first ones to come out, and it could not be otherwise, were the Cardinals Sandoval and Rivera, who at Sunday mass appealed for Lopez Obrador to recognise Calderón and appealed to him to "accept the rules of the democratic game". They know very well that the movement that has been unleashed as a result of the electoral fraud against AMLO, regardless of his intentions, is challenging not only Calderon but the institutions of "democracy" (capitalist democracy that is) as a whole. Former left-wing intellectuals, international governments, the business organisations, the media (in Mexico and abroad), have all joined the chorus, in defence of democracy and the institutions of government. While Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez has expressed himself in the strongest possible terms and said he "will not recognise the elected government", Evo Morales in Bolivia took the opposite approach saying that "even if there have been tricks, within the framework of the norms, the winner must be recognised". On Thursday September 14, Bolivia's Foreign Affairs Minister Choquehuanca sent an official letter of recognition to Calderón, in direct contradiction to Bolivia's ambassador to Mexico who had declared that Bolivia would wait until December 1 to take a decision. Meanwhile in Oaxaca, where the Popular Assembly of the People of Oaxaca has declared itself to be the legitimate government of the state and started to take over government functions (public order, transport, etc), the movement continues to challenge the governor. Last week there was an attempt by some leaders of the APPO, from the teachers' union (section 22 of the SNTE), to put an end to the teachers' strike which has been the backbone of the movement so far. The deal that was proposed included a sizeable wage increase for the teachers (the demand that sparked the movement), but when leading members of the APPO and of SNTE 22 tried to explain the agreement to the rank and file and advocated the end of the strike, this was rejected and the leaders expelled from the assemblies, showing the mood that exists in Oaxaca as well as that the struggle goes beyond the mere struggle for economic demands. Peoples' Assemblies, or similar bodies of dual power under other names have been spreading throughout Oaxaca. The Popular Mixtec Assembly and the APPO announced that these bodies had now spread to Santa Catarina Ticua, Yuxia, San Andrés Chicahuaxtla, Yolomécatl, La Laguna Guadalupe, Río Las Peñas, Siniyuvi, and were in the process to be established in San Juan Mixtepec, Santo Domingo del Estado, Teposcolula and San Agustín Tlacotepec. The APPO also reported that Peoples' Assemblies were also being set up in other states outside of Oaxaca, like in Guerrero, Michoacán and even in the northern state of Baja California. It is clear that the strategy of the state is to combine repression with concessions that might force the teachers to abandon the movement, thus weakening it significantly. The nationwide Secretaria de Gobernacion (Ministry of the Interior) has revealed that they are considering sending federal police and even the army to Oaxaca, to re-establish legality. It is not ruled out that they could even find an "institutional" way to remove the hated governor of Oaxaca in order to put an end to the insurrectionary movement. There is the danger that the declaration of AMLO as a president will remain just words. For this new "government" to become a real government it must, at a certain point, clash head on and replace the Calderon government. A situation of dual power (the elements of which exist today in Mexico) cannot last for a long period of time without one replacing the other. The main task now for the revolutionary movement in Mexico is for this government elected at the CND to become a real government. This should be done by creating local committees of struggle, in every neighbourhood, factory, school and military barrack, and for these to be linked up by elected representatives at the local, regional, state and national level. These committees should start by struggling for the immediate demands of the masses (for clean water, food, housing, trade union democracy, decent wages, against privatisation, etc), so that the struggle for genuine democracy (workers' democracy) becomes inseparable from the struggle for the improvement of the living conditions of the masses. Then these committees, like in Oaxaca, could start taking over power at the local level, running their own police force accountable to the assemblies, transportation, provision of food, etc. The calling of a general strike, which has been advocated by the Marxist Tendency Militante since the beginning of the movement, would galvanise the movement and put forward clearly the question of who rules. A general strike demonstrates clearly that it is actually the workers who make the country work and it brings to the fore not only the power they have to paralyse society, but also that they have the power to run it. What will happen in the next weeks and months in Oaxaca and in Mexico as a whole is difficult to predict. This is a struggle of living forces and there are many factors involved: the quality and the actions of the leadership of the movement, the tiredness of the masses, the manoeuvres of the ruling class and its more or less skilful management of the situation etc., and to this we have to add accidental elements which might propel the movement even further. But one thing is clear: this is not just a "normal" movement against electoral fraud. It has much deeper roots going back over the last 15 years of attacks on the living conditions of the masses, on their acquired rights, the implementation of the NAFTA agreement which destroyed Mexican agriculture and forced millions of Mexicans to emigrate to the US, the widespread feeling that the institutions of bourgeois democracy (the government, the judges, the governors, the media) do not serve the people but only a small minority of the rich and powerful, etc. Because of this, the movement will not go away. It will develop in ebbs and flows, and through these the masses will learn valuable lessons. The best and most advanced activists amongst the workers, the peasants, the indigenous peoples, the youth, must gather around a genuine revolutionary tendency which can put forward a programme that can take the movement forward. The revolutionary events in Mexico, part of a continent wide movement, are an inspiration for all of us. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 4) U.S. to Maintain Iraq Force Levels By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 12:37 p.m. ET September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-US-Iraq.html?hp&ex=1158724800&en=52aa0f7e7bbbd51a&ei=5094&partner=homepage WASHINGTON (AP) -- The U.S. military will likely maintain or possibly even increase the current force levels of more than 140,000 troops in Iraq through next spring, the top US. commander in the Middle East said Tuesday in one of the gloomiest assessments yet of how quickly American forces can be brought home. Gen. John Abizaid, commander of U.S. Central Command, said military leaders would consider adding troops or extending the Iraq deployments of other units if needed. ''If it's necessary to do that because the military situation on the ground requires that, we'll do it,'' he said. ''If we have to call in more forces because it's our military judgment that we need more forces, we'll do it.'' Abizaid said that right now the current number of troops ''are prudent force levels'' that are achieving the needed military effect. His comments came as U.S. political leaders continue to face declining public support for the war in Iraq, as they head into the coming congressional elections. Abizaid, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Peter Pace are expected to meet with members of Congress later this week. Late last year, military leaders had said they hoped to reduce troop levels to about 100,000 by the end of this year. But Abizaid said Tuesday that the rising sectarian violence and slow progress of the Iraqi government made that impossible. ''I think that this level probably will have to be sustained through the spring,'' he told military reporters. ''I think that we'll do whatever we have to do to stabilize Iraq and Afghanistan and use the military power of the U.S. to do that.'' Abizaid cautioned that the solution to much of Iraq's violence -- both sectarian and insurgents -- is not necessarily ''throwing more American units at the problem.'' Instead, he said it is vital that the Iraqi government improve the political and economic conditions in the embattled country, as part of an effort to get the ''angry young men'' off the streets. And he said there will be more emphasis on the U.S. military teams that are training the Iraqi army and police forces. There are currently 147,000 U.S. forces in Iraq -- up more than 20,000 from the troop levels in late June. Rumsfeld extended the one-year deployment of an Alaska-based brigade in July, as part of the effort to stem the escalating violence in Baghdad. Abizaid said Tuesday that there are no plans to further extend the deployment of the Alaska Stryker brigade. On the Net: Defense Department: http://www.defenselink.mil ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 5) Thai Prime Minister Declares State of Emergency By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 12:43 p.m. ET September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Thailand.html?hp&ex=1158724800&en=7088b6ed163114a6&ei=5094&partner=homepage BANGKOK, Thailand (AP) -- The Thai military launched a coup against Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra on Tuesday night, circling his offices with tanks, seizing control of TV stations and declaring a