Bay . Area . United . Against . War
|
||
|
BAUAW NEWSLETTER Subscribe/Unsubscribe
Friday, June 16, 2006
BAUAW NEWSLETTER-THURSDAY, JUNE 22, 2006
OCTOBER 28 LOCALLY COORDINATED
ANTIWAR ACTIVITIES: A CALL TO ACTION The A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition has initiated a call for locally coordinated protests on Saturday, October 28th, just days before the pitiful charade known as the 2006 mid -term elections. The people will force the issue of the Iraq war onto the U.S. political stage by taking to streets in demonstrations in cities and towns throughout the United States. Tens of thousands of people will take to the streets in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Seattle, New York, Miami, Washington D.C. and in other large and small cities and towns throughout the United States. http://answer.pephost.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ANS_homepage ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- A new movie, "The Road to Guantanamo" is touring film fests right now, and it will also be playing in San Francisco starting this Friday. For more specifics about the film, which is a docu- drama about three prisoners' lives, go to http://www.roadtoguantanamomovie.com/ . ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Iraq Body Count Press Release 13, 9th March 2006. For current totals, see our database page. http://www.iraqbodycount.net/press/pr13.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- JUNE 27 "National Day of Action" To Stand With Lt.Watada! On June 7th, 2006, U.S. Army First Lieutenant Ehren Watada became the first commissioned officer to publicly announce his opposition to the Iraq war and his intent to refuse to deploy with his unit to Iraq. “My son, 1st Lt. Ehren Watada, is not the same person who entered the military service three years ago. His decision to refrain from deploying to Iraq comes through much soul searching. It is an act of patriotism. It is a statement to all Americans, to men and women in uniform, that they need not remain silent out of fear, that that they have the power to turn the tide of history: to stop the destruction of a country and the killing of untold numbers of innocent men, women, and children. It is a message that states unequivocally that blindly following orders is no longer an option. My son, Lt. Watada’s stance is clear. He will stay the course. I urge you to join him in this effort.” -Carolyn Ho, Ehren's mother To demonstrate our support for Ehren, and his couregeous stand, we call for a National Day of Action on June 27th to support Ehren as he officially resists deployment this week. We are urging you today to join with people across the country and attend or organize a coordinated action in your community on June 27th supporting Ehren’s refusal of orders! Supporters have planned events across the country. For more information go to: http://www.couragetoresist.org/x/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,1/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Eyewitness Account from Oaxaca A website is now being circulated that has up-to-date info and video that can be downloaded of the police action and developments in Oaxaca. For those who have not seen it elsewhere, the website is: www.mexico.indymedia.org/oaxaca http://www.mexico.indymedia.org/oaxaca ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- DRCNet Alert: Sources have informed us that the Hinchey-Rohrabacher medical marijuana vote in the House of Representatives is going to happen NEXT WEEK. This amendment if passed will forbid the US Dept. of Justice from interfering with state medical marijuana laws. Your help is needed -- it is crucial that more members of Congress vote for medical marijuana this year than did last year. Please visit http://stopthedrugwar.org/medicalmarijuana/ to e-mail your member of Congress today! http://stopthedrugwar.org/index.shtml ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- THIS JUST IN ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "Operation Return to Sender" Police-ICE Raid Against Immigrants June 18, 2006 From: dorindamoreno@comcast.net mailto:dorindamoreno@comcast.net "Operation Return To Sender" is a team of "POLICE ICE" has just arrested and deported over 150 undocumented immigrants . The immigrants are from Vista, Ca. Police ICE looks for the following: 1. Mexican congregating at local bars speaking Spanish and no English. 2. Mexicans having a party in large groups and the undercover police officer hearing ONLY Spanish spoken about their home country. This is a give away for the immigrant. 3. They are hitting the apartments where large numbers of Mexican live and work in the agriculture fields. 4. They hone in on Home Depot areas, 7/11 stores, and others categorized Mexican corners. 5. Be prepared if they take on the K-12 schools and colleges. 6. Be prepared if ICE takes on the Mexican patients in the hospitals. 7. ICE will be targeting Mexicans in any undisclosed area. The hit will come as a surprise in the early morning hours and when Mexican least expect the visit. 8. ICE comes in para-military uniforms in white with black bullet proof jackets. They work in teams of five to ten to an apartment complex and have their trucks parked half a block away. 9. This information was on our San Diego local news and might be in the National News tonight. 10. Being 23 miles from the Mexican border I see all kinds of Mexican round-ups and massive deportations. 11. What I find most disturbing is that ICE might next hit our schools in September, 2006. All large cities with Mexicans populations might see extensive raids. I hope the immigrant community now start to acquire their USA documents. Pedro Olivares Related: Immigration Sweep Brings Fear to Community By ELLIOT SPAGAT Associated Press Writer June 18, 2006 http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/photos/8/84cd1c7d-2976-4559-846e-171afc930239.html?SITE=NVLAS&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- PLEASE FORWARD ** PLEASE FORWARD WIDELY ** PLEASE FORWARD SAVE THE DATE! Thursday, June 29 @ 1 pm Stand with families who have lost children in California's youth prisons Sacramento (exact location TBA) GOV SCHWARZENEGGER ON CA's YOUTH PRISON CRISIS November 2004 "This will not just be dialogue, this will be action, because I am the Action Governor." November 2004 - present All talk, no action... When news of the human rights abuses in California's youth prisons first made headlines, the governor promised to "blow up the box" and reform the juvenile justice system. He has not lived up to that promise. The "Action Governor" has taken virtually no action at all. Five young people have died in these monstrous youth prisons. Many more have attempted suicide to escape the conditions. Still, Schwarzenegger is content to "plan." He has even refused to talk with families whose children died in his youth prisons, on his watch. Well, we've had enough waiting patiently while the governor whiles away his time in office "planning" to fix the problem. From June 27-June 29, families whose children have died in California youth prisons will stand vigil at the state Capitol, demanding that Schwarzenegger keep his promise to end the suffering and abuse in the CYA. SAVE THE DATE On the last day, Thursday, June 29, we want you to join us in Sacramento as we call on the governor to keep his word. Stand with these families in demanding action from the so-called "Action Governor." We will e-mail you with more information about where and when to meet in Sacramento, and about possible ridesharing from the Bay Area and elsewhere. To get the latest information, please contact Sumayyah Waheed: Sumayyah Waheed, Books Not Bars Organizer sumayyah@ellabakercenter.org 510.428.3939 x221 We look forward to seeing you in two weeks! Many thanks, Jakada "J" Imani Director of Books Not Bars * The Ella Baker Center can't survive without the support of people like you. Please take a moment to support us today: http://www.ellabakercenter.org/donate ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- DEFEND SPC. SUZANNE SWIFT WHO SAID NO TO THE WAR! At 9:50 AM -0700 6/12/06 Larry Hildes, attorney for Suzanne Swift, wrote: SPC. Suzanne Swift has been diagnosed with PTSD as a result of constant and pervasive sexual harassment by multiple sergeants, both in Iraq, and then back here, one of whom coerced her into a long-term sexual relationship. She complained to command about these sergeants; only one was disciplined, and then only with a reprimand. She finally reached her limit and went AWOL in January. We've been attempting to resolve the situation with command, and have built up the documentation of her PTSD and were getting ready to negotiate her turning herself in when she got picked up by the Eugene, Oregon, police at 11:00 last night. The police forced their way in to the house, assaulted Suzanne's mother, and took Suzanne to the Lane County, Oregon, jail where she is right now. The Army indicated they're expecting to pick her up in the next day or two and ship her back to Ft. Lewis, Washington. More publicity is needed. Also calls to the Lane County Jail (541)682-2245, and to Lt. Col Switzer, her commander at Ft. Lewis-(253) 967-4921. Thanks, Larry Hildes (360) 715-9788, P.0. Box 5405, Bellingham, WA 98227 Related: A Moment of Silence Is Not Enough By Sara Rich t r u t h o u t | Statement On March 18th Sara Rich, mother of an AWOL US soldier, gave this address at an antiwar rally http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032006S.shtml ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Friends and Family of Lt. Ehren Watada www.ThankYouLt.org ACTION ALERT June 14, 2006 CONTACT ARMY TO DEMAND: "DROP INVESTIGATION INTO LT. WATADA'S PROTECTED FREE SPEECH AGAINST ILLEGAL WAR" On Wednesday, June 7th U.S. Army First Lieutenant Ehren Watada became the first U.S. commissioned officer to publicly speak out in opposition to the Iraq War and occupation. Lt. Watada outlined why he believes the war to be illegal, and why he would have to refuse to obey any future order to participate in it. The following day, Thursday, June 8th Lt. Watada's commanding officer moved to prosecute Lt. Watada for nothing more than his protected free speech. Lt. Watada was read his rights and declined to make a statement without a lawyer present. Although the Fort Lewis military public affairs officer has stated that Lt. Watada "hasn't done anything wrong" so far, an official investigation into his public speech is underway. When soldiers join the military they swear to uphold our Constitution. They do not give up their basic right to freedom of speech. Outlined in Department of Defense Directive 1325.6, members of the military have the right to say what they think and feel about the military, and even participate in peaceful demonstrations, as long as they are off-duty, out of uniform, off-base, and within the United States. PLEASE WRITE AND CALL: "Dear Col Stephen Townsend; Please drop the investigation currently underway against First Lt. Ehren Watada of 3-2 SBCT for his protected free speech in opposition to the war in Iraq. Respectfully," TO: Col Stephen Townsend Commanding Officer 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division Fort Lewis WA 98433 (253) 967-9601 CC: Lt Gen James Dubik Fort Commander Fort Lewis WA 98433 For background information: Military attempts to stop Lt. Watada from speaking against illegal war By Friends and Family of Lt. Ehren Watada. June 9, 2006 http://www.thankyoult.org/go/100.html When soldiers refuse to fight: Is the US Army trying to silence Lt. Watada? By Sarah Olson, Truthout.com. June 14, 2006 http://www.thankyoult.org/go/101.html For up-to-date and additional information: http://www.ThankYouLt.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Sign the petition to save Bayview Hunters Point: No more Fillmore! Editorial by Willie Ratcliff, http://www.sfbayview.com/060706/signthepetition060706.shtml As urban Black displacement grows, Bayview kicks off referendum drive to stop Redevelopment by Randy Shaw, http://www.sfbayview.com/060706/displacement060706.shtml Hands off Bayview Hunters Point! An open letter to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors http://www.sfbayview.com/050306/handsoff050306.shtml ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "The Democrats always promise to help workers, and the don't! The Republicans always promise to help business, and the do!" - Mort Sahl ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Emilano Zapata ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Please circulate widely Join the Campaign to Shut Down the Guantanamo Torture Center We urge you to join us in a nationwide campaign and petition drive to shut down the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility. The campaign is a project of the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition and VoteNoWar. Org which was the largest grassroots peoples referendum opposing the launch of the Iraq war. The goal of the campaign is to ignite a mass movement of the people of the United States and around the world to close Guantanamo and all the secret prisons and torture centers set up around the world by the Bush administration. Each and every official must be held accountable for their criminal conduct from Bush and Cheney to Rumsfeld and General Geoffrey Miller. Click here to send a letter to Congress and the White House: Shut Down Guantanamo and all torture centers and prisons. We will be gathering hundreds of thousands of names on the printed "Shut It Down" petition, available at http://www.shutitdown.org/. We will flood Congress with emails, faxes and phone calls. We will be launching a mass education campaign in the mainstream media and in the alternative media. With your help we will be placing newspaper ads around the country. We will be coalescing with organizations and movements who focus on civil rights, legal rights, faith-based and student communities, and within the labor movement. This is an issue that affects everyone. As someone who has been active in and supporting the anti-war movement you are well aware that the most important counter-weight to the Bush Administration's criminal policies has been the creation of a global progressive movement. Millions of people have been in the streets in countless demonstrations in the past few years. Now Bush's approval ratings have dropped to 29% and the anti-war movement's political position has been proven to be correct. But unless we act now, and help the rest of the country join in this movement, the criminals in the White House will continue on their path. Please make a donation to help support the organizing efforts to shut down the Guantanamo Bay torture facility. Suicides and Torture in Guantanamo Three men who had been held for four years resorted to hanging themselves this last weekend, according to Guantanamo prison authorities. Scores of others have tried to kill themselves. In a shocking but inadvertent admission of the depravity of the Guantanamo authorities, the Camp Commander Rear-Admiral Harry Harris described the suicides "an act of asymmetric warfare against us." He then said about the dead inmates, they "have no regard for life, neither ours or their own." The three men who killed themselves had previously been hunger strikers subjected to force-feeding by prison guards. Held for years without ever being charged with wrongdoing, without being able to see their families, subject to constant interrogation and torture by the U.S. government and no end in sight, Guantanamo detainees have increasingly attempted suicide and others have gone on hunger strikes. The Pentagon made public its approval of the use of force feeding, which is another form of torture. According to detainees, those who refuse to eat are strapped down twice a day in specially designed chairs, and tubes are violently inserted through their noses and into their stomachs. The U.S. military personnel force liquids through the tubes. Detainees, many of whom are left vomiting blood, have also reported that U.S. military personnel reuse the unclean tubes on different captives. As a result of the application of this torture regime, the U.S. military has bragged of a significant reduction in hunger strikers in recent days. The Associated Press today published a story about three British youths who were detained at Guantanamo for more than two years without charge before they were released. The AP story reports, "At the camp, the men say they were beaten and saw troops throw Qurans in the toilet. They also say they were forced to watch videotapes of prisoners who had allegedly been ordered to sodomize each other and were chained to a hook in the floor while strobe lights flashed and heavy metal music blared." The New York Times lead editorial from today (Monday June 12) condemned the Guantanamo prison and said that it was no surprise that detainees are committing suicide, "It is a place where secret tribunals sat in judgment of men whose identities they barely knew and who were not permitted to see the evidence against them. Inmates were abused, humiliated, tormented and sometimes tortured." Click here to send a letter to Congress and the White House: Shut Down Guantanamo and all torture centers and prisons. UN Panel says: Shut Down Guantanamo Now! The United Nations panel investigating conditions at Guantanamo insisted in a report released on May 19, 2006 that the prison must be shut down. The UN panel declared the prison to be a torture facility. Unless they are charged and given a fair trial, the report also called for the release of the hundreds of prisoners at Guantanamo who are being held indefinitely. Without criminal charges, these prisoners are held in savage conditions and subjected to physical and psychological abuse, including the much vaunted innovations of "cultural" and sexual humiliation. The UN report did not limit itself to demanding the closing of Guantanamo. It also called for the closure of secret CIA prisons, and the end of the "extraordinary renditions" which is the policy of the US government shipping people to other countries so that they can be more effectively tortured. This torture center must be closed. The people of the United States should join the people of Cuba and the people of the world in demanding that the entire U.S. Naval Base in Guantanamo Cuba be closed down. The U.S. invaded Cuba in 1898 and forced the colonial government of that time to sign a treaty giving the U.S. military control over this part of the island of Cuba in perpetuity. The continued maintenance of a U.S. Naval Base inside of Cuba against the wishes of the Cuban people is a modern day expression of the vilest colonialism. How ironic it is that the Bush Administration accuses the Cuban government of violating "human rights" when the only place in Cuba where the authorities engage in systematic torture of prisoners held without Due Process rights is the portion under the control of the U.S. government. Say No to Torture -- Say No to Bush' s Imperial Government The establishment of a torture facility at a US naval base located in a foreign country is not an isolated criminal act by this administration. It is part of a pattern whose methods and goals are now obvious. The Bush White House, in both its domestic and foreign policy, wants to establish that all existing international and domestic law that in any way inhibits the assumption of near-dictatorial power by the President of the United States must be declared null and void. The so-called war on terrorism is revealed as nothing more than a slogan masking a quest for unfettered empire. The war of aggression against Iraq; the assassination of targeted individuals; the establishment of torture facilities and secret prisons around the world; the secret phone record collection, warrantless wiretapping and monitoring of the email of millions of Americans -- all of this constitutes a brazen effort to assume unfettered authority and power. This is the challenge of our time. Will the people intervene and act decisively? The people of the United States, in partnership with the peoples of all continents, are a power far greater than the Bush White House. But we must act. Each one of us must act to inform our neighbors, family members and co-workers. Go to: http://www.shutitdown.org/ to send a letter to Congress and the White House: Shut Down Guantanamo and all torture centers and prisons. A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition Act Now to Stop War & End Racism http://www.ANSWERcoalition.org http://www.actionsf.org sf@internationalanswer.org 2489 Mission St. Rm. 24 San Francisco: 415-821-6545 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- ABOLISHING JROTC in SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOLS There will be a special meeting in July when the School Board will vote on this resolution. The meeting date is to be announced. School District Office 555 Franklin St San Francisco 415/241-6427 Report and Open letter to the Board of Education regarding JROTC: At the first reading of the resolution to rid the schools of JROTC on the basis of the policy of "Don't ask, don't tell" that discriminates against gay's in the military, which was presented to the Board of Education meeting on May 23, the JROTC teachers (all retired military officers) mobilized students to speak on behalf of JROTC. Carole Seligman and I spoke to many students in the lobby before the meeting began. Repeatedly they expressed that they loved the program. It gives them confidence in themselves, provides a supportive environment, encourages good scholarship in school, and encourages comradeship among the members. So much so, that a young girl had a silver-colored chain with a tiny silver-colored and diamond studded bullet. I really couldn't believe it was a bullet so I asked her if it was. She said, "oh! this? Yes, it's a bullet. You know, it's between me and my friend, you know, like, 'I'll take a bullet for you!'" Need I say more about the virtues of JROTC? Unfortunately, the resolution that follows says nothing of this aspect of JROTC. Nothing about the war. Nothing about young people being taught to "take a bullet for each other". Nothing about the realities of war. Nothing about asking students, gay or not, to risk their lives and take the lives of Iraqis for this inhuman and illegal war brought about by an inhuman and illegal government. It was announced by gay supporters of JROTC at the meeting that they expected the military to lift the prohibition on gays in the military this year. If this is true this will make this resolution obsolete before it can ever take effect. Are we to cheer that our gay brothers and sisters will be able to fight in this war? What is our plan to convince young gay and straight students that they can't "be all they can be" if they are dead; or legless and armless; or with the blood of too many dead in their hearts and head; or permanently brain-damaged; burnt or blinded by exploding eyeballs and deafened by exploding eardrums? Who will tell them of depleted uranium illness? Who will tell them that although there is a very high survival rate for our injured soldiers there is also a very high rate of survival with such catastrophic injury and illness? Who will tell them that they are more likely to be homeless after serving than in college? Who will tell them about the logic of "following orders" and a "chain of command" Instead of thinking and reasoning and making decisions for themselves leads to disaster? If you haven't seen it, I suggest you watch the HBO special, "Baghdad ER". In fact it should be shown to all of our students in middle and high school. (It's far too explicit for very young children.) We and the majority of the voters in San Francisco want the military out of our schools immediately! Here are my comments for the meeting. I was cut off midway through my timed one-minute delivery. The resolution follows my comments. Please look at it again and see that a vital antiwar message is missing from it and correct and amend the resolution immediately to reflect opposition to the militarization of our schools and the offering up of our students as cannon fodder for this bloodthirsty and greedy government and it's military might. We want a world without war! How can we teach children that violence is not the answer when the most powerful and influential adults in the world--our government-- uses it as their ultimate tool to gain wealth and power for themselves. You must take a stronger antiwar stand! I don't care how many antiwar resolutions you have passed. The proof of the pudding is in the military presence in our schools! Sincerely, Bonnie Weinstein Addressed to the President, Vice President and the Commissioners of the San Francisco Board of Education: I commend the board members who are bringing the motion to rid our schools of JROTC forward. This is in line with the wishes of the majority of the voters in San Francisco who voted to get the military out of our schools this past November. The military’s policy of “don’t ask, don’t tell” is unacceptable. Our obligation is to educate our children against prejudice of all kinds—not turn a blind eye—and turn a bigoted military loose on them. But that is not the only reason we want the military and JROTC out. We want our children to engage in physical education, in fact, to find joy in it; and to study history—to learn how to avoid the mistakes of the past; to gain satisfaction and experience joy in learning so they can contribute to human knowledge themselves as well as help fashion a better world! We want our children to feel responsible to her or his community. We want students to gain a sense of responsibility and pride in a job well done by contributing to the life and well being of their school, their home and their community. We don’t want to teach our children to blindly obey a chain of command or to glorify war. In fact, it is our duty to teach our children that blind obedience, violence, greed, bigotry, prejudice, human inequality, torture, pre- emptive war, profiting off of war and injustice, inequality in the application of the law, and poverty in the face of fantastic wealth is wrong, inhuman and intolerable and we can do better! We must rid our schools of the military and JROTC, hire enough Physical Education teachers immediately, and re-dedicate our schools to education and human development—and reject the road to war and militarism. Just one more thing, I want to correct the notion that the new school policy regarding military recruiters has resulted in less military presence in our schools. In fact, it has resulted in more. Many schools did not invite the military on Career Day and now they must, and that is a shame, because we want the military out! We don’t want our children to study war or bigotry any more! Not for one more second! Bonnie Weinstein, Bay Area United Against War, www.bauaw.org, 415-824-8730 The resolution: Introduction of Replacement Program for JROTC --Commissioners Mark Sanchez and Dan Kelly WHEREAS: It is the official policy of the San Francisco Unified School District to oppose discrimination of any kind against any group of people; and WHEREAS: The District’s opposition to discrimination is articulated in Board Policy 5163, which provides that the San Francisco Unified School District shall not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, creed, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, or handicapping condition in the provision of educational programs, services, and activities, in the admission of students to school programs and activities; and in the recruitment and employment of personnel; and WHEREAS: The San Francisco Unified School District deplores the "Don’t Ask Don’t Tell" policy of the U.S. Department of Defense, which requires the discharge of any member of the armed forces if such service member has engaged in "homosexual acts," has revealed that s/he is a homosexual or bisexual, or the member has married or attempted to marry a person known to be of the same biological sex; and WHEREAS: The District believes that the "Don’t Ask Don’t Tell" policy is an unjust, indefensible, unintelligent, state-sanctioned act of homophobia; and WHEREAS: The San Francisco Unified School District cannot justify committing any funding to a JROTC program because its connection to the U.S. Department of Defense suggests that discrimination against some groups is tolerable. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District calls for the phasing –out of the JROTC program of the United States Department of Defense on San Francisco Unified School District campuses; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Board of Education instructs District staff to provide all JROTC units at SFUSD campuses with one year notice that the programs will be terminated at all SFUSD campuses after the 2006-2007 school year; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Board of Education calls for the creation of a special task force to develop alternative, creative, career-driven programs which provide students with a greater sense of purpose and respect for self and humankind. Board has plan to oust ROTC from S.F. schools Members want to cut program over 'Don't ask, Don't tell' The students engage in physical training such as running, push-ups and jumping jacks; and discipline training such as marching, drill-practice and using a mock chain of command. They also study military history and perform community service. - Heather Knight, Chronicle Staff Writer Tuesday, May 23, 2006 http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/05/23/MNGIOJ0G7P1.DTL ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Free the Land! Support Indigenous Sovereignty! Support the courageous stand of the Onkwehonweh people! Dear supporters, As you know, one of our comrades made a solidarity trip up to the Six Nations a few weeks ago bringing up much needed supplies. He is planning a return trip and needs more support (see prior email). If you can give anything please get in touch (muayxthai@yahoo.co.uk). The following is a report from Six Nations regarding the current confrontation between indigenous people standing up for their rights, their land and their families and the Canadian and U.S. governments. As the Chicano activist Juan Santos wrote in Mexica Tlahtolli, last April, "The original Europeans in what is now the U.S. were not immigrants, but colonists. And the U.S. is not a nation of immigrants - it is a white colonial settler state, like South Africa under Apartheid, the former Rhodesia, Australia and Israel.” And, of course, like Canada. Jericho Boston UPDATE FROM GRAND RIVER June 9, 2006. Today has been a day of unrest at the land reclamation site. While we won't go into great detail on what has happened today as a press release is being prepared, let us say that the intimidation tactics and pressure from the outside has been worked up to the point that 1000 OPP [Ontario Provincial Police] officers are being dispatched to the area surrounding the reclamation site. Caledonia residents are up in arms, demanding the removal of our people from the site. They are even going so far as to set up a barricade on the recently opened Plank Road (Argyle Street) leading into Caledonia. The intimidation tactics leading up to today were constant..... including army helicopters and others flying overhead all hours of the day and night. They hovered overhead between 2 and 4 in the morning with their lights off and their nigh vision on , and then on occasion, shining high powered lights down onto the people on the site. [this is all the same as their tactics in Oka in 1990]. We are being faced daily with people driving by, hollering racial remarks including "go home you f'n Indians", "get a job", "your gonna die" etc. Garbage is being thrown at us. Besides the "flipping of the bird", there have been times where firecrackers are being thrown out the car windows toward us. These incidents, however, are not investigated by the OPP because “they are not breaking any laws”. [See ‘Rocks at Whisky Trench, National Film Board]. [what about hate laws, human rights and racial discrimination?] Today a United States Border Patrol vehicle was retrieved with high powered surveillance equipment in it. The first story from the OPP was that the "A.T.F. Officer" was just visiting friends in the neighborhood and taking pictures "kinda like a tourist". [Right! With a high tech surveillance van? He left the family car at home?] He was spotted just down from the front line barricade. We followed them to the back door of the reclamation site. Later we questioned what the United States ATF was doing snooping around taking pictures of us with the OPP riding in the back with them. They changed the story saying that they had been invited in by the OPP. [Why? Was the OPP getting lonely looking at each other? Did they need more maniacs to make themselves feel more comfortable?] What were they doing here? What is their mandate? The OPP refused to tell us why these people have gotten high government official clearance to be so far out of their jurisdiction. An OPP officer was hospitalized as a result of this incident. A CHTV Newsperson/cameraman had to get stitches as a result of a previous run-in with our people. [CHTV 11 not only reports the news, they “create” the news]. This situation is not good. [All reports from CHTV 11 are anti-Indigenous]. The incidents of today are a direct result of the constant intimidation tactics of the OPP, the military and the continued racist acts instigated against us by the Caledonia people [with their professionally made “Bring in the Army” signs always in their car trunks, just in case the cameras are there]. Other strategies are the recent blocking of our children from using the arena for lacrosse games and the back tracking by the Ontario government at the “talks”. This is supposed to push everything up to the ultimate goal of Canada and Ontario. They want to justify stopping the talks about returning our lands to us. At our fire tonight, we realized that Canada does not want to deal with the Onkwehonweh people because they know we are absolutely right in our position on the land, our sovereignty and upholding our Law. This violence today occurred as a result of the underhanded and direct attempts at inciting an action from us to justify another attack against us. They want to make it look like we are uncontrollable. Why else have they been playing the "terrorists in Canada in court in Brampton" back to back with the "Six Nations land reclamation in Caledonia" on all the news stations? Canada, with the help of corporate media, is making sure the mental brainwashing of its citizens against the Onkwehonweh continues. [Across Canada people are not buying this corporate brainwashing]. How convenient that CHTV 11 was there even before this all started! How coincidently that the couple who sparked the violence with their racial attacks and their attempt to run over our people, drove straight to the Canadian Tire parking lot! How convenient that a "by-stander" happened to have a video camera across the road at the Tim Horton’s coffee shop video taping the whole scene [with a Boston Cream donut in the other hand]. He directly reported to CHML radio which happens to be co-owned by CHTV 11. Was it a co-incidence! Or were they already on standby knowing that a story was about to break. [Another high-priced promotion failed!] It is unfortunate that our people fell for it. [Our guys are the only ones legally here]. The reality is, we are dealing with the constant mental, emotional and physical intimidation of the corrupt bureaucrats. Also, we face racial violence constantly. Does anyone know for sure how they would react in the same situation? The potential for violence against us here in the next while is tremendous. [Expect this to happen. This is their “bad act” and no one’s buying any tickets for it!] The Caledonia people want to take us off our land. The OPP are maintaining a line between the Caledonia residents and the reclamation site. [Just like the people in Chateauguay in 1990. See “Act of Defiance” by the National Film Board]. We don’t know how long this is going to last. Our people are on alert. We are on the site unarmed. We are trying to maintain the peace. We are keeping the people within the inner perimeter. We will continue to forward updates. Please forward to others. Stay Strong and keep the Peace. Hazel You support is crucial now. Do whatever you can. Use your good mind and heart. Stand by us in solidarity and support. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Great Counter-Recruitment Website http://notyoursoldier.org/article.php?list=type&type=14 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- SCROLL DOWN TO READ: EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ARTICLES IN FULL LINKS ONLY ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- DEFEND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND CIVIL RIGHTS! Last summer the U.S. Border Patrol arrested Shanti Sellz and Daniel Strauss, both 23-year-old volunteers assisting immigrants on the border, for medically evacuating 3 people in critical condition from the Arizona desert. Criminalization for aiding undocumented immigrants already exists on the books in the state of Arizona. Daniel and Shanti are targeted to be its first victims. Their arrest and subsequent prosecution for providing humanitarian aid could result in a 15-year prison sentence. Any Congressional compromise with the Sensenbrenner bill (HR 4437) may include these harmful criminalization provisions. Fight back NOW! Help stop the criminalization of undocumented immigrants and those who support them! For more information call 415-821- 9683. For information on the Daniel and Shanti Defense Campaign, visit www.nomoredeaths.org. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Saving The Idriss Stelley Foundation Host: Idriss Stelley Foundation, Rap4Rights Location: Studio Z 314 11th Street, San Francisco, CA View Map When: Sunday, June 25, 1:00pm Phone: 415.252.7100 KEEP IDRISS STELLEY FOUNDATION OPEN! ISF is a nonprofit organization created through the settlement of Idriss Stelley's vs. City & County and SFPD case and its allocation to his mother Mesha Monge-Irizarry. Her only child, a 23 year old African American honor student was killed by SFPD at the SF Sony Metreon on June 13, 2001. 48 shots! 9 officers! He stood alone in an empty theater. Mesha now operates the Idriss Stelley Foundation, a 24 HR bilingual crisis line (415) 595-8251 that has broadened its services to all people negatively impacted by law enforcement. Idriss Stelley's case is at the root of the 40-HR mandatory SFPD Mental Health Training. ISF provides free, confidential services to victims, biological and extended families who are negatively impacted by law enforcement ISF office is located at 4921 3rd St., in the heart of Bayview District, between Palou and Quesada in San Francisco and is open Sunday, Tuesday and Thursday from noon to 8 pm. Please come out Sunday June 25, 2006 at 1pm to enjoy food, drinks and live entertainment in support of ISF. (21+ Please) $5-500 DONATION ACCEPTED AT THE DOOR. NO PERSON TURNED AWAY FOR LACK OF FUNDS BUT PLEASE COME AND SUPPORT! ***IF YOU ARE NOT ABLE TO ATTEND BUT WOULD STILL LIKE TO DONATE TO THE IDRISS STELLEY FOUNDATION PLEASE CONTACT US VIA EMAIL AT RAP4RIGHTS@AOL.COM*** ISF IS DEPENDING ON THE COMMUNITY TO KEEP ITS DOORS OPEN! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- LaborFest 2006 Schedule July 1 (Saturday) 12-4:00 PM ($15-50) (sliding scale donation to CounterPULSE requested. Bring a bag lunch!) Labor Bike Tour with Chris Carlson of San Francisco©ˆs labor history For more info: call Chris Carlsson carlsson.chris@gmail.com http://www.laborfest.net/2006schedule.htm ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Fourth Annual International Al-Awda Convention San Francisco - July 14-16, 2006 To register: http://al-awda.org/sf-conv_reserve.html To flyer, the writing is on the wall: http://al-awda.org/pdf/flyer.pdf For all other info: http://al-awda.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- REMINDER TO ALL GROUPS: BE SURE AND POST ALL ACTIONS AND EVENTS TO WWW.INDYBAY.ORG TO REACH THE MOST PEOPLE AGAINST THE WAR IN THE BAY AREA! http://www.indybay.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Join the call by reproductive rights activists to send a letter to Defend Oglala Sioux President Cecilia Fire Thunder After taking a courageous stance against the ban on abortion in South Dakota, Cecilia Fire Thunder, first female president of the Oglala Sioux tribe, has been attacked by members of the Tribal Council, who are attempting to remove her from office. Background: After abortion was banned in South Dakota, Fire Thunder, a healthcare provider, announced that she would personally help set-up Sacred Choices Women's Clinic on her own land, within the boundaries of the Pine Ridge Reservation where the State of South Dakota has no jurisdiction. The clinic would provide reproductive health care to all women. In an interview she said, "Ultimately, this is a much bigger issue than just abortion. It's time for women to reclaim their bodies." and "As Indian women, we fight many battles. This is just another battle we have to fight." Read an interview, "The Power of Thunder" on Altnet at http://www.alternet.org/story/34314 The Complaint: On May 30 the Oglala Sioux Tribal Council banned abortions on Pine Ridge Indian Reservation and suspended President Fire Thunder for 20 days until an impeachment hearing can take place. The complaint is that Fire Thunder improperly used her title to solicit donations for the clinic. Fire Thunder has said that donations for the proposed private clinic have been unsolicited, though she has welcomed nationwide support. The surprise vote was called when Fire Thunder was out of town getting an annual checkup of the cochlear implants that restored her hearing. Read more at http://indianz.com/News/2006/014231.asp Fire Thunder said the people who brought this complaint are the same people who have opposed her since she was elected in November 2004. Fire Thunder ran on a platform of fiscal accountability, the Oglala Sioux Tribe was in financial trouble and listed as a financial high risk. Since Fire Thunder became president there have been audits that go back into 1997 (see http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096412970 ) And she took tribal employees off the roles for jobs that had been defunded by the federal government. (see analysis by Elizabeth Castle at the end of this message.). For her brave stance, Fire Thunder has been suspended and cleared before, see http://indianz.com/News/2005/010954.asp Support Fire Thunder: President Fire Thunder's supporters are organizing on the reservation. They would like letters, especially from indigenous people, to the tribal council in support of President Fire Thunder and opposing the tribe's ban on abortions. Message should reach the council before Monday, June 19. Oglala Sioux Tribal Council PO Box 2070 Pine Ridge, SD 57770-2070 fax: 605-867-1449 phone 605-867-5821 and send a copy to President Cecelia Fire Thunder PO Box 2070 Pine Ridge, SD 57770-2070 If you have any questions about this issue, please contact Radical Women at 415-864-1278 or rwbayarea@yahoo.com Thank you for your support! In solidarity, Toni Mendicino Bay Area Radical Women and Bay Area Coalition for Our Reproductive Rights Below is an excerpt from an email from Elizabeth Castle, UC Berkeley History Professor and personal historian to Madonna Thunder Hawk. ...there are many complicated political factors behind this action. This is the third time it has happened and the danger is that this time the Tribal Council is using the abortion issues as leverage. When she was elected she cleaned up house. This meant taking tribal employees off the roles for jobs that had been defunded by the federal government. In addition to federal cuts, often the grants were lost for these tribal programs because the employees had not taken the necessary action to see their reports were in and the grants were properly renewed. Fire Thunder notified these individuals that they were welcome back if they were able to get the program funded again. The ending of this "gravy train," created significant enemies. These actions must be understood in the ever relevant context of the continuing effects of colonization. They are very real as in the welfare mentality that reigns on the reservation makes progressive change difficult. The federal government not only knows this but encourages it as it makes the pathway to terminating treaty obligations to tribes. Though the full details are as of yet unknown, it is easy to see that the Fire Thunder's bold leadership makes her vulnerable not only to those right wing individuals off the reservation in the racist state of South Dakota but even more so at home in Pine Ridge. With generations of boarding school christianity drummed into the minds of many Native people, there is little awareness of the Lakota's traditional practices of reproductive control. It would be easy to see "Abortion is not traditional" signs popping up as a very patriarchal and inaccurate reinvigoration of traditional practice. Also, in a community where illegal sterilization was commonly practiced, the link to organizing behind the right to abortion will not be as easily made. Please take a look at the links below to see how often Fire Thunder has been attacked. It is dead clear that she needs serious support. Website: http://indianz.com/News/2005/010954.asp ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- FYI According to "Minimum Wage History" at http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/anth484/minwage.html " "Calculated in real 2005 dollars, the 1968 minimum wage was the highest at $9.12. "The 8 dollar per hour Whole Foods employees are being paid $1.12 less than the 1968 minimum wage. "A federal minimum wage was first set in 1938. The graph shows both nominal (red) and real (blue) minimum wage values. Nominal values range from 25 cents per hour in 1938 to the current $5.15/hr. The greatest percentage jump in the minimum wage was in 1950, when it nearly doubled. The graph adjusts these wages to 2005 dollars (blue line) to show the real value of the minimum wage. Calculated in real 2005 dollars, the 1968 minimum wage was the highest at $9.12. Note how the real dollar minimum wage rises and falls. This is because it gets periodically adjusted by Congress. The period 1997-2006, is the longest period during which the minimum wage has not been adjusted. States have departed from the federal minimum wage. Washington has the highest minimum wage in the country at $7.63 as of January 1, 2006. Oregon is next at $7.50. Cities, too, have set minimum wages. Santa Fe, New Mexico has a minimum wage of $9.50, which is more than double the state minimum wage at $4.35." ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- PRESERVE INTERNET NETWORK NEUTRALITY Hi, I can't imagine that you haven't seen this, but if you haven't, please sign the petition to keep our access. Everything we do online will be hurt if Congress passes a radical law next week that gives giant corporations more control over what we do and see on the Internet. Internet providers like AT&T are lobbying Congress hard to gut Network Neutrality--the Internet's First Amendment and the key to Internet freedom. Right now, Net Neutrality prevents AT&T from choosing which websites open most easily for you based on which site pays AT&T more. BarnesandNoble.com doesn't have to outbid Amazon for the right to work properly on your computer. If Net Neutrality is gutted, many sites--including Google, eBay, and iTunes--must either pay protection money to companies like AT&T or risk having their websites process slowly. That why these high-tech pioneers, plus diverse groups ranging from MoveOn to Gun Owners of America, are opposing Congress' effort to gut Internet freedom. So please! sign this petition telling your member of Congress to preserve Internet freedom? Click here: http://www.civic.moveon.org/save_the_internet?track_referer=706%7C1152463-5QFocRE05wmGUuh8yAMSzg ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Flash Film: Ides of March http://isahaqi.chris-floyd.com/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- NO BORDERS! NO WALLS! NO FENCES! GENERAL AMNESTY FOR ALL! OUR HOMELAND IS WHERE WE LIVE! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- REPEAL THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT IN 2007! Check out: 10 EXCELLENT REASONS NOT TO JOIN THE MILITARY http://www.10reasonsbook.com/ Public Law print of PL 107-110, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 [1.8 MB] http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html Also, the law is up before Congress again in 2007. See this article from USA Today: Bipartisan panel to study No Child Left Behind By Greg Toppo, USA TODAY February 13, 2006 http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-02-13-education-panel_x.htm ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies http://www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/declaration.html http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/decind.html http://www.usconstitution.net/declar.html http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805195.php Bill of Rights http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805182.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- ARTICLES IN FULL: ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 1) "Just in the Name of 'Democracy' " June 3, 2006 Copyright 2006 Mumia Abu-Jamal 2) Where the Hogs Come First By BOB HERBERT June 15, 2006 http://select.nytimes.com/2006/06/15/opinion/15herbert.html?hp 3) The Don't-Bother-to-Knock Rule New York Times Editorial June 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/opinion/16fri1.html?hp 4) The New Face of Solidarity By STEVEN GREENHOUSE June 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/business/16union.html 5) U.A.W. Says Applications for Buyouts Soar at G.M. By MICHELINE MAYNARD June 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/business/16uaw.html 6) Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Flag-Burning Measure By BLOOMBERG NEWS June 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/washington/16brfs-008.html 7) In Oil-Rich Angola, Cholera Preys Upon Poorest "A crisis committee began work only two and a half months after the epidemic began, and the government has set aside a mere $5 million in emergency money to fight the disease....Economists say the government simply has more money than it can spend." By SHARON LaFRANIERE June 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/world/africa/16cholera.html 8) Venezuela: Chávez Orders Russian Warplanes (AP) June 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/world/americas/16briefs-001.html 9) Ranchers Add Ladders to Border Fences By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 7:27 a.m. ET June 17, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Border-Fence-Ladders.html 10) Bienvenido A Fence With More Beauty, Fewer Barbs By WILLIAM L. HAMILTON June 18, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/weekinreview/18hamilton.html 11) Bush Turns to Big Military Contractors for Border Control By ERIC LIPTON Correction Appended Correction: May 20, 2006 A front-page article on Thursday about a federal plan to use contractors to help secure the borders of the United States misstated the amount that Lockheed Martin made in federal government sales in 2005. Of $37.2 billion in sales, more than $31 billion, not $6 billion, was in sales to the government. May 18, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/18/washington/18border.html?ex=1150776000&en=b8293eb7e22efbf1&ei=5070 12) DEPLOYMENT REFUSER HAS NO REGRETS By Michelle Tan Army Times June 14, 2006 http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-1870677.php 13) Here Illegally, Working Hard and Paying Taxes By EDUARDO PORTER June 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/19/business/19illegals.html?hp&ex=1150776000&en=a94929a93349f54f&ei=5094&partner=homepage 14) Residents Struggle to Survive, In and Out of Ramadi Inter Press Service Dahr Jamail and Ali Fadhil Dahr Jamail's Iraq Dispatches Visit the Dahr Jamail Iraq website http://dahrjamailiraq.com 15) The right to fuck and suck OPINION by Tommi Avicolli Mecca Bay Guardian, June 21, 2006 16) Israeli Attack Kills 3 Gaza Children By IAN FISHER June 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/21/world/middleeast/21mideast.html 17) Supreme Court Rules Against Illegal Immigrant By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS June 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/washington/22wire-scotus.html?hp&ex=1151035200&en=94c687d336f46592&ei=5094&partner=homepage 18) Army to Raise Maximum Age By AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE The Army said that it was raising the maximum age for enlistment to 42 from 40 to expand its pool of potential recruits. The move comes just six months after the Army raised the maximum age to 40 from 35; more than 1,000 people in that age bracket have enlisted since then. Recruits between the ages of 40 to 42 must meet the same physical standards as younger ones but will be subjected to additional medical screening, the Army said. Men and women in that age bracket can enlist and are eligible for the same signing bonuses and other incentives as younger recruits. June 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/washington/22brfs-007.html 19) Senate Rejects Minimum Wage Increase [The Republicans refuse to vote for an increase and the Democrats want to vote for a paltry increase in effect tying working people to a maximum of $7.25 an hour for the next two years! What choice is this? Let's see if the politicians can live on $7.25 an hour for the next two years!...bw] By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS The Senate rejected a proposed increase in the minimum wage by a vote of 52 to 46. Democrats had said it was past time to increase the rate of $5.15 an hour, in effect for nearly a decade. This was the ninth time since 1997 that Senate Democrats have proposed and Republicans have blocked a stand-alone increase in the minimum wage. Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, proposed the bill, which would have increased the rate to $5.85 beginning 60 days after enactment, to $6.55 a year later and to $7.25 a year after that. June 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/washington/22brfs-009.html 20) New Orleans Plans Juvenile Curfew By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 8:39 p.m. ET June 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-New-Orleans-Curfew.html ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 1) "Just in the Name of 'Democracy' " June 3, 2006 Copyright 2006 Mumia Abu-Jamal The word 'democracy' is a kind of verbal narcotic. To mention it is to daze us; to dull us; to lull us into peaceful slumber. That's why the Bush Regime, perhaps the least democratic of governments in generations, calls the invasion and occupation a 'war for democracy.' It is ironic that a government that is profoundly autocratic, that relies on elite authoritarianism, secrecy, wireless wiretaps, secret prisons and torture, can claim to be fighting for something that is becoming so rare in the U.S. (ahem -- democracy). But, don't trip; this ain't a Bush thing. Writer and historian, Michael Parenti in his book, Super Patriotism (San Francisco: City Light Books, 2004), tells us that democracy has been wiped out in a host of countries -- by the ! Parenti writes: "US leaders have long professed a dedication to democracy, yet over the last half century they have devoted themselves to overthrowing democratic governments in Guatemala, Guyana, the Dominican Republic,Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, Syria, Indonesia (under Sukarno), Greece (twice), Argentina (twice), Haiti (twice), Bolivia, Jamaica, Yugoslavia,and other countries. These governments were all guilty of pursuing policies that occasionally favored the poorer elements and infringed upon the affluent. In most instances, the US-sponsored coups were accompanied by widespread killings of democratic activists. "US leaders have supported covert actions, sanctions, or proxy mercenary wars against revolutionary governments in Cuba, Angola, Mozambique, Ethiopia, Iraq (with the CIA ushering in Saddam Hussein's reign of repression), Portugal, South Yemen, Nicaragua, Cambodia, East Timor, Western Sahara, and elsewhere. "US interventions and destabilization campaigns have been directed against other populist nationalistic governments, including Egypt, Lebanon, Peru, Iran, Syria, Zaire, Venezuela, the Fiji Islands, and Afghanistan (before the Soviets ever went into the country). "And since World War II, direct US military invasions or aerial attacks or both have been perpetrated against Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, North Korea, Yugoslavia, Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, Libya, Somalia, and Iraq (twice). There is no 'rogue state,' 'axis of evil,' or communist country that has a comparable record of such criminal aggression against other nations." [pp. 133-34) The point? The next time you hear about a 'war to bring democracy' -- question it. Decades ago, a Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles, gave the quintessential recipe for American military adventures abroad. Speaking during the Eisenhower years, Dulles said, "In order to bring a nation to support the burdens of maintaining great military establishments, it is necessary to create an emotional state akin to war psychology." Dulles added, "*There must be the portrayal of external menace*." To do this, Dulles explained, one must depict one's own country as the shining hero, while portraying the adversary as the embodiment of all evil. We have, all of us, seen this recipe cooked all of our lives, all around the world, and on every continent. It works, because people allow it to work. Yet, while Dulles explains how such a thing happens, he doesn't explain why. Years ago, an American president was explaining why the Vietnam War was necessary. This man said: "Now let us assume that we lost Indochina , the tin and tungsten that we so greatly value from that area would cease coming. So when the votes $400 million to help that war, we are not voting a give-away program. We are voting for the cheapest way that we can prevent the occurrence of something that would be of a most terrible significance to the , our security, our power and ability to get certain things we need from the riches of the Indo-Chinese territory and from Southeast Asia ." [p. 67]** These words were spoken by Dwight D. Eisenhower. Now, why is that remarkable? Isn't it merely the case of an American president talking turkey? These words were spoken in 1953 -- *eleven years before the entered the Vietnam War!* Why are wars fought? For 'democracy' -- or for profit? Think about this the next time you hear a plea for your patriotism. Just say, "No." Copyright 2006 Mumia Abu-Jamal **["Source: Carmichael, Stokely. Stokely Speaks: Black Power Back to Pan-Africanism. (New York: Vintage, 1971), p. 67. The author was giving an anti-war speech to students at Morgan State College, Baltimore, Md. , Jan. 28, 1967. He cited as his source a book entitled , by Felix Green.] ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 2) Where the Hogs Come First By BOB HERBERT June 15, 2006 http://select.nytimes.com/2006/06/15/opinion/15herbert.html?hp Tar Heel, N.C. Think pork. Sizzling bacon and breakfast sausage. Juicy chops and ribs and robust holiday hams. The pork capital of the planet is this tiny town in the Cape Fear River basin, not far from the South Carolina border. Spending a few days in Tar Heel and the surrounding area — dotted with hog farms, cornfields and the occasional Confederate flag — is like stepping back in time. This is a place where progress has slowed to a crawl. Tar Heel's raison d'être (and the employment anchor for much of the region) is the mammoth plant of the Smithfield Packing Company, a million-square-foot colossus that is the largest pork processing facility in the world. You can learn a lot at Smithfield. It's a case study in both the butchering of hogs (some 32,000 are slaughtered there each day) and the systematic exploitation of vulnerable workers. More than 5,500 men and women work at Smithfield, most of them Latino or black, and nearly all of them undereducated and poor. The big issue at Smithfield is not necessarily money. Workers are drawn there from all over the region, sometimes traveling in crowded vans for two hours or more each day, because the starting pay — until recently, $8 and change an hour — is higher than the pay at most other jobs available to them. But the work is often brutal beyond imagining. Company officials will tell you everything is fine, but serious injuries abound, and the company has used illegal and, at times, violent tactics over the course of a dozen years to keep the workers from joining a union that would give them a modicum of protection and dignity. "It was depressing inside there," said Edward Morrison, who spent hour after hour flipping bloody hog carcasses on the kill floor, until he was injured last fall after just a few months on the job. "You have to work fast because that machine is shooting those hogs out at you constantly. You can end up with all this blood dripping down on you, all these feces and stuff just hanging off of you. It's a terrible environment. "We've had guys walk off after the first break and never return." Mr. Morrison's comments were echoed by a young man who was with a group of Smithfield workers waiting for a van to pick them up at a gas station in Dillon, S.C., nearly 50 miles from Tar Heel. "The line do move fast," the young man said, "and people do get hurt. You can hear 'em hollering when they're on their way to the clinic." Workers are cut by the flashing, slashing knives that slice the meat from the bones. They are hurt sliding and falling on floors and stairs that are slick with blood, guts and a variety of fluids. They suffer repetitive motion injuries. The processing line on the kill floor moves hogs past the workers at the dizzying rate of one every three or four seconds. Union representation would make a big difference for Smithfield workers. The United Food and Commercial Workers Union has been trying to organize the plant since the mid-1990's. Smithfield has responded with tactics that have ranged from the sleazy to the reprehensible. After an exhaustive investigation, a judge found that the company had threatened to shut down the entire plant if the workers dared to organize, and had warned Latino workers that immigration authorities would be alerted if they voted for a union. The union lost votes to organize the plant in 1994 and 1997, but the results of those elections were thrown out by the National Labor Relations Board after the judge found that Smithfield had prevented the union from holding fair elections. The judge said the company had engaged in myriad "egregious" violations of federal labor law, including threatening, intimidating and firing workers involved in the organizing effort, and beating up a worker "for engaging in union activities." Rather than obey the directives of the board and subsequent court decisions, the company has tied the matter up on appeals that have lasted for years. A U.S. Court of Appeals ruling just last month referred to "the intense and widespread coercion prevalent at the Tar Heel facility." Workers at Smithfield and their families are suffering while the government dithers, refusing to require a mighty corporation like Smithfield to obey the nation's labor laws in a timely manner. The defiance, greed and misplaced humanity of the merchants of misery at the apex of the Smithfield power structure are matters consumers might keep in mind as they bite into that next sizzling, succulent morsel of Smithfield pork. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 3) The Don't-Bother-to-Knock Rule New York Times Editorial June 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/opinion/16fri1.html?hp The Supreme Court yesterday substantially diminished Americans' right to privacy in their own homes. The rule that police officers must "knock and announce" themselves before entering a private home is a venerable one, and a well-established part of Fourth Amendment law. But President Bush's two recent Supreme Court appointments have now provided the votes for a 5-4 decision eviscerating this rule. This decision should offend anyone, liberal or conservative, who worries about the privacy rights of ordinary Americans. The case arose out of the search of Booker T. Hudson's home in Detroit in 1998. The police announced themselves but did not knock, and after waiting a few seconds, entered his home and seized drugs and a gun. There is no dispute that the search violated the knock-and-announce rule. The question in the case was what to do about it. Mr. Hudson wanted the evidence excluded at his trial. That is precisely what should have happened. Since 1914, the Supreme Court has held that, except in rare circumstances, evidence seized in violation of the Constitution cannot be used. The exclusionary rule has sometimes been criticized for allowing criminals to go free just because of police error. But as the court itself recognized in that 1914 case, if this type of evidence were admissible, the Fourth Amendment "might as well be stricken." The court ruled yesterday that the evidence could be used against Mr. Hudson. Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, argued that even if police officers did not have to fear losing a case if they disobeyed the knock-and-announce rule, the subjects of improper searches could still bring civil lawsuits to challenge them. But as the dissenters rightly pointed out, there is little chance that such suits would keep the police in line. Justice Scalia was also far too dismissive of the important privacy rights at stake, which he essentially reduced to "the right not to be intruded upon in one's nightclothes." Justice Stephen Breyer noted in dissent that even a century ago the court recognized that when the police barge into a house unannounced, it is an assault on "the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life." If Justice Sandra Day O'Connor had stayed on the court, this case might well have come out the other way. For those who worry that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito will take the court in a radically conservative direction, it is sobering how easily the majority tossed aside a principle that traces back to 13th-century Britain, and a legal doctrine that dates to 1914, to let the government invade people's homes. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 4) The New Face of Solidarity By STEVEN GREENHOUSE "...unions represent just 7.8 percent of the nation's private-sector work force, down from 35 percent in the 1950's." June 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/business/16union.html Manuel Alvarez is the type of worker that service-sector unions are eager to attract. After 11 years as a houseman at the Hilton Hotel at Los Angeles International Airport, he earns $9.95 an hour, about $20,000 a year. "It's not enough to live on," said Mr. Alvarez, an immigrant from Mexico who vacuums halls and flips mattresses. "I go to two churches each week to pick up donated food." On his days off, he collects bottles and cans for the deposit, adding $200 a month to his income. His hope is to join a union, and soon. This week, judging by the somber mood at the United Automobile Workers convention, the state of organized labor would seem dire. Not so long ago, the U.A.W. was the nation's largest and most swaggering union, leading the way in building America's middle class by winning impressive wages, health coverage and pensions. But the U.A.W. is now in full retreat, ready to make concessions to help save the American auto industry. Its plight points to a little-understood development: the nation's private sector is divided into two very different labor movements. The first comprises manufacturing unions, like the auto workers and machinists, which are on the defensive and on the decline. The second is made up of unions for the expanding service sector, which are upbeat and on the prowl for hundreds of thousands of nursing home aides, janitors, supermarket cashiers and workers like Mr. Alvarez. Unite Here, the union that represents hotel, restaurant and apparel workers, is seeking to organize thousands of nonunion Hilton workers in a battle that could culminate in a strike at many Hiltons this summer. In a way, said Bruce Raynor, president of Unite Here, the service-sector unions hope to imitate the manufacturing unions of old. "Our goal is to move service-sector workers into the middle class," he said. "The manufacturing unions did that for factory workers. It took them 20 years to do that, and we hope to do the same thing." The manufacturing unions have been devastated by globalization, with many companies insisting that America's unionized factory workers are overpaid and their benefit packages too rich compared with overseas workers. Delphi, the beleaguered auto parts company, has repeatedly trumpeted this assertion as it called for cutting its workers' $27-an-hour wages in half. In contrast, the service-sector unions are largely immune to globalization — just try to outsource the job of a hamburger-flipper, hotel housekeeper or bedpan- emptier to China. Helping to make service-sector unions optimistic about attracting more members is the perception that workers like hotel housekeepers and janitors are underpaid and have skimpy benefits. Moreover, many of these workers are immigrants, who are often more enthusiastic about unions than native-born workers. To help his union rebound, Ron Gettelfinger, the president of the auto workers, announced plans this week to spend $60 million more on recruiting nonunion workers. But this could prove an uphill battle. "The U.A.W. and the steelworkers once defined the labor movement, but now they're associated with declining membership and declining influence," said Richard W. Hurd, a labor relations professor at Cornell University. "It's tough for the manufacturing unions to overcome what has happened the last 20 years, and it will make it harder for them to reach out to areas of manufacturing that are still vibrant." Today, just 2 million manufacturing workers belong to unions, down from 3.5 million a decade ago. That compares with more than 3 million workers in service and retail unions, and more than 7 million in public sector unions. "The service sector presents a tremendous opportunity for the labor movement," said Paul F. Clark, a professor of labor studies at Pennsylvania State University. "There are lots of low-paid workers, lots of immigrant workers, a lot of workers who can benefit from a union. But there are a lot of hurdles they need to navigate if they are going to form unions." Some labor experts say the effort to help workers like Mr. Alvarez join a union may not be easy. Companies have grown more aggressive and sophisticated in combating unions, often hiring consultants who lecture workers and show videos, hammering the point that unions do not help workers and only want their dues. Even many workers who favor unions are scared to speak out in favor of them, frightened that their employers will retaliate against them, perhaps by firing them, perhaps by cutting back their hours. "There's great hostility to unions in general," said Nancy B. Johnson, a professor of management at the University of Kentucky. "In the old days," she said, "you'd see co-workers dying and you'd see raw exploitation, so you wanted a union to protect you. Now if you work at nice retailers like Target or Kmart, you don't see people dying on the job. Yeah, you suffer some minor injustices, but a lot of workers today have learned to settle with what they have." Nonetheless, many labor leaders voice confidence that unions will grow again. They point to some polls showing that more than half of nonunion workers say they would vote to join a union if given the chance. Despite such sentiments, unions represent just 7.8 percent of the nation's private-sector work force, down from 35 percent in the 1950's. "I think the labor movement has a bright future," said Mr. Raynor of Unite Here. "The objective conditions — income inequality, employers using their power over workers to shift the burden of health care and retirement, workers being paid below middle-class wage levels — make it clear that many workers need unions. Unions are the only institution in society that can force employers to change the way they distribute their income." He said it was outrageous that some luxury hotels paid their workers $7 or $8 an hour. Mr. Alvarez, 59, says that out of his $20,000 pay, he spends $1,600 a year on health insurance premiums and another $2,500 on prescription drugs for his wife's asthma and for his high blood pressure and a thyroid ailment. "I want a union because it would give us more pay and far better health insurance," he said, noting that unionized workers at the Hilton in Beverly Hills pay no premiums for their health insurance. The unions that broke off from the A.F.L.