---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

Monday , March 20
4 p.m.
Military recruitment office
Stonestown Mall, San Francisco)
(across from Macy's at old Kinko's location)

Monday, March 20 will mark the THIRD YEAR of the war in Iraq. With the
majority of the country now against the war and the death toll of US
soldiers in Iraq over 2,300, we call upon the military to cease and desist its
aggressive tactics and not to recruit ONE MORE OF OUR YOUTH to suffer
in this illegal and immoral war! The vast majority of San Franciscans say
"Troops Out Now!" and many feel that the conflict in Iraq is only made worse by
the US presence there.

We will converge on the Marine Recruitment Center Monday at 4:00 PM,
joining with high school students in the area, college antiwar groups in the
Campus Antiwar Network, and antiwar activists throughout the Bay Area. We
will call upon the military not to recruit one more youth to war, and to leave our
community! Bring your signs, your noisemakers, and your love for peace!

Campus Antiwar Network is a grassroots collaboration of student
antiwar groups throughout the US. For more info please visit
www.campusantiwar.net.

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

DANGER: MILITARY OPT OUT FORMS
SIGNED BY 95% OF S.F. PARENTS
COULD BE MADE NULL AND VOID BY THE SFUSD!

EQUAL ACCESS FOR MILITARY RECRUITERS WILL BE
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL ON:

TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 7:00 P.M.
Irving G. Breyer Board Meeting Room
555 Franklin Street, First Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

In spite of a two-billion-dollar military recruitment advertising budget
outside of the schools, the Equal Access for Recruiters Board of
Education Policy (62-14Sp1) will allow two recruiters each from the
Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and National Guard into schools
to recruit children each time colleges or employers bring notice
of scholarship, job or career opportunities to the students
at their schools!

SAN FRANCISCO VOTERS VOTED TO
BRING THE TROOPS HOME NOW IN 2005!

WE VOTED TO GET THE MILITARY
OUT OF OUR SCHOOLS IN 2006!

AND PARENTS HAVE MADE THEIR POSITION CLEAR!
THEY HAVE OPTED OUT OF MILITARY RECRUITMENT
BY A 95 PERCENT MAJORITY!

We urge you to get on the speakers list for the Board meeting
and come and register your outrage!

Add your name to the speakers list for the Tuesday, March 28th
meeting by calling: 415-241-6427 Monday between 8:00 a.m.
and 4:00 p.m., or Tuesday, between 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.

BAUAW COUNTER-PROPOSAL FOR ACTION
BY THE BOARD OF EDUCATION:

Let it be district policy that, as long as this war is being
carried out against the will of the Iraqi people and, against
the will of the American people; and as long as the No Child
Left Behind Act is still in effect, the military will be given
a stall in the dirtiest bathroom or basement closet on school
or campus when they insist on coming! And huge warning
signs will be posted at the door and around school
and given to each student stating:

The material and information you receive from the military
is full of lies and false promises designed to get you to sign
up to risk your life in an unlawful, and unjust war. While,
under the current No Child Left Behind Act, the school
can't legally prevent the military from coming on school
grounds without losing funding that will keep the school
open, we can and will warn all students of the deceitful
and unlawful attempts by the military to get students
to sign up.

STUDENTS BEWARE! DON'T BELIEVE A WORD THE MILITARY
SAYS! DON'T RELY ON THEIR CONTRACT WITH YOU! AS SOON
AS YOU JOIN, IT BECOMES NULL AND VOID AND YOU BELONG
TO THEM! YOUR LIFE WILL NO LONGER BE YOUR OWN! TURN
AWAY FROM MILITARY RECRUITMENT AND DON'T JOIN THE
MILITARY! GO TO THE COUNSELING OFFICE FOR INFORMATION
ON COLLEGE AND JOB TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES NOT
CONNECTED TO THE MILITARY! GO TO COLLEGE OR JOB
TRAINING NOT INTO COMBAT!

Note: There is nothing unlawful against protesting the
presence of the military in our schools. Further, the San
Francisco Board of Education will make it its urgent business
to organize against the No Child Left Behind Act on a national
level by contacting school districts around the country
to protest this act of holding our children and their schools
hostage for military recruitment purposes. All parents and
the community will be notified well in advance of when
and where the military will show up next so that they can
choose to keep their children home on that day or to
organize and/or participate in a protest of the presence
of the military since they are clearly not wanted in this district.

www.bauaw.org
415-824-8730

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
DEFEND FREE SPEECH!
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

ATTACK ON FREE SPEECH AT PACE UNIVERSITY
BACKGROUND INFO:

Dear Friends:

Yesterday we (Brian Kelly and Lauren Giaccone) were threatened with
disciplinary actions ranging from warnings to expulsion: all for holding
a peaceful rally, handing out educational flyers about Bill Clinton's war
crimes, and holding regular CAN/SDS meetings at our school.

Yesterday, the Pace University Dean of Students disrupted our regular
joint Campus Antiwar Network (C.A.N.) and Students for a Democratic
Society (S.D.S.) meeting citing a university policy against "unrecognized
student organizations" reserving or using university space. This occurred
after an event we held on Sunday where I (Brian Kelly) called Bill Clinton
a "war criminal" with my friend and fellow anti-war activist Lauren Giaccone,
citing his atrocities around the world during his presidency. We were not
charged with any violation; however, we were detained and threatened
by both Secret Service agents and various police officers.

For more information about what happened at the event, including the
threats made to us and the illegal searches that occurred please visit
the following link:

http://leftist.ws/2006/03/08/why-i-called-bill-clinton-a-war-criminal/

When I got back to my dorm I found:

An envelope from my university on the ground near my front door. Inside
the envelope was a letter from Pace stating that they are pursuing disciplinary
actions against me for the following:

1. Failure to register a rally
2. Violation of distribution and solicitation policy
3. Reservation of university space by an unrecognized organization

These charges are an attempt to stop us from voicing our opinions
and exercising our constitutional rights to free speech, press, and
assembly. Pace's message to students and the community is clear:
We do not recognize constitutional rights.

Any of these charges can carry penalties ranging from verbal warnings
to expulsion.

We believe the only chance to challenge these charges is to make
sure that Pace knows that the world is watching them.

We are challenging President Caputo and the University not only on
this instance, but also on their attack on civil liberties around the
university, their enforced apolitical atmosphere, their union-busting
activities, and the presence of Homeland Security agents on campus.

Thanks for your support!
Brian Kelly
President, Pace Campus Antiwar Network
kelly@leftist.ws

FOR ONGOING UPDATES:
http://www.campusantiwar.net/

SAMPLE LETTER:

To: Pace University
Dear David Caputo, President of Pace University:
president@pace.edu
campus "hotline" 1-866-PAC-E001

We are outraged that your school is charging two students, Brian Kelly
and Lauren Giaccone, with potential expulsion from school for engaging
in a peaceful protest.

In the interest of free speech, we demand that you drop ALL charges
against Brian and Lauren, and that your administration cease any
harassment of the Pace University Campus Antiwar Network, Students
for a Democratic Society, and any other activist organizations.

Sincerely,
the undersigned
To add your name go to:

http://www.traprockpeace.org/pace_repression/

OPEN LETTER TO:

David A. Caputo
President
Pace University
president@pace.edu
campus "hotline" 1-866-PAC-E001

Dear President Caputo,

The news of the persecution of Brian Kelly and Lauren Giaccone
for holding an antiwar meeting on the campus is extremely
distressing. The purpose for campus rules that require pre-
registration of groups and meetings is to prevent violence or
other illegal activities from taking place on the campus not
to prevent the peaceful exercise of free speech and assembly.

The real perpetrators of illegalities and violence--the U.S.
Military--are the ones that should be banned from campus
and brought up on charges for disseminating lies about
military service such as assuring enlistees that they do not
have to fight but can have careers in such fields as "electric
guitar player" or "doctor" instead--which is a blatant lie and
act of overt and covert deception. Are these promises designed
to honestly recruit the "best of the best?" NO! These recruitment
techniques are designed to recruit the most economically
desperate and naive of students.

The recent Supreme Court ruling upholding "equal access"
to students in colleges and High Schools for the military is just
a way to circumvent the "opt-out" forms that both parents and
students have signed to keep the military away--to keep the
lies away.

The function of any school is to promote the lives and future
of our kids not to promote their road to death and possibly
severe injury that could end any chance of a decent future
for them.

The military doesn't need your help! They have a two billion
dollar budget this year alone for recruitment advertising with
McCann/Erickson, a major advertising agency. And they are
actively spreading these lies about one's "choices" in military
service. But, once you take your second oath you become
military property to do with as they please and all of your rights
are suspended and all of the promises that the military gave--
even contracts that they sign with enlistees--are made null and
void by taking that second oath.

Already, over a third of returning veterans are seeking psychological
assistance from public health facilities and are suffering from
depression and post traumatic stress syndrome because the cause
for what they signed up for turned out to be a bunch of lies.
Instead they have experienced an entire population--the people
of Iraq--expressing their overwhelming desire for the U.S. Troops
to get out of their country. They are not welcomed by the people
of Iraq with open arms as the enlistees were told.

And, most importantly, the Iraqi people's hatred for the U.S.
Intervention into their country is completely justified! The
analogy of murderous people entering your home, killing
family members, destroying your home, torturing and
imprisoning children and grandparents, stealing or destroying
all that you own and then expecting that those very same people
be asked to undo what they have done is insane!

This war is dead, dead, dead wrong! These students should be
hailed as heroes! And, our institutions of higher learning as well
as our public school system should be actively fighting to get the
military out of the schools. They should be universally demanding
that schools be off-limits to these military organizations who are
carrying out mass murder and turning innocent kids who just want
a good life for themselves and their families into murderers too!

The schools and universities--teachers and professors AND
ADMINISTRATORS--should be actively fighting against such laws
as "No Child Left Behind" that holds our children's education and
funding of the schools as ransom to the military--a law that ties
school funding to open hunting season of our kids year-round
to military ghouls!

The constitution expressly states that people have the right
to peacefully protest and demonstrate their opposition to government
policy. No rules can be designed to circumvent the constitution--
even on college campuses!