provisional authority pledging loyalty to the king. An announcement on Thai television declared that a ''Council of Administrative Reform'' with King Bhumibol Adulyadej as head of state had seized power in Bangkok and nearby provinces without any resistance. At least 14 tanks surrounded Government House, Thaksin's office. Thaksin was in New York at the U.N. General Assembly and declared a state of emergency via a government-owned TV station. A convoy of four tanks rigged with loudspeakers and sirens rolled through a busy commercial district warning people to get off the street for their own safety. A senior military official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation, said army Commander-in-Chief Gen. Sondhi Boonyaratkalin had used the military to take over power from the prime minister. Thaksin has faced calls to step down amid allegations of corruption and abuse of power. Massive rallies earlier this year forced Thaksin to dissolve Parliament and call an election in April, three years ahead of schedule. The poll was boycotted by opposition parties and later annulled by Thailand's top courts, leaving the country without a working legislature. Thaksin's Thai Rak Thai Party twice won landslide election victories, in 2001 and 2005 and had been expected to win the next vote on Oct. 15, bolstered by its widespread support in the country's rural areas. Thaksin, who had been scheduled to address the U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday night, switched his speech to Tuesday at 7 p.m. EDT. On Monday, Thaksin had said he may step down as leader of Thailand after the upcoming elections but would remain at the helm of his party, despite calls for him to give up the post. In Bangkok, several hundred soldiers were deployed at government installations and major intersections, according to an Associated Press reporter. Army-owned TV channel 5 interrupted regular broadcasts with patriotic music and showed pictures of the king. At least some radio and television stations monitored in Bangkok suspended programming. The cable television station of the Nation newspaper reported that tanks were parked at the Rachadamnoen Road and royal plaza close to the royal palace and government offices. ''The prime minister with the approval of the cabinet declares serious emergency law in Bangkok from now on'' Thaksin said by television from New York. He said he was ordering the transfer of the nation's army chief to work in the prime minister's office, effectively suspending him from his military duties. Thaksin's critics want to jettison his policies promoting privatization, free trade agreements and CEO-style administration. Opposition to Thaksin gained momentum in January when his family announced it had sold its controlling stake in telecommunications company Shin Corp. to Singapore's state-owned Temasek Holdings for a tax-free $1.9 billion. Critics allege the sale involved insider trading and complain a key national asset is now in foreign hands. Thaksin also has been accused of stifling the media and mishandling a Muslim insurgency in southern Thailand that flared under his rule. In Thailand's mostly Muslim south, separatist insurgents have waged a bloody campaign that has left at least 1,700 dead, mostly civilians, since 2004. Citizens there have complained of rights abuses by soldiers and discrimination by the country's Buddhist majority. Bhumibol, a 78-year-old constitutional monarch with limited powers, has used his high prestige to pressure opposing parties to compromise during political crises. He is credited with helping keep Thailand more stable than many of its Southeast Asian neighbors. He is the world's longest-serving monarch, celebrated his 60th year on the throne with lavish festivities in mid-June that were attended by royalty from around the world. Many Thais are counting on him to pull the country through its current political crisis, which has left it with no functioning legislature and only a caretaker government after a divisive, inconclusive election. Bhumibol was born in Cambridge, Mass. He became the ninth king of Thailand's Chakri dynasty on June 9, 1946, succeeding his older brother, Ananda, killed by an unexplained shooting. Since then, the beloved king has reigned through a score of governments, democratic and dictatorial. He has taken an especially active role in rural development. In 1992, demonstrators against a military strongman were gunned down before the king stepped in to end the fighting and usher in a period of stability. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 6) Seeing Huge Losses, Chrysler Slashes Production By MICHELINE MAYNARD September 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/business/20autocnd.html?hp&ex=1158724800&en=0774124b74af9322&ei=5094&partner=homepage DETROIT, Sept. 19 — Dogged by slumping sales of sport utility vehicles, the Chrysler Group said today that it would cut production by 16 percent the rest of this year, and it confirmed that it expected to lose $1.26 billion on operations in 2006. DaimlerChrysler’s chief executive, Dieter Zetsche, also said the company would continue to press the United Automobile Workers union to agree to concessions on health care benefits, even though the union said earlier this month that it would not reach a deal with the automaker. At a briefing with industry analysts, Chrysler said it would cut third- quarter production by 90,000 vehicles, double its original plan to cut 45,000 vehicles out of its production schedules. Chrysler said it would cut another 35,000 vehicles from its production plans during the fourth quarter. Over all, Chrysler said it planned to build 705,000 cars and trucks during the second half of the year, down 16 percent from its original second-half projection. Mr. Zetsche, who ran Chrysler from 2000 until last year, declined to estimate how big a charge against earnings the company might take. No decision has yet been made on whether the company will cut jobs or take other steps. But Mr. Zetsche said Chrysler was examining its structural costs from its factories to its purchasing operations. He said the company would act on those costs if necessary, but he was not specific. “We have to clearly dig deeper into the top of Chrysler to make sure we further can accelerate the process of increased competitiveness,” Mr. Zetsche said. In the presentation to analysts, Chrysler forecast that its share of the American car market would be 10.6 percent during the third quarter, down from its original plan to hold 11.2 percent. That puts it in fourth place, behind General Motors, the Ford Motor Company and Toyota, and just slightly ahead of Honda. But in July, Honda outsold Chrysler, bumping it down to fifth place in the American market. Honda recently announced plans to build a new factory in Indiana, raising the likelihood that it could overtake Chrysler permanently at some point. Chrysler depends more heavily on sales of minivans, sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks than any of its Detroit competitors. But sales of S.U.V.’s and pickups have declined this year in the wake of gasoline prices that reached $3 a gallon this summer. Consumers have shifted away from larger vehicles to cars and crossover vehicles. As a result, Chrysler has been dogged all year by big inventories of unsold Jeeps and pickups, some of which are parked on lots across the Detroit area and in Toledo, Ohio, home to much of its Jeep production. Nonetheless, the company had doggedly insisted that it had no plans for deeper cuts in production like those at G.M. and Ford, and that its business would pick up in the second half of 2006. Indeed, Chrysler plans to introduce a number of new vehicles, including more S.U.V.s, crossover vehicles and the Sebring sedan during the rest of the year, a reason why its fourth-quarter production cuts were more modest than those in the third quarter. But DaimlerChrysler stunned analysts last week when it said Chrysler would lose $1.5 billion during the third quarter, more than double its previous forecast that it would lose $600 million during the quarter. That disclosure, coupled with Chrysler’s announcement today, drew criticism from analysts, who asked Mr. Zetsche why the company had stayed so long with its forecast that it would break even, only to suddenly acknowledge that it expected a significant loss. “There is no way around saying we were optimistic,” Mr. Zetsche said. “We saw things developing not in the way we planned for them.” Rather than change the company’s forecast, Mr. Zetsche said, managers insisted that “next month, we will make it” until the time came to “face the music.” “Obviously, our communication was miserable in this regard,” he said. He declined to blame either American or German managers for the company’s problems, saying that the responsibility lay with management in general. “You can blame anybody of us — that is fair, absolutely,” Mr. Zetsche said. Mr. Zetsche laid some blame, in fact, on the U.A.W. for resisting a health care deal. Last year, U.A.W. members at G.M. and Ford, who had previously received fully paid health care benefits, agreed to pay for part of their medical coverage. Earlier this month, however, the U.A.W.’s president, Ron Gettelfinger, said there would not be a similar deal at Chrysler because a union analysis showed that the company was not in as dire financial shape as G.M. and Ford. Mr. Zetsche said he was “extremely dissatisfied” at the union’s stand. “It is a very strange position that we should have to lose $10 billion before we can have the same as at G.M. and Ford,” he said, referring to G.M.’s $10.6 billion loss last year. The U.A.W. had no immediate comment today. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 7) U.S. Resorting to 'Collective Punishment' Inter Press Service Dahr Jamail and Ali al-Fadhily Dahr Jamail's Iraq Dispatches http://dahrjamailiraq.com RAMADI, Sep 18 (IPS) - U.S. forces are taking to collective punishment of civilians in several cities across the al-Anabar province west of Baghdad, residents and officials say.* "Ramadi, the capital of al-Anbar province, is still living with the daily terror of its people getting killed by snipers and its infrastructure being destroyed," Ahmad, a local doctor who withheld his last name for security purposes told IPS. "This city has been facing the worst of the American terror and destruction for more than two years now, and the world is silent." Destroying infrastructure and cutting water and electricity "for days and even weeks is routine reaction to the resistance," he said. "Guys of the resistance do not need water and electricity, it's the families that are being harmed, and their lives which are at stake." Students and professors at the University of al-Anbar told IPS that their campus is under frequent attack. "Nearly every week we face raids by the Americans or their Iraqi colleagues," a professor speaking on condition of anonymity told IPS. Students said that U.S. troops occupied their school last week.. "We've been under great pressure from the Americans since the very first days of their occupation of Iraq," a student told IPS. Such raids are being reported all over Ramadi. "The infrastructure destruction is huge around the governorate building in downtown Ramadi," said a 24-year-old student who gave his name as Ali al-Ani. "And they are destroying the market too." IPS reported Sep. 5 that the U.S. military was bulldozing entire blocks of buildings near the governorate to dampen resistance attacks on government offices. Such U.S. action seems most severe in al-Anabar province, where resistance is strongest, and which has seen the highest U.S. casualties. The city of Hit 80km west of Ramadi was surrounded by U.S. troops for several days earlier this week. Several civilians were killed and at least five were detained by U.S. forces. Checkpoints are in place at each entrance to the city after the U.S. military lifted the cordon around it. This has stifled movement and damaged local businesses. "There was an attack on a U.S. convoy, and three vehicles were destroyed," a local tribal chief who gave his name as Nawaf told IPS. "It wasn't the civilians who did it, but they are the ones punished. These Americans have the bad habit of cutting all of the essential services after every attack. They said they came to liberate us, but look at the slow death they are giving us every day." In Haditha, a city of 75,000 on the banks of the Euphrates River in western al-Anbar, collective punishment is ongoing, residents say. This was the site of the massacre of 24 civilians by U.S. marines in November 2005. "The Americans continue to raid our houses and threaten us with more violence," a local tribal leader who gave his name as Abu Juma'a told IPS. "But if they think they will make us kneel by these criminal acts, they are wrong. If they increase the pressure, the resistance will increase the reaction. We see this pattern repeated so often now." Abu Juma'a added: "I pray that the Americans return to their senses before they lose everything in the Iraqi fire." In Fallujah, local police say residents have turned against them due to the collective punishment tactics used by U.S. forces. "The Americans started pushing us to fight the resistance despite our contracts that clearly assigned us the duties of civil protection against normal crimes such as theft and tribal quarrels," a police lieutenant told IPS. "Now 90 percent of the force has decided to quit rather than kill our brothers or get killed by them for the wishes of the Americans." At least one U.S. vehicle is reported destroyed every day on average in the face of mounting U.S. raids and a daily curfew. The scene is one of destruction of the city, not rebuilding. "Infrastructure rebuilding is just a joke that nobody laughs at," Fayiq al-Dilaimy, an engineer in Fallujah told IPS. He was on the rebuilding committee set up after the November 2004 U.S.-led operation which destroyed approximately 75 percent of the city.. "People of this city could rebuild their city in six months if given a real chance. Now look at it and how sorrowful it looks under the boots of the 'liberators'." Many of the smaller towns have been badly hit. "Khaldiyah (near Fallujah) and the area around it have faced the worst collective punishments for over two years now," said a government official in Ramadi. "But of course most cities in al-Anbar are being constantly punished by the Americans." Samarra and Dhululiyah towns, both north of Baghdad, have also been facing collective punishment from the U.S. military, according to residents. "Curfews and concrete walls are permanent in both cities, which makes life impossible," Ali al-Bazi, a lawyer who lives in Dhululiyah and works in Samarra told IPS. "There are so many killings by American snipers. So many families have lost loved ones trying to visit relatives or even just stepping outside of their house." While Baghdad is not in al-Anbar province, occupation forces have used similar tactics there. In January 2005 IPS reported that the military used bulldozers to level palm groves, cut electricity, destroy a fuel station and block access roads in response to attacks from resistance fighters. A U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad did not comment on specific cases, but told IPS that the U.S. military "does its best to protect civilians from the terrorists." (c)2006 Dahr Jamail. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 8) Rules for the Real World New York Times Editorial September 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/opinion/20wed1.html?_r=1&oref=slogin The White House has been acting lately as though the struggle over the proper way to handle prisoners is a debate about how tough to get with Osama bin Laden if he’s ever actually caught. This week, we’ve had two powerful reminders of the real issue: when a government puts itself above the law, innocent people are put at risk. On Monday, Canada issued a scathing report about the story of a Canadian citizen, Maher Arar, who was abducted by American agents in late 2002 and turned over to Syrian authorities, who obligingly tortured him for 10 months until he signed a transparently false confession. The report said Mr. Arar never had any connection to terrorism. But the United States stonewalled Canada’s investigation, which concluded that the Americans misled Canada about their plans for Mr. Arar. Sending him to Syria, where he would certainly be tortured, was not just immoral and un-American, it was a violation of international law. In Iraq, American authorities have been holding an Iraqi-born photographer for The Associated Press for five months without charging him with any crime. Military officials say they have evidence that Bilal Hussein has “strong ties” to insurgents, but refuse to show it to Mr. Hussein, his lawyers, The A.P. or even to the Iraqi courts. We don’t know the truth. But we know how to get at it: If the Americans have evidence against Mr. Hussein, they should present it. If he committed a crime, he should be charged. If not, he should be set free. These two cases illustrate vividly why Congress needs to pass an effective law on the handling of prisoners that not only provides for legal military tribunals to try dangerous men like Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, who is believed to have organized the 9/11 attacks, but also deals with the other men, perhaps hundreds, wrongly imprisoned at Guantánamo Bay, and sets rules for the future. The bills now before Congress don’t meet the test. The White House’s measure endorses the practice of picking up any foreign citizens the United States wants, abusing and even torturing them, and then trying them on the basis of secret evidence. It effectively repudiates the Geneva Conventions, putting American soldiers at risk. The other bill, written by the only three Republican senators who were willing to defy the White House, preserves the conventions and creates a respectable trial process. But it defines “illegal enemy combatant” so broadly that the administration could apply it to almost any foreigner it chose, including legal United States residents. Both bills choke off judicial review and allow even those acquitted by a military tribunal to be held indefinitely. Either bill might be acceptable if the United States government were infallible. As it is, they would legalize the sorts of abuses of power that the United States fought against in other countries for most of the 20th century. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 9) Canadian Man Tortured in Syria Wants Explanation From U.S. By IAN AUSTEN http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/world/americas/20canada.html OTTAWA, Sept. 19 — A software engineer who was exonerated of any involvement in terrorism by a Canadian government inquiry said Tuesday that he wanted the United States to explain why he was sent to Syria, where he was jailed and tortured. And in addition to compensation and an apology from the Canadian authorities, whose inaccurate information contributed to his deportation to Syria, Maher Arar, 37, said he also wanted Prime Minister Stephen Harper to contact President Bush to demand that his name, as well as those of his family members, be formally cleared in the United States. “It is my hope that the U.S. government provides the people with a valid explanation of what happened,” Mr. Arar said in an interview. “What does this do for the credibility of the U.S. government when it talks about protecting human rights?” In its report, released Monday, the commission of inquiry said the Royal Canadian Mounted Police had supplied American authorities with false information, including the claim that the Syrian-born Mr. Arar and his wife were “suspected of being linked to the Al Qaeda movement.” That, it said, led to the American decision to detain him in October 2002, while he was changing planes in New York. Mr. Arar was then flown to Jordan in an American government plane to Jordan and taken overland to Syria. There, the report said, Mr. Arar was repeatedly beaten and forced to make a false confession. He was freed in 2003. Mr. Arar said he had been shocked to learn that not only he but his wife and his two children had been on terrorist watch lists used by border officials in the United States and Canada. “Thank God I didn’t know about this when I was in Syria,” he said. “Knowing that would have made my situation worse.” Prime Minister Harper told the House of Commons on Tuesday that Mr. Arar had “been done a tremendous injustice,” adding, “We all know this took place during the period of the previous government.” However, Mr. Harper, who has been in office since January, previously led a party known as the Canadian Alliance, which had called Mr. Arar a dangerous terrorist and attacked efforts by the earlier Liberal government to secure his release. Mr. Arar filed a suit against the American officials he said were responsible for sending him to Syria, but a federal judge in New York dismissed the case after deciding he did not have jurisdiction. That decision is now on appeal. In Washington, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said he had not read the report, but said, “We were not responsible for his removal to Syria,” adding, “I’m not aware that he was tortured.” Mr. Arar acknowledged that years might pass before he received any action in the United States. Still, he said, “The fact that I have yet to get answers from the American government doesn’t mean that the American people aren’t interested.” ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 10) Border Fence Must Skirt Objections From Arizona Tribe By RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD September 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/washington/20fence.html?ref=us TOHONO O’ODHAM NATION, Ariz., Sept. 14 — The Senate is expected to vote Wednesday on legislation to build a double-layered 700-mile- long fence on the Mexican border, a proposal already approved by the House. If the fence is built, however, it could have a long gap — about 75 miles — at one of the border’s most vulnerable points because of opposition from the Indian tribe here. More illegal immigrants are caught — and die trying to cross into the United States — in and around the Tohono O’odham Indian territory, which straddles the Arizona border, than any other spot in the state. Tribal leaders have cooperated with Border Patrol enforcement, but they promised to fight the building of a fence out of environmental and cultural concerns. For the Tohono O’odham, which means “desert people,” the reason is fairly simple. For generations, their people and the wildlife they revere have freely crossed the border. For years, an existing four- foot-high cattle fence has had several openings — essentially cattle gates — that tribal members use to visit relatives and friends, take children to school and perform rites on the other side. “I am O’odham first, and American or Mexican second or third,” said Ramon Valenzuela, as he walked his two children to school through one gate two miles from his O’odham village in Mexico. But the pushed-up bottom strands of the cattle fence and the surrounding desert littered with clothing, water jugs and discarded backpacks testify to the growth in illegal immigrant traffic, which surged here after a Border Patrol enforcement squeeze in California and Texas in the mid-1990’s. Crossers take advantage of a remote network of washes and trails — and sometimes Indian guides — to reach nearby highways bound for cities across the country. Tribal members, who once gave water and food to the occasional passing migrant, say they have become fed up with groups of illegal immigrants breaking into homes and stealing food, water and clothing, and even using indoor and outdoor electrical outlets to charge cellphones. With tribal police, health and other services overwhelmed by illegal immigration, the Indians welcomed National Guard members this summer to assist the Border Patrol here. The tribe, after negotiations with the Department of Homeland Security, also agreed to a plan for concrete vehicle barriers at the fence and the grading of the dirt road parallel to it for speedier Border Patrol and tribal police access. The Indians also donated a parcel this year for a small Border Patrol substation and holding pen. Tribal members, however, fearing the symbolism of a solid wall and concern about the free range of deer, wild horses, coyotes, jackrabbits and other animals they regard as kin, said they would fight the kind of steel-plated fencing that Congress had in mind and that has slackened the crossing flow in previous hot spots like San Diego. “Animals and our people need to cross freely,” said Verlon Jose, a member of the tribal council representing border villages. “In our tradition we are taught to be concerned about every living thing as if they were people. We don’t want that wall.” The federal government, the trustee of all Indian lands, could build the fence here without tribal permission, but that option is not being pressed because officials said it might jeopardize the tribe’s cooperation on smuggling and other border crimes. “We rely on them for cooperation and intelligence and phone calls about illegal activity as much as they depend on us to respond to calls,” said Chuy Rodriguez, a spokesman for the Border Patrol in Tucson, who described overall relations as “getting better and better.” The Tohono number more than 30,000, including 14,000 on the Arizona tribal territory and 1,400 in Mexico. Building a fence would impose many challenges, apart from the political difficulties. When steel fencing and other resources went up in California and Texas, migrant traffic shifted to the rugged terrain here, and critics say more fencing will simply force crossers to other areas without the fence. Or under it, as evidenced by the growth in the number of tunnels discovered near San Diego. The shift in traffic to more remote, treacherous terrain has also led to hundreds of deaths of crossers, including scores on tribal land here. The effort to curtail illegal immigration has proved especially difficult on the Tohono O’odham Nation, whose 2.8 million acres, about the size of Connecticut, make it the second largest in area. Faced with poverty and unemployment, an increasing number of tribal members are turning to the smuggling of migrants and drugs, tribal officials say. Just this year, the tribal council adopted a law barring the harboring of illegal immigrants in homes, a gesture to show it is taking a “zero tolerance” stand, said the tribal chairwoman, Vivian Juan-Saunders. Two members of Ms. Juan-Saunders’s family have been convicted of drug smuggling in the past several years, and she said virtually every family had been touched by drug abuse, smuggling or both. Sgt. Ed Perez of the tribal police said members had been offered $400 per person to transport illegal immigrants from the tribal territory to Tucson, a 90-minute drive, and much more to carry drugs. The Border Patrol and tribal authorities say the increase in manpower and technology is yielding results. Deaths are down slightly, 55 this year compared with 62 last year, and arrests of illegal immigrants in the Border Patrol sectors covering the tribal land are up about 10 percent. But the influx of agents, many of whom are unfamiliar with the territory or Tohono ways, has brought complaints that the agents have interfered with tribal ceremonies, entered property uninvited and tried to block members crossing back and forth. Ms. Juan-Saunders said helicopters swooped low and agents descended on a recent ceremony, apparently suspicious of a large gathering near the border, and she has complained to supervisors about agents speeding and damaging plants used for medicine and food. Some traditional and activist tribal members later this month are organizing a conference among eight Indian nations on or near the border to address concerns here and elsewhere. “We are in a police state,” said Michael Flores, a tribal member helping to organize the conference. “It is not a tranquil place anymore.” Mr. Rodriguez acknowledged the concerns but said agents operated in a murky world where a rush of pickups from a border village just might be tribal members attending an all-night wake, or something else. “Agents make stops based on what they see,” he said. “Sometimes an agent sees something different from what tribal members or others see.” Agents, he added, are receiving more cultural training, including a new cultural awareness video just shot with the help of tribal members. “Our relations have come a long way” in the past decade, he said. Mr. Valenzuela said several agents knew him and waved as he traveled across the border, but others have stopped him, demanding identification. Once, he said, he left at home a card that identifies him as a tribal member and an agent demanded that he go back into Mexico and cross at the official port of entry in Sasabe, 20 miles away. “I told him this is my land, not his,” said Mr. Valenzuela, who was finally allowed to proceed after the agent radioed supervisors. Mr. Valenzuela said he would not be surprised if a big fence eventually went up, but Ms. Juan-Saunders said she would affirm the tribe’s concerns to Congress and the Homeland Security department. She said she would await final word on the fence and its design before taking action. Members of Congress she has met, she said, “recognize we pose some unique issues to them, and that was really what we are attempting to do, to educate them to our unique situation.” The House last week approved a Republican-backed bill 238 to 138 calling for double-layer fencing along a third of the 2,000-mile-long border, roughly from Calexico, Calif., to Douglas, Ariz. There is considerable support for the idea in the Senate, although President Bush’s position on the proposal remains uncertain. The Homeland Security secretary, Michael Chertoff, has expressed doubts about sealing the border with fences. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 11) Update on Suzanne Swift September 19th, 2006. 101 days since her arrest. formydaughtersuzanne@yahoo.com http://suzanneswift.org/ I do not even know where to start. So much has happened so fast that our heads are spinning. First about Suzanne. Her mental health is declining. She has had two write-ups (counseling/official reprimands) in the past few weeks for being late in the mornings for formation. She is having a hard time waking up because her anxiety and depression are getting so bad. She is having trouble sleeping and bad dreams when she does sleep, so waking up early is just brutal for her. She is still doing office work filing police reports in an office. She is being allowed to come to Eugene every other week to meet with Dr. Schwartz, her psychologist. She has seen him only 6 times in the past 101 days. It is really hard for her to go back to Ft. Lewis and it breaks my heart every time she leaves, because I know she is beyond miserable up here and being re-traumatized by them daily. With the increasing media attention, Suzanne has been getting more and more silent, yet solid, support form other active women in the military. This gives us great hope that we are helping effect change for them as well as for validating women veteran's experiences and working to create new hope for the future safety for young women who hope to serve their country without fear of harassment and abuse someday. Suzanne has given 7 interviews now and they have really taken their toll on her. She has spoken to : The San Francisco Chronicle, New York Times Magazine, Washington Post, Democracy Now, The Register Guard, ABC Nightline, and Fox news. These were very hard on her and her attorney, Keith Scherer, and I decided along with Suzanne that there would be no more interviews until she is either charged or freed. If she is charged her mental state will most likely deteriorate so that is very much up in the air. We appreciate the thoughtful way that the press has been working with us and we appreciate your professionalism. The Iraq Veterans Against the War and Vets for Peace took matters into their own hands and staged a sit-in on the 97th day in Congressman Peter DeFazio's Washington DC office. They would not leave until Congressman DeFazio agreed to take some serious action on behalf of Suzanne. The Congressman's office called me and we agreed that a congressional investigation into Suzanne's case would be beneficial and, within 24 hours, on Wednesday the 13th of September, Suzanne was signing a release of information for the Congressional investigation to proceed. On Friday, September 15th, Suzanne was on the cover of the San Francisco Chronicle and it has been major media ever since. I am flying to Washington DC this week to meet with Congressman DeFazio and talk to him about military sexual violence and the treatment Suzanne has received from the military to date and the future unknown plans for her. Our attorney came out to Eugene to meet with us. Keith Scherer, http://gslattorneys.com/keith-scherer.aspx, is a wonderful man and a very aggressive, intelligent attorney. We are so impressed with him and feel complete trust in his legal wisdom and ability. We are financially and emotionally preparing for a court martial so, please, if you have not done so already either make a financial contribution to Suzanne's legal defense fund or get some type of fundraising activity planned in your community. I am going to be doing some traveling around the country to talk about Suzanne's case, raise awareness and fundraise. Also, please set Suzanne's website as your home page, http://suzanneswift.org/, until she is free. It is a very interactive and alive site full of new things almost daily. HUGE thanks to Stacy Hafely, MFSO Missouri, for being the web goddess supreme. Suzanne's petition has reached 6,000 signatures, which is AMAZING! Please continue to make calls and write letters on Suzanne's behalf. There are easy forms and all the numbers and addresses on the website. It is very easy to use. Also, please feel free to post or forward this email to other sites/lists. I want to spread the word so we can increase the numbers of supporters for Suzanne. Thank you!!! Most of all please visualize Suzanne's case being resolved with integrity and justice . . . Suzanne deserves a timely resolution to this nightmare that they have created for her and many other women in the military. Once again, do something everyday, no matter how big or small...... Peace, Sara Rich, M.S.W ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 12) City Hall declares war on the people of Bayview Hunters Point by Willie Ratcliff sfbayview@lists.riseup.net “This is a last-ditch effort to deny the people the right to take part in their government.” That’s what I’m telling the press who are calling in response to news received just this morning that the San Francisco City Attorney has issued a 13-page opinion claiming to invalidate the referendum petition on the Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Plan. According to City Attorney Dennis Herrera, the opinion was requested by Mayor Gavin Newsom, Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin, District 10 Supervisor Sophie Maxwell (BVHP is in District 10) and the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency. The City Attorney’s press release (at the bottom of this message) and the full opinion are posted front and center on his website, www.sfgov.org/cityattorney/ With the 40th anniversary of the Hunters Point Uprising of Sept. 27, 1966, only days away, this sounds like a declaration of war against the same people who protested then and are protesting still against police brutality and for jobs, economic equity and the right to develop our own community and control our own destiny. In 1966, when Hunters Point youngsters, furious when police shot 16-year-old Matthew Johnson and killed him, blocked the cops from entering their neighborhood east of Third Street, the mayor called in police sharpshooters to line up on Third Street execution style and fire into the Bayview Opera House, where terrified children had sought refuge, and called in the National Guard, which sent tanks – yes, tanks! – lumbering up and down Third Street. In 1966, the mayor was trying to drive Blacks out of San Francisco. In 2006, the mayor is still trying to drive Blacks out of San Francisco. Our answer 40 years ago or 40 years in the future is clear: “We shall not be moved!” Our referendum petition was signed, according to the San Francisco Department of Elections’ official certification letter issued Sept. 12, by 33,056 San Francisco voters. People all over the city understood that the Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Plan, which proposed to add 1,361 acres to the 800-plus acres of our neighborhood that the Redevelopment Agency already controls, is nothing but a land grab. People all over the city knew that in California, redevelopment is officially described as “repeopling” and that by signing the petition, they were saying, in effect, “Not in my name!” Our petition was drafted with the advice of several attorneys who specialize in the law governing referendums and redevelopment. And it was thoroughly examined prior to circulation by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, who in turn consulted with the City Attorney, and by the Director of Elections. On the petition form that people in our neighborhood and all over the city eagerly signed is printed the entire text of the Redevelopment Plan Ordinance passed 7-4 by the Board of Supervisors. That’s what the law requires. But in his “Opinion No. 2006-01,” apparently the first formal opinion he has issued this year, the City Attorney takes 13 pages to answer the question whether our petition should also have reprinted “documents incorporated by reference in the Ordinance, including the Redevelopment Plan.” He lists 10 documents – motions and resolutions and the CEQA findings as well as the 62-page Redevelopment Plan – that he says should have been reprinted as a part of each petition form and lugged around by the hundreds of people who gathered those 33,056 signatures. If that’s what the law governing referendums really requires, the people have as a practical matter no right to petition their government. It was hard enough for us – poor people in San Francisco’s poorest neighborhood – to pay the printing bill for tens of thousands of four-page, legal size petitions. If each form had been the size of a large book as the City Attorney’s opinion would require, not only their cost but their weight and bulk would have made circulating them economically and physically impossible. I also want to correct a misleading statement in Section A of the City Attorney’s opinion. He writes, “[W]e understand that here the circulators did not at any time on or before filing the Petition on August 30, 2006 ask the Clerk of the Board or the Director of Elections to review the sample Petition or to provide advice regarding the required form of the referendum petition against the Ordinance.” Well, not only did we most definitely consult with both the