Bay . Area . United . Against . War
|
||
|
BAUAW NEWSLETTER Subscribe/Unsubscribe
Sunday, November 14, 2004
BAUAW NEWSLETTER-SUNDAY, NOV.14, 2004-EMERGENCY MEETING MONDAY, NOV. 15COME TO THE NEXT BAUAW MEETING AND BRING YOUR IDEAS ON HOW TO ACHIEVE UNITY IN THE MOVEMENT: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15TH, 7:00 p.m. 1380 Valencia Street (Between 24th & 25th Streets, SF) BAUAW: 415-824-8730 ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* Open letter to Bay Area Activists from Bay Area United Against War (BAUAW): Dear friends who organized, participated, and/or spoke in the demonstrations sponsored by Not in Our Name and ANSWER on Nov. 3 and Nov. 9. At the concluding rally of the emergency demonstration ANSWER called to protest the U.S. assault on Fallujah, Jahahara, of AFSC and N'COBRA, issued a kind of challenge to all the major antiwar organizations to make a unified response to the U.S. government's war against Iraq. He called on the national organizations, of which we are all affiliated to one or more-ANSWER, UFPJ, NION-to unify in building a massive antiwar movement. This call is so timely because the war and occupation continue unabated, the consequences for the Iraqis are devastating (over 100,000 civilians killed by U.S. actions) and over 1,110 U.S. troops are dead and tens of thousands injured. Those of us who are old enough to have participated in the movement against the U.S. war on Vietnam know that the most effective mass actions against that war that called for bringing all U.S. troops home now [Out Now!] were unified actions where people of different ideologies were able to come together for Out Now despite their divergent opinions on other topics. The mass movement that was built on the streets of the U.S. created a supportive environment for U.S. soldiers to resist the war in multiple ways eventually becoming an unreliable fighting force for U.S. imperialism. Now, it is very clear from all who spoke at the last two demonstrations, that we have wide areas of agreement. We all spoke about the need for the movement to get back into the streets to protest the war in massive demonstrations. We all spoke about the need for unity. We all spoke about the way to bring peace and end the war was for the U.S. government to get out of Iraq. The next step is for all our organizations to meet together and concretely plan how this unity will be carried out. Bay Area United Against War is willing to host such a meeting, or participate in such a meeting called by others. Let's make it happen. Bring the Troops Home Now! Carole Seligman, Bay Area United Against War (BAUAW) ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* ALL OUT IN SUPPORT OF THE LOCAL 2 HOTEL WORKERS! SOLIDARITY RALLY Saturday, November 20 at 11 a.m. Union Square, Downtown San Francisco ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* 1) Commentary: Will the Antiwar Movement Stand Up This Time? Iraq Watch: From Peace No War Network November 13, 2004 URL: http://www.PeaceNoWar.net Fallujah and the Reality of War By RAHUL MAHAJAN November 6, 2004 http://www.counterpunch.org/mahajan11062004.html 2) U.S. Troops Set for Final Attack on Falluja Force THE INSURGENTS By DEXTER FILKINS and ROBERT F. WORTH November 13, 2004 http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/13/international/middleeast/13iraq.html?hp&ex =1100408400&en=9553e430c442567f&ei=5094&partner=homepage 3) Humanitarian aid barred from Falluja Red Crescent says 157 families are still in the heart of Falluja An Iraqi Red Crescent convoy blocked from entering Falluja by US forces has asked the United Nations for help. Sunday 14 November 2004 11:46 AM GMT http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/443C3B4E-C2D2-4B18-9C5C-7C9B657A8DCF. htm 4) Falluja Residents Desperate for Food, Water, Aid By Omar Anwar FALLUJA, Iraq (Reuters) Sun Nov 14, 8:43 AM ET http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=2&u=/nm/20041114/ts_nm /iraq_falluja_scene_dc 5) U.S. Troops Hunt Falluja Rebels, Keep Aid Out By Michael Georgy and Omar Anwar FALLUJA, Iraq (Reuters) November 14, 2004 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=1&u=/nm/20041114/ts_nm /iraq_dc 6) Pentagon Envisioning a Costly Internet for War By TIM WEINER November 13, 2004 http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/13/technology/13warnet.html?hp&ex=1100408400& en=27b47c63b0a8e037&ei=5094&partner=homepage 7) For the First Time Since Vietnam, the Army Prints a Guide to Fighting Insurgents By DOUGLAS JEHL and THOM