As long as this war is being carried out against the will of the
Iraqi people and, against the will of the American people; and
as long as the "no child left behind" law is still in effect, the military
should be given a stall in the dirtiest bathroom on campus as their
headquarters! And huge warning signs should be posted at the
door stating:

"The material and information you receive from the military is full
of lies and false promises designed to get you to sign up to risk
your life in an unlawful, and unjust war. While the university/school
can't legally prevent the military from coming on campus without
losing funding that will keep the school open, we can warn our
students of their deceitful and unlawful attempts to get them to sign up.
STUDENTS BEWARE AND TURN AWAY FROM THIS MILITARY RECRUITMENT
TOILET AND DON'T JOIN THE MILITARY."

The administration COULD do this and not be in defiance
with "no child left behind."

It us the only thing a school with a conscience can do.

The whole world is watching what your school does in this circumstance.
We demand that you drop all charges against the students and their lawful,
peaceful organizations and carry out the will of the majority of Americans
and protest the hunting of more cannon fodder for this murderous war
in our places of learning.

Be creative! Use all the means at your disposal to fight this unconstitutional
requirement to keep the military on our school campuses--including the
Reserve and Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps. Let them train in a toilet
as well!

Schools should be a safe haven not a hunting grounds for death and destruction!

This message will be circulated far and wide!

Sincerely,

Bonnie Weinstein, Bay Area United Against War
www.bauaw.org

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

OPEN LETTER TO:
Dr. Monte Moses, Superintendent
Cherry Creek Schools

RE:

Teach vs. speech
How should public schools handle hot controversy in class?
A teacher's Comments on Bush stoke an ever-simmering debate
By Karen Rouse and Robert Sanchez
Denver Post Staff Writers
DenverPost.com
Article Launched: 3/03/2006 01:00 AM
http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_3564246

and:

Right-Wing Attack Dogs Go after a Colorado High School Teacher
by Michael D. Yates
March 3, 2006
http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/yates030306.html

And some of the "criminal" comments made by Jay Bennish:

"Among other things, Mr. Bennish asked his class which country
has the most weapons of mass destruction and answered the
United States.  He suggested that capitalism was inimical
to human rights and that the U.S. wants to create by military
force if necessary a world in its own image.  He suggested that
there were chilling similarities between Bush's words and those
of Hitler.  Right on the mark if you ask me!  Meanwhile, the
moronic Gunny Bob said that Bennish criticized capitalism
but was a capitalist himself (because he gets paid a wage?).
Finally, on March 3, the Denver Post noted that, near the end
of the recording, Mr. Bennish told his students, "You have
to figure this stuff out for yourselves. . . . I'm not in any way
implying that you should agree with me. . . . What I'm trying
to get you to do is think about these issues more in depth
and not just to take things from the surface."  And, "I'm glad
you [those students who challenged him] asked all of your
questions because they're all very good, legitimate questions." 
Sounds like a real brain washer to me!"

Dr. Monte Moses, Superintendent
Cherry Creek Schools
Phone: 720-554-4213
Email:
4700 South Yosemite Street
Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111
Phone: 303-773-1184
Fax: 303-773-9884

Dear Dr. Moses,

I am appalled to read these articles and learn that geography
teacher, Jay Bennish, who teaches at Overland High School
in Aurora, Colorado is in trouble and out of work for things
he said in an honors geography class. What happened to
freedom of speech and for the right of students and teachers
to discuss freely the current events of the day. How can this
be avoided in a subject like geography?

Are our teachers to be given a script to read in the classroom
and the admonition to prohibit any discussion that deviates
from that script?

And, even more outrageous, is the School District going to
dance to the tune of right-wing radio announcers? Is this
what our educational system is going to come to? Is congress
ready to appoint Bill O'Reiley and Fox's Hannity and Colmes
to head the Department of Education?

This is an outrageous travesty of justice that won't be
tolerated and has already attracted the attention of
people throughout our country.

Put Jay Bennish back to work with all of his back pay
(if he has lost any) and keep right-wing radio out
of the classroom!

Teachers like Jay are beacons of light and should be
cherished! His comments as reprinted above show
that he is the voice of reason.

Sincerely,

Bonnie Weinstein, Bay Area United Against War
Www.bauaw.org


VOTE ON LINE FOR JAY BENNISH AND FREE SPEECH:
http://blogs.rockymountainnews.com/denver/rockytalklive/

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

SCROLL DOWN TO READ:
EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS
GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS
ARTICLES IN FULL
LINKS ONLY

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

DANGER: MILITARY OPT OUT FORMS
SIGNED BY 95% OF S.F. PARENTS
COULD BE MADE NULL AND VOID BY THE SFUSD!

EQUAL ACCESS FOR MILITARY RECRUITERS WILL BE
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL ON:

TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 7:00 P.M.
Irving G. Breyer Board Meeting Room
555 Franklin Street, First Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

In spite of a two-billion-dollar military recruitment advertising budget
outside of the schools, the Equal Access for Recruiters Board of
Education Policy (62-14Sp1) will allow two recruiters each from the
Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and National Guard into schools
to recruit children each time colleges or employers bring notice
of scholarship, job or career opportunities to the students
at their schools!

SAN FRANCISCO VOTERS VOTED TO
BRING THE TROOPS HOME NOW IN 2005!

WE VOTED TO GET THE MILITARY
OUT OF OUR SCHOOLS IN 2006!

AND PARENTS HAVE MADE THEIR POSITION CLEAR!
THEY HAVE OPTED OUT OF MILITARY RECRUITMENT
BY A 95 PERCENT MAJORITY!

We urge you to get on the speakers list for the Board meeting
and come and register your outrage!

Add your name to the speakers list for the Tuesday, March 28th
meeting by calling: 415-241-6427 Monday between 8:00 a.m.
and 4:00 p.m., or Tuesday, between 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.

BAUAW COUNTER-PROPOSAL FOR ACTION
BY THE BOARD OF EDUCATION:

Let it be district policy that, as long as this war is being
carried out against the will of the Iraqi people and, against
the will of the American people; and as long as the No Child
Left Behind Act is still in effect, the military will be given
a stall in the dirtiest bathroom or basement closet on school
or campus when they insist on coming! And huge warning
signs will be posted at the door and around school
and given to each student stating:

The material and information you receive from the military
is full of lies and false promises designed to get you to sign
up to risk your life in an unlawful, and unjust war. While,
under the current No Child Left Behind Act, the school
can't legally prevent the military from coming on school
grounds without losing funding that will keep the school
open, we can and will warn all students of the deceitful
and unlawful attempts by the military to get students
to sign up.

STUDENTS BEWARE! DON'T BELIEVE A WORD THE MILITARY
SAYS! DON'T RELY ON THEIR CONTRACT WITH YOU! AS SOON
AS YOU JOIN, IT BECOMES NULL AND VOID AND YOU BELONG
TO THEM! YOUR LIFE WILL NO LONGER BE YOUR OWN! TURN
AWAY FROM MILITARY RECRUITMENT AND DON'T JOIN THE
MILITARY! GO TO THE COUNSELING OFFICE FOR INFORMATION
ON COLLEGE AND JOB TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES NOT
CONNECTED TO THE MILITARY! GO TO COLLEGE OR JOB
TRAINING NOT INTO COMBAT!

Note: There is nothing unlawful against protesting the
presence of the military in our schools. Further, the San
Francisco Board of Education will make it its urgent business
to organize against the No Child Left Behind Act on a national
level by contacting school districts around the country
to protest this act of holding our children and their schools
hostage for military recruitment purposes. All parents and
the community will be notified well in advance of when
and where the military will show up next so that they can
choose to keep their children home on that day or to
organize and/or participate in a protest of the presence
of the military since they are clearly not wanted in this district.

www.bauaw.org
415-824-8730

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

Text of Resolution No. 62-14Sp1 ˆ Authorization to Approve Board
Policy Regarding Equal Access for Recruiters

[DRAFT] BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICY (62-14Sp1)

Equal Access for Recruiters

Recruiters of all types (including but not limited to employment,
education, service opportunities, military or military alternatives)
shall be given equal access to San Francisco Unified School District
high schools. The principal at each school shall determine the
frequency with which recruiters may visit, but in order to be in
compliance with the equal access rule, each recruiter shall be
granted the opportunity to visit any single campus at least as
frequently as any other recruiter. For purposes of this policy,
each branch of the military is considered to be a separate
recruiting organization.

This recruitment policy must be posted throughout the year.
At a minimum, these rules shall be posted in the school's
main office, counseling center, career center, and on the
District's website.

All recruiters must comply with the following guidelines:

 Recruiters must obtain the written permission of the principal
or designee to be on campus. Such permission may be granted
for the full year;
 Recruiters must contact the principal or designee prior to
their visit to schedule specific times to be on campus, and
the monthly schedule for such visits must be posted at a
minimum in the school's main office, counseling center,
and career center;
 All recruiters must sign in and sign out in the school's
main office each time they visit the campus;
 Recruiters shall limit all recruiting activities to the specific
area designated by the principal or designee. This designated
area must be within a specific confined space on the campus
(such as a classroom or office); recruiters may not roam the
campus or grounds. Recruiters may not pursue or approach
students; recruiting activities may only be directed at students
who affirmatively approach the recruiter for information.
 The principal or designee may permit recruiters to leave
information in a designated area. Such information must be
dated and clearly identify a contact name and number that
students, staff or others may call if there are questions
about the information;
 If the principal or designee designates such an area for
recruiter information, the area must include a clearly visible
sign that states that SFUSD and the school do not endorse
or sponsor the materials;
 All recruiters must clearly identify the organization that
they are recruiting for: military recruiters must be in uniform,
and all other recruiters must wear identification that similarly
indicates the organization that they are recruiting for;
 Recruiters may not take students out of the designated
recruitment area or off campus;
 No more than two recruiters from each organization
may recruit on campus at one time.

Recruiters of all types are cautioned to remember that the
primary goal of the SFUSD high schools is to educate students.
Recruiting activities that are disruptive or that interfere with the
traditional activities of a given school day are not permitted.

Recruiters who harass students or staff, provide misleading
or untrue information, or who do not comply with applicable
state and federal laws or SFUSD rules or policies may have their
organization's permission to recruit on campus revoked for the
remainder of the semester, or the semester following the infraction
if the infraction occurs after the fifteenth week of the semester.
The principal or designee, in his or her discretion, may provide
students with access to information to correct any misleading
or untrue information provided by such recruiter(s), if available.