-C.I.O., including Unite Here and the Service Employees International Union, largely represent service sector workers and have ambitious plans to unionize far more of them. Daniel J. B. Mitchell, a professor of public policy at the University of California, Los Angeles, said many service- sector workers held jobs that were every bit as blue-collar as factory jobs. "It's not surprising that unions are targeting workers in industrial laundries," where the temperature is soaring and the pace intense, he said. "It's not classified as manufacturing, but it's like blue-collar work." Manufacturing unions — their membership and their image — have been devastated by the constant stream of plant closings in recent years. General Motors, Ford and Delphi have announced widespread closings, which will reduce their union work force by more than 60,000, while a Maytag factory will soon close in Newton, Iowa, the town where the company was founded. Since 2000, the nation has lost three million manufacturing jobs, one-sixth of the total. Nowadays many unionized factory workers seem on their heels, worried about imports, plant closings and demands for concessions. Bob Perdue, a locomotive operator at AK Steel's mill in Middletown, Ohio, is in a surly mood because his company locked him out along with its 2,700 unionized workers on March 1, when their union rejected the company's demands for concessions. The company has called for a pension freeze, having the workers start contributing toward health insurance premiums and having retirees pay far more each year for their health insurance. AK says those proposals are needed to help it control costs and remain competitive against low-cost rivals. "Things are bad," Mr. Perdue said. "We never expected to be out this long. We want to protect ourselves and protect our retirees. Leo W. Gerard, president of the United Steelworkers of America, said American manufacturers were at a huge disadvantage because companies rather than the government shouldered the cost of health coverage. If the United States adopted a national health care plan like Canada's, he said, that would go far to revive American manufacturing. "We need an economic policy in which the nation decides to have a manufacturing base," he said. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 5) U.A.W. Says Applications for Buyouts Soar at G.M. By MICHELINE MAYNARD June 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/business/16uaw.html LAS VEGAS, June 15 — With a week to go before the deadline, it looks like at least 30,000 United Automobile Workers union members at General Motors will opt for incentives to leave or retire — equal to the number of jobs G.M. plans to cut. The union's president, Ron Gettelfinger, said Thursday that 25,000 G.M. workers — or roughly 22 percent of its work force represented by the U.A.W. — had signed up thus far. Company and union officials had always expected applications to accelerate as the deadline approached and workers made final decisions about the deals. Another 8,500 workers at the parts supplier Delphi, or a little more than a third of its U.A.W. membership, had accepted the plans, said Richard Shoemaker, an outgoing union vice president. The comments came as the U.A.W. wrapped up its leadership convention here. Next Friday marks the deadline for workers to make up their minds about the packages, which are available to all 113,000 U.A.W. members at G.M. and all 23,000 union members at Delphi. The auto parts supplier was part of G.M. until it was spun off in 1999. The workers have a week after the deadline to change their minds, meaning the total will not be known until June 30, at the earliest. Workers who have 30 years on the job and are eligible to retire would receive $35,000 as well as full health care benefits and a pension. Workers with less experience can receive up to $140,000 to give up their jobs. They would keep their pension benefits but forfeit retirement health care coverage. G.M. will pay for buyouts for 13,000 of the Delphi workers who were offered the deals when G.M. made them available to all its hourly workers in March. It will share the cost with Delphi for another 10,000 packages, which it offered last week. Delphi filed for bankruptcy protection in October, and has been seeking steep wage and benefit cuts from the U.A.W., which thus far has resisted. It also plans to shut 21 of its 29 American plants, and eliminate 14,000 U.A.W. jobs. G.M. is playing a role because it is liable for pensions and retirement health care for workers who were at Delphi before it became an independent parts supplier. G.M. plans to cut 30,000 jobs through 2008 under a restructuring plan that calls for it to close all or part of a dozen plants. Unless they accept the packages, workers who lose their jobs go into a program called the Jobs Bank, where they are paid their full salary and benefits until the U.A.W. contract expires in late 2007. Toni Simonetti, a G.M. spokeswoman, declined to comment on specific figures on the packages because "people are still signing up for it." But she said the acceptance rate had surpassed G.M.'s expectations. Lindsay Williams, a spokesman for Delphi, said the company would not discuss numbers until after next Friday's deadline. He added, "We've been pleased with the rate so far." As the union's convention closed, Mr. Gettelfinger named new lead negotiators for each of the Detroit auto companies. Cal Rapson, a union vice president, will be in charge of the union's G.M. and Delphi departments, replacing Mr. Shoemaker. Bob King, who had been in charge of organizing for the union, will lead the Ford department, while General Holiefield, who has served as an administrative assistant to Mr. Gettelfinger, will lead negotiations at DaimlerChrysler. The appointments build on the vice presidents' backgrounds. Mr. Rapson ran the union's regional that includes Flint, Mich., long dominated by G.M. plants, while Mr. King was once the youngest president of a local union in the U.A.W., heading the unit representing workers at Ford's sprawling Rouge complex. Another union vice president, Terry Thurman, will succeed Mr. King as the head of organizing, while Jimmy Settles takes on a variety of duties including the union's agriculture department. Mr. Gettelfinger, who closed the convention by linking hands with his officers and singing the union's anthem, "Solidarity Forever," urged union delegates not to leave their enthusiasm behind in Las Vegas. "We have to roll up our sleeves and go to work," Mr. Gettelfinger said. Nick Bunkley contributed reporting from Detroit for this article. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 6) Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Flag-Burning Measure By BLOOMBERG NEWS June 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/washington/16brfs-008.html The Senate Judiciary Committee approved a constitutional amendment that would empower Congress to outlaw flag burning. The measure has already been approved by a two- thirds majority in the House. To become part of the Constitution, it must be passed by the same margin in the Senate and ratified by 38 state legislatures. In 1989, the Supreme Court voted 5 to 4 to strike a Texas law that barred flag burning, ruling that the law restricted freedom of expression guaranteed by the Constitution. Supporters argued yesterday that the proposed amendment would restore the power of Congress — rather than unelected judges — to decide the flag-burning issue. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 7) In Oil-Rich Angola, Cholera Preys Upon Poorest "A crisis committee began work only two and a half months after the epidemic began, and the government has set aside a mere $5 million in emergency money to fight the disease....Economists say the government simply has more money than it can spend." By SHARON LaFRANIERE June 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/world/africa/16cholera.html LUANDA, Angola, June 10 — In a nation whose multibillion-dollar oil boom should arguably make its people rich enough to drink Evian, the water that many in this capital depend on goes by a less fancy name: Bengo. The Bengo River passes north of here, its waters dark with grit, its banks strewn with garbage. Two dozen roaring pumping stations suck in 1.3 million gallons from the river each day, filling 450 tanker trucks that in turn supply 10,000 vendors across Luanda's endless slums. The vendors then fill the jerry cans and washtubs of the city's slum dwellers, who buy the water to drink and bathe in. This is one reason, health experts here say, that Luanda's slums are now the center of one of the worst cholera epidemics to strike Africa in nearly a decade, an outbreak that has sickened 43,000 Angolans and killed more than 1,600 since it began in February. But it is only one reason. Cholera typically spreads through contact with contaminated water or sewage, and in Luanda's slums, both are everywhere. Neighborhoods here are ringed by mountains of garbage, often soaked by rivulets of human waste. Only about half of slum dwellers have even an outdoor latrine. Children stripped to their underwear dance through sewage-clogged creeks and slide down garbage dumps on sleds made of sheet metal into excrement-fouled puddles. Much of the city has no drainage system; in heavy rains, the filthy water rises hip-high in some of the poorest dwellings. One development group estimated that it would take 22,000 dump trucks to clear away the trash. That was in 1994, when Luanda had half the population of 4.5 million it has now. "I have never seen anything like it," said David Weatherill, a water and sanitation expert for Doctors Without Borders, which is leading the response to the epidemic. "You see conditions like this on a smaller scale. But I have never seen it on such a huge scale. It is quite shocking." Angola is in the midst of a gusher in oil revenue, its hotels crammed with oil executives and its harbor filled with tankers carrying away the 1.4 million barrels of crude pumped here each day. The economy grew by 18 percent last year. The government racked up a budget surplus of more than $2 billion. This year it is expected to take in $16.8 billion in revenue, well over twice the $7.5 billion it received in 2004. Next year, revenue is expected to rise by a third again, almost all because of oil. Economists say the government simply has more money than it can spend. Yet it seems powerless to address even the basic issues of clean water and sewers that would make such epidemics entirely preventable — a paradox that critics attribute to corruption, incompetence or the hangover of a 27-year civil war that flooded the capital with refugees, or all three. "We are talking about a government that has the means," said Stephan Goetghebuer, East Africa coordinator for Doctors Without Borders. "There are a lot of things they could be doing. The living conditions are really terrible, and they are terrible even if you compare them to other places in Africa." Sebastião Veloso, Angola's health minister, said the scope of the problem defied a quick fix. "We just do our best," he said. "The lack of infrastructure is a very complicated administrative problem. We are doing our part at the Ministry of Health, and the rest of government must do its part. We are pressuring the government, because otherwise these epidemics will continue." Only one in six Luandan households is lucky enough to have running water, and for many of them, it comes from a community standpipe, according to Development Workshop, a nonprofit group in Angola. The often- contaminated river water from trucks that roam the slums costs up to 12 cents a gallon — a hefty sum in a nation where two-thirds of the people live on less than $2 a day, and up to 160 times the price paid in better-off neighborhoods with piped water. So the poor ration their water use, limiting themselves to about two gallons a day per person for drinking, bathing, washing clothes and cleaning. That is far below the five-gallon daily minimum recommended by the United Nations — and one twenty-sixth the average use in Western countries, according to Doctors Without Borders. In an attempt to beat back the epidemic, the government, with the help of the United Nations, is distributing a limited amount of free clean water. The few distribution points are easy to spot. Hundreds of people rise before dawn to set their plastic buckets in lines that stretch for blocks. The crowds remain long after the water is gone. One afternoon last week, dozens of people crowded around one empty plastic water tank about eight miles from downtown. "They are waiting for the last drop," said José Mateus, a neighborhood coordinator. No one knows precisely why cholera arose out of the slums this year after a cholera-free decade in Angola. Epidemiologists say the long absence of the disease worsened the outbreak because the population had no built-up immunity. Once it began, not even the tidiest slum household could halt it. It first hit Boa Vista, a shantytown minutes from downtown. Ombrina Cabanga, a 20-year-old mother of a 2-year-old girl, did everything to protect herself, said her sister-in-law, Oriana Gabriel. She washed vegetables, rinsed plates and cleaned the latrine the family shares with three others. As the Health Ministry recommended, she used bleach to disinfect the drinking water she bought from the neighborhood vendor. But her house is a few feet from a giant trash-filled gulley. Her latrine, like everyone else's, drains directly into it. And she sold soap every day in the city's famously squalid outdoor market, a job she hoped to escape by taking adult literacy classes. One Tuesday in late March, she came home and vomited into a bucket. Two nights later, she was dead. "I am just a working man, I don't know why the government doesn't help us," said her husband, Vieira Muieba, 27, a construction worker. "I don't know where the money goes. We become angry but we don't know what to do." From Boa Vista, the epidemic moved along the major highways to all but 4 of the nation's 18 provinces. Maria André lost her 15-year-old daughter, 13-year-old niece and 4-year-old nephew in the span of two days. Five other children in the household were also taken ill but recovered. Ms. André is racked with guilt nearly three weeks after the deaths. "I don't know what happened," she said. "I heard about the disease on the radio, and all of a sudden, it was here. They were all healthy and now, they are dead. "It is not easy to lose three children all at once." Angolan government officials say there is no overnight solution to the lack of basic water and sanitation. In late May, President José Eduardo dos Santos promised new measures to improve conditions, including moving Luandans out of the most appalling slums. But the government's plans are in their infancy and, despite the gusher of oil revenues, short on financing. Consider the government's plan to take over some of the provision of water to Luanda's slums. Four months into Angola's cholera epidemic, 20 trucks have been ordered — minuscule compared to the fleet of more than 300 private trucks now supplying the poor. As of early June, Mr. Veloso, the health minister, was still waiting for the first delivery. The government's harshest critics blame corruption for the abysmal living conditions. Transparency International, which promotes good governance worldwide, ranks Angola as the world's seventh most corrupt nation. The State Department said in a 2002 report that Angola's wealth was concentrated in the hands of a tiny elite, in part made up of government officials who had enriched themselves on an enormous scale. Other diplomats and analysts say Angola's ruling party is still trying to get on its feet after a civil war that raged almost nonstop from 1975, when Angola gained independence from Portugal, until mid-2002. Dauda Wurie, a project officer for the United Nations Children's Fund, said the war had eviscerated the government's corps of competent managers, leaving disarray. "I am not defending them," he said of the government officials. "They buy big cars. They live in big houses. But it would be wrong to expect that everything will turn around just because war stopped." Doctors Without Borders officials say the government response to the outbreak has been woefully slow and underfinanced. A crisis committee began work only two and a half months after the epidemic began, and the government has set aside a mere $5 million in emergency money to fight the disease. Assessing the water taken by private truckers from the Bengo fell to Doctors Without Borders. Last month it issued its report: laboratory tests in April showed the raw river water was unsafe to drink. But only one in 10 truckers chlorinated water tanks; the others simply delivered untreated water to the city. Presented with those findings, the government did nothing, the report states. So Doctors Without Borders organized the distribution of free chlorine. It now plans to insist that the truckers pour chlorine crystals into their tanks while inspectors watch, lest they sell them instead. How much those truckers — and the neighborhood vendors they supply — earn in profits is unclear. But Janetta Jamela's bedroom in eastern Luanda is one hint. Fifteen bags of concrete are stacked against the wall — to add three new bedrooms and a new kitchen and bathroom. Since she and her husband scraped up $200 to build an underground water tank three years ago, she estimated, she has earned about $235 a month selling water — $75 a month more than her husband earns as a government security officer. "But you have to have the $200 to start with," she said. The cholera epidemic is now waning, having run what epidemiologists call its natural, devastating course. But without an improvement in slum conditions, said Mr. Weatherill, the group's water and sanitation expert, the respite may last only until the next rainy season. "Unless things change, we probably will be back the next year," he said in a telephone interview, "and the year after that." ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 8) Venezuela: Chávez Orders Russian Warplanes (AP) June 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/world/americas/16briefs-001.html President Hugo Chávez said Venezuela would buy 24 Russian-made Sukhoi fighter jets this year and build a factory to produce Kalashnikov assault rifles. The SU-30 jets will replace a fleet of American F-16's because the United States has refused to sell Venezuela upgrades. Mr. Chávez has been using surging oil revenues to modernize Venezuela's military. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 9) Ranchers Add Ladders to Border Fences By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 7:27 a.m. ET June 17, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Border-Fence-Ladders.html FALFURRIAS, Texas (AP) -- A few Texas ranchers tired of costly repairs to cattle fences damaged by illegal immigrants have installed an easier route over the U.S.-Mexican border -- ladders. ''It's an attempt to get them to use the ladders instead of tearing the fences,'' said Scott Pattinson, who owns one of a group of ranches known as La Copa. La Copa is just south of a U.S. Border Patrol highway checkpoint that went up 75 miles from the border several years ago, sending migrants through the brambly scrub of nearby ranches instead. Some immigrants walk for hours or days to skirt the checkpoints in temperatures hovering around 100 degrees. Their feet have worn visible paths through a forest of cactus and mesquite otherwise thick enough to conceal them from Border Patrol helicopters overhead and agents only a few hundred yards away. The paths lead from one ripped-down section of fencing to another. Texas ranches can be so large it could be days before owners notice the hole in the fence, long after the livestock possibly escapes. Paul Johnson protects his 2,700-acre exotic game ranch of zebras, scimitar-horned oryx and wildebeests with about 10 miles of high wire fence, and joined his neighbors in placing ladders along the way. But apparently some immigrants think the ladders are too good to be true. ''They ignore it a lot,'' Johnson said. ''They're afraid that they're monitored by the Border Patrol.'' Johnson plans to take the ladders down, worried about the message he's sending. ''I think what it does is give a signal that we are wanting them to cross there, don't mind the crossing, and that kind of magnifies the problem,'' he said. Rancher Michael Vickers never liked the ladder idea and instead has ringed his fence with 220 volts of electricity. ''I've had a dose of it myself, it's not fun,'' he said. ''That's just my attitude, why make it easier for them to trespass?'' ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 10) Bienvenido A Fence With More Beauty, Fewer Barbs By WILLIAM L. HAMILTON June 18, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/weekinreview/18hamilton.html HAVING trouble with the neighbors? Put up a fence. If things go well, you hang out at the fence and talk. That's not generally the thinking for fences between nations; such barriers can't easily mask their harsh purpose. Now a fence is proposed for the 2,000-mile border between the United States and Mexico in an effort to improve national security and stem illegal immigration. The Senate wants 370 miles of it; the House, 698. And President Bush has invited military contractors to devise a "virtual" fence that would seal the existing stopgap fencing with high-technology tools like motion sensors, drones and satellites. But maybe some form of backyard diplomacy is in order — Mexico is no enemy — and there are obvious suspects for the job: professional designers, whose duty it is to come up with welcome solutions that defy ugly problems; to create appeal where there might be none. As a classic design challenge, The New York Times asked 13 architects and urban planners to devise the "fence." Several declined because they felt it was purely a political issue. "It's a silly thing to design, a conundrum," said Ricardo Scofidio of Diller Scofidio & Renfro in New York. "You might as well leave it to security and engineers." Four of the five who submitted designs proposed making the boundary a point of innovative integration, not traditional division — something that could be seen, from both sides, as a horizon of opportunity, not as a barrier. James Corner of Field Operations, a New York urban planning and landscape architecture firm, suggested that any monumental fortifications have a second purpose, like a solar energy-collecting strip that would produce what he described as a "productive, sustainable enterprise zone" that attracted industry from the north and created employment for the south — in the same no-man's median that people now cross in search of work. Mr. Corner called his partnership of 20th-century territorial power and 21st-century green, global interconnectedness "a kind of Bush meets Gore hybrid." Calvin Tsao, director of the Architectural League of New York and a partner in Tsao & McKown, also proposed an enterprise zone that, in re-creating the border as a series of small, developing cities, would become a border of light that could be seen from space at night. Eric Owen Moss, an architect in Los Angeles, was more specific with his border as beacon of light. In his design, a strolling, landscaped arcade of lighted glass columns would invite a social exchange in the evening, much like the "paseo," popular in Hispanic culture. "Make something between cultures, which leads to a third," Mr. Moss said. "Celebrate the amalgamation of the two." Enrique Norten, an architect born in Mexico who has offices now in Mexico City and New York with his firm TEN Arquitectos, proposed using the fence budget to build infrastructures like highways instead. "The future is about embracing the economy of Mexico," he said, of a long-term plan for the area, not a literal stopgap measure like a fence. Mr. Norten was speaking from Germany, where he was attending the World Cup. "Look at Europe, where this is happening. Spain was a border country 10 years ago. Now it's part of a greater community." Antoine Predock, based in Albuquerque, "dematerialized" the fence, he explained, with a physical wall designed as a mirage. An earthwork of rammed, tilted dirt would be pushed into place by Mexican day laborers. Crushed rock scattered before it, and heated from below, would appear to lift it off the ground, in the way that heat in the desert appears to make objects hover, like mirages. "There would be confusion about the materiality of the wall," Mr. Predock explained. "It would discourage you from crossing, but the message from both sides would be one of good will." ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 11) Bush Turns to Big Military Contractors for Border Control By ERIC LIPTON Correction Appended Correction: May 20, 2006 A front-page article on Thursday about a federal plan to use contractors to help secure the borders of the United States misstated the amount that Lockheed Martin made in federal government sales in 2005. Of $37.2 billion in sales, more than $31 billion, not $6 billion, was in sales to the government. May 18, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/18/washington/18border.html?ex=1150776000&en=b8293eb7e22efbf1&ei=5070 WASHINGTON, May 17 — The quick fix may involve sending in the National Guard. But to really patch up the broken border, President Bush is preparing to turn to a familiar administration partner: the nation's giant military contractors. Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and Northrop Grumman, three of the largest, are among the companies that said they would submit bids within two weeks for a multibillion-dollar federal contract to build what the administration calls a "virtual fence" along the nation's land borders. Using some of the same high-priced, high-tech tools these companies have already put to work in Iraq and Afghanistan — like unmanned aerial vehicles, ground surveillance satellites and motion-detection video equipment — the military contractors are zeroing in on the rivers, deserts, mountains and settled areas that separate Mexico and Canada from the United States. It is a humbling acknowledgment that despite more than a decade of initiatives with macho-sounding names, like Operation Hold the Line in El Paso or Operation Gate Keeper in San Diego, the federal government has repeatedly failed on its own to gain control of the land borders. Through its Secure Border Initiative, the Bush administration intends to not simply buy an amalgam of high-tech equipment to help it patrol the borders — a tactic it has also already tried, at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars, with extremely limited success. It is also asking the contractors to devise and build a whole new border strategy that ties together the personnel, technology and physical barriers. "This is an unusual invitation," the deputy secretary of homeland security, Michael Jackson, told contractors this year at an industry briefing, just before the bidding period for this new contract started. "We're asking you to come back and tell us how to do our business." The effort comes as the Senate voted Wednesday to add hundreds of miles of fencing along the border with Mexico. The measure would also prohibit illegal immigrants convicted of a felony or three misdemeanors from any chance at citizenship. The high-tech plan being bid now has many skeptics, who say they have heard a similar refrain from the government before. "We've been presented with expensive proposals for elaborate border technology that eventually have proven to be ineffective and wasteful," Representative Harold Rogers, Republican of Kentucky, said at a hearing on the Secure Border Initiative program last month. "How is the S.B.I. not just another three-letter acronym for failure?" President Bush, among others, said he was convinced that the government could get it right this time. "We are launching the most technologically advanced border security initiative in American history," Mr. Bush said in his speech from the Oval Office on Monday. Under the initiative, the Department of Homeland Security and its Customs and Border Protection division will still be charged with patrolling the 6,000 miles of land borders. The equipment these Border Patrol agents use, how and when they are dispatched to spots along the border, where the agents assemble the captured immigrants, how they process them and transport them — all these steps will now be scripted by the winning contractor, who could earn an estimated $2 billion over the next three to six years on the Secure Border job. More Border Patrol agents are part of the answer. The Bush administration has committed to increasing the force from 11,500 to about 18,500 by the time the president leaves office in 2008. But simply spreading this army of agents out evenly along the border or extending fences in and around urban areas is not sufficient, officials said. "Boots on the ground is not really enough," Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said Tuesday at a news conference that followed Mr. Bush's announcement to send as many as 6,000 National Guard troops to the border. The tools of modern warfare must be brought to bear. That means devices like the Tethered Aerostat Radar, a helium-filled airship made for the Air Force by Lockheed Martin that is twice the size of the Goodyear Blimp. Attached to the ground by a cable, the airship can hover overhead and automatically monitor any movement night or day. (One downside: it cannot operate in high winds.) Northrop Grumman is considering offering its Global Hawk, an unmanned aerial vehicle with a wingspan nearly as wide as a Boeing 737, that can snoop on movement along the border from heights of up to 65,000 feet, said Bruce Walker, a company executive. Closer to earth, Northrop might deploy a fleet of much smaller, unmanned planes that could be launched from a truck, flying perhaps just above a group of already detected immigrants so it would be harder for them to scatter into the brush and disappear. Raytheon has a package of sensor and video equipment used to protect troops in Iraq that monitors an area and uses software to identify suspicious objects automatically, analyzing and highlighting them even before anyone is sent to respond. These same companies have delivered these technologies to the Pentagon, sometimes with uneven results. Each of these giant contractors — Lockheed Martin alone employs 135,000 people and had $37.2 billion in sales last year, including an estimated $6 billion to the federal government — is teaming up with dozens of smaller companies that will provide everything from the automated cameras to backup energy supplies that will to keep this equipment running in the desert. The companies have studied every mile of border, drafting detection and apprehension strategies that vary depending on the terrain. In a city, for example, an immigrant can disappear into a crowd in seconds, while agents might have hours to apprehend a group walking through the desert, as long as they can track their movement. If the system works, Border Patrol agents will know before they encounter a group of intruders approximately how many people have crossed, how fast they are moving and even if they might be armed. Without such information, said Kevin Stevens, a Border Patrol official, "we send more people than we need to deal with a situation that wasn't a significant threat," or, in a worst case, "we send fewer people than we need to deal with a significant threat, and we find ourselves outnumbered and outgunned." The government's track record in the last decade in trying to buy cutting-edge technology to monitor the border — devices like video cameras, sensors and other tools that came at a cost of at least $425 million — is dismal. Because of poor contract oversight, nearly half of video cameras ordered in the late 1990's did not work or were not installed. The ground sensors installed along the border frequently sounded alarms. But in 92 percent of the cases, they were sending out agents to respond to what turned out to be a passing wild animal, a train or other nuisances, according to a report late last year by the homeland security inspector general. A more recent test with an unmanned aerial vehicle bought by the department got off to a similarly troubling start. The $6.8 million device, which has been used in the last year to patrol a 300-mile stretch of the Arizona border at night, crashed last month. With Secure Border, at least five so-called system integrators — Lockheed, Raytheon and Northrop, as well as Boeing and Ericsson — are expected to submit bids. The winner, which is due to be selected before October, will not be given a specific dollar commitment. Instead, each package of equipment and management solutions the contractor offers will be evaluated and bought individually. "We're not just going to say, 'Oh, this looks like some neat stuff, let's buy it and then put it on the border,' "Mr. Chertoff said at a news conference on Tuesday. Skepticism persists. A total of $101 million is already available for the program. But on Wednesday, when the House Appropriations Committee moved to approve the Homeland Security Department's proposed $32.1 billion budget for 2007, it proposed withholding $25 million of $115 million allocated next year for the Secure Border contracting effort until the administration better defined its plans. "Unless the department can show us exactly what we're buying, we won't fund it," Representative Rogers said. "We will not fund programs with false expectations." ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 12) DEPLOYMENT REFUSER HAS NO REGRETS By Michelle Tan Army Times June 14, 2006 http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-1870677.php First Lt. Ehren Watada doesn’t regret publicly announcing that he will not deploy to Iraq because he believes the war is illegal and immoral. “I know there are a lot of people, especially in the military, who hate me, who think I’m a traitor, think I’m a coward, think I should spend the rest of my life at Leavenworth and I should be taken out on the street the shot,” Watada told Army Times. But “there are a lot of people in the military who are supporting me. On June 7, the day first went public about refusing to deploy to Iraq, Watada said three noncommissioned officers walked up to him and shook his hand. He said he has received e-mails from NCOs and field grade officers thanking him for speaking up. “All of us have convictions, but we need to stand up for our convictions,” said Watada, who’s assigned to 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, at Fort Lewis, Wash. “If you see something wrong, you have a responsibility to take action and act upon it. His decision to refuse deployment to Iraq didn’t come easily, Watada said. He did his homework, researching international law, the history of war, and the history of Iraq, and read articles by governmental and non-governmental agencies, journalists and scholars about the situation in Iraq. “There was a time when I thought maybe I should just be a conscientious objector,” Watada said. “It would be a lot easier than going through all this pain and standing up to my commanders . . . but I couldn’t be true to myself and do it. Watada, 28, whose application to resign his commission was denied by the Army, has submitted an application for exception from the stop-loss policy so that he can resign. He said he’s been told that legal proceedings against him, if any, won’t take place until his unit deploys to Iraq without him. The Stryker brigade is set to deploy later this month. “I don’t regret it at all,” Watada said about speaking out. “I was giving up a lot, I think, when the easier thing and the better thing for my future would be to do my year [in Iraq]. I just felt like I couldn’t go on with the rest of my life knowing that what we did was wrong but I did it anyway because it was the easiest thing to do. Soft spoken and articulate, Watada said he hasn’t experienced open hostility from his fellow soldiers. “There’s no one waiting to smash my windows in or slash my tires, but there’s definitely tension. To his critics, Watada has this to say: “Put yourself in my shoes. Go in front of the country and do what I did and have to face the consequences of those actions. If they call me a coward, I want to see them do that. It’s definitely scary and terrifying, but it’s easier to do something when everyone’s doing it too. It’s a lot more terrifying doing it alone. BACKGROUND: Army Times piece on Lt. Watada's decision to refuse deployment [On Wednesday, the *Army Times* carried a short profile by Michelle Tan on Lt. Ehren Watada, the army lieutenant refusing to deploy on Iraq on grounds the war is illegal.