SHANKER WASHINGTON November 13, 2004 http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/13/politics/13army.html?oref=login 8) CRUSADES - NEW & OLD By Mumia Abu-Jamal [Col. Writ. 10/23/04] Copyright 2004 9) IS FASCISM POSSIBLE HERE? By Mumia Abu-Jamal [Col. Writ. 10/28/04] Copyright 2004 10) It's time to take the "No Blood for Oil" slogan to the auto companies Rally Sunday, Nov. 21, 12:00 noon-1:30 p.m. Opening Day - San Francisco Auto Show SF Moscone Center, 747 Howard 11) 31 U.S. Troops Killed So Far in Fallujah By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS November 14, 2004 Filed at 11:14 a.m. ET 12) Assemblyman Condemns Palestinian Art Show November 12, 2004 By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 9:31 p.m. ET ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* 1) Commentary: Will the Antiwar Movement Stand Up This Time? Iraq Watch: From Peace No War Network November 13, 2004 URL: http://www.PeaceNoWar.net Fallujah and the Reality of War By RAHUL MAHAJAN November 6, 2004 http://www.counterpunch.org/mahajan11062004.html The assault on Fallujah has started. It is being sold as liberation of the people of Fallujah; it is being sold as a necessary step to implementing "democracy" in Iraq. These are lies. I was in Fallujah during the siege in April, and I want to paint for you a Word-picture of what such an assault means. Fallujah is dry and hot; like Southern California, it has been made an agricultural area only by virtue of extensive irrigation. It has been known for years as a particularly devout city; people call it the City of a Thousand Mosques. In the mid-90's, when Saddam wanted his name to be added to the call to prayer, the imams of Fallujah refused. U.S. forces bombed the power plant at the beginning of the assault; for the next several weeks, Fallujah was a blacked-out town, with light provided by generators only in critical places like mosques and clinics. The town was placed under siege; the ban on bringing in food, medicine, and other basic items was broken only when Iraqis en masse challenged the roadblocks. The atmosphere was one of pervasive fear, from bombing and the threat of more bombing. Noncombatants and families with sick people, the elderly, and children were leaving in droves. After initial instances in which people were prevented from leaving, U.S. forces began allowing everyone to leave except for what they called "military age males," men usually between 15 and 60. Keeping noncombatants from leaving a place under bombardment is a violation of the laws of war. Of course, if you assume that every military age male is an enemy, there can be no better sign that you are in the wrong country, and that, in fact, your war is on the people, not on their oppressors,, not a war of liberation. The main hospital in Fallujah is across the Euphrates from the bulk of the town. Right at the beginning, the Americans shut down the main bridge, cutting off the hospital from the town. Doctors who wanted to treat patients had to leave the hospital, with only the equipment they could carry, and set up in makeshift clinics all over the city; the one I stayed at had been a neighborhood clinic with one room that had four beds, and no operating theater; doctors refrigerated blood in a soft-drink vending machine. Another clinic, I,m told, had been an auto repair shop. This hospital closing (not the only such that I documented in Iraq) also violates the Geneva Convention. In Fallujah, you were rarely free of the sound of artillery booming in the background, punctuated by the smaller, higher-pitched note of the mujaheddin's hand-held mortars. After even a few minutes of it, you have to stop paying attention to it and yet, of course, you never quite stop. Even today, when I hear the roar of thunder, I,m often transported instantly to April 10 and the dusty streets of Fallujah. In addition to the artillery and the warplanes dropping 500, 1000, and 2000-pound bombs, and the murderous AC-130 Spectre gunships that can demolish a whole city block in less than a minute, the Marines had snipers criss-crossing the whole town. For weeks, Fallujah was a series of sometimes mutually inaccessible pockets, divided by the no-man's-lands of sniper fire paths. Snipers fired indiscriminately, usually at whatever moved. Of 20 people I saw come into the clinic I observed in a few hours, only five were "military-age males." I saw old women, old men, a child of 10 shot through the head; terminal, the doctors told me, although in Baghdad they might have been able to