The principal shall retain copies of the recruitment calendars and
sign-in sheets and provide such copies to the Assistant
Superintendent for High Schools by June 30th of each year.

SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
San Francisco, California

Superintendent's Proposal

No. 62-14Sp1 AUTHORIZATION TO APPROVE BOARD POLICY
REGARDING EQUAL ACCESS FOR RECRUITERS

REQUESTED ACTION:

That the Board of Education approves a new Board Policy regarding
Equal Access for Recruiters. This policy provides for equal access
to SFUSD high schools for all types of recruiters, including but not
limited to employment, education, service opportunities, military
or military alternatives. The policy also outlines the guidelines and
restrictions related to recruiting activities and access.

...........................................................

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

New play by local writer Tommi Avicolli Mecca

Following on the heels of his critically acclaimed
one-man show last year, local author and activist
Tommi Avicolli Mecca is debuting his new work, "the
aching in god's heart," March 16-18, 8pm and March 19
at 5pm at Theatre St. Boniface, 175 Golden
Gate/Leavenworth.

The play takes a hard look at the meaning of love and
family. Sofia, a dutiful daughter who has given up
everything to take care of la famiglia, is suddenly
forced to face the truth about her life of devotion.
"The play really looks at the conflict that develops
between 'la via vecchia' (the old ways) of the
immigrant generation and those of the first generation
born here in America. It's the Italian/American story
we don't see on TV or in the movies," says author
Avicolli Mecca.

The cast includes Renee Saucedo, Diana Hartman,
Giancarlo Campagna and Avicolli Mecca.

The four performances of "aching" will benefit four
local nonprofits: Housing Rights Committee, Day
Laborers Program, St. Boniface Neighborhood Center and
the Family Link. Admission is $10 but no one will be
turned away for lack of funds. Bring a check for your
favorite nonprofit. To reserve tickets, call (415)
861-5848.

...........................................................

SATURDAY, MARCH 18 AND 25
VENEZUELA AT THE CROSSROADS
Workers on the Move

Luis Primo, Venezuelan Labor Leader to Speak in San Francisco

The U.S. Hands Off Venezuela Campaign invites you to hear
Luis Primo, a central leader of the Venezuelan National Union
of Workers (UNT), the new labor federation in Venezuela
which has replaced its corrupt predecessor which supported
the U.S.-backed attempted coup against President Chavez.
Luis Primo will address the antiwar rally on Saturday, March 18
and will speak at a public meeting on Saturday, March 25.

Currently, Primo is a Regional Coordinator for the UNT
(Caracas-Miranda), he heads the Union/Political Education
for the UNT on the national level, and works with the Ministry
of Labor on the Committee on the Recovered Factories.
Primo will be running for the National Leadership of the
UNT at its upcoming congress this spring.

Hands Off Venezuela has been organized around the
principle that the people of Venezuela should be able
to determine their own destiny, without the interference
of foreign governments, particularly the U.S. government.
We have organized numerous educational events to inform
people in this country about the important events unfolding
in Venezuela so that people here can have an informed position.
Without the truth, people are in no position to act.

We hope that Luis Primo's visit to California will be one
of many exchanges between Venezuelan and American
trade unionists. In addition to speaking in San Francisco, he will
be touring the West Coast where he will speak in a half-dozen
cities. To make this possible, Hands Off Venezuela Campaign
has launched a fund raising drive to cover the many expenses
of the tour. Volunteers are needed to help organize the event,
and donations of any amount are greatly appreciated.
Donations can be sent to: HOV, 4579 18th St., San Francisco,
CA 94114. Letters of support or endorsements of the tour are
also appreciated and can be sent to sfbay@ushov.org.

When and Where:
7 pm, Saturday, March 25, 2006
ILWU Local 34 Hall, 4 Berry St., San Francisco
(Located next door to SBC Park.
Take MUNI N line toward SBC Park.)

Partial List of Endorsers

Dolores Huerta
San Francisco Labor Council (AFL-CIO)
South Bay Labor Council (AFL-CIO)
Contra Costa Central Labor Council (AFL-CIO)
Vanguard Public Foundation
San Francisco Bay View National Black Newspaper
Alan Benjamin, Executive Board, SF Labor Council, Co-coordinator Open
World Conference
Fred Hirsch, Vice President of Plumbers and Fitters Local 393, San Jose
California
Gloria LaRiva, President, Local 39521 Media Workers Sector/CWA*
Louie Rocha, President CWA Local 9423*
Global Exchange
Chris Gilbert and Karen Bennett, MATRIX Program*, UC Berkeley Art
Museum*
Dorinda Moreno, Hitec Aztec Communications, Santa Maria, CA.
Cesar Chavez Lifetime Achievement Legacy Award, 2003
National Network on Cuba
Network of Bay Area Worker Cooperatives
Todd Chretien, Green Party candidate for U.S. Senate, California
Peace and Freedom Party

* for identification purposes only

Admission: $5, $3 seniors, unemployed, and students

For more information, call 415-786-1680 or email sfbay@ushov.org

labor donated

...........................................................

Power in Eden:
Emergence of Gender Hierarchies
in the Ancient World

With Bruce Lerro

4 Sunday evenings from 7 to 9 March 19th, 26th, April 2nd, April 9th
Marxist Library 6501 Telegraph (cross-street Alcatraz)

-How Relevant is Engels' Origin of the Family,
Private Property and the State in the light of over one-hundred
years of anthropology and archeology?

-To what extent was "primitive communism" egalitarian
in terms of gender relations?

-When in history does individualism start? Is it a product
of capitalism or does it go back further?

-Agricultural State Civilizations (The Asiatic Mode
of Production) were the most oppressive to women in history.
Why was there no women's movement in the ancient world?

Bruce Lerro has been teaching and writing about the origins
of class and gender inequalities for the past fifteen years.
He has lectured at New College of California and teaches
regularly at Golden Gate University, Dominican University,
John F. Kennedy University and Diablo Valley College.
He is the author of Power in Eden: Emergence of Gender
Hierarchies in the Ancient World, Trafford Press, 2005.

Format
Initial Talk˜broadly discussing all four questions

Part I˜In Depth Reading and Discussion of each of the
Four Questions

Part II ˆOptional˜In Depth Reading and Discussion of Other
Chapters in the text.

This will be determined by Bruce and the class participants

Pedagogy

The initial talk will be a lecture with brief discussion
at the end of each question

For all four classes in part one there will be assigned
readings during the week and each class will be
a discussion of the readings. We will discuss clarification
as well as substantive questions each week.
There will be no lecture.

Required Reading: Power in Eden: Emergence
of Gender Hierarchies in the Ancient World

My Approach
I consider myself a Marxist-materialist and I believe
that the Marxian tradition must be informed and
enriched by over one hundred years of research.
I consider Marxism a method rather than a scholastic dogma.
What You May Learn
-The process of female subordination was a very gradual
and had super-structural and psychological components
as well as economic
-Engels was right about some things and wrong about others
-A provocative stage theory about how male dominance originated
-There are well-researched conditions under which women
will or will not be likely to rebel

......................................................................

April 7-9, 2006
Quality Inn (Located On US 31)
Kokomo, Indiana 46902
Meeting Introductions 7:ooPM Friday
Saturday & Sunday Begin With Registration At 8:00AM

Working people are under attack as never before. The institutions on
which workers have depended√the Democratic Party and the unions have
utterly failed to defend us. Democratic as well as Republican
politicians support the war in Iraq, the Patriot Act, savage cuts in
social programs, outsourcing jobs, attacking public education,
rewriting bankruptcy laws to benefit credit card companies. Union
officials work with corporations to cut wages, rob retirees of their
pensions, impose wage tiers, cut health care. They replace worker
solidarity with worker-against-worker Company Teams. They support the
war-makers in DC.

Meanwhile most working people, blue-collar and white-collar, employed
and unemployed, remain unorganized and largely defenseless.

The politicians and the unions are part of the problem. We cannot rely
on them and we cannot change them. We have to go around them, to create
institutions that we control to fight for the values, the livelihoods,
the future of working people.

SOLIDARITY NOW is a new organization formed in Peoria, IL in 2005. Our
goals are to rebuild the culture of mutual support that is natural to
working people, to fight for the goals of working people, and to build
a movement for democratic revolution.

If you are an auto worker, a teacher, a nurse, a student, a professor,
work in an office or school or hospital or university, are employed or
unemployed, working or retired, we invite you to join Solidarity Now
and to join us in Kokomo for our National Meeting.

To be assured of a room, please make your reservations now at the
Quality Inn, Kokomo, IN (765-459-8001). Tell them you are with
Solidarity Now. Rooms are $58 per night, single or double, breakfast
included. Please let Tino Scalici (tinoscalici@msn.com) or Dave
Stratman (newdem@aol.com) know if you would like to join Solidarity Now
or if you plan to attend the meeting.

(For more info on Solidarity Now, please see our web site at
solidaritynow.com.)

We are still negotiating the cost of the conference rooms. We will
either take up a collection or charge a small conference fee to cover
the costs. The meeting will be an all day event.

Future of the Union Mailing List
http://futureoftheunion.com/mailman/listinfo/news_futureoftheunion.com

......................................................................


Major Mobilization Set for April 29th

Dear Friends,

We are pleased to announce the kick-off for the organizing
of what promises to be a major national mobilization on
Saturday, April 29th. Today, each of the initiating groups
(see list below) is announcing this mobilization. Our
organizations have agreed to work together on this
project for several reasons:

The April 29th mobilization will highlight our call for an
immediate end to the war on Iraq. We are also raising
several other critical issues that are directly connected
to one another.

It is time for our constituencies to work more closely:
connecting the issues we work on by bringing diverse
communities into a common project.

It is important for our movements to help set the agenda
for the Congressional elections later in the year. Our
unified action in the streets is a vital part of that process.

Please share the April 29th call widely, and please use
the links at the end of the call to endorse this timely
mobilization and to sign up for email updates.

April 29th Initiating Organizations
United for Peace and Justice
Rainbow/PUSH Coalition
National Organization for Women
Friends of the Earth
U.S. Labor Against the War
Climate Crisis Coalition
Peoples' Hurricane Relief Fund
National Youth and Student Peace Coalition

A war based on lies
Spying, corruption and attacks on civil liberties
Katrina survivors abandoned by government

MARCH FOR PEACE,
JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY

End the war in Iraq -
Bring all our troops home now!