Clerk of the Board – who was very helpful – and the Director of Elections, but I still have an email from the Clerk containing some of her advice. This sudden reversal by City Hall is a pure power play – an attempt by the powerful to crush the powerless. But even the so-called founding fathers admitted that governments derive “their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed,” and we do not give our consent. Is City Hall the only powerful player trying to roll over us? No, I think it’s the big developers who are drooling to take a big bite out of Bayview Hunters Point, the neighborhood with the most sunshine and the most spectacular views in San Francisco. Those developers donated over $40,000 to the re-election campaign of our so-called representative, District 10 Supervisor Sophie Maxwell, according to her latest campaign finance report. She is the prime sponsor and champion of the land-grabbing Redevelopment Plan. If the big developers and their puppets, the mayor and his minions, win this war, they’ll have made what may be the largest urban renewal land grab in the nation’s history: some 2,200 acres of San Francisco, the city with the highest priced land on earth. But this is our home. Our roots run deep. Many who live here today – and their parents and grandparents – were driven out of the Fillmore, world famous as “Harlem of the West,” decades ago by Redevelopment Agency bulldozers that destroyed the homes of over 5,000 Black families and more than 200 Black-owned businesses. This time, we shall not be moved. How you can help The City and County of San Francisco has declared war on us, and we will need a war chest to fight back. I’m looking to hear from attorneys who want to help – call me at the Bay View, (415) 671-0789 – and contributions to pay for this new battle and the remaining bills and loans from the petition drive. Please make checks payable to Defend Bayview Hunters Point and mail them to P.O. Box 470156, San Francisco CA 94147. We believe the power of the people will ultimately prevail, and we are counting on your help to confirm the truth of last week’s editorial headline, “People power stops Redevelopment land grab.” Many of you have not seen the editorial in last week’s printed Bay View because our website, www.sfbayview.com , which used to get 2 million hits a month, is not yet back online. It was badly hacked the week of July 7, and our webmaster, Terone Ward, with the collaboration of a team of experts from South America, has been working feverishly to rebuild it. Meanwhile, here is the editorial from the Bay View of Sept. 13, 2006: People power stops Redevelopment land grab Editorial by Willie Ratcliff Just before 5 p.m. Tuesday, Sept. 12, San Francisco Director of Elections John Arntz officially certified that the referendum petition opposing the Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Plan is successful! According to the certification letter, Elections counted 33,056 signatures after we turned them in on Aug. 30. After sampling them according to law, Elections found that many more than the required 21,615 are valid. While shouts of joy greeted the news here at the Bay View and throughout our neighborhood and beyond, the major media were shocked into total silence – a paragraph by our friends at Beyond Chron the only coverage so far. Give the big media a minute to huddle with the mayor and Supervisor Sophie Maxwell, sponsor of the Redevelopment Plan, and they’ll come out telling us how stupid we are to want to control our own land and determine our own destiny. Yeah, just like Black New Orleanians are stupid to want to reclaim their homes and control their reconstruction. The powers that be are paying attention. They call all the time. Often they ask, “How can you fix up your neighborhood without the help of the Redevelopment Agency?” Well, first of all, Redevelopment has never helped Black people – except out of our homes and out of town. Consider their catastrophic ethnic cleansing of the Fillmore, our “Harlem of the West.” And also consider what Redevelopment, the mayor and Sophie Maxwell are doing to us today – approving $85 million in City bond funds for AIMCO, self-described as “the nation’s largest owner/ operator of apartment homes,” so as to deny cooperative ownership to the 604 families of Shoreview, Bayview, LaSalle and All Hallows, apartment complexes in the existing Hunters Point Redevelopment Area. But the best answer is, “We have all the talent and expertise, the mind and muscle, to develop our own community. All we need is the money, which means no more redlining, i.e., racism in lending.” Redlining is illegal – and unconstitutional – and the City can help us break down that barrier. Last week, in an interview by Art Bruzzone, former chair of the local Republican Party, on his show, San Francisco Unscripted, shown repeatedly on Channel 11, I told Art a little about my own development experience. That’s a 20-unit apartment building in the picture at the top of this column that my family and I built; it’s by far the largest residential building in Valdez, Alaska – see the mountain rising behind it? – and the largest building ever built and owned by Blacks in Alaska. I was able to get the loan for it when Alaska was awash in oil money in the late ‘70s. Imagine a Third Street where buildings that we have lovingly restored to their original glory are interspersed with handsome new buildings that we build with our own hands – our own contractors hiring and training our own people who are hungry for work. All who were denied the right to build the light rail when the City was in charge will prize the right to rebuild Third Street when we are in charge. We can get started right away if the Board of Supervisors votes to reject the Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Plan. That’s the next step in the referendum process: the Supervisors’ reconsideration of their earlier approval of the Plan. If they check the addresses on the petitions and see that voters in their districts – in every district – eagerly signed, they’ll vote unanimously to reject the plan. All we need, though, are two more votes to win and the four we had to stay the course – they are Chris Daly, Ross Mirkarimi, Tom Ammiano and Gerardo Sandoval. Please thank those four and call all the Supervisors. Their numbers are in the phone book and on the web at www.sfgov.org/site/bdsupvrs We’ve proven we’re a powerful people now; I think they’ll be ready to listen. If the Supervisors make the mistake of voting again to approve the Redevelopment Plan, we’re still all right. Then the Plan goes to the next available ballot – probably in November 2007 – for all San Francisco voters to decide. We’ll win. Every time a plan like this has appeared on ballots around the country, voters defeat it by 85-98 percent. And meanwhile, the City is prohibited by law from implementing the Plan. So celebrate and congratulate yourself! This is our victory, yours and mine. If you donated a dollar – and we still have some big bills and loans to pay – or circulated a petition or signed one or even thought about it, you are a winner today! Now our job is to replace Supervisor Sophie Maxwell this November. An activist who checked her latest campaign contributions report was amazed to see she’s amassed over $40,000 from developers – donors with names like Build Inc., Martin Union Property Capitalist, Nibbi Bros. Construction, Robin Chiang Architect, Steven Kaufman Realtor, Sandra Steinmetz Property Manager and Zanello Properties. Sophie and her staff were on their job Tuesday defending those developers with a press release attacking the referendum, specifically naming Brian Murphy O’Flynn, whose support was invaluable to us. I’m told Sophie was overheard the other day telling someone who asked that the reason she has no Black aides in her office is that she doesn’t know of anyone who’s qualified. Six years of suffering under Sophie is enough. If you, like me, know and like more than one of the candidates running against her, that’s ok. You have three votes and will be ranking your choices 1, 2, 3. My first choice this year – as it was in 2000 when she first ran – is Marie Harrison. She lives right around the corner from me now on Quesada, with that beautiful garden just outside her front door, in a big, lovingly restored house with a spectacular view of nearly the whole district. She led the fight to shut down PG&E’s killer power plant, and she can lead us to victory after victory. Imagine what we’d have accomplished if she’d been our Supervisor for the last six years! Three cheers for our team. Let’s keep on winning. Contact Bay View publisher Willie Ratcliff at publisher@sfbayview.com or (415) 671-0789. Contribute to the referendum campaign by sending your check or money order to Defend Bayview Hunters Point, P.O. Box 470156, San Francisco Ca 94147. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 13) President Chavez's Speech to the United Nations By: President Hugo Chavez Friday, Sep 16, 2005 http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/print.php?artno=1555 Your Excellencies, friends, good afternoon: The original purpose of this meeting has been completely distorted. The imposed center of debate has been a so-called reform process that overshadows the most urgent issues, what the peoples of the world claim with urgency: the adoption of measures that deal with the real problems that block and sabotage the efforts made by our countries for real development and life. Five years after the Millennium Summit, the harsh reality is that the great majority of estimated goals- which were very modest indeed- will not be met. We pretended reducing by half the 842 million hungry people by the year 2015. At the current rate that goal will be achieved by the year 2215. Who in this audience will be there to celebrate it? That is only if the human race is able to survive the destruction that threats our natural environment. We had claimed the aspiration of achieving universal primary education by the year 2015. At the current rate that goal will be reached after the year 2100. Let us prepare, then, to celebrate it. Friends of the world, this takes us to a sad conclusion: The United Nations has exhausted its model, and it is not all about reform. The XXI century claims deep changes that will only be possible if a new organization is founded. This UN does not work. We have to say it. It is the truth. These transformations – the ones Venezuela is referring to- have, according to us, two phases: The immediate phase and the aspiration phase, a utopia. The first is framed by the agreements that were signed in the old system. We do not run away from them. We even bring concrete proposals in that model for the short term. But the dream of an ever-lasting world peace, the dream of a world not ashamed by hunger, disease, illiteracy, extreme necessity, needs-apart from roots- to spread its wings to fly. We need to spread our wings and fly. We are aware of a frightening neoliberal globalization, but there is also the reality of an interconnected world that we have to face not as a problem but as a challenge. We could, on the basis of national realities, exchange knowledge, integrate markets, interconnect, but at the same time we must understand that there are problems that do not have a national solution: radioactive clouds, world oil prices, diseases, warming of the planet or the hole in the ozone layer. These are not domestic problems. As we stride toward a new United Nations model that includes all of us when they talk about the people, we are bringing four indispensable and urgent reform proposals to this Assembly: the first; the expansion of the Security Council in its permanent categories as well as the non permanent categories, thus allowing new developed and developing countries as new permanent and non permanent categories. The second; we need to assure the necessary improvement of the work methodology in order to increase transparency, not to diminish it. The third; we need to immediately suppress- we have said this repeatedly in Venezuela for the past six years- the veto in the decisions taken by the Security Council, that elitist trace is incompatible with democracy, incompatible with the principles of equality and democracy. And the fourth; we need to strengthen the role of the Secretary General; his/her political functions regarding preventive diplomacy, that role must be consolidated. The seriousness of all problems calls for deep transformations. Mere reforms are not enough to recover that “we” all the peoples of the world are waiting for. More than just reforms we in Venezuela call for the foundation of a new United Nations, or as the teacher of Simón Bolívar, Simón Rodríguez said: “Either we invent or we err.” At the Porto Alegre World Social Forum last January different personalities asked for the United Nations to move outside the United States if the repeated violations to international rule of law continue. Today we know that there were never any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The people of the United States have always been very rigorous in demanding the truth to their leaders; the people of the world demand the same thing. There were never any weapons of mass destruction; however, Iraq was bombed, occupied and it is still occupied. All this happened over the United Nations. That is why we propose this Assembly that the United Nations should leave a country that does not respect the resolutions taken by this same Assembly. Some proposals have pointed out to Jerusalem as an international city as an alternative. The proposal is generous enough to propose an answer to the current conflict affecting Palestine. Nonetheless, it may have some characteristics that could make it very difficult to become a reality. That is why we are bringing a proposal made by Simón Bolívar, the great Liberator of the South, in 1815. Bolívar proposed then the creation of an international city that would host the idea of unity. We believe it is time to think about the creation of an international city with its own sovereignty, with its own strength and morality to represent all nations of the world. Such international city has to balance five centuries of unbalance. The headquarters of the United Nations must be in the South. Ladies and gentlemen, we are facing an unprecedented energy crisis in which an unstoppable increase of energy is perilously reaching record highs, as well as the incapacity of increase oil supply and the perspective of a decline in the proven reserves of fuel worldwide. Oil is starting to become exhausted. For the year 2020 the daily demand for oil will be 120 million barrels. Such demand, even without counting future increments- would consume in 20 years what humanity has used up to now. This means that more carbon dioxide will inevitably be increased, thus warming our planet even more. Hurricane Katrina has been a painful example of the cost of ignoring such realities. The warming of the oceans is the fundamental factor behind the demolishing increase in the strength of the hurricanes we have witnessed in the last years. Let this occasion be an outlet to send our deepest condolences to the people of the United States. Their people are brothers and sisters of all of us in the Americas and the rest of the world. It is unpractical and unethical to sacrifice the human race by appealing in an insane manner the validity of a socioeconomic model that has a galloping destructive capacity. It would be suicidal to spread it and impose it as an infallible remedy for the evils which are caused precisely by them. Not too long ago the President of the United States went to an Organization of American States’ meeting to propose Latin America and the Caribbean to increase market-oriented policies, open market policies-that is neoliberalism- when it is precisely the fundamental cause of the great evils and the great tragedies currently suffered by our people. : The neoliberal capitalism, the Washington Consensus. All this has generated is a high degree of misery, inequality and infinite tragedy for all the peoples on his continent. What we need now more than ever Mr. President is a new international order. Let us recall the United Nations General assembly in its sixth extraordinary session period in 1974, 31 years ago, where a new International Economic Order action plan was adopted, as well as the States Economic Rights and Duties Charter by an overwhelming majority, 120 votes for the motion, 6 against and 10 abstentions. This was the period when voting was possible at the United Nations. Now it is impossible to vote. Now they approve documents such as this one which I denounce on behalf of Venezuela as null, void and illegitimate. This document was approved violating the current laws of the United Nations. This document is invalid! This document should be discussed; the Venezuelan government will make it public. We cannot accept an open and shameless dictatorship in the United Nations. These matters should be discussed and that is why I petition my colleagues, heads of states and heads of governments, to discuss it. I just came from a meeting with President Néstor Kirchner and well, I was pulling this document out; this document was handed out five minutes before- and only in English- to our delegation. This document was approved by a dictatorial hammer which I am here denouncing as illegal, null, void and illegitimate. Hear this, Mr. President: if we accept this, we are indeed lost. Let us turn off the lights, close all doors and windows! That would be unbelievable: us accepting a dictatorship here in this hall. Now more than ever- we were saying- we need to retake ideas that were left on the road such as the proposal approved at this Assembly in 1974 regarding a New Economic International Order. Article 2 of that text confirms the right of states to nationalizing the property and natural resources that belonged to foreign investors. It also proposed to create cartels of raw material producers. In the Resolution 3021, May, 1974, the Assembly expressed its will to work with utmost urgency in the creation of a New Economic International Order based on- listen carefully, please- “the equity, sovereign equality, interdependence, common interest and cooperation among all states regardless of their economic and social systems, correcting the inequalities and repairing the injustices among developed and developing countries, thus assuring present and future generations, peace, justice and a social and economic development that grows at a sustainable rate.” The main goal of the New Economic International Order was to modify the old economic order conceived at Breton Woods. We the people now claim- this is the case of Venezuela- a new international economic order. But it is also urgent a new international political order. Let us not permit that a few countries try to reinterpret the principles of International Law in order to impose new doctrines such as “pre-emptive warfare.” Oh do they threaten us with that pre-emptive war! And what about the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine? We need to ask ourselves. Who is going to protect us? How are they going to protect us? I believe one of the countries that require protection is precisely the United States. That was shown painfully with the tragedy caused by Hurricane Katrina; they do not have a government that protects them from the announced nature disasters, if we are going to talk about protecting each other; these are very dangerous concepts that shape imperialism, interventionism as they try to legalize