save him. One thing that snipers were very discriminating about every single ambulance I saw had bullet holes in it. Two I inspected bore clear evidence of specific, deliberate sniping. Friends of mine who went out to gather in wounded people were shot at. When we first reported this fact, we came in for near-universal execration. Many just refused to believe it. Some asked me how I knew that it wasn't the mujaheddin. Interesting question. Had, say, Brownsville, Texas, been encircled by the Vietnamese and bombarded (which, of course, Mr. Bush courageously protected us from during the Vietnam war era) and Brownsville ambulances been shot up, the question of whether the residents were shooting at their own ambulances, I somehow guess, would not have come up. Later, our reports were confirmed by the Iraqi Ministry of Health and even by the U.S. military. The best estimates are that roughly 900-1000 people were killed directly, blown up, burnt, or shot. Of them, my guess, based on news reports and personal observation, is that 2/3 to were noncombatants. But the damage goes far beyond that. You can read whenever you like about the bombing of so-called Zarqawi safe houses in residential areas in Fallujah, but the reports don't tell you what that means. You read about precision strikes, and it's true that America's GPS-guided bombs are very accurate when they,re not malfunctioning, the 80 or 85% of the time that they work, their targeting radius is 10 meters, i.e., they hit within 10 meters of the target. Even the smallest of them, however, the 500-pound bomb, has a blast radius of 400 meters; every single bomb shakes the whole neighborhood, breaking windows and smashing crockery. A town under bombardment is a town in constant fear. You read the reports about X killed and Y wounded. And you should remember those numbers; those numbers are important. But equally important is to remember that those numbers lie in a war zone, everyone is wounded. The first assault on Fallujah was a military failure. This time, the resistance is stronger, better-armed, and better-organized; to "win," the U.S. military will have to pull out all the stops. Even within horror and terror, there are degrees, and we and the people of Fallujah ain't seen nothin, yet. George W. Bush has just claimed a new mandate the world has been delivered into his hands. There will be international condemnation, as there was the first time; but our government won't listen to it; aside from the resistance, all the people of Fallujah will be able to depend on to try to mitigate the horror will be us, the antiwar movement. We have a responsibility, that we didn't meet in April and we didn't meet in August when Najaf was similarly attacked; will we meet it this time? Rahul Mahajan is publisher of the weblog Empire Notes, with regularly updated commentary on U.S. foreign policy, the occupation of Iraq, and the state of the American Empire. He has been to occupied Iraq twice, and was in Fallujah during the siege in April. His most recent book is Full Spectrum Dominance: U.S. Power in Iraq and Beyond. He can be reached at rahul@empirenotes.org ( mailto:rahul@empirenotes.org ) For more photos and Videos from Iraq, visit: "Report from Baghdad" July, 2003 http://www.actionla.org/Iraq/IraqReport/intro.html Peace, No War War is not the answer, for only love can conquer hate Not in our Name! And another world is possible! Tel: (213)403-0131 Information for antiwar movements, news across the World, please visit: http://www.PeaceNoWar.net Please Join PeaceNoWar Listserv, send e-mail to: peacenowar-s ubscribe@lists.riseup.net Please Donate to Peace No War Network! Send check pay to: ActionLA/SEE 1013 Mission St. #6 South Pasadena CA 91030 (All donations are tax deductible) PEACE! Bay_Area_Activist list info: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bay_area_activist Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bay_area_activist/messages Calendar: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bay_area_activist/calendar List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bay_area_activist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> List-Subscribe: List subscription is by invitation only - Send an email to: <mailto:bay_area_activist-owner@yahoogroups.com> to request an invitation. WHEN SPIDERS UNITE, THEY CAN TIE DOWN A LION -- Ethiopian Proverb ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* 2) U.S. Troops Set for Final Attack on Falluja Force THE INSURGENTS By DEXTER FILKINS and ROBERT F. WORTH