SATURDAY, APRIL 29, 2006
NEW YORK CITY

Unite for change - let's turn our country around!

The times are urgent and we must act.

Too much is too wrong in this country. We have a foreign
policy that is foreign to our core values, and domestic
policies wreaking havoc at home. It's time for a change.

No more never-ending oil wars!
Protect our civil liberties & immigrant rights. End illegal
spying, government corruption and the subversion of
our democracy.

Rebuild our communities, starting with the Gulf Coast.
Stop corporate subsidies and tax cuts for the wealthy
while ignoring our basic needs.

Act quickly to address the climate crisis and the
accelerating destruction of our environment.

Our message to the White House and to Congress
is clear: either stand with us or stand aside!

We are coming together to march, to vote, to speak
out and to turn our country around!

Join us in New York City on Saturday, April 29th

Click here to endorse this mobilization:
http://unitedforpeace.org/modinput4.php?modin=119
Click here to sign up for email updates on plans for April 29th:
http://www.unitedforpeace.org/email

April 29th Initiating Organizations
United for Peace and Justice
Rainbow/PUSH Coalition
National Organization for Women
Friends of the Earth
U.S. Labor Against the War
Climate Crisis Coalition
Peoples' Hurricane Relief Fund
National Youth and Student Peace Coalition

......................................................................

ANSWER Coalition: All Out for April 29 in New York City!
End Occupation from Iraq to Palestine, to Haiti, and Everywhere!
Fight for workers rights, civil rights and civil liberties - unite
against racism!

300,000 Came to Washington on Sept. 24

In recent weeks the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition has been in the final
stages for planning a national demonstration in Washington DC on April
29, 2006. This action was to follow the local and regional
demonstrations for March 18-19 and youth and student actions scheduled
on March 20 on the 3rd anniversary of the criminal bombing, invasion
and occupation of Iraq.

On September 24, 2005 more than 300,000 people surrounded the White
House in the largest mobilization against the Iraq war and occupation
since the invasion of Iraq in March 2003. This demonstration was
initiated by the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition in May 2005 and we urged a
united front with other major anti-war coalitions and communities. We
marched demanding immediate and unconditional withdrawal from Iraq. We
also stood in solidarity with the Palestinian and Haitian people and
others who are suffering under and resisting occupation. Coming as it
did following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, we changed the demands of
the September 24 protest to include the slogan "From Iraq to New
Orleans, FundPeople's Needs not the War Machine."

During the past several years, and as demonstrated in a powerful
display on September 24, the anti-war movement has grown significantly
in its breadth and depth as the leadership has included the Arab and
Muslim community -- those who are among the primary targets of the
Bush Administration's current war at home and abroad.

The anti-war sentiment inside the United States is rapidly becoming a
significant obstacle to the Bush Administration's war in Iraq. The
anti-war movement has the potential to be a critical deterrent to the
U.S. government's aspirations for Empire. At this moment the White
House and Pentagon are issuing threats and making plans to move
against other sovereign countries. Iran and Syria are being targeted
as the U.S. seeks to consolidate power in the Middle East.

Simultaneously the Bush administration is working to undermine the
gains of the people of Latin America by working totopple the
democratically elected president of Venezuela and destroy the
revolutionary process for social change going on in that country.
Likewise it is intensifying the economic war and CIA subversions
against Cuba.

We believe that our movement must weld together the broadest, most
diverse coalition of various sectors and communities into an effective
force for change. This requires the inclusion of targeted communities
and political clarity. The war in Iraq is not simply an aberrational
policy of the Bush neo-conservatives. Iraq is emblematic of a larger
war for Empire. It is part of a multi-pronged attack against all those
countries that refuse to follow the economic, political and military
dictates of the Washington establishment and Wall Street.

This is the foundation of the political program upon which the
A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition has organized mass demonstrations in the recent
years. The fact that many hundreds of thousands of people
havedemonstrated in Washington D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, New
York and other cities is a testament to the huge progress that has
been made in building a new movement on this principled basis.
The people of the United States have nothing to gain and everything to
lose from the occupation of Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Haiti and
the threats of new wars and intervention in Syria, Iran, Venezuela,
Cuba, the Philippines, North Korea and elsewhere. It has been made
crystal clear in recent weeks that Washington is aggressively
prosecuting its strategy of total domination of the Middle East. U.S.
leaders are seeking to crush all resistance to their colonial agenda,
whether from states or popular movements in the region. The
A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition andthe anti-war movement is raising the demand,
"U.S. Out of the Middle East."

At its core, the war for Empire is supported by the Republican Party
and Democratic Party alike, which constitute the twin parties of
militarism and war, and this quest for global domination will continue
regardless of the outcome of the 2006 election. In fact, leading
Democrats are attacking Bush for being "soft" on Iran and North Korea.
Real hope for turning the tide rests with building a powerful global
movement of resistance in which the people of the United States stand
with their sisters and brothers struggling against imperialism and the
new colonialism.

On the home front the Bush administration is involved in a
far-reaching assault against working class communities as most
glaringly evidenced by its criminal and racist negligence towards the
people of New Orleans and throughout the hurricane ravaged Gulf
States. While turning their backs on these communities in the moments
ofgreatest need, the U.S. government is now working with the banks and
developers who, like vultures, are exploiting mass suffering and
dislocation to carry out racist gentrification that only benefits the
wealthy. The administration is also working to eviscerate hard-fought
civil rights and civil liberties, engaging in a widespread campaign of
domestic spying and wiretapping against the people of the U.S. and
other assaults against the First and Fourth Amendments.

In early December 2005, the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition filed for permits
for a national march in Washington DC on April 29, 2006. We were
preparing to announce the April 29 action but in recent days we have
heard from A.N.S.W.E.R. organizers in a number of unions that U.S.
Labor Against the War was seeking union endorsements for a call for an
anti-war demonstration on the same day in New York City. Having two
demonstrations on April 29 in both Washington D.C. and New York City
seems to us to be lessadvantageous than having the movement unite
behind one single mobilization. As such, we decided to hold back our
announcement. Subsequently, the New York City demonstration has been
announced by a number of organizations. Underscoring the need to have
the largest possible demonstration on April 29, the A.N.S.W.E.R.
Coalition has decided to fully mobilize, in all of its chapters and
organizing centers, to bring people to the New York City demonstration
on April 29. The banners and slogans of different coalitions may not
be the same, but it is in the interest of everyone to march
shoulder-to-shoulder against the criminal war in Iraq and the Bush
administration's War for Empire, including its racist, sexist and
anti-worker domestic program.

All out for a united, mass mobilization on April 29 in New York City!
Click here to become a transportation center in your city or town for
the April 29 demonstration.

Click here to receive updates on A.N.S.W.E.R.'s mobilization for the
April 29 NYC demonstration.
A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition
Act Now to Stop War & End Racism
http://www.answercoalition.org/
info@internationalanswer.org
National Office in Washington DC: 202-544-3389
New York City: 212-694-8720
Los Angeles: 323-464-1636
San Francisco: 415-821-6545
Click here to unsubscribe from the ANSWER e-mail list.

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

PUSH FOR PEACE
MEMORIAL DAY KICKOFF
MONDAY, MAY 29, 2006
GOLDEN GATE PARK, S.F.
(Exact location to be announced.)

Welcome to the Official Push for Peace Site!
http://www.pushforpeace.us/civic/index.php?q

The Push For Peace movement is geared to combine the efforts of
able-bodied activists to those with special needs or challenges,
so that all people can participate and be counted.

The Push for Peace logo shows a Navy veteran in a wheelchair
with a peace sign on the wheel, with people marching behind
him. It can be seen at:

http://www.pushforpeace.us/civic/index.php?q=node/71

Just in case we don't get to modify the map before the weekend,
I'll just name our proposed stops. We start, of course with Golden
Gate Park, from there we head south to Los Angeles. Turning
east we move to Phoenix, then on to Albuquerque. Now it's
north to Denver, and east to St Louis. North again to Chicago,
and east to Detroit. Continue east to Cleveland, and then NYC
if all goes well Central Park (Imagine), culminating at the gates
of the White House on July 4, 2006

Push For Peace is a collective of veterans, progressive activists,
and everyday citizens working together through education,
motivation, and truth to bring America's troops home from the
war in Iraq and to help bring healing and peace to our nation.
The Push For Peace movement is geared to combine the efforts
of able-bodied activists to those with special needs or challenges,
so that all people can participate and be counted. The Push
For Peace effort will include organized rallies and marches,
as well as appearances and performances by high-profile
speakers and entertainers, to rally the American people and
show them we stand united with our fellow citizen and soldier.
It is our goal to grow the base of participants each day resulting
in a cross-country Push culminating at the gates of the White
House on July 4, 2006. Events will be scheduled across the
country leading up to the big Push in July. So keep checking
the Push calendar for events near you. Mapping it all out...
[Website shows map of stops in US en route to DC on July 4, 2006...bw]

This is a tentative and unfinished P4P route and is only a work in progress.
The Push is set to leave Golden Gate Park on Memorial Day 2006 (currently
working on permits) and then we will Push our way across the country
to arrive in DC across from the White House gathering at Lafayette Park
(currently working on permits) on July 4th, 2006. Golden Gate Park,
San Francisco, California Las Vegas Nevada Phoenix, Arizona Denver,
Colorado Crawford, Texas New Orleans, Louisiana more states pending...
Pushing real Democracy! http://www.pushforpeace.us/civic/index.php?q=

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

FACTSHEET
The Right To Return, a Basic Right Still Denied
http://al-awda.org/facts.html
...........................................................

Protests Planned Against Media War Coverage
By Danny Schechter
Source: MediaChannel.org
http://mediachannel.org/blog/node/3378

...........................................................

TELL BUSH AND CONGRESS: STOP THE WAR
ON IRAN BEFORE IT STARTS!
Please join the online campaign to
STOP THE WAR ON IRAN BEFORE IT STARTS!
YOUR EMERGENCY ACTION IS NEEDED NOW!
Send emails to President Bush, Vice President
Cheney, Secretary of State Rice, U.N. Secretary-
General Annan, Congressional leaders and
the media demanding NO WAR ON IRAN!
http://stopwaroniran.org/

...........................................................