[1] -- To what has already been reported, it adds his assertion that he was tempted to be a conscientious objector, that the Army has told him that there will be no proceedings against him until the Stryker brigade to which he's been assigned ships out to Iraq, and that he says that "there are a lot of people in the military who are supporting me." -- "On June 7, the day first went public about refusing to deploy to Iraq, Watada said three noncommissioned officers walked up to him and shook his hand," Tan reports. -- The tone of the article is quite respectful; it fails to summarize Lt. Watada's argument, but reports: "He did his homework, researching international law, the history of war, and the history of Iraq, and read articles by governmental and non-governmental agencies, journalists and scholars about the situation in Iraq." -- The *Army Times* has also carried an early AP story on Lt. Watada, and an AP piece on the decision of First United Methodist Church to offer itself as "sanctuary" for service personnel contemplating the alternatives to service in Iraq. -- Thanks to Bob Rudolph and Marion Ward for sending this piece. --Mark] http://www.ufppc.org/content/view/4679/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 13) Here Illegally, Working Hard and Paying Taxes By EDUARDO PORTER June 19, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/19/business/19illegals.html?hp&ex=1150776000&en=a94929a93349f54f&ei=5094&partner=homepage MINNEAPOLIS — It is 5:30 in the evening as Adriana makes her way to work against a flow of people streaming out of the lattice of downtown stores and office towers here. She punches a time card, dons a uniform and sets out to clean her first bathroom of the night. A few miles away, Ana arrives at a suburban Target store at 10 p.m. to clean the in-house restaurant for the next day's shoppers. At 5:30 the next morning, Emilio starts his rounds at the changing rooms at a suburban department store. A half-hour later, Polo rushes to clean the showers and locker room at a university here before the early birds in the pool finish their morning swim. Adriana, 27; Ana, 27; Emilio, 48; and Polo, 52, are all illegal immigrants, denizens of one of the most easily overlooked corners of the nation's labor force and almost universally ignored by the workers, shoppers and students they clean up after. "It's like you are invisible," Adriana said. Invisible, perhaps, but not hidden. In contrast to the typical image of an illegal immigrant — paid in cash, working under the table for small-scale labor contractors on a California farm or a suburban construction site — a majority now work for mainstream companies, not fly-by-night operators, and are hired and paid like any other American worker. Polo — who, like all the workers named in this article, agreed to be interviewed only if his full identity was protected — is employed by a subsidiary of ABM Industries, a publicly traded company based in San Francisco with 73,000 workers across the country and annual revenues of $2.6 billion. Emilio works for the Kimco Corporation, a large private company with 5,000 employees in 30 states and sales of about $100 million. More than half of the estimated seven million immigrants toiling illegally in the United States get a regular paycheck every week or two, experts say. At the end of the year they receive a W-2 form. Come April 15, many file income tax returns using special ID numbers issued by the Internal Revenue Service so foreigners can pay taxes. Some even get a refund check in the mail. And they are now present in low-skilled jobs across the country. Illegal immigrants account for 12 percent of workers in food preparation occupations, for instance, according to an analysis of census data by the Pew Hispanic Center. In total, they account for an estimated one in 20 workers in the United States. The building maintenance industry — a highly competitive business where the company with the lowest labor costs tends to win the contract — has welcomed them with open arms. According to the Pew Hispanic Center, more than a quarter of a million illegal immigrants are janitors, 350,000 are maids and housekeepers and 300,000 are groundskeepers. The janitorial industry has been transformed in recent years as a handful of companies have consolidated by taking over hundreds of small local operators. That activity has gone hand-in-hand with the steady advance of immigrants, legal and illegal — almost all of them Hispanic — who have been drawn into what was once an overwhelmingly American- born work force. Adriana works for Harvard Maintenance, a New York contractor that has some 3,700 janitors and cleans landmarks like Yankee Stadium and Shea Stadium. ABM Industries, Polo's employer, is the biggest contractor in Minneapolis and St. Paul, with about 35 percent of the market and a portfolio of high- profile customers that include the Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport and some downtown buildings. ABM is a coast-to-coast force in the business, responsible for cleaning a virtual Who's Who of the nation's best-known buildings, at one time even including the World Trade Center in New York, where several illegal janitors died on 9/11. Despite a murky legal status, ABM hired Polo just as it would hire any other worker. His wife and daughter — who already worked at the university — recommended him to their supervisor, who collected Polo's application and paperwork, gave him an ABM uniform and put him on the payroll. He makes $11.75 an hour, has health insurance and gets two weeks of paid vacation every year. The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 made it a crime for companies to knowingly hire illegal immigrants. Employers say they do their utmost to comply. "We don't ever knowingly hire undocumented workers," said Amy Polakow, a spokeswoman for Kimco. Harvard Maintenance issued a statement: "While we are dismayed that an employee allegedly has submitted fraudulent documentation," it said, "we screen all new hires and make sure they provide proper paperwork." Buying the Documents A written statement from ABM said that "if an individual were found to have presented falsified work authorization documents to gain employment, their employment would be terminated." Still, in many cities it would be hard to put together a cleaning crew without resorting to an illegal work force. Adriana used to work for ABM too, she said. But last year Harvard Maintenance, a rival contractor that entered the Minneapolis market two years ago, won the contract to clean her building. Adriana guesses that except for a couple of legal immigrants from Ecuador and a couple of Somalis, the rest of the three dozen or so janitors on her shift are illegal immigrants. And when the contractor changed, the work force in her building did not. "All the workers," Adriana said, "are the same ones." Illegal immigrants operate in a kind of parallel employment universe, structured in many ways like the legal job market but with its own rules and procedures. To begin with, acquiring the necessary documentation to work is a routine transaction these days. In Minneapolis, one only has to mill about for a few minutes in a Kmart parking lot known to immigrants and a young Guatemalan with a Patrón tequila hat will approach on his bike and quietly offer to help. A set of Polaroid photos can be purchased for $10 at the photo outlet- sporting goods store up the street — a quick snap against a white backdrop tucked among the soccer balls and jerseys of national squads from all over the world. The documents themselves cost $110. Within two hours of having received the photos, the Guatemalan is cycling back into the parking lot to make the drop of the ID package. It includes a green card with the customer's photo and somebody's fingerprints, along with a Social Security card, for which the number was plucked out of thin air. Some illegal immigrants do not even need the green card. Until the late 1990's, Mexican illegal immigrants typically arrived in Minnesota with their birth certificate and Mexican voting card, which could be used to obtain a legal Minnesota state ID. But getting a Social Security number could be a little more complicated in the old days. Lily, 38, another janitor cleaning a building downtown, knew no one in Minneapolis when she arrived illegally from Guatemala 14 years ago. So when a neighbor said she needed papers, she called the smuggler who brought her across the border at his home in Mexico. He asked her to make up a nine-digit number, which she did by combining the date she left Guatemala and the date she arrived in the United States two months later. She sent him some photos and $75 and received her fake papers by return mail. Documents in hand, getting a job is straightforward. A common first step for new immigrants is to apply to a temporary work agency for the first job. But as immigrant communities have grown, new arrivals have been able to tap into networks of friends, relatives and former neighbors to help them navigate the United States and jump straight into a permanent job. When Adriana and her sister arrived in Minneapolis from Mexico in 1998, their mother was waiting for them. She paid the smuggling fee of $1,700 per person and helped Adriana into her first job at the building where she worked and where she knew the supervisor well. "You know, it's the chain," Adriana said. "I just got a job in my building for a cousin." In some industries with many illegal immigrants, like construction, farming and landscaping, employers often turn to labor contractors to assemble crews of workers — transferring onto them the responsibility of checking the paperwork. That helps establish deniability in case of an immigration raid. By contrast, the big building maintenance contractors do much of the hiring themselves. But some still distance themselves from the job market itself by delegating hiring to supervisors in individual buildings — often immigrants themselves — who will receive the job applications, help fill in official documents and copy supporting papers. Adriana said she never had to step into ABM's offices, which are across the Mississippi River from downtown Minneapolis. She said that the supervisor knew she did not have proper papers. Cheaper Labor Starting about 30 years ago, as illegal immigration began to swell, building maintenance contractors in big immigrant hubs like Los Angeles started hiring the new immigrant workers as part of a broader effort to drive down labor costs. Unions for janitors fell apart as landlords shifted to cheaper nonunion contractors to clean their buildings. Wages fell and many American-born workers left the industry. Between 1970 and 2000, the share of Hispanic immigrants among janitors in Los Angeles jumped from 10 percent to more than 60 percent, according to a forthcoming book by Ruth Milkman, a sociologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, titled "L.A. Story: Work, Immigration and Unionism in America's Second City." (Russell Sage Foundation, August 2006.) The pattern repeated itself as immigrants spread throughout the rest of the country. By 2000, Hispanic immigrants made up nearly 1 in 5 janitors in the United States, according to Ms. Milkman's research, up from fewer than 1 in 20 in 1980. When the Service Employees International Union started to reorganize the industry in the late 1990's, it adapted its approach in some cities to appeal to illegal workers. For instance, union contracts in Los Angeles include clauses instructing employers to contact the union if an immigration official "appears on or near the premises" and barring the employers from revealing a worker's name or address to immigration authorities. Building maintenance contractors and those who contract their services underscore their efforts to keep illegal immigrants off the payroll. But beyond that they are reluctant to discuss the presence of illegal immigrants in the janitorial work force. In a statement, Target pointed out that its stores were cleaned by outside contractors. "As in the past," it read, "if we find any illegal behavior by our vendor, we will immediately terminate their contract." Mr. Mitchell said ABM had "put in place policies, procedures and ongoing managerial training for compliance with immigration law." Harvard Maintenance's statement added that "we believe our screening programs currently in place are among the best in the building services industry." For all these efforts, however, it is remarkably easy for illegal immigrants to get a regular, above-board job. The law requires employers to make workers fill out I-9 "employment eligibility" forms and provide documents to prove they are legally entitled to work. But the employers benefit from one large loophole: they are not expected to distinguish between a fake ID and the real thing. To work, illegal immigrants do not need to come up with masterpieces of ID fraud, only something that looks plausible. "To bring a criminal prosecution we need to show an employer knowingly hired an illegal immigrant," said Dean Boyd, a spokesman at Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the branch of the Department of Homeland Security that enforces immigration rules. " 'Knowingly' is the key word."Yet the standard of plausibility is not particularly tight. "Some of these documents are so visibly wrong that you don't need to be an expert on what a Social Security card looks like," said Michael Mahdesian, chairman of the board of Servicon Systems, a private contractor that cleans aerospace and defense facilities as well as office buildings in California, Arizona and New Mexico. Mr. Mahdesian said Servicon was more careful than other contractors — forced by the nature of its clients in the military industry to make more rigorous checks to keep illegal immigrants out. But he said that each time Servicon took over a cleaning contract in a new office building, it found that 25 percent to 30 percent of the workers it inherited from the previous contractor were working illegally, and had to let them go. "Most companies in this industry doing commercial office buildings take the view that it is not their job to be the immigration service," Mr. Mahdesian said. Companies have little to fear. The penalty for knowingly hiring illegal immigrants includes up to six months in jail — or up to five years in particularly egregious cases — and fines that range from $275 to $11,000 for each worker. Yet fines are typically negotiated down, and employers are almost always let off the hook. Only 46 people were convicted in 2004 for hiring illegal immigrants; the annual number has been roughly the same for the last decade. In a rare raid, about 50 illegal workers — including a handful of ABM janitors — were arrested at the Minneapolis-St. Paul airport in 2002, according to Tim Counts, a spokesman for the Minnesota office of immigration and customs enforcement. With one exception — the Wok & Roll Chinese restaurant in the airport terminal — no charges were brought against the companies that hired them, Mr. Counts said. Pushing for Unionization Despite becoming a fixture of the labor market, illegal immigrants remain vulnerable at work. Wages declined as illegal immigrants entered the janitorial labor pool. Janitors' median earnings fell by 3 percent in real terms between 1983 and 2002, when the Labor Department changed the definitions of building maintenance jobs and other occupations. Meanwhile, earnings across all occupations rose by 8 percent, after accounting for inflation. Though unionization has helped push janitors wages back up in many cities, they remain lower in markets with many illegal immigrants in the labor force. In New York City, janitors cleaning commercial buildings make $19 an hour. Mike Fishman, president of the Service Employees International Union's local in New York, points out that the union never lost ground in the city, and it is still unusual to find illegal immigrants cleaning office buildings there. In Southern California, by contrast, unions were decimated in the 1980's, and only started recovering in the late 1990's. According to Mike Garcia, president of the union's main local in the state, Southern California's unionized janitors earn between $8.50 and $11 an hour. Unscrupulous employers still victimize illegal workers frequently. Veronica, a 39-year old illegal immigrant from Mexico, had been working for a temporary employment agency for about a year, crating boxes of beauty products for Aveda, when the agency fired her, then rehired her under a different Social Security number to avoid paying her for the vacation time she had earned. "They don't want you to gain seniority," she said. When Adriana started her cleaning job downtown, she said, the supervisor recorded her on the payroll under a different name. But rather than change the entry on ABM's payroll, he asked her to buy a set of documents with the new name — forcing her to live for years with two identities, one for work and one for everything else. Adriana only managed to recover her real name by tagging it on as a middle name when Harvard took over the contract at her building and she reapplied for her job. Now, the name on her state ID is similar to the one on her Social Security card and paycheck. Many get caught using bad Social Security numbers and lose their jobs. The Social Security Administration sends "no match" letters every year to about eight million workers and about 130,000 employers. Though the letter warns employers not to fire workers because of the mismatch, many do. Lily, the Guatemalan immigrant, used to clean the offices of General Mills in suburban Minneapolis for a building contractor named Aramark. Earlier this year, she said, the company fired her and other workers, stating that it had received a letter from the government claiming the workers' Social Security numbers were wrong. "They wanted to get rid of the people the supervisor didn't like," Lily said. In a statement, Aramark said it "fully complies with federal laws and guidelines regarding employment eligibility, and has procedures in place to confirm employment eligibility of our employees. Should we discover that an employee does not have proper documentation, their employment with Aramark is terminated." It added that it did not fire workers simply on receipt of a "no match" letter, but gave workers up to 90 days to fix the problem. The one thing that illegal immigrants did not have to worry about, at least until recently, was the immigration police. But life has been getting tougher. Minnesota, for instance, tightened its requirements to award state ID's or driver's licenses. And, lately, immigration authorities have been pursuing illegal immigrants more aggressively. Since April, there have been high-profile raids at several work sites across the country, including IFCO Systems, a pallet and shipping container maker, where agents apprehended nearly 1,200 illegal workers and some managers. Since Oct. 1, 2005, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has arrested more than 2,100 people in "work site enforcement investigations," compared with 1,145 for the entire previous fiscal year and 845 in fiscal 2004. It is also bringing more serious charges — such as harboring illegal immigrants and money- laundering of illicit profits — against employers who hire them. Agents have also been sweeping through Minneapolis and other cities, seizing immigrants who had been served with deportation orders and expelling them from the country. But immigrants adapt. Pablo Tapia, the leader of a church- based community group, has been holding tutorials for immigrants on how to avoid being deported. One rule is "don't open the door" if immigration authorities come knocking. Another is "stay calm and do not run" if agents raid the workplace. "Just keep working," Mr. Tapia recommends. "If you run, it can be used against you in court." ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 14) Residents Struggle to Survive, In and Out of Ramadi Inter Press Service Dahr Jamail and Ali Fadhil Dahr Jamail's Iraq Dispatches Visit the Dahr Jamail Iraq website http://dahrjamailiraq.com *RAMADI, Jun 19 (IPS) - As the threat of a giant U.S. military operation in Ramadi lingers and sporadic clashes plague the city daily, residents struggle to cope, both inside and outside the sealed city.* A week spent in Ramadi, the capital of Anbar province west of Baghdad, reveals that residents are suffering from lack of water, electricity, cooking gas and medical supplies for the hospitals. The streets are eerily empty, and it appears that many people have now left the city, although possibly as many as 150,000 still remain in their homes, either because they are too afraid to leave or they have nowhere to go. "We will survive anyway," Um Qassim, a middle-aged housewife with six children, told IPS. "It is Allah who gives life and he is the only one able to take it away." Despite the horrible conditions here, with armed resistance groups controlling vast swathes of the city, and other areas subject to frequent shooting from U.S. snipers on the rooftops of houses, she said that people should be grateful to their god whatever happens to them, adding, "Those Americans will leave." The operation is part of a renewed crackdown on what the Pentagon says is a stronghold of the Sunni Arab resistance. As the threat of an all-out U.S. attack on the city looms, Imad Al-Muhammadi with the Iraqi Red Crescent in Ramadi told IPS, "Ramadi is a lot more difficult than the Fallujah crisis because people cannot flee to Baghdad and many other cities due to the threat of sectarian death squads, so it is very difficult to provide them with safe shelter at a reasonable distance from the military operations." Muhammadi said that many of the families who had left are facing "horrible living conditions in tents, abandoned schools and are staying under any roof that protects them from the burning summer sun." "There is no positive sign on the American side that shows a different solution from those of Fallujah and other cities which have been 'deleted' in order to be 'liberated'," he added. "Civilians, as usual, are the ones living the hardships of occupation and definitely the ones dying in vain." According to Maurizio Mascia, programme manager for the Italian Consortium of Solidarity (ICS), a non-governmental group based in Amman, Jordan that provides relief to refugees in Iraq, minor clashes were reported on Monday, mainly in Al-Qadisiya, Al-Mala'ab, Al-Andalus, Al-Aramel, Al-Aziziya, Al-Qattana, Al-Soufiya, the city centre (close to Abd Al-Jaleel mosque) and 30th of July. Additionally, U.S. and Iraqi forces are reported to be attacking the eastern side of the city in an effort to push into Ramadi. ICS reports that the number of checkpoints and the frequency of Multi-National Forces (MNF) patrols have increased since the beginning of the crisis, making it likely that both the MNF/Iraqi forces and insurgents are preparing themselves for a heightened battle. "The population is still leaving the city and the number of families in displacement traced in Anbar by ICS monitors is close to 3,200 now," Mascia told IPS by telephone. "The new IDPs [internally displaced persons] are mainly approaching Rutba and Al-Baghdadi, while Heet remains the main destination of Ramadi IDPs." He said about 1,000 IDP families are present now in Fallujah and surrounding areas. However, he added that "Most of the families are avoiding approaching Fallujah due to the complicated procedure enforced by MNF to enter the city." Mascia said that the number of families recorded by ICS is almost certainly low, since his group only logs families who get direct relief aid from their workers. "The Americans, instead of attacking the city all at once like they've done in their previous operations in cities like Fallujah and Al-Qa'im, are using helicopters and ground troops to attack one district at a time in Ramadi," Mascia told IPS from his office in Amman. "Access to Ramadi is extremely difficult," he continued. "The checkpoints are set up at the two bridges and make it extremely difficult to access the city by vehicle. The only available option to avoid the checkpoints is the desert way heading to Al-Ta'meem district." "The main dangers for the population are the MNF at the checkpoints and the snipers: both usually shoot at any movement that they consider dangerous -- causing many victims among civilians." According to Mascia, services at the main hospital, as well as health clinics, is down to a "low standard due to the security situation and lack of medical supplies". And similar to the tactics used during the U.S. assault on Fallujah in November 2004, the U.S. military continues to use loudspeakers to ask people to either hand over "insurgents" who are present in their neighbourhoods, or to evacuate their homes and flee the city. ICS reports that some of the messages have specifically made reference to what happened in Fallujah. Correspondents with the London-based Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR) in Baghdad recently reported on the use of snipers by the U.S. military in Ramadi: "People in Ramadi... estimate that about 70 percent of the city's population have fled in the last week, many of them holding white flags for fear of being shot at by Marine snipers." The IPS correspondent in Ramadi also witnessed snipers shooting at civilians in the city. "The ongoing violence between U.S. Marines and the insurgents, air strikes, and outages in the water, electricity and phone networks have already made life untenable," adds the IWPR report. "Ramadi residents say U.S. troops regularly take over houses to fight the insurgents, and combatants on both sides have been seen using rooftops as sniper positions." The Association of Muslim Scholars, based in Baghdad, has encouraged the residents of Heet, which is near Ramadi, to host those fleeing the city. Some more vulnerable families are also staying in mosques that are offering shelter to refugees. An IWPR reporter in Baghdad wrote that a 17-year-old student who fled Ramadi with his parents, Ghayath Salim al-Dulaimi, said his relatives had been prevented from leaving by U.S. air strikes two days earlier. "Our neighbourhood has emptied completely -- there's no one left," he told IWPR. "People are leaving in droves and there aren't any services at all. You can't get to hospital because movement is restricted." Responding to a question about the situation in Ramadi at a Jun. 15 news briefing, Brig. Gen. Carter Ham from the Pentagon said, "I think those who are looking for perhaps a large-scale offensive may be somewhat off the mark. And I think what we will see increasingly is the Iraqis finding ways to increasingly establish the presence of Iraqi security forces, and we'll help them do that in any way that we can." (c)2006 Dahr Jamail ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 15) The right to fuck and suck OPINION by Tommi Avicolli Mecca Bay Guardian, June 21, 2006 Three years ago, on June 26, 2003, the Supreme Court struck down all sodomy laws, and adults of all sexual orientations were, for the first time in the history of our country, totally free to engage in consensual sex "per os or per anum." That monumental decision freed our collective genitals from one of the most repressive laws ever slapped on them. The act of sodomy was named after the infamous city in the Bible that was destroyed by the Old Testament god-patriarch either for inhospitality (the liberal interpretation) or propositioning angels for anal sex (the fundie read). The term sodomy was first used by St. Peter Damian in the 11th century, when antihomo sentiment ran rampant in Europe. By 1350, most of the continent had sodomy statutes on the books, according to gay historian John Boswell. The prohibitions against oral and anal sex in America were enacted state-by-state and followed English law. The first colony to ban the "crime not to be named among Christians" was Virginia in 1610. By the 1950s, when the first "homophile" groups formed, all the states had sodomy laws. The post-Stonewall gay liberation movement pushed hard for the decriminalization of all sex acts between consenting adults. The movement got its first poster boy in 1982: A police officer caught Atlanta bartender Michael Hardwick in his own bedroom engaging in anal sex with another man. The officer, who had come to serve a summons at 3 a.m., entered the apartment on the invitation of Hardwick's roommate. The district attorney declined to prosecute but, at the urging of the ACLU, Hardwick decided to fight. In 1986, the Supreme Court delivered a blow to America's libidos: It upheld the Georgia sodomy laws (Bowers v. Hardwick). In 1988, two Texas men, John G. Lawrence and Tyron Garner, were jailed overnight and fined $200 after police found them having sex in Lawrence's apartment. The cops had come in response to a weapons disturbance falsely reported by a neighbor. The men followed Harwick's lead and took the matter to court. In a surprising turnaround, the Supreme Court struck down the Texas law (Lawrence v. Texas) and killed all the sodomy statutes in the 13 states that still had them. America had finally entered the modern world — except for the US military, which still punishes sodomy (Article 125) among straight and queer service members. In light of Lawrence v. Texas, that law will be struck down eventually too. Good riddance to it all. In an age when many queers are fighting for the more mainstream goals of getting married and joining the military, let us not forget the fight for sexual liberation that our LGBT movement once championed. As feminist anarchist Emma Goldman might've said: "If I can't fuck, I don't want to be in your revolution." Tommi Avicolli Mecca is a longtime radical working-class southern Italian sodomite writer, performer, and activist. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 16) Israeli Attack Kills 3 Gaza Children By IAN FISHER June 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/21/world/middleeast/21mideast.html JERUSALEM, June 20 — An Israeli aircraft fired Tuesday on a car that officials suspected was carrying armed Palestinian militants in Gaza and killed three children nearby, a 7-year-old girl and two boys, ages 5 and 16, hospital officials and witnesses said. The airstrike was the third this month to kill civilians, infuriating Palestinians and raising an impassioned debate in Israel about its military response to the firing of homemade rockets from Gaza into Israel. On June 9, eight civilians — seven from one family — were killed on a beach in Gaza during an Israeli bombardment against militants suspected of launching the rockets, called Qassams. The Israeli military later denied that its munitions caused the deaths, a contention disputed by Palestinians and human rights officials. Four days later, another strike in Gaza killed at least two militants and another eight civilians. Tuesday's attack, according to an Israeli military official, was aimed at a group affiliated with the Fatah organization of President Mahmoud Abbas that had fired a rocket earlier in the day and was on its way to carry out another attack. A military spokesman said the missile hit the car, but apparently the militants escaped. "We are dealing with a cell that was very active in these attacks," said the spokesman, Capt. Jacob Dallal. "While we regret the loss of civilian life, the overall responsibility lies with the Palestinian Authority." Since the beginning of the month, more than 140 Qassams have been fired from Gaza, seriously injuring one person. The issue of the rockets and the military response has strained the government. Residents of Sderot, the Israeli town hardest hit by the rockets, have complained that the government is not doing enough to protect them. Israeli military officials have spoken of stepping up operations in Gaza. Many other Israelis have said the Qassams do not represent a serious enough threat for so strong a military response, which has included some 6,000 artillery shells in recent months. "Qassams, Shmassams! So what?" the dovish former prime minister Shimon Peres was quoted as saying in the Israeli press. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 17) Supreme Court Rules Against Illegal Immigrant By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS June 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/washington/22wire-scotus.html?hp&ex=1151035200&en=94c687d336f46592&ei=5094&partner=homepage WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court on Thursday dealt a blow to some longtime illegal residents, upholding the deportation of a Mexican man who lived in the United States for 20 years. By an 8-1 vote, justices said that Humberto Fernandez-Vargas, who was deported several times from the 1970s to 1981, is subject to a 1996 law Congress passed to streamline the legal process for expelling aliens who have been deported at least once before and returned. After his last deportation in 1981, Fernandez-Vargas returned to the United States, fathered a child, started a trucking company in Utah and eventually married his longtime companion, a U.S. citizen. But by the time he applied for legal status -- after his marriage in 2001 -- Congress had passed the Illegal Immigration and Immigrant Responsibility Act, which revoked the right to appeal to an immigration judge an order of removal. Fernandez-Vargas was sent back to Mexico in 2004, and wanted to return to his family in the United States. He argued that the 1996 law should not be applied to him because he last entered America more than a decade before Congress passed the statute. "Fernandez-Vargas continued to violate the law by remaining in this country day after day and ... the United States was entitled to bring that continuing violation to an end," Justice David Souter wrote in the decision. It was unclear how broad of an impact the ruling would have. Souter said that unlawful immigrants like Fernandez-Vargas should have known about the 1996 law and taken "advantage of a grace period." The case is Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales, 04-1376. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 18) Army to Raise Maximum Age By AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE The Army said that it was raising the maximum age for enlistment to 42 from 40 to expand its pool of potential recruits. The move comes just six months after the Army raised the maximum age to 40 from 35; more than 1,000 people in that age bracket have enlisted since then. Recruits between the ages of 40 to 42 must meet the same physical standards as younger ones but will be subjected to additional medical screening, the Army said. Men and women in that age bracket can enlist and are eligible for the same signing bonuses and other incentives as younger recruits. June 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/washington/22brfs-007.html ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 19) Senate Rejects Minimum Wage Increase [The Republicans refuse to vote for an increase and the Democrats want to vote for a paltry increase in effect tying working people to a maximum of $7.25 an hour for the next two years! What choice is this? Let's see if the politicians can live on $7.25 an hour for the next two years!...bw] By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS The Senate rejected a proposed increase in the minimum wage by a vote of 52 to 46. Democrats had said it was past time to increase the rate of $5.15 an hour, in effect for nearly a decade. This was the ninth time since 1997 that Senate Democrats have proposed and Republicans have blocked a stand-alone increase in the minimum wage. Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, proposed the bill, which would have increased the rate to $5.85 beginning 60 days after enactment, to $6.55 a year later and to $7.25 a year after that. June 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/washington/22brfs-009.html ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 20) New Orleans Plans Juvenile Curfew By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 8:39 p.m. ET June 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-New-Orleans-Curfew.html NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- City officials are hurrying to resurrect a nighttime curfew to keep children off the streets, after five teenagers were killed last weekend. Curfew enforcement went by the wayside after Hurricane Katrina, but officials say the problem is now urgent as summer starts and more people return to the city. On Wednesday, work was under way to get one piece of the curfew program going: A holding center for violators. The center -- a partitioned room where violators wait for parents or social workers -- was, like so much else, flooded by Hurricane Katrina. Mayor Ray Nagin's predecessor, Marc Morial, was credited with using a curfew in the mid-1990s to fight a rise in crime. ''It has not actively been enforced because the juvenile justice system has been down and there is nowhere to house these juveniles,'' said Sgt. Carlton Lewis, a police spokesman. The move comes as National Guard troops patrol streets and help the depleted New Orleans Police Department fight a wave of crime. After last weekend's killings, Gov. Kathleen Blanco urged the city to keep children off the streets. That has become a central piece of the plan to squash crime before it spoils the city's recovery. The city attorney's office Wednesday was laying out the details of the curfew, a city spokesman said. The curfew will probably start at 11 p.m. and go until dawn, said William Short, a chief sheriff's deputy for Orleans Parish. David Utter, who heads the Juvenile Justice Project of Louisiana, said the move to install a curfew after the weekend shootings was misguided. ''Rushing to the blame-the-victim mentality seems to have little basis in the facts,'' he said, pointing out that only one of the five victims was, under the law, a juvenile at age 16. Instead, the city should channel its resources into restoring youth programs, schools and playgrounds destroyed by Katrina, he said. Latasha Smith, 21, agreed. She is being trained at a restaurant that employs at-risk young people in Central City, the neighborhood where the weekend shootings occurred. ''Right now they don't have any programs, facilities for these kids,'' Smith said. A basketball court she used to play on now contains trailers housing displaced families. Officials say they plan to restore more parks and playgrounds this summer. At a news conference Monday, Nagin and the City Council urged quick action in opening schools after hours, starting nighttime basketball programs and doing more to fight poverty. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- LINKS ONLY ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Pink Floyd's Roger Waters urges Israel to 'tear down the wall' By Jonathan Lis, Haaretz Correspondent, and Reuters Pink Floyd frontman Roger Waters, who inspired the rock band's iconic album "The Wall," scrawled "tear down the wall" on the concrete panels of Israel's West Bank barrier on Wednesday. Last update - 07:39 22/06/2006 http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/729817.html Study: Nonprofit Healthcare Often Better Quality Care http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0621-07.htm Helen Thomas, Veteran Critic of White House, Turns on 'Gullible' Press Pack http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0621-02.htm Female US Soldier Refuses Return to Iraq, Claiming Sexual Harassment http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0621-05.htm US Military Deems Homosexuality a 'Mental Disorder' http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0621-06.htm Test Tube Meat Nears Dinner Table http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0621-03.htm Rights Group Says Israel Beach Death Probe Not Credible http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0621-08.htm Rich City Poor City: Middle-class Neighborhoods Are Disappearing from the Nation's Cities, Leaving Only High- and Low-Income Districts, New Study Says http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0622-04.htm CEOs Earn 262 Times Pay of Average Worker http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0622-07.htm Lawsuit Is Filed Over Banned Children's Book About Cuba By TERRY AGUAYO The American Civil Liberties Union of Florida filed a federal lawsuit challenging a decision by the Miami-Dade School Board to remove a children's book about Cuba from its elementary school libraries. The board voted last week to ban the book, "Vamos a Cuba," and its English version, "A Visit to Cuba," after a parent objected to it, saying it contained misleading information about the island and painted a rosy picture of life there. But civil liberties union leaders called the ban a violation of the First Amendment, saying schools are responsible for providing students information with different viewpoints. June 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/us/22brfs-004.html FEMA Halts Evictions From Trailers in Mississippi By SHAILA DEWAN ATLANTA, June 21 — In yet another change of housing plans for Hurricane Katrina evacuees, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has suspended the eviction of 3,000 families who are living in government trailers in Mississippi. The move is the latest in a series of announcements and reversals that have caused confusion and occasionally panic among families unable to live in their ruined homes in New Orleans and elsewhere along the Gulf Coast. For several months, FEMA has repeatedly changed deadlines, sent conflicting letters to applicants, and declared people ineligible for housing assistance for the lack of signatures or failures to appear in person for property inspections. June 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/us/22trailers.html Teacher Strike May Influence Mexican Vote By JAMES C. McKINLEY Jr. OAXACA, Mexico, June 21 — What started as a teachers' strike here five weeks ago has grown into a major movement to oust the governor of Oaxaca State that could affect the presidential election on July 2. Last week began with strikers battling the police and ended with failed talks with a federal mediator. Tens of thousands of teachers still occupy the central square and the surrounding streets of this colonial town of 265,000, a cultural center and tourist attraction known for its artists and haunting pre-Columbian ruins. But the teachers, who number 70,000, have been joined by dozens of community groups, Indian rights organizations, farmers' cooperatives and revolutionary parties. The teachers' initial demand for better pay has been drowned out by the general cry for Gov. Ulises Ruiz to resign. June 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/world/americas/22mexico.html Morgan Profit Soars 111% and Revenue Rises 48% By LANDON THOMAS Jr. June 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/business/22wall.html Botched Israeli Strike Kills Palestinian in Gaza By IAN FISHER and STEVEN ERLANGER JERUSALEM, June 21 — A Palestinian woman was killed Wednesday in Gaza after a pair of Israeli missiles veered off target, one of them slamming into a house. It was the latest in a series of botched airstrikes that have killed at least a dozen Palestinian civilians in the past eight days. June 22, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/world/middleeast/22mideast.html John Pilger : In Palestine, a War on Children ZNet June 17, 2006 http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=10442§ionID=107 HAS RACISM INVADED CANADA? By Robert Fisk The Case of the Toronto 17 CounterPunch June 12, 2006 http://www.counterpunch.org/fisk06122006.html Stress Disorder Seen Soaring Among Returning Troops http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0620-02.htm Mental health: Children on the edge One in ten youngsters suffers mental problems as behavioural disorders double in 30 years By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor More than one million children are suffering from mental disorders severe enough to require treatment, doctors say. Rising divorce rates, increased drinking among young people and competitive pressures are among the factors behind the trend, with both sexes and all social classes affected. But a shortage of specialists and widespread stigmatisation of those with mental problems means many children are denied help or face long waits for treatment. Published: 21 June 2006 http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health_medical/article1093530.ece Bush's Visit to Vienna Is Marked by Tension By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG and JOHN O'NEIL Hundreds of people marched through the streets of Vienna today carrying banners reading "World's No. 1 Terrorist." June 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/21/world/europe/21cnd-prexy.html?hp&ex=1150948800&en=a7c4c6672338cbe9&ei=5094&partner=homepage A Legacy of the Storm: Depression and Suicide By SUSAN SAULNY New Orleans is experiencing what appears to be a near epidemic of depression and post-traumatic stress disorders, one that mental health experts say is of an intensity rarely seen in this country. It is contributing to a suicide rate that state and local officials describe as close to triple what it was before Hurricane Katrina struck and the levees broke 10 months ago. June 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/21/us/21depress.html?hp&ex=1150948800&en=9f71fcbb003d88f8&ei=5094&partner=homepage Two Killed in Florida Detention Center Shooting By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 11:16 a.m. ET TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) -- A guard at a federal detention center opened fire as investigators came to arrest him and five other guards Wednesday, starting a gunfight that killed two people and wounded another, the FBI said. The six guards were indicted Tuesday on corruption charges alleging they brought alcohol and other contraband into the part of the prison where female inmates were held and sold it or exchanged it for sex with the inmates or the inmates' silence. June 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Prison-Shooting.html?hp&ex=1150948800&en=84873af4c66afe51&ei=5094&partner=homepage The Debate Over Immigration Reform A showdown is looming over the most substantial overhaul of immigration law in 20 years. The Senate has passed a bill that would toughen border security and put most illegal immigrants on a path to citizenship. In contrast, the House has passed legislation that offers no provision for citizenship. President Bush is also deeply involved in the immigration debate and generally favors the provisions present in the Senate bill. The next step is for Senate and House leaders to meet in conference to try to reconcile their separate bills. The gulf between the two versions is so vast, and the politics of immigration so heated in this election year, that the prospects for a deal remain murky at best. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/25/washington/25IMMIGRATIONBILLS_GRAPHIC.html?ex=1151035200&en=7fb253a94cf708d6&ei=5070 There are 4 versions of Bill Number H.R.4437 for the 109th Congress 1 . Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005 (Introduced in House)[H.R.4437.IH] 2 . Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005 (Reported in House)[H.R.4437.RH] 3 . Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005 (Engrossed as Agreed to or Passed by House)[H.R.4437.EH] 4 . Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005 (Referred to Senate Committee after being Received from House)[H.R.4437.RFS] http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.4437: S.2611 Title: A bill to provide for comprehensive immigration reform and for other purposes. Sponsor: Sen Specter, Arlen [PA] (introduced 4/7/2006) Cosponsors (6) Related Bills: H.R.4437, S.2454, S.2612 Latest Major Action: 5/25/2006 Passed/agreed to in Senate. Status: Passed Senate with amendments by Yea-Nay Vote. 62 - 36. Record Vote Number: 157. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN02611: May 15, 2006 Transcript Bush's Speech on Immigration The following is the text of a speech by President George W. Bush on the subject of illegal immigration, as recorded by The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/15/washington/15text-bush.html?ex=1151035200&en=88cab9609094822b&ei=5070 House Adds Hearings on Immigration By CARL HULSE WASHINGTON, June 20 — In a decision that puts an overhaul of immigration laws in serious doubt, House Republican leaders said Tuesday that they would hold summer hearings around the nation on the politically volatile subject before trying to compromise with the Senate on a chief domestic priority of President Bush. June 21, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/21/washington/21immig.html?hp&ex=1150948800&en=63a79e3775cfae97&ei=5094&partner=homepage How US Hid the Suicide Secrets of Guantanamo http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0618-03.htm Hush-Hush Honors for US Military Top Brass http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0618-04.htm Suffering Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder http://www.commondreams.org/headlines0618-06.htm US Not Prepared for Catastrophe: Official Report http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0617-05.htm Dahr Jamail | "Operation Forward Together": Deeper Into the Quagmire "Here we go again," writes Dahr Jamail, "only this time with even more troops, raiding even more homes, manning more checkpoints, and of course more death squads operating - with backup support from American soldiers, and of course their air strikes." http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061906J.shtml Delta to End Pilots' Pension Plan By REUTERS Delta Air Lines said yesterday that it was notifying the federal pension insurer, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, that it intended to end its pilots' pension plan, a spokesman said. June 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/20/business/20air.html Panel Reaches Deal on Drilling Off U.S. Coasts By MICHAEL JANOFSKY WASHINGTON, June 19 — The chairman of the House resources committee said Monday that the committee had reached bipartisan agreement on a measure that would open the Outer Continental Shelf to oil and gas exploration. Representative Richard W. Pombo of California, the chairman, said the agreement was a compromise that would give states the option to drill in waters that the federal government had kept off limits to energy exploration for decades. At the same time, lawmakers also tried to satisfy lawmakers from Florida and other states who have opposed any drilling within 100 miles of their coastlines. June 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/20/washington/20drill.html No. 2 State Department Official Resigns to Join Wall Street Firm By HELENE COOPER WASHINGTON, June 19 — Deputy Secretary of State Robert B. Zoellick said Monday that he would be leaving his post as the State Department's second in command, as expected, to join the Wall Street investment house Goldman Sachs Group Inc. as a managing director. June 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/20/world/20zoellick.html Perfect Vision Is Helping and Hurting Navy By DAVID S. CLOUD June 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/20/us/20eye.html?hp&ex=1150862400&en=c0006f419ca9ec63&ei=5094&partner=homepage Next Victim of Warming: The Beaches By CORNELIA DEAN June 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/20/science/earth/20sea.html?8dpc Detainees Murder Charges for 3 G.I.'s in Iraq By THOM SHANKER and SABRINA TAVERNISE WASHINGTON, June 19 — Three American soldiers suspected of killing three detainees in Iraq and then threatening a soldier with death if he reported the shootings have been charged with premeditated murder and obstructing justice, Army officials said Monday. June 20, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/20/world/middleeast/20iraq.html FOCUS | National Guard Ordered to New Orleans Acting at the mayor's request, Governor Kathleen Blanco said Monday she would send National Guard troops and state police to patrol the streets of New Orleans after a bloody weekend in which six people were killed. "The situation is urgent," Blanco said. "Things like this should never happen, and I am going to do all I can to stop it." http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/062006Z.shtml FOCUS | Carol J. Williams: Kicked Out of Gitmo Carol J. Williams: "It is the opportunity to shed light into the dark corners of the anti-terrorism campaign that inspires us to surmount the obstacles and obfuscations. And it is the thwarting of that mission with moves like our expulsion that make us all the more determined to question, probe and illuminate the actions of our government being waged in the country's name." http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061906Z.shtml Funds flow on telecom legislation State's star lobbyists and PR firms take sides on cable franchise bill. By Jim Sanders -- Bee Staff Writer Published 12:01 am PDT Sunday, June 18, 2006 ://www.sacbee.com/content/business/tech/story/14269116p-15080277c.html Many of the Capitol's most powerful political players are waging a multimillion-dollar war over legislation to let telephone companies provide cable television service. Immigration Math: It's a Long Story By DANIEL ALTMAN June 18, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/business/yourmoney/18view.html No Retreat, No Surrender (They Hope) By MICHELINE MAYNARD Tonight I hear the neighborhood drummer sound I can feel my heart begin to pound You say you're tired and you just want to close your eyes And follow your dreams down. — Bruce Springsteen June 18, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/business/yourmoney/18uaw.html Guard Troops Set to Begin Mission on Mexican Border By RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD June 18, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/us/18guard.html In New Orleans, Money Is Ready but a Plan Isn't By ADAM NOSSITER June 18, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/us/nationalspecial/18orleans.html?hp&ex=1150689600&en=9a060633e372299f&ei=5094&partner=homepage 4 Months Into Aid Cutoff, Gazans Barely Scrape By By STEVEN ERLANGER June 18, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/world/middleeast/18gaza.html Former Antiterror Officials Find Industry Pays Better By ERIC LIPTON WASHINGTON, June 17 — Dozens of members of the Bush administration's domestic security team, assembled after the 2001 terrorist attacks, are now collecting bigger paychecks in different roles: working on behalf of companies that sell domestic security products, many directly to the federal agencies the officials once helped run. June 18, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/washington/18lobby.html?hp&ex=1150689600&en=2b212143597d60a3&ei=5094&partner=homepage A Long Road Ahead in Iraq New York Times Editorial June 18, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/opinion/18sun1.html?hp Bill Quigley | HUD to New Orleans Poor: "Go F(ind) Yourself (Housing)!" "The US Department of Housing and Urban Development has announced they plan to demolish over five thousand public housing apartments in New Orleans. HUD's demolition plans leave thousands of families with no hope of returning to New Orleans, where rental housing is scarce and costly," writes Bill Quigley. "How can thousands of low-income working families come home if HUD has fenced off their apartments, put metal shutters over their windows and doors and now plans to demolish their homes?" http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061806Y.shtml U.S./COLOMBIA: Dead Unionists No Hurdle to Free Trade Felipe Seligman and Juliana Lara Resende UNITED NATIONS, Jun 16 (IPS) - The U.S. government is not only a step away from ratifying a new free trade agreement, but also from rewarding persistent and severe human rights abuses in Colombia, where each year more trade union leaders are murdered than in all other nations put together, a new report charges. http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=33658 FOCUS | A Father Speaks Out Against the Iraq War On Father's Day, Fernando Suarez del Solar remembers his son, Jesus Suarez del Solar who was one of the first Americans killed during the invasion of Iraq. As a representative of Military Families Speak Out, a burgeoning organization of 1,500 families who call for an end to the US occupation of Iraq, Fernando Suarez tells high school and college students: stay in school; don't be deceived by false promises from recruiters for Bush. http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061806Z.shtml Venezuela bypasses Bush, offers help here Poor would get heating-oil discounts, eye operations Venezuela's government plans to offer discounted heating oil and free eye surgery to Milwaukee's low-income residents, Venezuelan officials announced Thursday. By LARRY SANDLER lsandler@journalsentinel.com Posted: June 15, 2006 http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=436487 Mexican Border Towns Fear US Crackdown As National Guard troops are being deployed to the border this month, migrant shelter directors are scrambling for funds and considering hiring more staff to keep their doors open 24 hours a day in anticipation of a record number of migrants being repatriated. http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061606R.shtml Delta Takes Steps to Avert Mass Retirement of Pilots By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH and JEFF BAILEY Delta Air Lines said yesterday that it planned to terminate the pension plan covering 13,000 active and retired pilots and some spouses, a move intended to save billions of dollars and also prevent an exodus of pilots that could have brought much of the carrier's operations to a halt. June 17, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/17/business/17delta.html Agency Sues Mining Company in Wake of Fire WASHINGTON, June 16 — Federal mine safety regulators filed a lawsuit on Friday against one of the largest mining companies in the country in an effort to force its officials to cooperate with the investigation of a deadly fire in January at a West Virginia coal mine. The civil suit, filed in a Federal District Court in West Virginia, describes a "broad refusal" by the company, Massey Energy, to turn over documents concerning management authority, ventilation, previous fires, construction projects and other matters at the Aracoma mine near Melville, W.Va...The fire, on Jan. 19, started along a belt line more than two miles inside the Aracoma Alma No. 1 Mine in Logan County, southwest of Charleston. The blaze, which killed two miners, occurred less than three weeks after 12 miners died following an explosion on Jan. 2 at another West Virginia mine, the Sago Mine, about 180 miles away. By IAN URBINA June 17, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/17/washington/17mine.html Delegation Seeks Release of Afghans Being Held at Guantánamo By CARLOTTA GALL KABUL, Afghanistan, June 14 — An Afghan government delegation to Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, said Wednesday that about half of the 94 Afghans being held there were not guilty of serious crimes and should be released. June 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/15/world/asia/15afghan.html Mexico's Populist Tilts at a Privileged Elite By JAMES C. McKINLEY Jr. June 17, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/17/world/americas/17amlo.html As Oil Rises in Markets, Rigs Rise in Mississippi Five years ago there were some 20 functioning oil wells inside the city limits of Laurel; now there are 83. By SHAILA DEWAN June 17, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/17/us/17wells.html?hp&ex=1150603200&en=74566fb2eee9800c&ei=5094&partner=homepage Contradictions Cloud Inquiry Into 24 Iraqi Deaths By JOHN M. BRODER June 17, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/17/world/middleeast/17haditha.html?hp&ex=1150603200&en=d24949f9866653f5&ei=5094&partner=homepage Pentagon Study Describes Abuse by Units in Iraq By ERIC SCHMITT June 17, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/17/washington/17formica.html?hp&ex=1150603200&en=5943f444831cfd1e&ei=5094&partner=homepage Time running out to curb effects of deep sea pollution, warns UN -Pace of change outstrips conservation efforts -Water temperature rises as alkalinity falls David Adam, environment correspondent Saturday June 17, 2006 http://www.guardian.co.uk/conservation/story/0,,1799872,00.html Greg Palast | African-American Voters Scrubbed by Secret GOP Hit List "The Republican National Committee has a special offer for African-American soldiers: Go to Baghdad, lose your vote," writes Greg Palast. "A confidential campaign directed by GOP party chiefs in October 2004 sought to challenge the ballots of tens of thousands of voters in the last presidential election, virtually all of them cast by residents of Black-majority precincts." http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061606J.shtml U.S.-Style Pay Packages Are All the Rage in Europe By GERALDINE FABRIKANT Along with hip-hop and Hollywood movies, Europeans are eagerly importing another American phenomenon: soaring pay packages for chief executives. For decades, Europeans were far more restrained than Americans when it came to rewarding the boss. Now, executives overseas are less inhibited about asking for American-style compensation. And often they are getting their wish. June 16, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/business/businessspecial/16pay.html Poll: US Seen as a Bigger Threat to Peace Than Iran http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0615-02.htm Iraq Conflict Fuels Rise in Global Refugees to 12 Million http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0615-04.htm "The Demons of Greed are Loose" Why a Global Economic Deluge Looms By GABRIEL KOLKO June 15, 2006 http://www.counterpunch.com/ FOCUS | Documents May Link Cheney to Halliburton No-Bid Iraq Contract Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that the Department of the Army, per order of US District Court Judge Ricardo M. Urbina, has released to Judicial Watch approximately 100 pages of documents which detail the multi-billion dollar, no-bid contract awarded in 2003 by the Army to Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR), a subsidiary of Halliburton Co. One document uncovered by Judicial Watch suggests the United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) may have publicly lied regarding the involvement of the Vice President's office in awarding the contract. http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061606Z.shtml Judge Rules That U.S. Has Broad Powers to Detain Noncitizens Indefinitely By NINA BERNSTEIN A federal judge in Brooklyn ruled yesterday that the government has wide latitude under immigration law to detain noncitizens on the basis of religion, race or national origin, and to hold them indefinitely without explanation. June 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/15/nyregion/15detain.html Bear Stearns Profit Jumps 83 Percent By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 1:36 p.m. ET June 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Earns-Bear-Stearns.html Alito Vote Loosens Limits on Evidence By DAVID STOUT WASHINGTON, June 15— The Supreme Court today affirmed the power of police officers backed by a search warrant to enter a home without knocking, and in so doing signaled the more conservative tilt of the tribunal in recent months. June 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/15/washington/15cnd-scotus.html?hp&ex=1150430400&en=fa5321eb3b84db97&ei=5094&partner=homepage US Military Death Toll in Iraq Reaches 2,500 The number of US military deaths in the Iraq war has reached 2,500, the Pentagon said on Thursday. In addition, 18,490 US troops have been wounded in the war. http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061506J.shtml Green Fuel's Dirty Secret By:Sasha Lilley on:Jun 14 2006 [11:35 am] (44 reads) http://www.innworldreport.net/ http://coanews.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=1003 US inflation and rate rise worries cause worldwide shares sell-off -Oil, gold and industrial metal prices plummet -Fears grow of American economic slowdown Larry Elliott and Justin McCurry in Tokyo Wednesday June 14, 2006 Guardian http://business.guardian.co.uk/print/0,,329504144-108725,00.html Gaza beach killings highlight need for revolutionary change By Yossi Schwartz in Israel Monday, 12 June 2006 http://www.marxist.com/gaza-beach-killings-change120606.htm Greg Palast | Keeping Iraq's Oil in the Ground Greg Palast asks, "Did the petroleum industry, which had a direct, if hidden, hand in promoting invasion, cheerlead for a takeover of Iraq to prevent overproduction?" http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061406J.shtml Dogs and Their Fine Noses Find New Career Paths By JENNIFER 8. LEE June 13, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/13/nyregion/13dogs.html?ex=1150430400&en=ea5c693d8f37c5c2&ei=5087%0A Global Image of the U.S. Is Worsening, Survey Finds By BRIAN KNOWLTON June 14, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/14/world/14pew.html
Monday, June 12, 2006
BAUAW NEWSLETTER-THURSDAY, JUNE 15, 2006
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Friends of Lt. Ehren Watada Bay Area Committee Organizing Meeting Saturday, June 17th @ Noon Veterans War Memorial Building 401 Van Ness Avenue (opposite SF City Hall) Room 223 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Demand General and Unconditional Amnesty for All! Demand the Freedom of Mumia Abu-Jamal! Demand Human Rights For All! Rally Monday, June 19, 2006, 5:00 P.M. Third Street and Palou Ave., San Francisco Note: This is a very important community rally. We urge everyone to turn out in support of the immigrant struggle and their linkage with the struggle for human rights and social justice in the Black community. Together and with the support of all those who seek human freedom and justice we can build a movement that can win! For more information call: 415-431-9925 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- TAKE ACTION! BART ALERT to Stop the Killing of Palestinian Children Israel has already fired 7,000 shells on the people of Gaza this year Palestinian families are starving because of US and EU sanctions Hospitals face a critical shortage of medicine and supplies Join MECA and hundreds of people to say “NO!” to killing children by violence and deprivation. When: Tuesday, June 20, 2006, 5pm Where: Downtown Berkeley BART Station, Center and Shattuck What: Rally and March to Protest the Killing of Children in Gaza Who: You, your friends and family—Bring your children ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- DEFEND SPC. SUZANNE SWIFT WHO SAID NO TO THE WAR! At 9:50 AM -0700 6/12/06 Larry Hildes, attorney for Suzanne Swift, wrote: SPC. Suzanne Swift has been diagnosed with PTSD as a result of constant and pervasive sexual harassment by multiple sergeants, both in Iraq, and then back here, one of whom coerced her into a long-term sexual relationship. She complained to command about these sergeants; only one was disciplined, and then only with a reprimand. She finally reached her limit and went AWOL in January. We've been attempting to resolve the situation with command, and have built up the documentation of her PTSD and were getting ready to negotiate her turning herself in when she got picked up by the Eugene, Oregon, police at 11:00 last night. The police forced their way in to the house, assaulted Suzanne's mother, and took Suzanne to the Lane County, Oregon, jail where she is right now. The Army indicated they're expecting to pick her up in the next day or two and ship her back to Ft. Lewis, Washington. More publicity is needed. Also calls to the Lane County Jail (541)682-2245, and to Lt. Col Switzer, her commander at Ft. Lewis-(253) 967-4921. Thanks, Larry Hildes (360) 715-9788, P.0. Box 5405, Bellingham, WA 98227 Related: A Moment of Silence Is Not Enough By Sara Rich t r u t h o u t | Statement On March 18th Sara Rich, mother of an AWOL US soldier, gave this address at an antiwar rally http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032006S.shtml ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Friends and Family of Lt. Ehren Watada www.ThankYouLt.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTION ALERT June 14, 2006 CONTACT ARMY TO DEMAND: "DROP INVESTIGATION INTO LT. WATADA'S PROTECTED FREE SPEECH AGAINST ILLEGAL WAR" On Wednesday, June 7th U.S. Army First Lieutenant Ehren Watada became the first U.S. commissioned officer to publicly speak out in opposition to the Iraq War and occupation. Lt. Watada outlined why he believes the war to be illegal, and why he would have to refuse to obey any future order to participate in it. The following day, Thursday, June 8th Lt. Watada's commanding officer moved to prosecute Lt. Watada for nothing more than his protected free speech. Lt. Watada was read his rights and declined to make a statement without a lawyer present. Although the Fort Lewis military public affairs officer has stated that Lt. Watada "hasn't done anything wrong" so far, an official investigation into his public speech is underway. When soldiers join the military they swear to uphold our Constitution. They do not give up their basic right to freedom of speech. Outlined in Department of Defense Directive 1325.6, members of the military have the right to say what they think and feel about the military, and even participate in peaceful demonstrations, as long as they are off-duty, out of uniform, off-base, and within the United States. PLEASE WRITE AND CALL: "Dear Col Stephen Townsend; Please drop the investigation currently underway against First Lt. Ehren Watada of 3-2 SBCT for his protected free speech in opposition to the war in Iraq. Respectfully," TO: Col Stephen Townsend Commanding Officer 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division Fort Lewis WA 98433 (253) 967-9601 CC: Lt Gen James Dubik Fort Commander Fort Lewis WA 98433 For background information: Military attempts to stop Lt. Watada from speaking against illegal war By Friends and Family of Lt. Ehren Watada. June 9, 2006 http://www.thankyoult.org/go/100.html When soldiers refuse to fight: Is the US Army trying to silence Lt. Watada? By Sarah Olson, Truthout.com. June 14, 2006 http://www.thankyoult.org/go/101.html For up-to-date and additional information: http://www.ThankYouLt.