November 13, 2004 http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/13/international/middleeast/13iraq.html?hp&ex =1100408400&en=9553e430c442567f&ei=5094&partner=homepage FALLUJA, Iraq, Nov. 12 - American forces moved into position Friday for a decisive battle with bands of insurgents, pounding some of their last strongholds with airstrikes and repelling attempts by some fighters to shoot their way out through the desert countryside south of the city. But other fighters, among the most resilient the Americans have encountered in five days of battle, seemed resigned to making a last stand in Falluja's southern residential neighborhoods. "Right now they've got no place to go," said Col. Craig Tucker, commander of a regimental combat team encompassing several battalions of American troops. "I think they've come here to die." Twenty-two American servicemen have been killed and 170 wounded in Falluja since the invasion began on Monday evening, said Lt. Gen. John F. Sattler, the top Marine commander in Iraq. Of the Iraqi forces, 5 have been killed and 40 wounded, Gen. Abdul Qader Mohammed Jassim, an Iraqi commander, said. An audio recording posted Friday on the Internet and attributed to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian terrorist who has become the Americans' enemy No. 1 in Iraq, praised the efforts of the jihadists in Iraq and said the blood spilled in Falluja "will light the way to God's victory." "I call for the heroes of Islam in Falluja to endure just for a short time," he said, "and victory will come soon. I want you to remember our Prophet Muhammad when he fought in the past." In the north, Mosul remained restive on Friday as the government deployed national guardsmen from outside the area to fill a security vacuum after hundreds of Iraqi policemen fled Thursday in the face of a guerrilla uprising. The police chief of Mosul was fired, another senior Iraqi security officer was assassinated and the top American commander in the region said the loyalty and reliability of the city's entire 4,000- to 5,000-member police force was now suspect. On Friday morning, Al Jazeera, the Arabic satellite television network, showed a videotape of a Lebanese-American hostage who had been kidnapped earlier. Reuters also reported that a Syrian driver who had been kidnapped in August with two French journalists, Georges Malbrunot and Christian Chesnot, had turned up in Falluja. No further details were available. One prominent member of the Senate Armed Services Committee said the increasing mayhem raised questions about whether the United States could win the fight against a wider insurgency, whatever the outcome in Falluja. "The insurgency is not abating," the member, Senator Jack Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat who is a former officer in the 82nd Airborne Division, said in a telephone interview with reporters after he visited American forces in Iraq on Friday. "In some respects, it's becoming more pronounced in many parts of the country - not all parts of the country, but many parts of the country. It's hard to determine whether that's the last gasp or continued building momentum." On Thursday, insurgents overran at least a half-dozen police stations in Mosul, set fire to squad cars and made off with weapons. The crisis in Mosul has raised serious doubts about the ability of Iraqi security forces to take over policing duties anytime soon from the more than 140,000 American troops here. "There is a struggle going on," Brig. Gen. Carter Ham, the commander charged with controlling the north, said in a telephone interview from his headquarters in Mosul. "I don't want to kid you and tell you that every neighborhood is one you can walk down the middle of," he said. "There are some very dangerous neighborhoods. It's not over." The American military said one soldier was killed Thursday in Mosul. General Sattler, the top Marine commander in Iraq, declared that the American military controlled 80 percent of Falluja. But many remaining insurgents waged intense gun battles and appeared determined to make a last stand in Shuhada, a neighborhood on the southern edge of the city. There are indications that the remaining insurgents are running low on weapons, supplies and morale, military officials said. "We feel we've broken their back and spirit," General Sattler said. Some insurgents are firing at the American military cordon to the south, in an apparent effort to fight their way out, military officials said. At the same time, insurgents in rural areas