March 2006 National Immigrant
Solidarity Network Monthly Digest
National Immigrant Solidarity Network
URL: http://www.ImmigrantSolidarity.org
e-mail: Info@ImmigrantSolidarity.org
No Immigrant Bashing! Support Immigrant Rights!

...........................................................

WHY WE FIGHT
A film by Eugene Jarecki
[Check out the trailer about this new film.
This looks like a very powerful film.]
http://www.sonyclassics.com/whywefight/

...........................................................

The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies
http://www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/declaration.html
http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/decind.html
http://www.usconstitution.net/declar.html
http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805195.php

Bill of Rights
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html
http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805182.php

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
ARTICLES IN FULL:
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

1) Police Memos Say Arrest Tactics Calmed Protest
By JIM DWYER
The same tactic is cited in another report, dated Feb. 8, 2002,
and signed by Capt. Robert L. Bonifaci, commander of the Queens
North Task Force. Captain Bonifaci wrote, "It should be noted that
a large part of the success in policing the major demonstration on
Saturday, Feb. 2, 2002, was due in part to the proactive arrest
policy that was instituted at the start of the march at 59th Street
and Fifth Avenue, and directed toward demonstrators who were
obviously potential rioters."
March 17, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/17/nyregion/17police.html?
hp&ex=1142658000&en=5b0782ad98a92b1c&ei=5094&partner=homepage

2) Senate Approves Budget, Breaking Spending Limits
By CARL HULSE
In the House, lawmakers easily approved almost $92 billion in
emergency spending, with about $68 billion going for military
operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and $19 billion for hurricane
recovery, slightly less than the White House sought.
March 17, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/17/politics/17spend.html?
hp&ex=1142658000&en=c77e916f9818f6cb&ei=5094&partner=homepage

3) Nuclear Reactors Found to Be Leaking Radioactive Water
By MATTHEW L. WALD
March 17, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/17/national/17nuke.html?pagewanted=all

4) Blacks and Browns: The Need to Make Common Cause
by Black Commentator (BC) Editor Bruce Dixon
Black Commentator Issue 175 - March 16, 2006

5) 8,000 Desert During Iraq War
By Bill Nichols, USA TODAY
March 7, 2006
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-03-07-deserters_x.htm

6) Military Sexual Assault Reports Up 40 Pct.
Staff and agencies
By LOLITA C. BALDOR, 16 minutes ago
17 March, 2006
http://localnewsleader.com/jackson/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=160102

7) French Union Threatens Strike Over Labor Law
By JAMES KANTER
International Herald Tribune
March 19, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/19/international/europe/19cnd-france.html?hp&ex=1142830800&en=b0865a488a785408&ei=5094&partner=homepage

8) 'Key Influencers' Get an Eyeful at Marine Boot Camp
BY WAYNE WOOLLEY
Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, every public high
school in the United States must open its doors to military
recruiters and provide them lists of student names unless
children's parents complete "opt out" paperwork.
School districts are free to limit times recruiters may visit
and where they can set up. Recruiters say access is generally
the most limited in more affluent districts.
c.2006 Newhouse News Service
http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/woolley031606.htm

9) Something Good on TV Tuesday Night:
"Boston Legal"
Tuesday, March 20, 10:00 p.m., Channel 7
Lead character Alan Shore's closing argument in case of woman
who doesn't pay her taxes because she is against the war:
http://www.boston-legal.org/19-stickit/ep19-stickit.shtml#dialogue


---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

1) Police Memos Say Arrest Tactics Calmed Protest
By JIM DWYER
The same tactic is cited in another report, dated Feb. 8, 2002,
and signed by Capt. Robert L. Bonifaci, commander of the Queens
North Task Force. Captain Bonifaci wrote, "It should be noted that
a large part of the success in policing the major demonstration on
Saturday, Feb. 2, 2002, was due in part to the proactive arrest
policy that was instituted at the start of the march at 59th Street
and Fifth Avenue, and directed toward demonstrators who were
obviously potential rioters."
March 17, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/17/nyregion/17police.html?
hp&ex=1142658000&en=5b0782ad98a92b1c&ei=5094&partner=homepage

In five internal reports made public yesterday as part of a lawsuit,
New York City police commanders candidly discuss how they had
successfully used "proactive arrests," covert surveillance and
psychological tactics at political demonstrations in 2002, and
recommend that those approaches be employed at future gatherings.

Among the most effective strategies, one police captain wrote, was
the seizure of demonstrators on Fifth Avenue who were described
as "obviously potential rioters."

The reports provide a rare glimpse of internal police evaluations
and strategies on security and free speech issues that have
provoked sharp debate between city officials and political
demonstrators since the Sept. 11 attack.

The reports also made clear what the police have yet to discuss
publicly: that the department uses undercover officers to infiltrate
political gatherings and monitor behavior.

Indeed, one of the documents ˜ a draft report from the
department's Disorder Control Unit ˜ proposed in blunt
terms the resumption of a covert tactic that had been disavowed
by the city and the federal government 30 years earlier. Under
the heading of recommendations, the draft suggested, "Utilize
undercover officers to distribute misinformation within the crowds."

Asked about the proposal, Paul J. Browne, the chief spokesman
for the Police Department, said yesterday: "The N.Y.P.D. does
not use police officers in any capacity to distribute misinformation."

Mr. Browne also said that the "proactive" arrests referred to in
the report ˜ numbering about 30 ˜ involved protesters with
pipes and masks who he said presented an obvious threat.

In another report, a police inspector praised the "staging
of massive amounts" of armored vehicles, prisoner wagons
and jail buses in the view of the demonstrators, writing that
the sight "would cause them to be alarmed."

Besides the draft report, the documents released yesterday
included four final reports written by commanders to assess
police performance during the World Economic Forum, which
met in New York from Jan. 31 to Feb. 4, 2002.

The economic forum, a private organization that normally
meets in Davos, Switzerland, and draws a grab bag of leaders
from government, business, and academia ˜ as well as
protesters from a miscellany of causes and movements ˜
was moved to the city as a gesture of solidarity after the
terror attack.

Security was extremely tight around Midtown Manhattan,
where the delegates were meeting at the Waldorf-Astoria,
and demonstrators were kept blocks from the hotel. Officials
spoke of violence during antiglobalism protests at other high
profile gatherings in Seattle and Genoa, Italy. In the end, though,
as one of the police reports noted, "the amount of confrontation
and number of arrests were lower than expected."

Parts of that document and others were made public, over
the objections of the city, by a federal magistrate, Gabriel W.
Gorenstein, who said the excerpts went to the heart of a lawsuit
brought by 16 people who were arrested at an animal rights
demonstration during the economic forum. The police said
they were blocking the sidewalk and had refused to obey an
order to disperse; the demonstrators said no one told them
to move.

Many of the issues in the animal rights case, which challenge
broad police tactics and arrest strategies, resonate in well over
a hundred other lawsuits brought against the city by demonstrators
who were arrested at war protests, bicycle rallies and during
the Republican National Convention.

Daniel M. Perez, the lawyer representing the people arrested
at the animal rights demonstration, argued that the police tactics
"punish, control and curtail the lawful exercise of First Amendment
activities." The Police Department and the city have said that
preserving public order is essential to protecting the civil rights
of demonstrators and bystanders.

Mr. Perez maintains that the police documents, taken together,
show a policy of pre-emptive arrests. The draft report discussed
how early arrests could shape future events. "The arrests made
at West 59th Street and Fifth Avenue set a 'tone' with the
demonstrators and their possible plans at other demonstrations,"
the report stated.

The disorder control unit's commander, Thomas Graham,
is listed as the author of the report, but the document is not
signed and the word "draft" is handwritten across the top.

The same tactic is cited in another report, dated Feb. 8, 2002,
and signed by Capt. Robert L. Bonifaci, commander of the Queens
North Task Force. Captain Bonifaci wrote, "It should be noted that
a large part of the success in policing the major demonstration on
Saturday, Feb. 2, 2002, was due in part to the proactive arrest
policy that was instituted at the start of the march at 59th Street
and Fifth Avenue, and directed toward demonstrators who were
obviously potential rioters."

Elaborating on the report, Mr. Browne, the police spokesman,
said that plainclothes officers saw a group of demonstrators put
on masks as they drew near the Plaza Hotel, then take out metal
pipes and try to rush police lines.

"In addition to mainly peaceful protesters, the W.E.F. attracted
hard-core, violent elements that were surveilled by the N.Y.P.D.,"
Mr. Browne said, citing the incident at the Plaza. "Yes, we used
surveillance techniques to track and hopefully disrupt violent
elements. That's proactive."

About 30 people were arrested there, and virtually all their
cases are now sealed, indicating that the charges were either
dismissed by prosecutors or dropped after six months without
further incident.

The Police Department report from Michael E. Shortell, a deputy
inspector who headed a narcotics command in northern Manhattan,
included a list of "positive aspects" of the Police Department's
approach. Among them: "The staging of massive amounts of
equipment in the key areas (e.g. armored vehicles, command
posts, prisoner wagons, Department of Correction buses, city buses)."

Capt. Timothy Hardiman also took note of what he saw as the
helpful presence of city corrections buses, which are used to
transport prisoners and have reinforced windows, protected
by metal grids.

"It was useful to have buses with corrections officers on hand,"
Captain Hardiman wrote. "They also had a powerful psychological
effect."

Mr. Browne said the main reason buses were on hand was to
quickly move prisoners from an arrest scene. "If a corrections
bus had a deterrent effect on someone contemplating a violent
act, then that's value added," he said.

However, the draft report stated that the emphasis on quickly
moving prisoners had not been helpful. "This hastened the process
adding to the confusion and increasing the potential for mistakes
to be made," the report stated.

Mr. Perez said the show of force sent a deliberate warning to
people expressing their opinions. "The message is, if you turn out,
be prepared to be arrested, be prepared to be sent away for a long
time," he said. "It sounds like something from a battle zone."

Demonstrators arrested during the economic forum were held
by the police for up to 40 hours without seeing a judge ˜ twice
as long as people accused of murder, rape and robbery arrested
on those same days, Mr. Perez said.

Mr. Browne of the Police Department said that the arrests were
processed as quickly as possible, and that protesters were not
singled out for longer detention.

The reports, which were heavily edited at the request of the city,
also discuss the use of undercover officers at the protests. Captain
Hardiman wrote that "the use of undercovers from narcotics provided
useful information." And on Inspector Shortell's list of positive
aspects of the strategy, he listed "the use of undercover personnel
in the ranks of the protesters."