the violation of the national sovereignty. The full respect towards the principles of International Law and the United Nations Charter must be, Mr. President, the keystone for international relations in today’s world and the base for the new order we are currently proposing. It is urgent to fight, in an efficient manner, international terrorism. Nonetheless, we must not use it as an excuse to launch unjustified military aggressions which violate international law. Such has been the doctrine following September 11. Only a true and close cooperation and the end of the double discourse that some countries of the North apply regarding terrorism, could end this terrible calamity. In just seven years of Bolivarian Revolution, the people of Venezuela can claim important social and economic advances. One million four hundred and six thousand Venezuelans learned to read and write. We are 25 million total. And the country will-in a few days- be declared illiteracy-free territory. And three million Venezuelans, who had always been excluded because of poverty, are now part of primary, secondary and higher studies. Seventeen million Venezuelans-almost 70% of the population- are receiving, and for the first time, universal healthcare, including the medicine, and in a few years, all Venezuelans will have free access to an excellent healthcare service. More thatn a million seven hundred tons of food are channeled to over 12 million people at subsidized prices, almost half the population. One million gets them completely free, as they are in a transition period. More than 700 thousand new jobs have been created, thus reducing unemployment by 9 points. All of this amid internal and external aggressions, including a coup d’etat and an oil industry shutdown organized by Washington. Regardless of the conspiracies, the lies spread by powerful media outlets, and the permanent threat of the empire and its allies, they even call for the assassination of a president. The only country where a person is able to call for the assassination of a head of state is the United States. Such was the case of a Reverend called Pat Robertson, very close to the White House: He called for my assassination and he is a free person. That is international terrorism! We will fight for Venezuela, for Latin American integration and the world. We reaffirm our infinite faith in humankind. We are thirsty for peace and justice in order to survive as species. Simón Bolívar, founding father of our country and guide of our revolution swore to never allow his hands to be idle or his soul to rest until he had broken the shackles which bound us to the empire. Now is the time to not allow our hands to be idle or our souls to rest until we save humanity. Translated by Néstor Sánchez ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 14) Home Raids Provoke Increased Unrest Inter Press Service Dahr Jamail and Ali al-Fadhily Dahr Jamail's Iraq Dispatches http://dahrjamailiraq.com BAGHDAD, Sep 20 (IPS) - Renewed raids at Iraqi homes by joint U.S.-Iraqi security forces are angering Iraqis -- while failing to improve the worsening security situation.* "Operation Forward Together should be called 'To Hell Together'," 53-year-old Hamid Fassal, an estate broker from the Dora region of Baghdad told IPS, referring to the major U.S.-Iraqi joint security campaign launched in June. "They should be ashamed of what's going on after four years of plans and such huge expenditure. The result is only more deaths and more agony for all Iraqis." U.S. troops accompanied by Iraqi soldiers have conducted raids across much of the Sunni region of Iraq in search of death squads. Several Iraqis say they are surprised about the areas searched because they say U.S. forces know that the majority of death squads are located in the Shia areas. "I do not understand what they are really looking for and whether they are doing it right," Salim al-Juboori of the Sherq Journal in Baghdad told IPS. "They searched Amiriya, Adhamiyah, Dora and other places in Baghdad where citizens are the victims of gangs who come from other places under government flags, and during curfew hours." Residents of the Amiriya neighbourhood of Baghdad recently faced a week-long blockade after U..S. troops raided more than 6,000 houses. Residents had to face checkpoints and body searches. "They detained many innocent people and robbed lightweight valuable materials from the houses they raided," a member of the Amiriya local council told IPS. "It seems they were searching for gold, cash and expensive mobile devices. They know very well where to search for criminals, so why destroy Amiriya?" Similar complaints have come from Dora, Adhamiya and other Sunni areas of Baghdad, and other cities throughout the primarily Sunni province of al-Anbar west of Baghdad. "Hasn't Fallujah had enough," said Mansoor al-Kubaissi of the Fallujah Youth Centre. "Those Americans are raiding our houses, looting our savings and business capital and detaining our sons again and again, as if there were a feud between us. Look at the result of their doings: they are being attacked several times a day and their soldiers are falling dead every day." Kubaissi was referring to joint U.S.-Iraqi security force raids in central Fallujah over this past weekend. On Sunday Sep. 17, five car bombs and another tied to a bicycle exploded in Fallujah. The bomb attacks targeted U.S. and Iraqi troops during their routine patrols and home raids. U.S. forces have detained many people, including Reuters/BBC/al-Jazeera correspondent Fadhil al-Bedrani. Bedrani is well known to people in Fallujah for his professional reporting during more than three years of U.S. occupation. Associated Press (AP) photographer Bilal Hussein, who is also from Fallujah, has been detained for five months by the U.S. military. Hussein was accused by U.S. forces of being a "security threat", but they have never filed charges or permitted a public hearing. Executives from AP say they did not find any sign of inappropriate contact with resistance fighters. Bedrani and Hussein are only two among an estimated 14,000 people detained by the U.S. military across the world.. At least 13,000 of these are in Iraq. Most have been held without charge, and have been given no date for a court appearance or tribunal hearing where they might argue for their freedom. The home raids and neighbourhood searches that are leading to more such detentions meanwhile continue to anger Iraqis. Many say the raids are only worsening the already chaotic and violent situation. "Their searches always end up with terrible failures," Col. Kathum Jawad of the previous Saddam security directorate told IPS in Baghdad. "Two days after their search in Adhamiya, 14 roadside bombs exploded within a quarter an hour, killing soldiers. This failure only means the Iraqi problem is not coming to an end as long as those people are in power." (c)2006 Dahr Jamail. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 15) G.O.P. in Senate Narrows Immigration Focus to 700-Mile Fence By CARL HULSE September 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/washington/21immig.html?ref=us WASHINGTON, Sept. 20 — Senate Republicans formally put aside a broad immigration overhaul sought by President Bush on Wednesday and decided instead to press ahead with narrower bills to require building 700 miles of fence on the southwestern border. Senator Bill Frist of Tennessee, the majority leader, said the fate of millions of illegal immigrants already in the United States had become a “fundamental sticking point” in trying to reach agreement with the House on a broad bill. Mr. Frist said the fence proposal, which the House has passed, was the best alternative if lawmakers wanted to salvage some immigration changes before the Nov. 7 elections. “Let’s focus on a problem the American people understand,’’ the senator said, “and that is, we have hundreds of thousands of people coming across our border every year into our country.” He added that the broad measure could be considered when Congress returned in mid-November or next year. The Senate voted, 94 to 0, to debate the measure on fencing and other border barriers at the cost of billions of dollars. But the fate of even that measure is unclear, because members of both parties have reservations, and Mr. Frist may need to block any amendments if he wants to deliver it to Mr. Bush before Congress adjourns next week. The fence represents one element of the broad bipartisan measure that the Senate approved in May after Mr. Bush had delivered a prime-time address calling for sweeping changes in immigration law, including allowing some illegal immigrants to earn citizenship. House Republicans, fearing a backlash from the right, refused to consider any bill that could be called amnesty for illegal immigrants. The two chambers never formally opened negotiations to reconcile the Senate bill with a strict border enforcement measure that the House approved in December. Republican backers of the broad Senate approach suggested that the party could be penalized at the polls for not pursuing a comprehensive solution. “It is one of the greatest problems facing the country today,” Senator Arlen Specter, the Pennsylvania Republican who is chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said. “For the Republicans not to produce is not good. Perhaps we will find a little better mood in the lame-duck session.” Other Republicans said constituents were demanding that the government do a much better job of sealing borders before considering other aspects of an immigration overhaul like a temporary-worker program, new penalties for businesses that employ illegal immigrants and possible citizenship. “This is putting the horse before the cart,” Senator Rick Santorum, Republican of Pennsylvania, said about moving | |