south of Falluja have begun firing more rockets on the American positions ringing the city. Iraqi military forces have been going through houses in the city's northern half, taking prisoners and seizing weapons caches. "We are doing it very methodically, block by block, going into each room," said Lt. Col. Rod Symons, the senior advisor to the Third Brigade of the Iraqi Armed Forces. In one building, Iraqi troops discovered a box Thursday containing insurgent DVD's and pamphlets, along with the passport, driver's license and Defense Department identification card of Cpl. Wassef Ali Hassoun, a Lebanese-American Marine believed to have been kidnapped in June who later surfaced in Lebanon. Elsewhere in the building were a new Marine uniform without name tags and four large sacks of gunpowder and wire. In the building's basement was a room with what appeared to be blood on the walls and floor, officials said. In at least one area of central Falluja, insurgents were already infiltrating neighborhoods that they had just been rousted from, forcing commanders to send troops to areas behind the main battle lines. About 300 fighters surrendered to Iraqi forces on Friday in a mosque, General Jassim said at a news conference. Elsewhere, a Blackhawk helicopter crashed after being struck by antiaircraft fire near Taji, north of Baghdad, military officials said. The three crew members were wounded but the helicopter was recovered. It was the third American helicopter forced down this week; two others crash-landed Thursday after being fired on near Falluja. In southern Baghdad, an American soldier was killed and three others wounded Friday in an ambush. A wave of coordinated attacks across Baghdad and the area to the west appears to be a loosely organized counteroffensive to the invasion of Falluja. American commanders say insurgent leaders are likely to have fled Falluja before the invasion and are now at work elsewhere. In Baghdad, American and Iraqi forces arrested Sheik Mahdi al- Sumaydai, a prominent fundamentalist Sunni cleric, and more than a dozen of his followers after finding weapons in his sheik's mosque, officials said. Mr. Sumaydai was arrested by the Americans last winter and was released several months ago. His mosque is the largest religious sanctuary in the capital for devotees of the Salafiya branch of Sunni Islam, which Mr. Zarqawi and Osama bin Laden practice. A cleric representing Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani gave a lukewarm condemnation of the invasion of Falluja during Friday Prayer in Karbala. The ayatollah advocates following "a peaceful means of settling the security situation and restoring peace in the restive cities," said the cleric, Ahmed al-Safi. It was the first statement attributed to Ayatollah Sistani on the fighting in Falluja. Some Sunni leaders, including Mr. Sumaydai, have criticized the ayatollah in recent days for not taking a stand on Falluja. Though the streets were quieter in Mosul than they had been on Thursday, insurgents carried out sporadic attacks against Iraqi and American forces there. Gunmen raided the home of Brig. Gen. Mowaffak Daham, the head of the anticrime task force, and led him, his brother-in-law and a son out onto the lawn, said Salim al-Samedi, 29, a neighbor. The insurgents stood them up against a wall and shot them dead while chanting "God is great!" and then set fire to the house. A fire engine rushed to the scene, and the gunmen shot dead two of the fire fighters, Mr. Samedi said. The governor of Ninevah Province had his home burned down on Thursday, said Yasir Abdul-Razzaq, a relative, though the governor was still safe in the confines of the government center, which is protected by American armor and Iraqi troops. The governor's office fired Mosul's police chief, Brig. Gen. Muhammad Kheiri Barhawi. The police chief of Samarra, Taleb Shamel, told The Associated Press that he had also been fired. Iraqi officials said national guardsmen from near the Syrian border were being sent to Mosul to help put down the uprising. The brigades are made up of Kurdish militiamen. Kurds, Christians and Sunni Arabs are the largest population groups in Mosul, and it was unclear how the Sunni Arabs, who are leading the attacks, will take to the heavy presence of Kurdish soldiers. Reporting for this article was contributed by Eric Schmitt from Washington; Iraqi employees of The New York Times from Baghdad, Mosul and Karbala; and James Glanz and Edward Wong from Baghdad. Copyright 2004 The New York Times ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* 3) Humanitarian aid barred from Falluja Red Crescent says 157 families are still in the heart of Falluja An Iraqi Red Crescent convoy blocked from entering Falluja by US forces has asked the United Nations for help. Sunday 14 November 2004 11:46 AM GMT http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/443C3B4E-C2D2-4B18-9C5C-7C9B657A8DCF. htm US troops have directed the convoy, carrying emergency food, water and medical supplies into the Falluja hospital on the outskirts of the town, away from the reach of local citizens. "They will not be allowed to cross the bridge today," Capt. Adam Collier told Reuters at Falluja hospital, where the convoy is waiting to cross the Euphrates River into the main part of the embattled Iraqi city. He cited security reasons. Abu Fahd, a member of the relief convoy, told Aljazeera that "the relief convoy wants to enter Falluja town for humanitarian purposes only, to save women, children and elderly people. "I hope the United Nations will hear our appeals," he said. "We are now in Falluja hospital, outside the city. There is no one in the hospital except the medical team, doing nothing." But the US military said it saw no need for the Iraqi Red Crescent to deliver aid to people inside Falluja and said it did not think any Iraqi civilians were trapped inside the city. 'Aid not needed' "There is no need to bring [Red Crescent] supplies in because we have supplies of our own for the people," said US marine Colonel Mike Shupp. The relief convoy aims to help civilians stuck in Falluja town "Now that the bridge (into Falluja) is open I will bring out casualties and all aid work can be done here (at Falluja's hospital)," he added. He said he had not heard of any Iraqi civilians being trapped inside the city and did not think that was the case. But aid workers say there are still hundreds of families left in the city, which has been pummelled by sustained aerial bombardment and artillery fire in recent days. "We know of at least 157 families inside Falluja who need our help," said Firdus al-Ubadi of the Iraqi Red Crescent. No medicines The Iraqi Red Crescent sent seven trucks and ambulances to Falluja on Saturday, hoping to get food, blankets, water purification tablets and medicine to hundreds of families trapped inside the city during the past six days of fighting. "There is no need to bring [Red Crescent] supplies in because we have supplies of our own for the people" Colonel Mike Shupp, US marine "None of the injured residents are being allowed to come to the hospital, while those outside are not allowed to go into the town," Abu Fahd said. "The town is suffering from cuts in power and water supplies. There are no medicines or ambulances either. "The injured and the dead are now on the streets. Many families want to get out of their houses, but they have no alternative shelters to go into," he said. "The US forces have prevented us from entering the town claiming it is not safe. US forces have said they control 80% of the town." Relief team "I have asked them to allow the relief team into the areas they control, to offer humanitarian aid for women, children and the elderly, and transfer the injured to the hospital, but they have refused," Abu Fahd said. Baghdad hospitals received wounded refugee children The Red Crescent sent a convoy of essential goods along with 53 volunteers and three doctors from Baghdad to attend to people in Falluja. It believes that 157 families are still in the heart of Falluja, but it is concerned about the plight of tens of thousands of people living in refugee camps and villages dotted outside. "They are dying of starvation and lack of water, especially the children," Red Crescent spokeswoman Firdus al-Ubadi said. "If there is no solution to this crisis it will expand to other cities and other parts of Iraq and there will be a great disaster here." Earlier, the Red Crescent society despatched a convoy of four relief trucks and an ambulance to Amiriyat al-Falluja and a tourist village in Habbaniya, where an additional 1500 refugees are camped. Aljazeera ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* 4) Falluja Residents Desperate for Food, Water, Aid By Omar Anwar FALLUJA, Iraq (Reuters) Sun Nov 14, 8:43 AM ET http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=2&u=/nm/20041114/ts_nm /iraq_falluja_scene_dc FALLUJA, Iraq (Reuters) - No food. No water. No help. As fierce fighting casts a pall of smoke over the rubble-strewn Iraqi city of Falluja, thousands of Iraqi