The power of the police to secretly monitor political gatherings
was tightly controlled by a federal court between 1985 and early
2003, the result of a lawsuit by political activists from the 1960's
who charged that police undercover officers had disrupted their
ability to express their opinions. Many of the restrictions from
that case, known as Handschu, were eased at the request of the
city in 2003.

The proposal to use undercover officers to spread misinformation ˜
which the Police Department says was not adopted ˜ recalled the
origins of the Handschu lawsuit, which was based in part on the
actions of undercover agents and officers who instigated trouble
and spread lies among a group of military veterans who opposed
the Vietnam War.

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

2) Senate Approves Budget, Breaking Spending Limits
By CARL HULSE
In the House, lawmakers easily approved almost $92 billion in
emergency spending, with about $68 billion going for military
operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and $19 billion for hurricane
recovery, slightly less than the White House sought.
March 17, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/17/politics/17spend.html?
hp&ex=1142658000&en=c77e916f9818f6cb&ei=5094&partner=homepage

WASHINGTON, March 16 ˜ The Senate narrowly approved a $2.8
trillion election-year budget Thursday that broke spending limits
only hours after it increased federal borrowing power to avert
a government default.

The budget decision at the end of a marathon day of voting
followed a separate 52-to-48 Senate vote to increase the federal
debt limit by $781 billion, bringing the debt ceiling to nearly
$9 trillion. The move left Democrats attacking President Bush
and Congressional Republicans for piling up record debt
in their years in power.

Despite calls by Republican deficit hawks to hold the line,
Senate Republicans joined with Democrats to approve more
than $16 billion in added spending for social, military, job
safety and home-heating programs, exceeding a ceiling
established by President Bush.

In separate action, the House advanced $92 billion in war
spending and hurricane recovery money.

Even with the added money, the Senate approved the $2.8
trillion budget by only 51 to 49 with five Republicans defecting.
Senator Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana was the sole Democrat
to back the budget after winning agreement for a new
$10 billion effort for levee rebuilding and coastal protection
to be paid for out of oil royalties and other sources. Her vote
saved Vice President Dick Cheney from having to break a tie.

The White House and Senate Republican leaders sought to
put the best face on the budget outcome, with Joshua B. Bolten,
director of the Office of Management and Budget, crediting
Republicans for "navigating difficult waters" in winning approval.
Mr. Bolten said the administration would work to eliminate
the added spending and restore the benefit cuts sought
by the White House.

The successful push for additional spending alarmed and
frustrated conservative Republicans who have been trying
to steer the party back to a course of more fiscal restraint.

"It is very disturbing, and it gives me a whole lot of heartburn,"
said Senator Jim DeMint, Republican of South Carolina, who
attributed the additional spending to political anxiety. "They
want to go and say they are helping people, but we are not
helping people when we are selling out their future."

In the House, lawmakers easily approved almost $92 billion
in emergency spending, with about $68 billion going for
military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and $19 billion
for hurricane recovery, slightly less than the White House sought.

The House and the Senate then left for a weeklong break.

The Senate budget bill would clear the way to opening the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, but the outlook
for that provision is uncertain given strong resistance by
Republican moderates in the House and a long legislative
route before final approval.

The budget fight and the focus on the rising national debt
proved uncomfortable for some Republicans, who instead
of tightening the federal belt found themselves caught in a
Senate rush to add spending after raising the federal debt
ceiling for the fourth time in five years.

"This budget could be the final nail in our coffin, if we don't
watch it," said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South
Carolina, who said the Republican spending pattern was
demoralizing party voters. "I don't think we properly
understand the keys to our electoral success."

But Senator Arlen Specter, the Pennsylvania Republican who
led the push for $7 billion in extra money for health and
education programs, said those areas had been starved
for money in recent years and could not afford to be
overlooked again.

"Health and education are the two major capital assets
of this country," said Mr. Specter, whose proposal passed
easily, 73 to 27.

The provision, like many of the other spending increases,
was ostensibly paid for, but Mr. Specter readily acknowledged
that the plan to pay the new money out of the succeeding
year's allocation was a gimmick.

In another spending increase, the Senate unanimously approved
$184 million for mine safety. The provision by Senators
Robert C. Byrd and John D. Rockefeller IV, both West Virginia
Democrats, would be used to hire mine safety inspectors and
put in place better mine rescue technologies over five years.
It came after a string of mining accidents that left 24 miners
dead this year.

The increases in spending took the budget further away from
President Bush's original plan. Senate budget writers had
stripped some Medicare cuts sought by the president and
added other spending before even bringing it to the floor.

Senator Tom Harkin, the Iowa Democrat who joined with
Mr. Specter in seeking the increase for health and education,
said the vote showed that his Republican colleagues were
"recognizing the American people want something different
than the president's budget."

The changes also mean that reaching a final budget deal
with the House will be difficult, given conservative resistance
there to new spending. In a subtle swipe at the Senate, House
Republicans circulated a memorandum on Thursday showing
how they had been willing to resist efforts to add money for
social and domestic security programs to the emergency
spending bill.

The administration told Congress that the increase in the
statutory debt limit to nearly $9 trillion was needed to avoid
a default and keep the government operating.

The increase in the debt limit brought the total increase during
the Bush administration to $3 trillion. Democrats said the rising
debt was the consequence of what they described as a reckless
Republican fiscal policy centered on tax cuts for the affluent.

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, said
Thursday that given Mr. Bush's record, "I really do believe
this man will go down as the worst president this country
has ever had."

Few Republicans took the floor to defend the debt limit request,
and three ˜ Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, Conrad Burns of Montana
and John Ensign of Nevada ˜ joined all Democrats in opposing
the increase.

But Senator Charles E. Grassley, the Iowa Republican who is
chairman of the Finance Committee, attributed most of the
growth in the debt to increased domestic security and the
costs of natural disasters.

Senator Kent Conrad of North Dakota, the senior Democrat
on the Budget Committee, said it was fitting the Senate would
agree to raise the debt limit on the same day it adopted
a budget that he said would add substantially to the nation's
accumulating red ink over the next five years.

"This thing is larded with debt," Mr. Conrad said.

Ian Urbina contributed reporting for this article.

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

3) Nuclear Reactors Found to Be Leaking Radioactive Water
By MATTHEW L. WALD
March 17, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/17/national/17nuke.html?pagewanted=all

WASHINGTON, March 16 ˜ With power cleaner than coal and
cheaper than natural gas, the nuclear industry, 20 years past
its last meltdown, thinks it is ready for its second act: its first
new reactor orders since the 1970's.

But there is a catch. The public's acceptance of new reactors
depends in part on the performance of the old ones, and lately
several of those have been discovered to be leaking radioactive
water into the ground.

Near Braceville, Ill., the Braidwood Generating Station, owned
by the Exelon Corporation, has leaked tritium into underground
water that has shown up in the well of a family nearby. The
company, which has bought out one property owner and is
negotiating with others, has offered to help pay for a municipal
water system for houses near the plant that have private wells.

In a survey of all 10 of its nuclear plants, Exelon found
tritium in the ground at two others. On Tuesday, it said
it had had another spill at Braidwood, about 60 miles
southwest of Chicago, and on Thursday, the attorney
general of Illinois announced she was filing a lawsuit
against the company over that leak and five earlier ones,
dating to 1996. The suit demands among other things
that the utility provide substitute water supplies to residents.

In New York, at the Indian Point 2 reactor in Buchanan, workers
digging a foundation adjacent to the plant's spent fuel pool
found wet dirt, an indication that the pool was leaking. New
monitoring wells are tracing the tritium's progress toward
the Hudson River.

Indian Point officials say the quantities are tiny, compared
with the amount of tritium that Indian Point is legally allowed
to release into the river. Officials said they planned to find
out how much was leaking and declare the leak a "monitored
release pathway."

Nils J. Diaz, the chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
said he would withhold judgment on the proposal until after
it reached his agency, but he added, "They're going to have to fix it."

This month, workers at the Palo Verde plant in New Mexico
found tritium in an underground pipe vault.

The Union of Concerned Scientists, which is critical of nuclear
power safety arrangements, said recently that in the past 10 years,
tritium had leaked from at least seven reactors. It called for
a systematic program to ensure there were no more leaks.

Tami Branum, who lives close to the Braidwood reactor and
owns property in the nearby village of Godley, said in a telephone
interview, "It's just absolutely horrible, what we're trying to deal
with here." Ms. Branum and her children, 17-year-old twin girls
and a 7-year-old boy, drink only bottled water, she said, but
use municipal water for everything else. "We're bathing in it,
there's no way around it," she said.

Ms. Branum said that her property in Godley was worth about
$50,000 and that she wanted to sell it, but that no property
was changing hands now because of the spill.

A spokesman for Exelon, Craig Nesbit, said that neither Godley's
water nor Braidwood's water system was threatened, but that
the company had lost credibility when it did not publicly
disclose a huge fuel oil spill and spills of tritium from 1996
to 2003. No well outside company property shows levels that
exceed drinking water standards, he said.

Mr. Diaz of the regulatory agency, speaking to a gathering
of about 1,800 industry executives and government regulators
last week, said utilities were planning to apply for 11 reactor
projects, with a total of 17 reactors. The Palo Verde reactor
was the last one that was ordered, in October 1973, and
actually built.

As the agency prepares to review license applications for the
first time in decades, it is focusing on "materials degradation,"
a catch-all term for cracks, rust and other ills to which nuclear
plants are susceptible. The old metal has to hold together,
or be patched or replaced as required, for the industry to have
a chance at building new plants, experts say.

Tritium, a form of hydrogen with two additional neutrons in its
nucleus, is especially vexing. The atom is unstable and returns
to stability by emitting a radioactive particle. Because the
hydrogen is incorporated into a water molecule, it is almost
impossible to filter out. The biological effect of the radiation
is limited because, just like ordinary water, water that
incorporates tritium does not stay in the body long.

But it is detectable in tiny quantities, and always makes its
source look bad. The Energy Department closed a research
reactor in New York at its Brookhaven National Laboratory
on Long Island, largely because of a tritium leak.

And it can catch up to a plant after death; demolition crews
at the Connecticut Yankee reactor in Haddam Neck, Conn.,
are disposing of extra dirt that has been contaminated with
tritium and other materials, as they tear the plant down.