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Sign the petition to save Bayview Hunters Point: No more Fillmore! Editorial by Willie Ratcliff, http://www.sfbayview.com/060706/signthepetition060706.shtml As urban Black displacement grows, Bayview kicks off referendum drive to stop Redevelopment by Randy Shaw, http://www.sfbayview.com/060706/displacement060706.shtml Hands off Bayview Hunters Point! An open letter to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors http://www.sfbayview.com/050306/handsoff050306.shtml ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "The Democrats always promise to help workers, and the don't! The Republicans always promise to help business, and the do!" - Mort Sahl ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- "It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Emilano Zapata ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Palestine, Sudan & the Myth of a "Humanitarian" U.S. Foreign Policy Tues. June 13, 7pm S.F. Women's Building 3543 18th St. (btwn Valencia and Guerrero) near 16th St. BART, San Francisco A.N.S.W.E.R. Educational Forum ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Please circulate widely Join the Campaign to Shut Down the Guantanamo Torture Center We urge you to join us in a nationwide campaign and petition drive to shut down the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility. The campaign is a project of the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition and VoteNoWar. Org which was the largest grassroots peoples referendum opposing the launch of the Iraq war. The goal of the campaign is to ignite a mass movement of the people of the United States and around the world to close Guantanamo and all the secret prisons and torture centers set up around the world by the Bush administration. Each and every official must be held accountable for their criminal conduct from Bush and Cheney to Rumsfeld and General Geoffrey Miller. Click here to send a letter to Congress and the White House: Shut Down Guantanamo and all torture centers and prisons. We will be gathering hundreds of thousands of names on the printed "Shut It Down" petition, available at http://www.shutitdown.org/. We will flood Congress with emails, faxes and phone calls. We will be launching a mass education campaign in the mainstream media and in the alternative media. With your help we will be placing newspaper ads around the country. We will be coalescing with organizations and movements who focus on civil rights, legal rights, faith-based and student communities, and within the labor movement. This is an issue that affects everyone. As someone who has been active in and supporting the anti-war movement you are well aware that the most important counter-weight to the Bush Administration's criminal policies has been the creation of a global progressive movement. Millions of people have been in the streets in countless demonstrations in the past few years. Now Bush's approval ratings have dropped to 29% and the anti-war movement's political position has been proven to be correct. But unless we act now, and help the rest of the country join in this movement, the criminals in the White House will continue on their path. Please make a donation to help support the organizing efforts to shut down the Guantanamo Bay torture facility. Suicides and Torture in Guantanamo Three men who had been held for four years resorted to hanging themselves this last weekend, according to Guantanamo prison authorities. Scores of others have tried to kill themselves. In a shocking but inadvertent admission of the depravity of the Guantanamo authorities, the Camp Commander Rear-Admiral Harry Harris described the suicides "an act of asymmetric warfare against us." He then said about the dead inmates, they "have no regard for life, neither ours or their own." The three men who killed themselves had previously been hunger strikers subjected to force-feeding by prison guards. Held for years without ever being charged with wrongdoing, without being able to see their families, subject to constant interrogation and torture by the U.S. government and no end in sight, Guantanamo detainees have increasingly attempted suicide and others have gone on hunger strikes. The Pentagon made public its approval of the use of force feeding, which is another form of torture. According to detainees, those who refuse to eat are strapped down twice a day in specially designed chairs, and tubes are violently inserted through their noses and into their stomachs. The U.S. military personnel force liquids through the tubes. Detainees, many of whom are left vomiting blood, have also reported that U.S. military personnel reuse the unclean tubes on different captives. As a result of the application of this torture regime, the U.S. military has bragged of a significant reduction in hunger strikers in recent days. The Associated Press today published a story about three British youths who were detained at Guantanamo for more than two years without charge before they were released. The AP story reports, "At the camp, the men say they were beaten and saw troops throw Qurans in the toilet. They also say they were forced to watch videotapes of prisoners who had allegedly been ordered to sodomize each other and were chained to a hook in the floor while strobe lights flashed and heavy metal music blared." The New York Times lead editorial from today (Monday June 12) condemned the Guantanamo prison and said that it was no surprise that detainees are committing suicide, "It is a place where secret tribunals sat in judgment of men whose identities they barely knew and who were not permitted to see the evidence against them. Inmates were abused, humiliated, tormented and sometimes tortured." Click here to send a letter to Congress and the White House: Shut Down Guantanamo and all torture centers and prisons. UN Panel says: Shut Down Guantanamo Now! The United Nations panel investigating conditions at Guantanamo insisted in a report released on May 19, 2006 that the prison must be shut down. The UN panel declared the prison to be a torture facility. Unless they are charged and given a fair trial, the report also called for the release of the hundreds of prisoners at Guantanamo who are being held indefinitely. Without criminal charges, these prisoners are held in savage conditions and subjected to physical and psychological abuse, including the much vaunted innovations of "cultural" and sexual humiliation. The UN report did not limit itself to demanding the closing of Guantanamo. It also called for the closure of secret CIA prisons, and the end of the "extraordinary renditions" which is the policy of the US government shipping people to other countries so that they can be more effectively tortured. This torture center must be closed. The people of the United States should join the people of Cuba and the people of the world in demanding that the entire U.S. Naval Base in Guantanamo Cuba be closed down. The U.S. invaded Cuba in 1898 and forced the colonial government of that time to sign a treaty giving the U.S. military control over this part of the island of Cuba in perpetuity. The continued maintenance of a U.S. Naval Base inside of Cuba against the wishes of the Cuban people is a modern day expression of the vilest colonialism. How ironic it is that the Bush Administration accuses the Cuban government of violating "human rights" when the only place in Cuba where the authorities engage in systematic torture of prisoners held without Due Process rights is the portion under the control of the U.S. government. Say No to Torture -- Say No to Bush' s Imperial Government The establishment of a torture facility at a US naval base located in a foreign country is not an isolated criminal act by this administration. It is part of a pattern whose methods and goals are now obvious. The Bush White House, in both its domestic and foreign policy, wants to establish that all existing international and domestic law that in any way inhibits the assumption of near-dictatorial power by the President of the United States must be declared null and void. The so-called war on terrorism is revealed as nothing more than a slogan masking a quest for unfettered empire. The war of aggression against Iraq; the assassination of targeted individuals; the establishment of torture facilities and secret prisons around the world; the secret phone record collection, warrantless wiretapping and monitoring of the email of millions of Americans -- all of this constitutes a brazen effort to assume unfettered authority and power. This is the challenge of our time. Will the people intervene and act decisively? The people of the United States, in partnership with the peoples of all continents, are a power far greater than the Bush White House. But we must act. Each one of us must act to inform our neighbors, family members and co-workers. Go to: http://www.shutitdown.org/ to send a letter to Congress and the White House: Shut Down Guantanamo and all torture centers and prisons. A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition Act Now to Stop War & End Racism http://www.ANSWERcoalition.org http://www.actionsf.org sf@internationalanswer.org 2489 Mission St. Rm. 24 San Francisco: 415-821-6545 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: People United For a General and Unconditional Amnesty Rally Monday, June 19, 2006, 5:00 P.M. Palou Avenue and Third Street, S.F. No matter what the decisions the lawmakers make to "reform" the immigration laws, we know that they will make some immigrant workers "legal" and others "illegal." We will hold a rally June 19, 2006 at 5:00 p.m. at Palou Avenue and Third Street in San Francisco to demand General and Unconditional Amnesty for All Immigrants. We hold this rally in celebration of the date of June 19th, 141 years ago when it was declared the end of slavery by Black people in this country. Our Black brothers and sisters continue to be a slave of racism and injustice just as we immigrants. And the government continues to put on Death Row the great leaders of the Black movement such as Mumia Abu-Jamal. We make a call for unity at this rally in the Bayview so we can honor June 19th by making a commitment to sow the first seeds together in order to make a reality the emancipation of the Black people and the immigrants and to demand the immediate freedom of the great leader of the Black people, Mumia Abu-Jamal, innocent on Death Row. For More Information: People United For a General and Unconditional Amnesty Barrio Unido Por una Amnistia General e Incondicional 474 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Contact Persons: Cristina Gutierrez: 415-431-9925 Kati Sanchez: 415-368-2576 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- ABOLISHING JROTC in SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOLS There will be a special meeting in July when the School Board will vote on this resolution. The meeting date is to be announced. School District Office 555 Franklin St San Francisco 415/241-6427 Report and Open letter to the Board of Education regarding JROTC: At the first reading of the resolution to rid the schools of JROTC on the basis of the policy of "Don't ask, don't tell" that discriminates against gay's in the military, which was presented to the Board of Education meeting on May 23, the JROTC teachers (all retired military officers) mobilized students to speak on behalf of JROTC. Carole Seligman and I spoke to many students in the lobby before the meeting began. Repeatedly they expressed that they loved the program. It gives them confidence in themselves, provides a supportive environment, encourages good scholarship in school, and encourages comradeship among the members. So much so, that a young girl had a silver-colored chain with a tiny silver-colored and diamond studded bullet. I really couldn't believe it was a bullet so I asked her if it was. She said, "oh! this? Yes, it's a bullet. You know, it's between me and my friend, you know, like, 'I'll take a bullet for you!'" Need I say more about the virtues of JROTC? Unfortunately, the resolution that follows says nothing of this aspect of JROTC. Nothing about the war. Nothing about young people being taught to "take a bullet for each other". Nothing about the realities of war. Nothing about asking students, gay or not, to risk their lives and take the lives of Iraqis for this inhuman and illegal war brought about by an inhuman and illegal government. It was announced by gay supporters of JROTC at the meeting that they expected the military to lift the prohibition on gays in the military this year. If this is true this will make this resolution obsolete before it can ever take effect. Are we to cheer that our gay brothers and sisters will be able to fight in this war? What is our plan to convince young gay and straight students that they can't "be all they can be" if they are dead; or legless and armless; or with the blood of too many dead in their hearts and head; or permanently brain-damaged; burnt or blinded by exploding eyeballs and deafened by exploding eardrums? Who will tell them of depleted uranium illness? Who will tell them that although there is a very high survival rate for our injured soldiers there is also a very high rate of survival with such catastrophic injury and illness? Who will tell them that they are more likely to be homeless after serving than in college? Who will tell them about the logic of "following orders" and a "chain of command" Instead of thinking and reasoning and making decisions for themselves leads to disaster? If you haven't seen it, I suggest you watch the HBO special, "Baghdad ER". In fact it should be shown to all of our students in middle and high school. (It's far too explicit for very young children.) We and the majority of the voters in San Francisco want the military out of our schools immediately! Here are my comments for the meeting. I was cut off midway through my timed one-minute delivery. The resolution follows my comments. Please look at it again and see that a vital antiwar message is missing from it and correct and amend the resolution immediately to reflect opposition to the militarization of our schools and the offering up of our students as cannon fodder for this bloodthirsty and greedy government and it's military might. We want a world without war! How can we teach children that violence is not the answer when the most powerful and influential adults in the world--our government-- uses it as their ultimate tool to gain wealth and power for themselves. You must take a stronger antiwar stand! I don't care how many antiwar resolutions you have passed. The proof of the pudding is in the military presence in our schools! Sincerely, Bonnie Weinstein Addressed to the President, Vice President and the Commissioners of the San Francisco Board of Education: I commend the board members who are bringing the motion to rid our schools of JROTC forward. This is in line with the wishes of the majority of the voters in San Francisco who voted to get the military out of our schools this past November. The military’s policy of “don’t ask, don’t tell” is unacceptable. Our obligation is to educate our children against prejudice of all kinds—not turn a blind eye—and turn a bigoted military loose on them. But that is not the only reason we want the military and JROTC out. We want our children to engage in physical education, in fact, to find joy in it; and to study history—to learn how to avoid the mistakes of the past; to gain satisfaction and experience joy in learning so they can contribute to human knowledge themselves as well as help fashion a better world! We want our children to feel responsible to her or his community. We want students to gain a sense of responsibility and pride in a job well done by contributing to the life and well being of their school, their home and their community. We don’t want to teach our children to blindly obey a chain of command or to glorify war. In fact, it is our duty to teach our children that blind obedience, violence, greed, bigotry, prejudice, human inequality, torture, pre- emptive war, profiting off of war and injustice, inequality in the application of the law, and poverty in the face of fantastic wealth is wrong, inhuman and intolerable and we can do better! We must rid our schools of the military and JROTC, hire enough Physical Education teachers immediately, and re-dedicate our schools to education and human development—and reject the road to war and militarism. Just one more thing, I want to correct the notion that the new school policy regarding military recruiters has resulted in less military presence in our schools. In fact, it has resulted in more. Many schools did not invite the military on Career Day and now they must, and that is a shame, because we want the military out! We don’t want our children to study war or bigotry any more! Not for one more second! Bonnie Weinstein, Bay Area United Against War, www.bauaw.org, 415-824-8730 The resolution: Introduction of Replacement Program for JROTC --Commissioners Mark Sanchez and Dan Kelly WHEREAS: It is the official policy of the San Francisco Unified School District to oppose discrimination of any kind against any group of people; and WHEREAS: The District’s opposition to discrimination is articulated in Board Policy 5163, which provides that the San Francisco Unified School District shall not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, creed, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, or handicapping condition in the provision of educational programs, services, and activities, in the admission of students to school programs and activities; and in the recruitment and employment of personnel; and WHEREAS: The San Francisco Unified School District deplores the "Don’t Ask Don’t Tell" policy of the U.S. Department of Defense, which requires the discharge of any member of the armed forces if such service member has engaged in "homosexual acts," has revealed that s/he is a homosexual or bisexual, or the member has married or attempted to marry a person known to be of the same biological sex; and WHEREAS: The District believes that the "Don’t Ask Don’t Tell" policy is an unjust, indefensible, unintelligent, state-sanctioned act of homophobia; and WHEREAS: The San Francisco Unified School District cannot justify committing any funding to a JROTC program because its connection to the U.S. Department of Defense suggests that discrimination against some groups is tolerable. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District calls for the phasing –out of the JROTC program of the United States Department of Defense on San Francisco Unified School District campuses; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Board of Education instructs District staff to provide all JROTC units at SFUSD campuses with one year notice that the programs will be terminated at all SFUSD campuses after the 2006-2007 school year; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Board of Education calls for the creation of a special task force to develop alternative, creative, career-driven programs which provide students with a greater sense of purpose and respect for self and humankind. Board has plan to oust ROTC from S.F. schools Members want to cut program over 'Don't ask, Don't tell' The students engage in physical training such as running, push-ups and jumping jacks; and discipline training such as marching, drill-practice and using a mock chain of command. They also study military history and perform community service. - Heather Knight, Chronicle Staff Writer Tuesday, May 23, 2006 http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/05/23/MNGIOJ0G7P1.DTL ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Free the Land! Support Indigenous Sovereignty! Support the courageous stand of the Onkwehonweh people! Dear supporters, As you know, one of our comrades made a solidarity trip up to the Six Nations a few weeks ago bringing up much needed supplies. He is planning a return trip and needs more support (see prior email). If you can give anything please get in touch (muayxthai@yahoo.co.uk). The following is a report from Six Nations regarding the current confrontation between indigenous people standing up for their rights, their land and their families and the Canadian and U.S. governments. As the Chicano activist Juan Santos wrote in Mexica Tlahtolli, last April, "The original Europeans in what is now the U.S. were not immigrants, but colonists. And the U.S. is not a nation of immigrants - it is a white colonial settler state, like South Africa under Apartheid, the former Rhodesia, Australia and Israel.” And, of course, like Canada. Jericho Boston UPDATE FROM GRAND RIVER June 9, 2006. Today has been a day of unrest at the land reclamation site. While we won't go into great detail on what has happened today as a press release is being prepared, let us say that the intimidation tactics and pressure from the outside has been worked up to the point that 1000 OPP [Ontario Provincial Police] officers are being dispatched to the area surrounding the reclamation site. Caledonia residents are up in arms, demanding the removal of our people from the site. They are even going so far as to set up a barricade on the recently opened Plank Road (Argyle Street) leading into Caledonia. The intimidation tactics leading up to today were constant..... including army helicopters and others flying overhead all hours of the day and night. They hovered overhead between 2 and 4 in the morning with their lights off and their nigh vision on , and then on occasion, shining high powered lights down onto the people on the site. [this is all the same as their tactics in Oka in 1990]. We are being faced daily with people driving by, hollering racial remarks including "go home you f'n Indians", "get a job", "your gonna die" etc. Garbage is being thrown at us. Besides the "flipping of the bird", there have been times where firecrackers are being thrown out the car windows toward us. These incidents, however, are not investigated by the OPP because “they are not breaking any laws”. [See ‘Rocks at Whisky Trench, National Film Board]. [what about hate laws, human rights and racial discrimination?] Today a United States Border Patrol vehicle was retrieved with high powered surveillance equipment in it. The first story from the OPP was that the "A.T.F. Officer" was just visiting friends in the neighborhood and taking pictures "kinda like a tourist". [Right! With a high tech surveillance van? He left the family car at home?] He was spotted just down from the front line barricade. We followed them to the back door of the reclamation site. Later we questioned what the United States ATF was doing snooping around taking pictures of us with the OPP riding in the back with them. They changed the story saying that they had been invited in by the OPP. [Why? Was the OPP getting lonely looking at each other? Did they need more maniacs to make themselves feel more comfortable?] What were they doing here? What is their mandate? The OPP refused to tell us why these people have gotten high government official clearance to be so far out of their jurisdiction. An OPP officer was hospitalized as a result of this incident. A CHTV Newsperson/cameraman had to get stitches as a result of a previous run-in with our people. [CHTV 11 not only reports the news, they “create” the news]. This situation is not good. [All reports from CHTV 11 are anti-Indigenous]. The incidents of today are a direct result of the constant intimidation tactics of the OPP, the military and the continued racist acts instigated against us by the Caledonia people [with their professionally made “Bring in the Army” signs always in their car trunks, just in case the cameras are there]. Other strategies are the recent blocking of our children from using the arena for lacrosse games and the back tracking by the Ontario government at the “talks”. This is supposed to push everything up to the ultimate goal of Canada and Ontario. They want to justify stopping the talks about returning our lands to us. At our fire tonight, we realized that Canada does not want to deal with the Onkwehonweh people because they know we are absolutely right in our position on the land, our sovereignty and upholding our Law. This violence today occurred as a result of the underhanded and direct attempts at inciting an action from us to justify another attack against us. They want to make it look like we are uncontrollable. Why else have they been playing the "terrorists in Canada in court in Brampton" back to back with the "Six Nations land reclamation in Caledonia" on all the news stations? Canada, with the help of corporate media, is making sure the mental brainwashing of its citizens against the Onkwehonweh continues. [Across Canada people are not buying this corporate brainwashing]. How convenient that CHTV 11 was there even before this all started! How coincidently that the couple who sparked the violence with their racial attacks and their attempt to run over our people, drove straight to the Canadian Tire parking lot! How convenient that a "by-stander" happened to have a video camera across the road at the Tim Horton’s coffee shop video taping the whole scene [with a Boston Cream donut in the other hand]. He directly reported to CHML radio which happens to be co-owned by CHTV 11. Was it a co-incidence! Or were they already on standby knowing that a story was about to break. [Another high-priced promotion failed!] It is unfortunate that our people fell for it. [Our guys are the only ones legally here]. The reality is, we are dealing with the constant mental, emotional and physical intimidation of the corrupt bureaucrats. Also, we face racial violence constantly. Does anyone know for sure how they would react in the same situation? The potential for violence against us here in the next while is tremendous. [Expect this to happen. This is their “bad act” and no one’s buying any tickets for it!] The Caledonia people want to take us off our land. The OPP are maintaining a line between the Caledonia residents and the reclamation site. [Just like the people in Chateauguay in 1990. See “Act of Defiance” by the National Film Board]. We don’t know how long this is going to last. Our people are on alert. We are on the site unarmed. We are trying to maintain the peace. We are keeping the people within the inner perimeter. We will continue to forward updates. Please forward to others. Stay Strong and keep the Peace. Hazel You support is crucial now. Do whatever you can. Use your good mind and heart. Stand by us in solidarity and support. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Great Counter-Recruitment Website http://notyoursoldier.org/article.php?list=type&type=14 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- SCROLL DOWN TO READ: EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ARTICLES IN FULL LINKS ONLY ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: People United For a General and Unconditional Amnesty Rally Monday, June 19, 2006, 5:00 P.M. Palou Avenue and Third Street, S.F. No matter what the decisions the lawmakers make to "reform" the immigration laws, we know that they will make some immigrant workers "legal" and others "illegal." We will hold a rally June 19, 2006 at 5:00 p.m. at Palou Avenue and Third Street in San Francisco to demand General and Unconditional Amnesty for All Immigrants. We hold this rally in celebration of the date of June 19th, 141 years ago when it was declared the end of slavery by Black people in this country. Our Black brothers and sisters continue to be a slave of racism and injustice just as we immigrants. And the government continues to put on Death Row the great leaders of the Black movement such as Mumia Abu-Jamal. We make a call for unity at this rally in the Bayview so we can honor June 19th by making a commitment to sow the first seeds together in order to make a reality the emancipation of the Black people and the immigrants and to demand the immediate freedom of the great leader of the Black people, Mumia Abu-Jamal, innocent on Death Row. For More Information: People United For a General and Unconditional Amnesty Barrio Unido Por una Amnistia General e Incondicional 474 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Contact Persons: Cristina Gutierrez: 415-431-9925 Kati Sanchez: 415-368-2576 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- DEFEND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND CIVIL RIGHTS! Last summer the U.S. Border Patrol arrested Shanti Sellz and Daniel Strauss, both 23-year-old volunteers assisting immigrants on the border, for medically evacuating 3 people in critical condition from the Arizona desert. Criminalization for aiding undocumented immigrants already exists on the books in the state of Arizona. Daniel and Shanti are targeted to be its first victims. Their arrest and subsequent prosecution for providing humanitarian aid could result in a 15-year prison sentence. Any Congressional compromise with the Sensenbrenner bill (HR 4437) may include these harmful criminalization provisions. Fight back NOW! Help stop the criminalization of undocumented immigrants and those who support them! Bay Area Tour of Daniel and Shanti Saturday, June 17th, 1 p.m. Unitarian Universalist Church 1187 Franklin Street at Geary San Francisco For more information on the event call 415-821- 9683. For information on the Daniel and Shanti Defense Campaign, visit www.nomoredeaths.org. Co-sponsored by: La Raza Centro Legal, SF Living Wage Coalition, No More Deaths, Socialist Organizer, San Francisco Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Ministry and Bay Area Labor Committee for Peace & Justice, East Bay Jobs With Justice, San Francisco Labor Council. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Saving The Idriss Stelley Foundation Host: Idriss Stelley Foundation, Rap4Rights Location: Studio Z 314 11th Street, San Francisco, CA View Map When: Sunday, June 25, 1:00pm Phone: 415.252.7100 KEEP IDRISS STELLEY FOUNDATION OPEN! ISF is a nonprofit organization created through the settlement of Idriss Stelley's vs. City & County and SFPD case and its allocation to his mother Mesha Monge-Irizarry. Her only child, a 23 year old African American honor student was killed by SFPD at the SF Sony Metreon on June 13, 2001. 48 shots! 9 officers! He stood alone in an empty theater. Mesha now operates the Idriss Stelley Foundation, a 24 HR bilingual crisis line (415) 595-8251 that has broadened its services to all people negatively impacted by law enforcement. Idriss Stelley's case is at the root of the 40-HR mandatory SFPD Mental Health Training. ISF provides free, confidential services to victims, biological and extended families who are negatively impacted by law enforcement ISF office is located at 4921 3rd St., in the heart of Bayview District, between Palou and Quesada in San Francisco and is open Sunday, Tuesday and Thursday from noon to 8 pm. Please come out Sunday June 25, 2006 at 1pm to enjoy food, drinks and live entertainment in support of ISF. (21+ Please) $5-500 DONATION ACCEPTED AT THE DOOR. NO PERSON TURNED AWAY FOR LACK OF FUNDS BUT PLEASE COME AND SUPPORT! ***IF YOU ARE NOT ABLE TO ATTEND BUT WOULD STILL LIKE TO DONATE TO THE IDRISS STELLEY FOUNDATION PLEASE CONTACT US VIA EMAIL AT RAP4RIGHTS@AOL.COM*** ISF IS DEPENDING ON THE COMMUNITY TO KEEP ITS DOORS OPEN! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- LaborFest 2006 Schedule July 1 (Saturday) 12-4:00 PM ($15-50) (sliding scale donation to CounterPULSE requested. Bring a bag lunch!) Labor Bike Tour with Chris Carlson of San Francisco©ˆs labor history For more info: call Chris Carlsson carlsson.chris@gmail.com http://www.laborfest.net/2006schedule.htm ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Fourth Annual International Al-Awda Convention San Francisco - July 14-16, 2006 To register: http://al-awda.org/sf-conv_reserve.html To flyer, the writing is on the wall: http://al-awda.org/pdf/flyer.pdf For all other info: http://al-awda.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- REMINDER TO ALL GROUPS: BE SURE AND POST ALL ACTIONS AND EVENTS TO WWW.INDYBAY.ORG TO REACH THE MOST PEOPLE AGAINST THE WAR IN THE BAY AREA! http://www.indybay.org ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Join the call by reproductive rights activists to send a letter to Defend Oglala Sioux President Cecilia Fire Thunder After taking a courageous stance against the ban on abortion in South Dakota, Cecilia Fire Thunder, first female president of the Oglala Sioux tribe, has been attacked by members of the Tribal Council, who are attempting to remove her from office. Background: After abortion was banned in South Dakota, Fire Thunder, a healthcare provider, announced that she would personally help set-up Sacred Choices Women's Clinic on her own land, within the boundaries of the Pine Ridge Reservation where the State of South Dakota has no jurisdiction. The clinic would provide reproductive health care to all women. In an interview she said, "Ultimately, this is a much bigger issue than just abortion. It's time for women to reclaim their bodies." and "As Indian women, we fight many battles. This is just another battle we have to fight." Read an interview, "The Power of Thunder" on Altnet at http://www.alternet.org/story/34314 The Complaint: On May 30 the Oglala Sioux Tribal Council banned abortions on Pine Ridge Indian Reservation and suspended President Fire Thunder for 20 days until an impeachment hearing can take place. The complaint is that Fire Thunder improperly used her title to solicit donations for the clinic. Fire Thunder has said that donations for the proposed private clinic have been unsolicited, though she has welcomed nationwide support. The surprise vote was called when Fire Thunder was out of town getting an annual checkup of the cochlear implants that restored her hearing. Read more at http://indianz.com/News/2006/014231.asp Fire Thunder said the people who brought this complaint are the same people who have opposed her since she was elected in November 2004. Fire Thunder ran on a platform of fiscal accountability, the Oglala Sioux Tribe was in financial trouble and listed as a financial high risk. Since Fire Thunder became president there have been audits that go back into 1997 (see http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096412970 ) And she took tribal employees off the roles for jobs that had been defunded by the federal government. (see analysis by Elizabeth Castle at the end of this message.). For her brave stance, Fire Thunder has been suspended and cleared before, see http://indianz.com/News/2005/010954.asp Support Fire Thunder: President Fire Thunder's supporters are organizing on the reservation. They would like letters, especially from indigenous people, to the tribal council in support of President Fire Thunder and opposing the tribe's ban on abortions. Message should reach the council before Monday, June 19. Oglala Sioux Tribal Council PO Box 2070 Pine Ridge, SD 57770-2070 fax: 605-867-1449 phone 605-867-5821 and send a copy to President Cecelia Fire Thunder PO Box 2070 Pine Ridge, SD 57770-2070 If you have any questions about this issue, please contact Radical Women at 415-864-1278 or rwbayarea@yahoo.com Thank you for your support! In solidarity, Toni Mendicino Bay Area Radical Women and Bay Area Coalition for Our Reproductive Rights -------------------- Below is an excerpt from an email from Elizabeth Castle, UC Berkeley History Professor and personal historian to Madonna Thunder Hawk. ...there are many complicated political factors behind this action. This is the third time it has happened and the danger is that this time the Tribal Council is using the abortion issues as leverage. When she was elected she cleaned up house. This meant taking tribal employees off the roles for jobs that had been defunded by the federal government. In addition to federal cuts, often the grants were lost for these tribal programs because the employees had not taken the necessary action to see their reports were in and the grants were properly renewed. Fire Thunder notified these individuals that they were welcome back if they were able to get the program funded again. The ending of this "gravy train," created significant enemies. These actions must be understood in the ever relevant context of the continuing effects of colonization. They are very real as in the welfare mentality that reigns on the reservation makes progressive change difficult. The federal government not only knows this but encourages it as it makes the pathway to terminating treaty obligations to tribes. Though the full details are as of yet unknown, it is easy to see that the Fire Thunder's bold leadership makes her vulnerable not only to those right wing individuals off the reservation in the racist state of South Dakota but even more so at home in Pine Ridge. With generations of boarding school christianity drummed into the minds of many Native people, there is little awareness of the Lakota's traditional practices of reproductive control. It would be easy to see "Abortion is not traditional" signs popping up as a very patriarchal and inaccurate reinvigoration of traditional practice. Also, in a community where illegal sterilization was commonly practiced, the link to organizing behind the right to abortion will not be as easily made. Please take a look at the links below to see how often Fire Thunder has been attacked. It is dead clear that she needs serious support. Website: http://indianz.com/News/2005/010954.asp ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- FYI According to "Minimum Wage History" at http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/anth484/minwage.html " "Calculated in real 2005 dollars, the 1968 minimum wage was the highest at $9.12. "The 8 dollar per hour Whole Foods employees are being paid $1.12 less than the 1968 minimum wage. "A federal minimum wage was first set in 1938. The graph shows both nominal (red) and real (blue) minimum wage values. Nominal values range from 25 cents per hour in 1938 to the current $5.15/hr. The greatest percentage jump in the minimum wage was in 1950, when it nearly doubled. The graph adjusts these wages to 2005 dollars (blue line) to show the real value of the minimum wage. Calculated in real 2005 dollars, the 1968 minimum wage was the highest at $9.12. Note how the real dollar minimum wage rises and falls. This is because it gets periodically adjusted by Congress. The period 1997-2006, is the longest period during which the minimum wage has not been adjusted. States have departed from the federal minimum wage. Washington has the highest minimum wage in the country at $7.63 as of January 1, 2006. Oregon is next at $7.50. Cities, too, have set minimum wages. Santa Fe, New Mexico has a minimum wage of $9.50, which is more than double the state minimum wage at $4.35." ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- PRESERVE INTERNET NETWORK NEUTRALITY Hi, I can't imagine that you haven't seen this, but if you haven't, please sign the petition to keep our access. Everything we do online will be hurt if Congress passes a radical law next week that gives giant corporations more control over what we do and see on the Internet. Internet providers like AT&T are lobbying Congress hard to gut Network Neutrality--the Internet's First Amendment and the key to Internet freedom. Right now, Net Neutrality prevents AT&T from choosing which websites open most easily for you based on which site pays AT&T more. BarnesandNoble.com doesn't have to outbid Amazon for the right to work properly on your computer. If Net Neutrality is gutted, many sites--including Google, eBay, and iTunes--must either pay protection money to companies like AT&T or risk having their websites process slowly. That why these high-tech pioneers, plus diverse groups ranging from MoveOn to Gun Owners of America, are opposing Congress' effort to gut Internet freedom. So please! sign this petition telling your member of Congress to preserve Internet freedom? Click here: http://www.civic.moveon.org/save_the_internet?track_referer=706%7C1152463-5QFocRE05wmGUuh8yAMSzg ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Flash Film: Ides of March http://isahaqi.chris-floyd.com/ ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- NO BORDERS! NO WALLS! NO FENCES! GENERAL AMNESTY FOR ALL! OUR HOMELAND IS WHERE WE LIVE! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- REPEAL THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT IN 2007! Check out: 10 EXCELLENT REASONS NOT TO JOIN THE MILITARY http://www.10reasonsbook.com/ Public Law print of PL 107-110, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 [1.8 MB] http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html Also, the law is up before Congress again in 2007. See this article from USA Today: Bipartisan panel to study No Child Left Behind By Greg Toppo, USA TODAY February 13, 2006 http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-02-13-education-panel_x.htm ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies http://www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/declaration.html http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/decind.html http://www.usconstitution.net/declar.html http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805195.php Bill of Rights http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805182.php ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- ARTICLES IN FULL: ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 1) Israeli Airstrike Kills Militant and 9 Others By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 10:58 a.m. ET June 13, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Israel-Palestinians.html?hp&ex=1150257600&en=2c1c06ca11a88c5b&ei=5094&partner=homepage 2) How Not to Get Out Of Iraq:Why “Redeployment” is the Wrong Answer to the Iraq Question by Pat Gerber Published on Monday, June 12 2006 by CommonDreams.org http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0612-23.htm 3) Representative Kennedy Reaches Deal "Police did not conduct field sobriety tests on Kennedy. A police union official has said the officers involved in the accident were instructed by a superior to take the congressman home." By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 12:20 p.m. ET June 13, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Patrick-Kennedy.html?hp&ex=1150257600&en=bfded5242e0efdc2&ei=5094&partner=homepage 4) Somber Tone and Protest as U.A.W. Convenes By MICHELINE MAYNARD June 13, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/13/business/13union.html 5) House Passes $94.5 Billion for Iraq War and Katrina Aid "$66 billion for the two wars...20 billion in funds to further deal with the remaining hurricane devastation along the Gulf Coast... and $1.9 billion for a border security initiative featuring the deployment of 6,000 National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border..." By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 1:07 p.m. ET June 13, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Congress-Iraq-Katrina.html 6) UAW Highlights Special Bulletin by Gregg Shotwell/The UnCommonSense June 12, 2006 http://futureoftheunion.com/?p=2849 7) G.M. — Again "The loophole works this way: A dual-fuel vehicle that can run on either gasoline or 85 percent ethanol, or E85, is credited with a much higher mileage rating than it really gets. That keeps the overall mileage of the cars and trucks that a company like Ford or General Motors makes in any given year within the government's mileage limits." By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN June 14, 2006 http://select.nytimes.com/2006/06/14/opinion/14friedman.html?hp 8) The Road Back Lives Suspended on Gulf Coast, Crammed Into 240 Square Feet By DAN BARRY June 14, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/14/us/14road.html?hp&ex=1150344000&en=27602b6dedfa0f03&ei=5094&partner=homepage 9) U.A.W. Will Use Part of Strike Fund to Aid Recruitment of New Members By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS June 14, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/14/business/14union.html 10) Profits Fall, Stores Close Grocery Chains and Bush's Ownership Society By SETH SANDRONSKY June 10 / 11, 2006 http://www.counterpunch.org/sandronsky06102006.html 11) "Just in the Name of 'Democracy' " June 3, 2006 Copyright 2006 Mumia Abu-Jamal 12) Where the Hogs Come First By BOB HERBERT June 15, 2006 http://select.nytimes.com/2006/06/15/opinion/15herbert.html?hp ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 1) Israeli Airstrike Kills Militant and 9 Others By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 10:58 a.m. ET June 13, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Israel-Palestinians.html?hp&ex=1150257600&en=2c1c06ca11a88c5b&ei=5094&partner=homepage GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (AP) -- An Israeli airstrike targeting a key figure in Palestinian rocket attacks killed 10 people Tuesday, including the militant, two children and three medical workers who rushed to the scene of an initial blast. The deaths of at least eight civilians in the Gaza City attack was sure to heighten anti-Israel passions already inflamed by a weekend blast at a Gaza shore that killed eight beachgoers. It was also likely to further complicate efforts by the moderate Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, to persuade the balking Hamas government to endorse a proposal implicitly recognizing Israel. Abbas condemned the airstrike, calling it ''state terrorism.'' The deadly airstrike came just hours after hundreds of Palestinian police loyal to Abbas went on a rampage against the Hamas government, riddling the parliament building and Cabinet offices with bullets before setting them ablaze in retaliation for an attack by Hamas gunmen in the Gaza Strip. The rampage raised new fears the Palestinians were headed toward civil war. The Israeli military said its aircraft targeted militants on a mission to launch Katyusha rockets at southern Israel. Palestinian witnesses said the first missile missed the vehicle, which then hit a curb and was struck by two other missiles. The last two missiles killed the civilians and wounded 32 others, three of them seriously. Also killed was Hamoud Wadiya, Islamic Jihad's top rocket launcher, and an unidentified person in his van, whom the Israeli military identified as another Palestinian militant. Islamic Jihad swiftly vowed revenge. ''The Zionist enemy insists on shedding Palestinian blood and we insist on going ahead with our holy war and resistance,'' said Khader Abib, an Islamic Jihad leader in Gaza. ''God willing, the resistance groups ... will deliver a harsh response. All options are open.'' Hekmat Mughrabi, tears streaming down her face and her veil soaked with blood, said her 30-year-old son, Ashraf, and a 13-year-old family member died when one of the missiles hit the curb outside her home. She and her son were chatting on her bed when they heard the boom of the first missile. The young man ran to the door of the house after the initial explosion, seeking to calm the children, who had been on the roof making paper kites during their summer vacation. ''He was shouting to the kids, 'Don't be afraid, don't be afraid,''' and hadn't even finished his sentence when the second missile hit, she said. ''My son died in my arms.'' Shrapnel from the blast injured several other family members in the house, she said. Outside, dozens of people surrounded Wadiya's mangled yellow van, whose interior was a jumble of twisted metal and shredded upholstery. A man wailed beside the van as people propped him up by the arms. A white slipper lay in a pool of blood on the ground. If the van was carrying Katyusha rockets as Israel said, that could explain why the army was so determined to stop it. Katyushas have a longer range than the homemade rockets usually fired by Gaza militants and have only recently appeared in the coastal strip. A Cabinet minister from Hamas, Yousef Rizka, condemned what he called ''the continuous series of Israeli massacres of our Palestinian people.'' ''I call on the international community to immediately intervene to protect the Palestinian people from the increasing aggression of the Israeli occupation army, which will definitely provoke a response that will engage the entire region,'' Rizka said. Hamas recently resumed open involvement in rocket attacks against Israel, and after the beach explosion Friday, officially called off a 16-month truce. Ambulances raced toward Shifa Hospital, carrying dead and wounded. At the hospital, three blood-covered bodies lay on the floor, and rescue workers carried a dead boy inside. A father and son also were killed, as were three medical workers on their way to tend to people wounded by an earlier missile. Doctors had a hard time handling all the casualties, and some were treated on the bloodied floor. At the hospital's morgue, where the bodies were brought, angry women shouted, ''Death to Israel, death to the occupation!'' Just outside, an Islamic Jihad militant fired his rifle in a show of anger. Other gunmen vowed revenge. One went inside the morgue, put his hands on one of the dead bodies, then smeared their blood on his rifle. Angry crowds burned tires near the house one Israeli missile hit. ''What happened today is a brutal massacre committed against innocent civilians and fighters from our group,'' said Abib, the Islamic Jihad leader, outside the morgue. ''This massacre is similar to the one that took place on Friday.'' Palestinians have blamed the Gaza beach deaths on an Israeli artillery round. Israeli military officials said Tuesday that the military's investigation, whose results are to be released later in the day, shows the deaths likely were caused by a mine planted by Hamas militants. Abbas accused Israel of trying to ''wipe out the Palestinian people.'' ''Every day there are martyrs, there are wounded people, all of them innocents, all of them bystanders,'' he said. ''They want to eliminate the Palestinian people, but we are going to sit tight. We are sitting tight on our land. ''We want to establish our state and live in peace,'' he added. ''What Israel is committing is state terrorism.'' Abbas, a moderate elected separately last year, is being squeezed by violence with Israel and violence pitting his Fatah faction against Hamas gunmen, which has killed 20 Palestinians, some of them civilians, over the past month. He is trying to persuade Israel to restart long-stalled peace talks with him, rather than the Hamas government, but Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, visiting European capitals this week, says Israel won't negotiate with Abbas unless Hamas abandons violence. Olmert plans to unilaterally pull Israeli settlers out of about 90 percent of the West Bank, with or without negotiations. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 2) How Not to Get Out Of Iraq:Why “Redeployment” is the Wrong Answer to the Iraq Question by Pat Gerber Published on Monday, June 12 2006 by CommonDreams.org http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0612-23.htm “Redeployment.” Even if you can define it correctly, you may not know what its implications are. For starters, it is not a formula for ending the war. Rep. John Murtha introduced America to the word “redeployment” during his press conference last November, when he spoke about a bill he authored that was designed to prevent the military he loves from becoming “a broken force,” to use General Helmly’s words. Rep. Murtha has never claimed that his redeployment bill was peace-oriented, and if you examine it closely, you can see that its purpose is to change the arc of the war rather than end it. Now Senator Boxer has introduced a Senate companion to Murtha’s House of Representatives resolution. Both of these call for American troops to be “redeployed at the earliest practicable date.” The phrase “earliest practicable date” is so vague that it allows things to be done whenever the good old boys in Washington decide that they are in the mood. The word “redeployment” means moving troops from point A to point B and/or giving them a new set of tasks. In this instance, it means that some of the forces who are currently on Iraqi soil will be moved to other bases in the region and become part of two new entities specified in the legislation, “a quick-reaction U.S. force” that can be put back into Iraq on a few hours notice and “an over-the-horizon presence of U.S Marines.” A number of analysts have pointed out that this proposed redeployment is no more than a vehicle for moving the focus of the war from the ground to the air: -... if the troops are pulled back from the front and brought home, the Pentagon plans to replace their combat capability with air power … [This] would probably decrease the number of US casualties and (they hope) ensure the re-election of most of those congressmen and women who will hear the wrath of their constituents … [It is] a strategy that replaces ground combat with death from the air (1) - When troops are cut, we'll still be bombing the hell out of the place … the plans call for the air war to be beefed up and kept that way for years to come. (2) -...the departing American troops will be replaced by American airpower ... while the number of American casualties would decrease as ground troops are withdrawn, the over-all level of violence and the number of Iraqi fatalities would increase unless there are stringent controls over who bombs what. (3) -...a pullout won't end the war … we're going to leave and increase the bombing (4) - The added air power is meant to compensate for any lost punch on the ground (5) -… the Pentagon plans to copy Imperial Britain’s method of ruling oil-rich Iraq … A powerful British RAF contingent, based at Habbibanyah, was tasked with bombing serious revolts and rebellious tribes ... The USAF has developed an extremely effective new technique of wide area control. Small numbers of strike aircraft are kept in the air around the clock. When US ground forces come under attack or foes are sighted, these aircraft are vectored to the site in minutes and deliver precision-guided bombs on enemy forces. The effectiveness of this tactic has led Iraqi resistance fighters to favor roadside bombs over ambushes against US convoys. (6) The Murtha and Boxer resolutions are steps toward repositioning U.S. planes, the troops who fly and service them, and everything else the military needs to bases in nearby Kuwait, Qatar, and Oman, as well as on ships that patrol the Gulf. These aircraft would then patrol Iraq’s skies 24/7, looking for “signs of trouble” and dropping bombs whenever any are found. Since the number of troops needed to control Iraq by use of air power is smaller than the number we currently have on the ground, some of them – perhaps as many as 25% -- will be able to come home. However, this is not a formula for bringing peace to the region but for continuing to exercise American control without having our boots on their soil. Instead of advancing the cause of ending the war and ushering in an era of peace, it allows the U.S. to continue managing Iraq’s affairs by using a new technique. This is not a substitute for ending the carnage. But there is more bad news. One of the things this resolution does accomplish is to provide a convenient way for politicians to continue to play politics with the war. Because its provisions entail a lowering of troop levels, congressmembers who sign on as co-sponsors can make themselves appear to be in favor of peace, though actually all they are supporting is a change in the war’s strategy. (Troop levels will have to be reduced regardless of any action congress may take because, as Murtha and others have pointed out, the only way to sustain the current number of troops would be to have a draft, which no one wants to advocate at this time.) In addition, the chatter about redeployment has taken the spotlight off of other, better proposals pending in congress as well as off of any serious discussion of what the end game will look like and when it will start. Most insidiously, if this passes, it will become harder -- not easier -- for congress to pass true peace-oriented legislation in the future. For example, they will have a more difficult time mandating a timetable in any future bill, as they will already be on the record on that topic as a result of having passed the Murtha and Boxer resolutions. It may also become more difficult for them to direct that steps be taken toward ending the conflict, call for peace talks with combatants, or direct the future course of the war because it is difficult to be certain whether the redeployment bills cede decision-making power about these issues to the Pentagon. Last year, a few peace groups endorsed the Murtha bill before they understood what it actually entailed. Let’s not make that mistake again. This year, let’s tell congress that the only redeployment we want is the one that brings the troops home. Pat Gerber (ppaattgg@yahoo.com) is a San Francisco editor, cartoonist, and peace activist. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 3) Representative Kennedy Reaches Deal Police did not conduct field sobriety tests on Kennedy. A police union official has said the officers involved in the accident were instructed by a superior to take the congressman home. By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 12:20 p.m. ET June 13, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Patrick-Kennedy.html?hp&ex=1150257600&en=bfded5242e0efdc2&ei=5094&partner=homepage WASHINGTON (AP) -- Rep. Patrick Kennedy has reached a deal with prosecutors to plead guilty to a charge of driving under the influence of prescription drugs in connection with his middle- of-the-night car crash last month near the U.S. Capitol. Two additional charges of reckless driving and failure to exhibit a driving permit will be dismissed under the plea agreement. Announcing this, Kennedy's chief of staff, Sean Richardson, said the Rhode Island Democrat would appear in District of Columbia Superior Court Tuesday afternoon ''to accept the consequences of his actions.'' ''He is looking forward to closing this chapter,'' Richardson said. ''He's feeling great and is expected to be back to work.'' Kennedy agreed to the guilty plea in exchange for having two additional charges of reckless driving and failure to exhibit a driving permit dismissed. Kennedy returned to Congress last week after nearly a month of treatment for addiction to prescription pain drugs at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota. The six-term congressman, who has struggled with addiction since high school, had entered the clinic one day after the May 4 crash on Capitol Hill that he said he could not remember. The accident has raised questions about whether Kennedy, 38, was drinking and had received special treatment by police, who did not conduct field sobriety tests. Kennedy has denied consuming alcohol before the crash. In the hours before the crash, Kennedy said he returned home from work and took a sleeping pill, Ambien, and Phenergan, a prescription anti-nauseau drug that can cause drowsiness. He said he did not consume alcohol. Kennedy crashed his green 1997 Ford Mustang convertible into a security barrier near the Capitol about 3 a.m. The officer listed alcohol influence as a contributing factor in the crash and noted that Kennedy was ''ability impaired,'' with red, watery eyes, slurred speech and unsteady balance, according to the accident report. Police did not conduct field sobriety tests on Kennedy. A police union official has said the officers involved in the accident were instructed by a superior to take the congressman home. Kennedy has denied asking for special treatment. Police had observed Kennedy's car, with no headlights on, swerve into the wrong lane and strike a curb. Kennedy nearly hit a police car, the report said, and did not respond to the officer's efforts to pull him over. He continued at a slower speed before hitting a security barrier head-on, the report said. Kennedy told the police officer he was ''headed to the Capitol to make a vote,'' the report said. He was cited for failure to keep in the proper lane, traveling at ''unreasonable speed'' and failing to ''give full time and attention'' to operating his vehicle. Kennedy's office has said that it has not received those initial citations. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 4) Somber Tone and Protest as U.A.W. Convenes By MICHELINE MAYNARD June 13, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/13/business/13union.html LAS VEGAS, June 12 — The United Automobile Workers' convention opened here Monday with leaders and members in a familiar fighting mood, but with a new battle plan aimed at protecting what they have rather than gaining new ground. The change reflected the falling fortunes of Detroit's automakers, a new reality that the union's president, Ron Gettelfinger, laid out for members both in his speech and in a written report that the U.A.W. issued on Sunday. "This isn't a cyclical downturn," Mr. Gettelfinger told the convention. "The kind of challenges we face aren't the kind that can be ridden out. They're structural challenges, and they require new and farsighted solutions." That statement, part of an hourlong speech, drew silence from the audience. What brought the delegates to their feet was Mr. Gettelfinger's dismissal of comments by pundits who try to argue that the U.A.W. has lost its influence. "They think we've run out of gas intellectually and emotionally, that we've lost our will, our creativity and our nerve," said Mr. Gettelfinger, who is expected to win re-election to a second four-year term later this week. "We've got news for them," he went on, pounding the lectern. "We're not going to surrender. We're not going to lower our sights, give up our dreams or give up our fight for a better world for our children and grandchildren." In the short term, though, many union members at the convention said the most urgent fight was to protect the current lot of the members, to draw a line in the sand. A Ford worker, Gary Walkowicz, said he could not support any further concessions by the U.A.W., despite Ford's financial problems. "If we start giving concessions, the companies will only want more," said Mr. Walkowicz, who works at Ford's truck plant in Dearborn, Mich. He was among a small group of workers who passed out bright yellow leaflets to convention delegates Monday, urging them to fight further concessions. The leaflets, titled "Draw the Line at Delphi," asked union officials to allow open debate at the convention over resisting givebacks. "These are life and death issues for our union," said the leaflet, which was signed by more than 30 local union officials and other delegates. Delphi, a former G.M. division that is now a stand-alone parts supplier, is operating under bankruptcy protection and seeking steep concessions from workers to lower its operating costs. Mr. Gettelfinger has shown a willingness to negotiate when the circumstances demand it. In his speech, he gravely took responsibility for a landmark agreement, reached last year with General Motors and Ford, that required workers to pay more for health care coverage. The deal, meant to alleviate an enormous burden that the automakers face in providing retiree health care, was "the most painful decision" he had made as union president. Further, Mr. Gettelfinger told delegates, broader economic pressures had forced all labor groups to reset their expectations. "In the not-too-distant past," he said, "when the U.S. economy grew and productivity increased, we could expect wages to rise as well. That's no longer true." Mr. Gettelfinger vowed to fight for changes in bankruptcy laws, aiming his criticism at Delphi and other bankrupt parts suppliers that have demanded steep concessions from workers. "These reforms are needed to stop unscrupulous employers and their battery of bankruptcy vultures," he said. His voice barely audible over the delegates' cheers, Mr. Gettelfinger added, "We need to stop dead in their tracks those who would seek to void contracts with their workers while lining their pockets with everything of value and uncaringly destroying lives, hopes, dreams and communities in the process." The mood of defiance extended to several workers interviewed near Detroit. Tom Dean, a forklift driver with 29 years' experience at G.M.'s truck assembly plant in Pontiac, Mich., said Monday that he did not intend to accept a buyout under the programs that had been offered to workers at G.M. and Delphi. He said he hoped his job would remain secure until he was ready to leave in a few years. As for concessions, Mr. Dean said, "We want the company to prosper, but we don't want to be taken advantage of." Some 113,000 workers at G.M. and 23,000 at Delphi have until June 23 to decide whether to stay or go and a week more in which to change their minds. Barbara Farrell Brown, a convention delegate who has spent 22 years at G.M.'s plant at Lake Orion, Mich., said she had already rejected a $140,000 buyout that would have allowed her to keep her pension but required that she give up retirement health care coverage. "I'm not taking a buyout. I would not cut my ties," said Ms. Brown, who was accompanied to Las Vegas by her daughter, Stephanie, 21, a U.A.W. member at a G.M. parts supplier. Ms. Brown said she was concerned that a number of her factory's younger workers were planning to accept the deals and leave. She said she hoped to persuade them to stay and help carry on the U.A.W.'s fight. "A lot of our young seniority workers need to be taught how to stick together," Ms. Brown added. The call for creative new solutions to revive the union's fortunes in a struggling industry was made by others at the convention, as well. "We can help the auto industry win again," Senator Barack Obama, Democrat of Illinois, told the delegates via satellite. "We need to start thinking big again. "I need for all of you to fight for the future," Senator Obama continued. "I need all of you to be open to creative ways of doing business. None of us can afford to watch the American auto industry fail. If we've got the courage to succeed, labor will rise again." Labor experts viewed the sobering notes of the convention as a sign that the U.A.W. was facing the reality that has resulted in a drop in its membership to the lowest level since 1942. Mr. Gettelfinger noted Monday that the U.A.W. had lost more than 78,000 members in the four years since its last convention, although it managed to add 66,000 new members through organizing drives and affiliations with other unions. For all its troubles, the union remains a force with significant power to affect the future of the auto industry, said Harry Katz, director of the Institute of Collective Bargaining at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations. "They're still the U.A.W.," he said. Nick Bunkley contributed reporting from Pontiac, Mich., for this article. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 5) House Passes $94.5 Billion for Iraq War and Katrina Aid "$66 billion for the two wars...20 billion in funds to further deal with the remaining hurricane devastation along the Gulf Coast... and $1.9 billion for a border security initiative featuring the deployment of 6,000 National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border..." By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 1:07 p.m. ET June 13, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Congress-Iraq-Katrina.html WASHINGTON (AP) -- The House passed a $94.5 billion bill Tuesday to pay for continuing U.S. military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, hurricane relief, bird flu preparations and border security at home. The House-Senate compromise bill contains $66 billion for the two wars, bringing the cost of the three-year-old war in Iraq to about $320 billion. Operations in Afghanistan have now tallied about $89 billion, according to the Congressional Research Service. The bill, which passed by a 351-67 vote, had only minimal debate Monday night. It contains almost $20 billion in funds to further deal with the remaining hurricane devastation along the Gulf Coast. Much of the money would go to Louisiana for housing aid, flood control projects and a new veterans hospital in New Orleans. It also provides funding for small-business disaster loans, rebuilding federal facilities and replenishing Federal Emergency Management Agency disaster-relief coffers. The Senate is to clear the measure for President Bush's signature later this week. The big margin in the House reflected lawmakers' support for U.S. troops overseas despite whatever reservations they may have about the war. Separately, the House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday approved a $427 billion defense spending bill that includes another $50 billion for the Iraq and Afghanistan for the budget year beginning Oct. 1. The panel attached a provision to a measure to block the U.S. from operating permanent military bases in Iraq. Both House and Senate gave overwhelming votes to such language in the Iraq war funding bill, but Republicans stripped it out in House-Senate talks on the bill that passed the chamber Tuesday. The Iraq and hurricane relief measure's long legislative odyssey began in February as a $92.2 billion request by President Bush. He subsequently added another $2.2 billion in Louisiana levee projects and $1.9 billion for a border security initiative featuring the deployment of 6,000 National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border. The House largely stuck to Bush's demands when passing its version back in March. But the Senate, led by Appropriations Committee Chairman Thad Cochran, R-Miss., responded with a $109 billion measure that drew a veto threat from Bush for add-ons such as $4 billion in farm disaster aid, $648 million for port security and $1.1 billion in aid to the Gulf Coast seafood industry. But House negotiators killed a controversial Senate project to pay CSX Transportation $700 million for a recently rebuilt freight rail line along the Mississippi coast so the state could use its path for a new East-West highway. The project had earned scornful media coverage and protests from the White House and conservative activists. Although the measure sticks with Bush's demand of $94.5 billion -- including $2.3 billion to combat the avian flu -- lawmakers reduced funding for the Federal Emergency Management's main disaster fund for additional grants for Mississippi, Texas and Alabama and a new Armed Forces Retirement Home in Gulfport, Miss. The FEMA disaster relief fund would still receive $6 billion, which includes $400 million for temporary housing sturdier than FEMA trailers. The funds also go toward debris removal, reimbursing state and local governments for infrastructure repairs and direct aid to individuals. There is lingering concern that if the hurricane season is a destructive one another infusion of disaster aid will be needed before Election Day. But a senior White House official said last week that the funding would be sufficient to last until next year. The compromise bill includes Bush's plan to provide 1,000 more Border Patrol agents along the Mexican border, deploy about 6,000 National Guard troops and build detention space for 4,000 illegal immigrants. The bill also contains $4 billion in military and foreign aid for Iraq and other allies, and to combat famine in Africa and Afghanistan and support U.N. peacekeeping missions in Sudan. The bill also contains funding for controversial, accident- prone V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft for deployment to Iraq, as well as more popular C-130 cargo planes. During Monday's brief debate, Democrats said the huge cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan missions being done on the installment plan, hiding their cost from the public. ''In 18 separate actions, we will now have spent $450 billion on this adventure,'' said Rep. David Obey of Wisconsin, top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee. ''This is a huge expenditure for a misguided war.'' ''Enough blood is enough blood!'' said Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio. ''You can stop it! Bring our troops home!'' GOP Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma countered that the bill ''provides critical funds that will be used to conduct ongoing operations in the war on terror.'' Meanwhile, in a symbolic statement, the Senate on Tuesday voted 97-0 to commend U.S. troops and intelligence agents for actions that resulted in the death of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who led al-Qaida in Iraq until he was killed last Wednesday in an American airstrike. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 6) UAW Highlights Special Bulletin by Gregg Shotwell/The UnCommonSense June 12, 2006 http://futureoftheunion.com/?p=2849 Historic Gains! Lifetime Job Security! Pension Enhancements! Record Salary Increases! Free Cradle to Grave Health Care! No Co-Pays! No Premiums! For ALL International Appointees! Forever! “This is unbelievable!” exclaimed UAW spokesperson, Pauline Paul. “Ron Gettelfinger is king!” she gushed. Pauline punctuated her comments with finger puppets. “Words! Just! Aren’t! Enough!” she enunciated breathlessly. In 2003 UAW President Ron Gettelfinger completed negotiations on five contracts in two weeks. Everyone was stupefied. But his latest achievement exceeded the corporations’ wildest expectations. Ron Gettelfinger has officially announced the end of collective bargaining forever. “We took an entirely different tact,” Bob King, UAW VP of Organizing, said. “We organized the employers.” “The advantage of organizing employers is that we see eye to eye on everything,” explained Dick Shoemaker who will sit on the GM Board of Directors after his retirement from the UAW this June. “Now we don’t have to go through the motions of making workers vote until they get it right.” “Democracy is too inefficient,” said Gerard Bantom. Another UAW VP jockeying for a seat on Ford’s revolving circle of perks. “Now that we have organized the employers we can fast track concessions.” “Since we agree on everything,” said Cal Rapson, another UAW VP angling for a corner window in the Pyramid, “We can do away with the tedium of contract negotiations and grievances.” “Never mind elections,” Nate Gooden laughed. “The new agreement guarantees job security for all UAW International appointees and their children forever.” “This Non Expiring Living Agreement tranquilizes anxiety, relieves all doubt, and allows our negotiators to wheel and deal concessions more freely,” murmured Pauline Paul as she wiggled her finger puppets languidly in the air to demonstrate how relaxed International appointees feel. “Our appointees literally mesmerize the members into voting for which concessions they like best. Everyone is happy!” Pauline’s puppets hugged each other. “Even though the UAW has functioned like a one party state for years,” Frank Joyce, UAW Public Relations consultant, interjected. “The appointees feared they might be challenged by opposition groups, but now that we’ve organized the employers, who cares what workers think?” The new UAW INC. will enjoy a host of privileges including profit sharing, stock options, unrestricted use of company vehicles, extended vacations in luxury hotels, lucrative salaries, and free massages. “In a genuine spirit of solidarity, all the International appointees will share in the rewards gained from concessions. It’s really a win-win for all,” said William Clay Ford as he announced another plant closing. Ron Gettelfinger has always enjoyed a lot of support from those closest to the top. The buzz around the country club is that Ronnie G is Dr. Love Supreme, the go to guy with the hole-in-one drive. “When it comes to ‘Holding the Line on Health Care’ [Gettelfinger’s slogan at the 2002 UAW Convention], I must say, the reins couldn’t be in better hands,” said Rick Wagoner, head honcho at GM. “When Ron suggested that GM pony up for UAW attorney fees in their lawsuit against GM [the UAW sued GM for taking accrued vested benefits away from retirees], I knew it was time to put him on the payroll.” Outsiders are surprised by recent developments, but insiders can trace the trajectory of appointee ascendance up the corporate ladder and into Solidarity Heaven back to the golf course at Black Lake. “When the UAW built a golf course we knew right then and there that organizing had entered the twenty-first century,” said a greenskeeper who preferred not to have his name used because he can’t afford to live on his pension and doesn’t want to get fired for speaking out of turn. Ron Gettelfinger was not available for comment but sources close to the corporation’s beloved say Ronnie has been planning this feat since his days as a summer ranch hand. The work gave him saddle sores but long hot days on horse back instilled in him an appreciation for desk jobs. It was at the Rollover Ranch that Ron met the man who would influence him for the rest of his life, Steve “Bob” Miller, a turnaround specialist with a stunning pirouette and a graceful side saddle style that charmed the shit out of a lot of bulls. The two men were both studying accounting and working summers on the ranch when they rubbed their match heads together. Sparks flew and the rest is fodder for the long barrel. So it comes as no surprise that years later the two should meet again — this time riding herd on the rank and file. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 7) G.M. — Again "The loophole works this way: A dual-fuel vehicle that can run on either gasoline or 85 percent ethanol, or E85, is credited with a much higher mileage rating than it really gets. That keeps the overall mileage of the cars and trucks that a company like Ford or General Motors makes in any given year within the government's mileage limits." By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN June 14, 2006 http://select.nytimes.com/2006/06/14/opinion/14friedman.html?hp On May 31 I wrote a column accusing General Motors of acting irresponsibly by offering unlimited gasoline at $1.99 a gallon for one year to anyone who buys certain of its midsize sedans, big S.U.V.'s or gas-guzzling Hummers in California or Florida. At a time when we are at war in the Middle East, with an enemy who is indirectly financed by our energy purchases, it seems to me that every American, and every American company, has an obligation to reduce oil consumption. No one should be making a huge gas-guzzling Hummer, and no one should be driving one, and no one — certainly not G.M. — should be subsidizing people to drive them. After the May 31 column appeared, G.M.'s vice president for global communications, Steven J. Harris, and his colleagues denounced my argument in a formal statement and on G.M.'s corporate blog. This is an important issue, so let me respond to their response. To begin with, I would much prefer to see G.M. thriving and growing American jobs — not selling itself off, limb by limb. But as long as G.M. is giving away $1.99 gasoline for its gas guzzlers, I will be a harsh critic. Pardon me if — at a time when China is imposing higher mileage standards than America — I don't want to join the many congressmen and senators in drinking G.M.'s Kool-Aid and not demanding that it become the most fuel-efficient automaker in the world. If more people in Washington insisted that G.M. focus on building cars that could compete in a world of $3.99 gasoline, rather than creating an artificial universe of $1.99 gasoline, G.M. would not be worrying about bankruptcy today. G.M. says that the cars chosen for its $1.99 gas giveaway were chosen because of "their outstanding fuel economy and great consumer appeal." It also says that G.M. makes more cars that get an E.P.A.-estimated 30 miles per gallon on the highway than any other company. Fact: G.M. also sells more cars that get 9 to 11 m.p.g. — the Hummer — than any other company. And even though G.M. justified the $1.99 program as giving consumers a chance to drive some of its most fuel-efficient cars, it did not include its best-selling, most fuel-efficient model, the Chevy Aveo (35 m.p.g. highway), in the program, but did include seven gas-guzzling trucks. G.M. still does not have a family-friendly hybrid on the market (one is due this summer) — nine years after Toyota introduced the 45-m.p.g. Prius hybrid, which G.M. scoffed at at the time. Stephanie Salter, a columnist writing in the Terre Haute Tribune- Star, did a spoof about G.M.'s $1.99 gas giveaway by imagining what other less-than-healthy consumer companies might now do: "Today R.J. Reynolds Corp. announced a new 'smoke more/ pay less' instant rebate program for most of its cigarette brands. Time-dated coupons will be included in every pack of RJR cigarettes. Tobacco consumers who collect 10 same-brand coupons in five days can redeem them for a pack costing $1. The only brands not covered by the coupon program are the company's cigarettes with very low tar and nicotine content." Next, G.M.'s Harris asked: "How is offering a gas card that may be worth $1,000 any different or more sinister than the $2,000 cash rebate that Toyota's offering right now nationwide on its full-size S.U.V., the Sequoia?" Fact: Reading that question you'd think that G.M. was giving away cheap gas instead of big S.U.V. rebates. The truth: We called G.M. dealers in California who said that under the new program they were authorized to offer $5,000 discounts on the 2006 Suburban and Tahoe S.U.V.'s — which are like the Sequoia — in addition to G.M.'s unlimited $1.99 gas for a year. I guess Mr. Harris just forgot that. Yes, Toyota makes trucks and S.U.V.'s, just like G.M. I am not against either. Some people need them, others enjoy them. But I don't think we should be subsidizing gasoline so people who don't need them will buy them or buy the most gas- guzzling versions. G.M. says its full-size S.U.V.'s get better mileage than Toyota's. All I know is that Consumer Reports rates all size S.U.V.'s for fuel efficiency, reliability and performance. Toyota and Honda S.U.V.'s are its top picks in every size category. Ah, says Mr. Harris, but we offer nine vehicles that can run on E85 ethanol-gas blends, and have made 1.9 million such cars and trucks. Toyota makes none. The truth: The Big Three U.S. automakers started making flex-fuel cars in the mid-1990's after they were given a shameful federal loophole. As the Des Moines Register explained in an article on May 26: "The loophole works this way: A dual-fuel vehicle that can run on either gasoline or 85 percent ethanol, or E85, is credited with a much higher mileage rating than it really gets. That keeps the overall mileage of the cars and trucks that a company like Ford or General Motors makes in any given year within the government's mileage limits." By agreeing to build flex-fuel vehicles credited with phony mileage, Detroit gets to make many more bigger, heavier gas guzzlers, the paper explained, "without having to pay fines for exceeding the federal mileage standards." For instance, the 2006 G.M.C. two-wheel-drive Yukon 1500 actually gets 15 m.p.g. city and 20 m.p.g. highway. But under this loophole it is rated as getting 33 miles per gallon for purposes of meeting the government's fleet fuel economy standards. "The Union of Concerned Scientists calculates that the loophole increased U.S. oil consumption by 80,000 barrels per day in 2005 alone," the paper said. If G.M., Ford and Chrysler really care about saving oil and the environment, why exploit this loophole? And by the way, even though G.M. has made 1.9 million flex-fuel vehicles, it and the other automakers for a long time did little to inform customers that their cars could run on ethanol — because their real interest was the mileage loophole to make more big cars. Most people didn't know they were driving a flex- fuel car. "Until recently, the only way to tell was by checking the vehicle identification number," the paper noted. Recently, General Motors has put yellow gas caps on its dual-fuel vehicles to alert customers. I'm not a car expert, so let me leave the last word to Automotive News, the industry's top trade magazine. Its June 5 editorial said: "General Motors' promotion that reimburses some buyers for gasoline purchases is ill- advised for an automaker that is trying to burnish its green image. The program should be dropped, not expanded. ... It's simply a subsidy for vehicles that burn a lot of gasoline. And it's one more example of G.M.'s tone deafness on environmental issues. ... Yes, G.M. can make vehicles that are as fuel efficient as anybody else's. But it acts as though its future depends on gas guzzlers." ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 8) The Road Back Lives Suspended on Gulf Coast, Crammed Into 240 Square Feet By DAN BARRY June 14, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/14/us/14road.html?hp&ex=1150344000&en=27602b6dedfa0f03&ei=5094&partner=homepage LAKESHORE, Miss., June 12 — If you were to fly over rural Hancock County here, you would see more than 9,000 of them, white rectangles clumped in sun-bleached parks and scattered in piney woods like pieces of a trashed picket fence. Pick any one, and contained within that FEMA trailer are lives in claustrophobic suspension. Paulette Shiyou invites you into her family's trailer with a natural hospitality that has remained intact. Her husband, Hugh, offers a can of beer, and her son, Cody, itching to show you his card collection, his rock collection, his pocketknife, kicks off his sneakers. And suddenly, in this tight trailer of 240 square feet, an 11-year-old boy's shoes loom like ottomans. "I'm constantly yelling at him because you're always tripping over him," Ms. Shiyou says, scolding but smiling. "And he yells at me to turn the lights out." Cody defends himself by nodding toward the droning television set that sits near the only door, about five feet from his cubbyhole bunk bed. "I'll be going to bed," he says, "and she'll be watching TV and have all these lights on." As the television set gabs and a boy complains and a mother justifies her liberal use of lights by saying she just cannot tolerate darkness, not since the storm, it seems that in a FEMA trailer even words take up space. FEMA trailer. The phrase has nearly lost meaning, so embedded is it in the national memory of last year's crushing hurricanes, Katrina and Rita. The Federal Emergency Management Agency provided trailers to people whose homes were damaged or destroyed; got it. But tens of thousands of people continue to live crammed in FEMA trailers, greeting this year's hurricane season the same way they said goodbye to the last one: in light-metal boxes that even a tropical storm could flip like playing cards and which seem so vulnerable alongside the brush fires crackling through some stretches of the Gulf Coast. Ms. Shiyou hurries through her family's FEMA trailer back story, which is extraordinary, but here, mundane: Returning to a home that was miles from shore but destroyed, then moving like nomads, from a gymnasium to a warehouse to a tent to a FEMA trailer encampment for five months. Then, finally, back to their property, into this FEMA trailer on their former front lawn, where they have lived since March. She takes you on a tour. To keep from tracking mud into the trailer, the Shiyous have placed a recovered piece of their old deck on the ground. "This was the color of my house," Ms. Shiyou says, walking on it. "A country blue." She takes one step into the trailer, and the initial urge is to hunch. Mr. Shiyou, a gangly 6-foot-2, stretches out his arms to demonstrate how he can simultaneously touch the ceiling with one hand and the floor with the other. His wife slides open a door to her immediate right, revealing a room taken up almost entirely by the master bed. "You just crawl in from the foot and pull the blankets up as you go," she says. The hangers in the small closet have to be tilted sideways to fit, and the space-eating fan is necessary because you lose the air-conditioning if you slide the door shut for privacy. Mr. Shiyou says he sleeps less than five hours a night because that is all he can take of this confinement. Moving left, the kitchen, with the bread and cookies stored in the microwave, paper plates and plastic cups from Wal-Mart in the cabinet and a couple of Reed & Barton silver coffeepots the family found in the woods after the waters receded. "I'm going to put them in my china closet when I get one," Ms. Shiyou says, talking over the television set, which is blaring MTV beside her. "He usually always watches cartoons," she says of Cody. "And it drives me crazy." Take one step off the small stretch of tan linoleum, which she keeps clean with the mop at the door, and onto the patch of worn dun-colored carpet, which she keeps clean with the carpet sweeper beside the mop, and you are now in the dining room, living room, and practically into Cody's bed. A small, hard couch. A small booth with a small table, under which are stored a blue suitcase, Cody's book bag, Cody's suddenly massive sneakers and shoes and his father's even larger shoes. Cody's bed, where he stashes Doritos, and the bed above, used for storing blankets and winter clothes. Finally, the bathroom, whose door, when opened, blocks Cody's bed. You have to lean over the toilet to see yourself in the mirror. Mr. Shiyou practically kneels to fit into the shower. This, then, is the home where the Shiyous had family over for an Easter barbecue. "There was Vanessa and Joe, Jessica, Tim, Raegan and Kiley," Ms. Shiyou says. "And then Heather and Jasper, and then my niece Mindy her boyfriend, Josh, and their two kids, John and Jared. And wasn't David and Regina here? Yes, they were." Mr. Shiyou, 43, is a welder, and Ms. Shiyou, 40, runs a check- cashing store. When they look out from their FEMA trailer, they see two other FEMA trailers, occupied by two of her daughters and their families. They can also see the raised dirt foundation where they plan to build a home at a higher level, even though the land is well beyond the flood zone. Insurance paid off the note on their old home, and nothing more. They have secured another loan, but have yet to hear whether they will receive any federal grant to ease their financial burden. Either way, they plan to start building next month, and with luck will be out of the trailer by Christmas. Dusk has descended; a full moon is rising over the gulf. Mr. Shiyou returns to working on the all-but-destroyed house of a beloved 89-year-old neighbor. Ms. Shiyou, meanwhile, recreates in her mind the home they shared for 10 years and lost nine months ago. The Kia Sephia and the Dodge pickup in the driveway. The curio cabinet, with all those angels collected by her late mother. The framed family photographs. The children's encyclopedias. Her set of dishes, whose pattern was, was — "God, what color was my kitchen set?" Ms. Shiyou asks, her voice breaking. She says it will come to her, but it doesn't. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 9) U.A.W. Will Use Part of Strike Fund to Aid Recruitment of New Members By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS June 14, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/14/business/14union.html LAS VEGAS, June 13 (AP) — The United Automobile Workers union voted Tuesday to use part of its $914 million strike fund to pay for the recruitment of new members. The amendment to the union's constitution, approved overwhelmingly by voice vote at the U.A.W.'s convention here, allows the international leadership to spend up to $60 million from the strike fund, mainly for organizing efforts during the four years between conventions. The union's membership peaked at 1.5 million in 1979. It dropped to 676,000 in 2002 and now stands at just less than 599,000. "It makes sense in terms of what it's going to take to build the future strength of the U.A.W.," said Scott Bailey, president of Local 2865, a relatively new local that represents 12,000 academic student employees of the University of California. Mr. Bailey told fellow members that organizing could often take a long time, saying that it took nearly two decades to change California law to allow academic student workers to organize. "We all know that the industrial sector is flying away to right-to- work states, where it's going to take time and big-time financial resources to win campaigns," he said, referring to states with laws that do not favor unions. The U.A.W. said it had had success recently in organizing workers in health care, on college campuses, at auto dealerships and in the technical, office and professional sectors. Officials say the union has recruited about 66,000 new members since its last convention in 2002, with 42,000 coming from the traditional manufacturing sector and 24,000 from other areas. But the growth has not been enough to counter the loss of members because of restructuring, plant closings, outsourcing and privatization, the union's president, Ron Gettelfinger, said in his opening-day speech on Monday. The union is about to lose thousands more members in manufacturing. Ford Motor and General Motors want to reduce their hourly work forces by 60,000, and suppliers represented by the U.A.W. also are cutting jobs. Delphi, G.M.'s largest supplier, plans to close 21 of its 29 United States plants by 2008 and cut its hourly work force by thousands. The change approved Tuesday by the union allows the U.A.W. to use the $60 million for initiatives to bolster membership, strengthen its bargaining ability or promote the interests of members and working people. The membership also authorized the union to transfer $50 million from the strike fund to the union's general operating fund. And it voted to increase the dues rebates that locals get when the strike fund exceeds $550 million, giving them more money for operating costs. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 10) Profits Fall, Stores Close Grocery Chains and Bush's Ownership Society By SETH SANDRONSKY June 10 / 11, 2006 http://www.counterpunch.org/sandronsky06102006.html There are too many U.S. grocery chain stores, said George Whalin, head of Retail Management Consultants, in The Sacramento Bee of June 7. Call it overcapacity in the grocery industry. A few new owners of the Albertsons grocery chain are responding accordingly. In early June, three companies purchased Albertsons Inc. for the tidy sum of $17 billion. One of the trio, Cerberus Partners, an investment firm based in New York, partnered with the commercial real estate firm of Kimco Realty Corp. To halt a fall in profits for Albertsons during the past four years, 100 of its stores nationwide will be closing, 37 of which are located in Northern California. These "under-performing stores" did not bring an acceptable return on investment to owners, according to Albertsons spokeswoman Quyen Ha. And the consequences for Albertsons employees? How many of them will become jobless is not yet known. Contrast their bitter fate with that of Larry Johnston, CEO of Albertsons. Mr. Johnston earned about $60 million as Albertsons shareholders lost around $900 million between 2000 and 2003, said Graef Crystal, a business professor at UC Berkeley, in a report on KTVB NewsChannel 7, the NBC station in Boise, Idaho on July 8, 2003. Nice work if you can get it. Albertsons competes for profits and market share in the grocery industry with discounter Wal-Mart Stores Inc., owned by the Walton family of multi-billionaires. Their wealth is built on the backs of Wal-Mart's hourly work force, which earns lower wages than unionized Albertsons workers. As the good Marxists in corporate America know, low wages plus high productivity boost profit rates. Driven thusly, grocery companies compete to undersell their rivals and put them out of business. Wal-Mart is pursuing this strategy with a vengeance in California. In early 2006, Kroger-owned Ralphs fell to the Wal-Mart discount rout, departing the Sacramento area, having shut down eight of its stores in the capital region. Two years earlier, unionized Southern California grocery workers endured a five-month strike and lockout, trying to prevent Safeway-owned Vons, Ralphs and Albertsons from making deep cuts to employees' health benefits and hourly wages. On one hand, the employers did not get all of the cuts they wanted at the end of the five months. On the other hand, new-hire grocery workers in the south state were forced to labor for lower wages and fork out higher co-pays for their health benefits. The grocery chains had sought such cuts due to competition from Wal-Mart. It is unclear how many Albertsons workers will be fired as a result of the upcoming store closures. What is clear is that overcapacity runs a red line through the U.S. economy, from airlines to cars, and more. Currently, the shake-out underway in the marketplace of U.S. grocery chains is falling hard on wage earners. They are living the lives of pay cuts and layoffs under President George W. Bush's "Ownership Society." National health care would provide a cushion for the human harm created by overcapacity in the U.S. economy. It is time to think and act outside the box of the usual labor union-company agreements fueled by market share and profits. Seth Sandronsky is a member of Sacramento Area Peace Action and a co-editor of Because People Matter, Sacramento's progressive paper. He can be reached at ssandron@hotmail.com ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 11) "Just in the Name of 'Democracy' " June 3, 2006 Copyright 2006 Mumia Abu-Jamal The word 'democracy' is a kind of verbal narcotic. To mention it is to daze us; to dull us; to lull us into peaceful slumber. That's why the Bush Regime, perhaps the least democratic of governments in generations, calls the invasion and occupation a 'war for democracy.' It is ironic that a government that is profoundly autocratic, that relies on elite authoritarianism, secrecy, wireless wiretaps, secret prisons and torture, can claim to be fighting for something that is becoming so rare in the U.S. (ahem -- democracy). But, don't trip; this ain't a Bush thing. Writer and historian, Michael Parenti in his book, Super Patriotism (San Francisco: City Light Books, 2004), tells us that democracy has been wiped out in a host of countries -- by the ! Parenti writes: "US leaders have long professed a dedication to democracy, yet over the last half century they have devoted themselves to overthrowing democratic governments in Guatemala, Guyana, the Dominican Republic,Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, Syria, Indonesia (under Sukarno), Greece (twice), Argentina (twice), Haiti (twice), Bolivia, Jamaica, Yugoslavia,and other countries. These governments were all guilty of pursuing policies that occasionally favored the poorer elements and infringed upon the affluent. In most instances, the US-sponsored coups were accompanied by widespread killings of democratic activists. "US leaders have supported covert actions, sanctions, or proxy mercenary wars against revolutionary governments in Cuba, Angola, Mozambique, Ethiopia, Iraq (with the CIA ushering in Saddam Hussein's reign of repression), Portugal, South Yemen, Nicaragua, Cambodia, East Timor, Western Sahara, and elsewhere. "US interventions and destabilization campaigns have been directed against other populist nationalistic governments, including Egypt, Lebanon, Peru, Iran, Syria, Zaire, Venezuela, the Fiji Islands, and Afghanistan (before the Soviets ever went into the country). "And since World War II, direct US military invasions or aerial attacks or both have been perpetrated against Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, North Korea, Yugoslavia, Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, Libya, Somalia, and Iraq (twice). There is no 'rogue state,' 'axis of evil,' or communist country that has a comparable record of such criminal aggression against other nations." [pp. 133-34) The point? The next time you hear about a 'war to bring democracy' -- question it. Decades ago, a Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles, gave the quintessential recipe for American military adventures abroad. Speaking during the Eisenhower years, Dulles said, "In order to bring a nation to support the burdens of maintaining great military establishments, it is necessary to create an emotional state akin to war psychology." Dulles added, "*There must be the portrayal of external menace*." To do this, Dulles explained, one must depict one's own country as the shining hero, while portraying the adversary as the embodiment of all evil. We have, all of us, seen this recipe cooked all of our lives, all around the world, and on every continent. It works, because people allow it to work. Yet, while Dulles explains how such a thing happens, he doesn't explain why. Years ago, an American president was explaining why the Vietnam War was necessary. This man said: "Now let us assume that we lost Indochina , the tin and tungsten that we so greatly value from that area would cease coming. So when the votes $400 million to help that war, we are not voting a give-away program. We are voting for the cheapest way that we can prevent the occurrence of something that would be of a most terrible significance to the , our security, our power and ability to get certain things we need from the riches of the Indo-Chinese territory and from Southeast Asia ." [p. 67]** These words were spoken by Dwight D. Eisenhower. Now, why is that remarkable? Isn't it merely the case of an American president talking turkey? These words were spoken in 1953 -- *eleven years before the entered the Vietnam War!* Why are wars fought? For 'democracy' -- or for profit? Think about this the next time you hear a plea for your patriotism. Just say, "No." Copyright 2006 Mumia Abu-Jamal **["Source: Carmichael, Stokely. Stokely Speaks: Black Power Back to Pan-Africanism. (New York: Vintage, 1971), p. 67. The author was giving an anti-war speech to students at Morgan State College, Baltimore, Md. , Jan. 28, 1967. He cited as his source a book entitled , by Felix Green.] ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- 12) Where the Hogs Come First By BOB HERBERT June 15, 2006 http://select.nytimes.com/2006/06/15/opinion/15herbert.html?hp Tar Heel, N.C. Think pork. Sizzling bacon and breakfast sausage. Juicy chops and ribs and robust holiday hams. The pork capital of the planet is this tiny town in the Cape Fear River basin, not far from the South Carolina border. Spending a few days in Tar Heel and the surrounding area — dotted with hog farms, cornfields and the occasional Confederate flag — is like stepping back in time. This is a place where progress has slowed to a crawl. Tar Heel's raison d'être (and the employment anchor for much of the region) is the mammoth plant of the Smithfield Packing Company, a million-square-foot colossus that is the largest pork processing facility in the world. You can learn a lot at Smithfield. It's a case study in both the butchering of hogs (some 32,000 are slaughtered there each day) and the systematic exploitation of vulnerable workers. More than 5,500 men and women work at Smithfield, most of them Latino or black, and nearly all of them undereducated and poor. The big issue at Smithfield is not necessarily money. Workers are drawn there from all over the region, sometimes traveling in crowded vans for two hours or more each day, because the starting pay — until recently, $8 and change an hour — is higher than the pay at most other jobs available to them. But the work is often brutal beyond imagining. Company officials will tell you everything is fine, but serious injuries abound, and the company has used illegal and, at times, violent tactics over the course of a dozen years to keep the workers from joining a union that would give them a modicum of protection and dignity. "It was depressing inside there," said Edward Morrison, who spent hour after hour flipping bloody hog carcasses on the kill floor, until he was injured last fall after just a few months on the job. "You have to work fast because that machine is shooting those hogs out at you constantly. You can end up with all this blood dripping down on you, all these feces and stuff just hanging off of you. It's a terrible environment. "We've had guys walk off after the first break and never return." Mr. Morrison's comments were echoed by a young man who was with a group of Smithfield workers waiting for a van to pick them up at a gas station in Dillon, S.C., nearly 50 miles from Tar Heel. "The line do move fast," the young man said, "and people do get hurt. You can hear 'em hollering when they're on their way to the clinic." Workers are cut by the flashing, slashing knives that slice the meat from the bones. They are hurt sliding and falling on floors and stairs that are slick with blood, guts and a variety of fluids. They suffer repetitive motion injuries. The processing line on the kill floor moves hogs past the workers at the dizzying rate of one every three or four seconds. Union representation would make a big difference for Smithfield workers. The United Food and Commercial Workers Union has been trying to organize the plant since the mid-1990's. Smithfield has responded with tactics that have ranged from the sleazy to the reprehensible. After an exhaustive investigation, a judge found that the company had threatened to shut down the entire plant if the workers dared to organize, and had warned Latino workers that immigration authorities would be alerted if they voted for a union. The union lost votes to organize the plant in 1994 and 1997, but the results of those elections were thrown out by the National Labor Relations Board after the judge found that Smithfield had prevented the union from holding fair elections. The judge said the company had engaged in myriad "egregious" violations of federal labor law, including threatening, intimidating and firing workers involved in the organizing effort, and beating up a worker "for engaging in union activities." Rather than obey the directives of the board and subsequent court decisions, the company has tied the matter up on appeals that have lasted for years. A U.S. Court of Appeals ruling just last month referred to "the intense and widespread coercion prevalent at the Tar Heel facility." Workers at Smithfield and their families are suffering while the government dithers, refusing to require a mighty corporation like Smithfield to obey the nation's labor laws in a timely manner. The defiance, greed and misplaced humanity of the merchants of misery at the apex of the Smithfield power structure are matters consumers might keep in mind as they bite into that next sizzling, succulent morsel of Smithfield pork. ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- LINKS ONLY ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*-------- Judge Rules That U.S. Has Broad Powers to Detain Noncitizens Indefinitely By NINA BERNSTEIN A federal judge in Brooklyn ruled yesterday that the government has wide latitude under immigration law to detain noncitizens on the basis of religion, race or national origin, and to hold them indefinitely without explanation. June 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/15/nyregion/15detain.html Bear Stearns Profit Jumps 83 Percent By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 1:36 p.m. ET June 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Earns-Bear-Stearns.html Alito Vote Loosens Limits on Evidence By DAVID STOUT WASHINGTON, June 15— The Supreme Court today affirmed the power of police officers backed by a search warrant to enter a home without knocking, and in so doing signaled the more conservative tilt of the tribunal in recent months. June 15, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/15/washington/15cnd-scotus.html?hp&ex=1150430400&en=fa5321eb3b84db97&ei=5094&partner=homepage US Military Death Toll in Iraq Reaches 2,500 The number of US military deaths in the Iraq war has reached 2,500, the Pentagon said on Thursday. In addition, 18,490 US troops have been wounded in the war. http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061506J.shtml Green Fuel's Dirty Secret By:Sasha Lilley on:Jun 14 2006 [11:35 am] (44 reads) http://www.innworldreport.net/ http://coanews.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=1003 US inflation and rate rise worries cause worldwide shares sell-off -Oil, gold and industrial metal prices plummet -Fears grow of American economic slowdown Larry Elliott and Justin McCurry in Tokyo Wednesday June 14, 2006 Guardian http://business.guardian.co.uk/print/0,,329504144-108725,00.html Gaza beach killings highlight need for revolutionary change By Yossi Schwartz in Israel Monday, 12 June 2006 http://www.marxist.com/gaza-beach-killings-change120606.htm Greg Palast | Keeping Iraq's Oil in the Ground Greg Palast asks, "Did the petroleum industry, which had a direct, if hidden, hand in promoting invasion, cheerlead for a takeover of Iraq to prevent overproduction?" http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061406J.shtml Dogs and Their Fine Noses Find New Career Paths By JENNIFER 8. LEE June 13, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/13/nyregion/13dogs.html?ex=1150430400&en=ea5c693d8f37c5c2&ei=5087%0A Global Image of the U.S. Is Worsening, Survey Finds By BRIAN KNOWLTON June 14, 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/14/world/14pew.html
|
|