families remain cut off from desperately needed supplies. Seven Red Crescent trucks and ambulances have reached the main hospital on the western outskirts, but it is still too dangerous for them to cross the Euphrates river to bring help to locals, including hundreds of children, cut off for six days. "Our situation is very hard," said one resident contacted by telephone in the central Hay al-Dubat neighborhood on Sunday. "We don't have food or water. My seven children all have severe diarrhea. One of my sons was wounded by shrapnel last night and he's bleeding, but I can't do anything to help him." The man, who gave his name only as Abu Mustafa, said he had seen U.S. troops and Iraqi national guards in his street as explosions rang out. "There were bodies lying in the street." Abu Mustafa said he knew of six families nearby in a similar plight, but then broke down in tears. "We are still fasting, though it is the Eid (end of Ramadan feast) today. Allahu akbar, Allahu akbar (God is great)." Aid groups describe the situation in Falluja, where U.S. and Iraqi troops launched an full-scale military offensive last Monday to crush insurgents, as a humanitarian disaster. Up to half Falluja's 300,000 people fled during daily air strikes in the countdown to the assault, but thousands remain trapped as fighting rages around them. There are no statistics on the number of civilians killed or wounded in the fighting, only personal accounts of pain, hunger and fear from those trapped in the city. Some locals say the stench of decomposing bodies fills the air. Others tell of children dying because it was too dangerous to get them to help. One family buried their 9-year-old boy in the garden after he bled to death over several hours from a stomach wound. BODIES IN THE STREET Thousands of refugees are living in makeshift accommodation at camps outside the city, or with relatives. "It was terrible. We had no water or electricity. I even saw dead bodies lying in the street and a tank rolled over them," said Mohammed Ali Shalal, a 65-year-old truck driver who fled on Friday and is sheltering with a nephew in nearby Amriya, where 20 people were crammed into a two-bedroom apartment. "We ate dry bread and drank dirty water. I can't believe I'm safe and speaking to you now." Shalal said troops using loudspeakers told residents to go to a local mosque, where they were interrogated. "They let the old people go and detained the young," he said. Red Crescent secretary-general Jamal al-Karbouli said he was still waiting for U.S. permission to enter Falluja proper. "If we have any hope of entering, we will wait here, even for another night if necessary," he said. "Otherwise we will return to Amriyat al-Falluja and distribute the goods there." At least 10,000 civilians from Falluja have been sheltering in nearby towns such as Amriya and Habbaniya since before the offensive. Copyright (c) 2004 Reuters ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* 5) U.S. Troops Hunt Falluja Rebels, Keep Aid Out By Michael Georgy and Omar Anwar FALLUJA, Iraq (Reuters) November 14, 2004 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=1&u=/nm/20041114/ts_nm /iraq_dc FALLUJA, Iraq (Reuters) - U.S. and Iraqi forces hunted rebels in the devastated Iraqi city of Falluja on Sunday as fighting subsided after a ferocious six-day-old assault. No help has reached civilians since the offensive began on Monday and U.S. forces kept an Iraqi Red Crescent aid convoy of seven trucks and ambulances waiting at the main hospital near a bridge over the Euphrates River on the edge of Falluja. U.S. Marines swept through a last rebel redoubt in a southern quarter of the city that they see as a bastion for foreign fighters loyal to al Qaeda ally Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. "These are pretty diehard. These people down there are not sniping or firing, but waiting in their defenses for the Marines coming to their buildings. That's when they open fire," Marine Colonel Mike Shupp told Reuters at the hospital. A Reuters correspondent who drove through the city saw utter destruction. Bodies lay in the streets. Homes were smashed, mosques ruined, and power and telephone lines hung uselessly. Shupp said the Red Crescent did not need to deliver aid to civilians in Falluja and questioned whether there were any. "There is no need to bring supplies in because we have supplies of our own for the people. Now that the bridge is open, I will bring out casualties and all aid work can be done here." Shupp said he had not heard of any