After years of flat employment levels, the industry is preparing
to hire hundreds of new engineers. Luis A. Reyes, the executive
director for operations at the regulatory commission, told the
industry gathering last week, "We'll take your résumé in hard
copy, online, whatever you can do," eliciting laughter from
an audience heavy with executives of reactor operators and
companies that want to build new ones.

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

4) Blacks and Browns: The Need to Make Common Cause
by Black Commentator (BC) Editor Bruce Dixon
Black Commentator Issue 175 - March 16, 2006

In Chicago last Friday, March 10, no less than 300,000 people hit
the streets, bringing the city center to a standstill with the largest
demonstration in its history. They marched in protest of legislation
which has already passed the House of Representatives making the
"unlawful presence" of immigrants in the U.S. a federal felony.
If enacted the new laws also make an instant felon of anyone who
offers medical care or rents a room to, shelters or even gives
directions to an "unlawfully present" human in the U.S. If enacted,
it would provide up to five years in prison for each such offense.

While Chicago's sizeable African and Caribbean communities were
much in evidence, the main flavor of the day was Mexican. Hispanic
media played a major role in getting the crowds out. In the closest
thing to a general strike in the city's living memory, Latino factory
workers, students, janitors, hotel staff, teachers and the
self-employed called in sick, asked for or gave themselves
permission to be absent. Many employers looked the other
way, and workplaces along the march route emptied into
the street.

Chicago's Dr. Prexy Nesbitt is a veteran human rights activist
and one of the architects of the global anti-apartheid campaigns
of the 70s and 80s. He summed up the feeling of the city's
progressive black leadership thusly:

"It's another nail in the coffin of Bush's policies, which aim to
subjugate all people of color, and a major statement from hundreds
of thousands of Latinos that they reject divide and rule politics.
It reflects the growing consciousness of Latinos that their destiny
is inextricably intertwined with that of us, and especially with
black America."

"African Americans tend to be sympathetic to the plight of
nonwhite immigrants," says James Thindwa of Chicago Jobs
With Justice, an African immigrant himself.

"I've addressed more than one black audience where a woman
or someone gets up and launches into a diatribe about 'those
Mexicans taking all the jobs' but by the end of the evening
that person is often preaching tolerance and solidarity to the
crowd herself. It's a mark of the moral character of black
America that African Americans are very reachable and
teachable on that issue, and very accepting of the right
message, when that message reaches them."

The message however, has not reached some black Georgia
state legislators. Atlanta's Kasim Reed, DLC Democrat, has
authored a particularly loathsome anti-immigration bill
which he hopes will mirror and exceed the racist immigrant-
baiting of his Republican colleagues. Reed proposes to lock
up anyone who tries to get a job with a piece of false ID for
five years. Unsurprisingly, this morally bankrupt attempt to
outflank Republicans on the right has been embraced by
leading white Georgia Democrats.

"The magnet that gets people to Georgia is not social services,''
according to Georgia Senate Democratic leader Robert Brown.
"They're enticed here for work. If you really want to deal with
the issue, you have to do it at the point of the spear.''

When an African American legislator volunteers himself as
spear-chucker for white racism against brown people, something
is deeply wrong. It's something that goes beyond a single morally
compromised black politician. Georgia's Democratic party, as BC
pointed out back in 2004, has been on life support for some time now.

Only a shell of its former self, the party has been hollowed out
by the defection of most white voters and office-holders to the
White Man's Party, the GOP ˆ a process that began in the 1960s
and continues to this day. Several white Georgia Democratic state
legislators defected just last year, and the current Republican leader
of the Georgia State Senate is a former Democrat.

Georgia Democrats did the rest of the damage to themselves,
by embracing the Bill Clinton/Democratic Leadership Council (DLC)
brand of dollar-politics. This fatal, corporate-financed strategy
encouraged white and Black Democrats to adopt watered down
Republican positions in an ever-rightward search for white "swing"
voters."

Georgia's governor is a former elected white Democrat, and each
election cycle is still marked by its cohort of whites who get elected
as Democrats and switch parties before being sworn in. With few
Republicans in his Atlanta district, Reed seems to want Republican
votes and Republican money without the formality of political
rebirth. The former campaign manager of Atlanta's current mayor,
he is thought to be the business community's favorite to succeed
incumbent Mayor Shirley Franklin. With the dispersal and emptying
out of Atlanta's chocolate inner city long underway thanks to the
policies of thirty years of black mayors, popular wisdom is that
electing another black mayor in Atlanta may be impossible. But
by nakedly pandering to white racism against brown people, Reed
may hope to better his chances in a future mayoral race when
Atlanta's black voters are no longer a majority.

Beyond the corruption and enfeeblement of Georgia's DLC-led
Democratic party lies another and large factor enabling Reed's
and other treacheries. That factor is the continued shrinkage,
and in Atlanta, the near absence of local news coverage in the
mainstream media. Democracy Now's Amy Goodman, nailed
it in her March 14 broadcast:

"...a new report from the Project for Excellence in Journalism warns
that there has been a seismic transformation in the media
landscape as media companies slash the amounts of resources
put into original reporting. The study said, `The new paradox
of journalism is more outlets covering fewer stories.' The report
notes that in Philadelphia the number of newspaper reporters
has fallen from 500 to 220 in the last quarter century. Five AM
radio stations used to cover news in Philadelphia. Now there are
two. Nationwide it's estimated that there are 3,500 fewer professional
newsroom jobs since 2000, a drop of 7%. Just last week,
the Washington Post said that it would cut 80 newsroom jobs."

A local news whiteout of news coverage of what should have
been a 2005 mayoral campaign garnered Atlanta mayor Shirley
Franklin the Saddam-like total of 93% of an alarmingly low
turnout, and assured the installment of compliant meat
puppets on the city's school board and city council.
Atlanta is by no means unique.

Although broadcasters are granted licenses to serve the
public, and journalism has its own constitutional amendment
so it can fearlessly tell the truth, corporate media, including
black-owned media starves communities across the land of
the information we need about how our own affairs are
handled. Hence, aside from Latino media, news of the
historic Chicago march was scarcely covered outside that
city. And clowns like Kasim Reed can count on continued
non-coverage freeing them to move against the prevailing
moral current of their own constituencies and of black
America itself.

Harry Belafonte likes to tell the story of how Dr. Martin
Luther King confided in him in moments of doubt, as we
all do with our friends. King sometimes pondered the question
of whether he might be assisting the integration of African
Americans into the moral and political equivalent of a burning
building. Dr. King's answer, Harry's answer, and ours was and
ought to be that black America must be the moral conscience
of all America, demonstrating by our example how the fires
of racism, sexism, economic injustice and inequality can be
extinguished.

BC caught up with another companion of Dr. King this
week. SCLC's Rev. Dr. Joseph Lowery, wisely opined to
BC that Kasim Reed's cynical pandering

"...sounds like a rather insensitive and unkind way to
approach the immigration problem. The Bible calls us
to be careful how we treat strangers in our land, that it's
a measure of how we ourselves might be treated some day.
To solve the immigration problem we have to deal with it at
its root. We have to improve the quality of life for people in
Mexico and other places. It doesn't help when corporations
close down operations here, move jobs to Mexico and still
pay slave wages. People want to come here and make a better
living, to send money back and keep their families alive.
And once they're here, we're all, in a sense, immigrants."

Dr. Lowery swims confidently in the moral mainstream of black
America, just as Dr. King did a half century ago. SCLC's motto,
chosen at its 1957 founding was "to save the soul of America."
Ever the optimist, Dr. Lowery added that he'd like to talk to Kasim
Reed sometime real soon about his immigration bill.

Contact Bruce Dixon at bruce.dixon@blackcommentator.com.

© copyright 2002 -2006 www.BlackCommentaor All Rights Reserved

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

5) 8,000 Desert During Iraq War
By Bill Nichols, USA TODAY
March 7, 2006
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-03-07-deserters_x.htm

WASHINGTON ˜ At least 8,000 members of the all-volunteer U.S.
military have deserted since the Iraq war began, Pentagon records
show, although the overall desertion rate has plunged since the
Sept. 11 attacks in 2001.

Since fall 2003, 4,387 Army soldiers, 3,454 Navy sailors and 82 Air
Force personnel have deserted. The Marine Corps does not track
the number of desertions each year but listed 1,455 Marines in
desertion status last September, the end of fiscal 2005, says
Capt. Jay Delarosa, a Marine Corps spokesman.

Desertion records are kept by fiscal year, so there are no figures
from the beginning of the war in March 2003 until that fall.

Some lawyers who represent deserters say the war in Iraq
is driving more soldiers to question their service and that
the Pentagon is cracking down on deserters.

"The last thing they want is for people to think ... that this
is like Vietnam," says Tod Ensign, head of Citizen Soldier,
an anti-war group that offers legal aid to deserters.

Desertion numbers have dropped since 9/11. The Army, Navy and
Air Force reported 7,978 desertions in 2001, compared with 3,456
in 2005. The Marine Corps showed 1,603 Marines in desertion
status in 2001. That had declined by 148 in 2005.

The desertion rate was much higher during the Vietnam era. The Army
saw a high of 33,094 deserters in 1971 ˜ 3.4% of the Army force.
But there was a draft and the active-duty force was 2.7 million.

Desertions in 2005 represent 0.24% of the 1.4 million U.S. forces.

Opposition to the war prompts a small fraction of desertions, says
Army spokeswoman Maj. Elizabeth Robbins. "People always desert,
and most do it because they don't adapt well to the military," she
says. The vast majority of desertions happen inside the USA,
Robbins says. There is only one known case of desertion in Iraq.

Most deserters return within months, without coercion. Commander
Randy Lescault, spokesman for the Naval Personnel Command,
says that between 2001 and 2005, 58% of Navy deserters walked
back in. Of the rest, the most are apprehended during traffic stops.
Penalties range from other-than-honorable discharges to death
for desertion during wartime. Few are court-martialed.

Related story: Decades later, Marines hunt Vietnam-era deserters
By Bill Nichols, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON ˜ In the summer of 1965, Marine Cpl. Jerry
Texiero quietly disappeared from his California base, plagued
by personal demons and a mounting opposition to the Vietnam War.
Forty years later, in the summer of 2005, Texiero ˜ now known
as Gerome Conti ˜ was taken into custody by police in Tarpon
Springs, Fla., after the Marine Corps tracked him down.
March 7, 2006
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-03-07-deserter-side_x.htm

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

6) Military Sexual Assault Reports Up 40 Pct.
Staff and agencies
By LOLITA C. BALDOR, 16 minutes ago
17 March, 2006
http://localnewsleader.com/jackson/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=160102

WASHINGTON - Reports of sexual assaults in the military increased
by nearly 40 percent last year, the Pentagon announced Thursday,
saying the increase was at least partly due to a new program that
encourages victims to come forward.

The restricted, confidential reporting program also allows the
victims to consider pursuing an investigation later, and that was
done in 108 of the 435 cases during 2005. Until that new policy
went into effect last June, an investigation was automatically
triggered by a sexual assault report.

Kaplan said it is impossible to tell whether the increase in reports
during 2005 signals any actual increase in sexual assaults. But
he said he believes it shows that the military`s extensive program
in recent years to better train troops and to encourage reporting
has been successful.

Of the cases that were fully investigated in 2005, nearly 1,400 ˜
or 68 percent ˜ were completed by the end of the year. No action
was taken against more than 800 alleged offenders because the
incident was unfounded, there was a lack of evidence or the
person was not identified.

The military has come under fire for repeated problems with
sexual abuse at the service academies, in units stationed abroad
in Iraq , Kuwait, Afghanistan or Bahrain, and at military installations.
Detainee abuse allegations have also included sexual assaults.

Pentagon report:

http://www.sapr.mil/contents/references/2005%20RTC%20Sexual%
20Assaults.pdf

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

7) French Union Threatens Strike Over Labor Law
By JAMES KANTER
International Herald Tribune
March 19, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/19/international/europe/19cnd-france.html?hp&ex=1142830800&en=b0865a488a785408&ei=5094&partner=homepage

PARIS, March 19 — Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin of France
faced an ultimatum from union leaders today to withdraw the
employment law that set off huge nationwide demonstrations
and sporadic violence over the weekend or face a general strike.

After the protests ended in outbreaks of violence late Saturday,
union leaders gave Mr. Villepin a deadline of Monday evening
to withdraw the First Employment Contract, which was intended
to make it easier for businesses to hire and fire young people.

"If nothing moves, we will propose preparing a day of general
work stoppages in the coming days," said Bernard Thibault,
head of the powerful CGT labor union.

A front-page editorial in the French newspaper Le Journal du
Dimanche today predicted that Mr. Villepin would probably hold
firm. But further conflict could damage the prospects for Mr.
Villepin, who has been in office for 10 months, of running
for president next year.

The employment measure, set to go into effect in April, would
allow employers to lay off new workers younger than 26 without
cause for two years.

Protesters say the law erodes vital employment rights and
could be turned into a charter to exploit young workers.

The CGT union estimated that 1.5 million people protested
nationwide on Saturday. The Interior Ministry put the total
at 500,000, with 80,000 in Paris.

After a sunny afternoon of peaceful marching, violence
flared Saturday evening at Place de la Nation in eastern Paris,
prompting riot police officers to fire tear gas canisters to disperse
demonstrators.

Security forces arrested 167 people at the protests on Saturday
and were still holding 70 this morning, said Catherine Casteran,
a spokeswoman for the National Police. She said that 34 members
of the security forces and 18 demonstrators had been hurt in the
violence. None of the injuries was serious, although one demonstrator
was hospitalized with heart problems, she said.

There was little sign that the tension over the contract will ease
this week. On Monday evening, union leaders will meet to discuss
the timing of a possible general strike, said Maurice Marion,
a spokesman for the CGT union.

Student groups could resume their street protests as soon as
Thursday, the newspaper Le Monde reported.

So far the government has refused to cancel the measure, saying
only that modifications were possible. But commentators say that
Mr. Villepin now looks trapped after the ultimatum from unions,
a call by university presidents to suspend the measure and a recent
poll indicating that 68 percent of French citizens favor overturning the law.

"Watering-down the contract could be a quick escape route for
Villepin," said Emmanuel Rivière, the director of political research
at TNS-Sofres, a polling firm. "But that would be political liability
for him, too, because then the contract probably wouldn't do
as much to lower unemployment."

Mr. Villepin pushed through the law to ease chronic high
unemployment, particularly among the young. One in four
young people in France is out of work. The figure is as high
as 50 percent in suburbs with high percentages of immigrants
or their children, and unemployment helped to fuel an outburst
of rioting last year.

The government was also encouraged to make economic changes
by foreign and French investors, who say the economy cannot reach
robust levels of growth until businesses have the confidence
to hire workers when times are good because they have the
flexibility to shed others during an economic downturn.

But Mr. Villepin's plan has come unstuck as union members
fight to retain their job security and students accuse the
government of age discrimination and of leaving them
vulnerable to employers.

Mathilde Peaud, 20, who is studying to become an English
teacher, said employers could use the new terms to discourage
new employees from joining unions and get rid of female
workers who become pregnant.

"We fear that we could even get fired for refusing sexual
propositions," Ms. Peaud said.

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------

8) 'Key Influencers' Get an Eyeful at Marine Boot Camp
BY WAYNE WOOLLEY
Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, every public high
school in the United States must open its doors to military
recruiters and provide them lists of student names unless
children's parents complete "opt out" paperwork.
School districts are free to limit times recruiters may visit
and where they can set up. Recruiters say access is generally
the most limited in more affluent districts.
c.2006 Newhouse News Service
http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/woolley031606.html

PARRIS ISLAND, S.C. -- With spittle flying from his lips, Staff Sgt. Craig
Finger herded 38 wide-eyed new recruits off a bus and onto the
yellow footprints where generations of young men and women have
begun their transformation from civilian to Marine.

"Congratulations on your decision to become a United States Marine.
It is a decision you will never regret," Finger shouted in a raspy baritone.
"For the next 13 weeks, the words `I,' `me' and `mine' will no longer
be part of your vocabulary."

The recruits -- a few with knees visibly trembling -- shouted back
in unison, "Sir, yes, sir."

As this scene unfolded just before midnight one recent night,
several teachers stood in the shadows and watched.

"This is a window into a world few people ever see," said Matt
Wilkinson, a 46-year-old driver's education teacher at Princeton
High School in New Jersey. "I'm amazed."

That was the reaction the Marine Corps wanted.

Each year, the Marines pay for nearly 2,000 educators to observe
four days of basic training, or boot camp, to reach people the
corps considers "key influencers" of young people.

Educators from Western states go to Marine Recruit Depot San Diego;
those from the East come here, to Marine Recruit Depot Parris
Island, a swampy, bug-ridden place north of Savannah, Ga.

The educators workshop recently drew about 60 administrators,
guidance counselors and teachers from New York and New Jersey
-- all flown down on commercial planes. The Marines put the
group up at the Country Inn in Beaufort and treated them to
dinners at places like the officers' club at Marine Air Station.
On the last night, the Marines took the educators out for seafood
and steaks. An impromptu bar tour followed.

Last year, the program helped the Marines meet their goal of
32,000 new recruits despite suffering heavy losses in Iraq,
having the longest and hardest basic training -- and without
offering extra cash to enlist as the Army often does.

Col. John Valentin, the second-in-command of Parris Island,
told the educators his aim was "to pull back the curtain and
show how the business of making Marines is done."

"Our mission is not to take 19-year-old kids and get them
to march across a parade field. ... Our mission is to eventually
turn back to society people who are better citizens."

All four branches of the military try to reach people kids look
up to. Each has an educators program. But the Marines' is the
oldest and -- according to some educators who have attended
others -- the most comprehensive.

William Gibney, an assistant principal at Montclair (N.J.) High
School, said he attended the Air Force program several years
ago. He called it informative but less involved.

The Marines let the educators fire M16 rifles and navigate the
recruits' obstacle course. They showed them how Marines are
trained to kill. Most educators donned football helmets and
battled martial arts instructors with pugil sticks, a padded
device that looks like a giant Q-tip and is designed to teach
recruits how to fight with a rifle and bayonet. (The instructors
usually won.)

The educators also ate two meals with recruits, most of whom
are only barely removed from high school classrooms. Finally,
the educators saw a separate class of 250 recruits graduate.

As Gibney saw it, the Marines' ultimate aim was to sell
themselves as "best of the best." It worked for him.

"Their tag line says it all: Join us and become one of the few,
the proud," Gibney said. "I'd buy that. That's how they
sell Lexuses."

Few of the educators on the trip had served in the military,
but most said they were impressed.

As she walked off the range in a knee-length skirt after firing
a weapon for the first time ever, Doris Perkins, a retired teacher
who still meets with students at a school in New York City, said
she was sold. She had been on a Navy-sponsored workshop,
but there was little interaction with the recruits or their drill
instructors. And no trip to the firing range, either.

"It was nice, but it wasn't nearly as thorough as this one," she
said. "I would definitely recommend the Marines. The Navy
was nice, but I didn't feel it was enough to make
a recommendation."

Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, every public high
school in the United States must open its doors to military
recruiters and provide them lists of student names unless
children's parents complete "opt out" paperwork.

School districts are free to limit times recruiters may visit
and where they can set up. Recruiters say access is generally
the most limited in more affluent districts.

Sgt. Major Ray Centeno, the top enlisted man in New Jersey's
recruiting office, said the corps respects the boundaries the
districts set.

"We're not predators," he said. "We're not coming into your
schools to recruit kids who don't want to be Marines. The
military is not for everyone. The Marines are not for everyone.
... We want kids who are going to be successful in life.
We're not looking for thugs."

As the educators traveled around Parris Island, they passed
countless groups of recruits marching in perfect rows. They
toured a squad bay where the recruits sleep in perfectly
aligned bunk beds and scramble to attention on perfectly
polished linoleum.

"I can't wait to go back to school and report what I saw,"
said Janet Chiocchi, a school administrator and PTA member
in Smithtown, N.Y. "This place is beautiful. It's not like the
horror stories you heard about."

She said the young people she saw here looked just like
the young people she sees in school, but they acted differently.

"To see the discipline they're instilling in these kids is
inspiring," she said. "Today's kids are so `gimme, gimme,
gimme.' The kids I've seen here are the opposite of that."

The Marines made some inroads with Adacia Edwards,
a 23-year-old career counselor at Ewing (N.J.)