Iraqi civilians being trapped inside the city and did not think that was the case. "We will wait for permission and we will stay here tonight," Red Crescent convoy leader Jamal al-Karbouli told Reuters. Interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi, who has vowed to crush a raging insurgency before elections in January, said on Saturday there had been no civilian casualties in Falluja. His assertion contradicted accounts from residents inside the city, where intense violence has halted medical services and made any independent assessment impossible since Monday. "Our situation is very hard," said one resident contacted by telephone in the central Hay al-Dubat neighborhood. "We don't have food or water. My seven children all have severe diarrhea. "One of my sons was wounded by shrapnel last night and he's bleeding, but I can't do anything to help him." "BODIES IN STREET" The man, who gave his name only as Abu Mustafa, said he had seen U.S. troops and Iraqi national guards in his street as explosions rang out. "There were bodies lying in the street." Abu Mustafa said he knew of six families nearby in a similar plight, before breaking down in tears. "We are still fasting, though it is the Eid (end of Ramadan feast) today. Allahu akbar, Allahu akbar (God is great)," he sobbed. It is unclear how many of Falluja's 300,000 people remain, but about half are thought to have fled the fighting. Tank and artillery fire shook Falluja for much of the day but by nightfall the fighting had died away. Shupp said U.S. and Iraqi forces controlled the Sunni Muslim city and were going house to house in search of insurgents. A senior Iraqi official said more than 1,000 guerrillas had been killed in the offensive. The U.S. military says at least 22 American and five Iraqi troops have also died. The Falluja offensive has fueled violence across Iraq ( news -web sites )'s Sunni Muslim heartland, especially in the northern city of Mosul, where an uprising has left gunmen roaming some districts. Insurgents overran a police station in Mosul on Sunday and U.S. troops, backed by Iraqi security forces, were battling to retake it from them, according to a U.S. military spokesman. The U.S. commander in the north, Brigadier General Carter Ham, earlier told Reuters all nine Mosul police stations overrun and looted last week were back in U.S. or Iraqi forces' hands. In the refinery city of Baiji, U.S. helicopters fired missiles at insurgents, witnesses said. U.S. forces backed by tanks moved into the city center after clashing with rebels. A local doctor said seven people had been wounded in the fighting. Insurgents mortared a police station in Muqdadiya, northeast of Baghdad, killing one policeman, on Sunday, police said. On Saturday evening, rebels attacked a military base outside Baghdad with "indirect fire," killing one U.S. soldier and wounding three others, the U.S. military said. (Additional reporting by Luke Baker and Lin Noueihed in Baghdad, Maher al-Thanoon in Mosul, Sabah al-Bazee in Baiji) Copyright (c) 2004 Reuters ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* 6) Pentagon Envisioning a Costly Internet for War By TIM WEINER November 13, 2004 http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/13/technology/13warnet.html?hp&ex=1100408400& en=27b47c63b0a8e037&ei=5094&partner=homepage The Pentagon is building its own Internet, the military's world wide web for the wars of the future. The goal is to give all American commanders and troops a moving picture of all foreign enemies and threats - "a God's-eye view" of battle. This "Internet in the sky," Peter Teets, under secretary of the Air Force, told Congress, would allow "marines in a Humvee, in a faraway l and, in the middle of a rainstorm, to open up their laptops, request imagery" from a spy satellite, and "get it downloaded within seconds." The Pentagon calls the secure network the Global Information Grid, or GIG. Conceived six years ago, its first connections were laid six weeks ago. It may take two decades and hundreds of billions of dollars to build the new war net and its components. Skeptics say the costs are staggering and the technological hurdles huge. Vint Cerf, one of the fathers of the Internet and a Pentagon consultant on the war net, said he wondered if the military's dream was realistic. "I want to make sure what we realize is vision and not hallucination," Mr. Cerf said. "This is sort of like Star Wars, where the policy was, 'Let's go out and build this system,' and technology lagged far behind,'' he said. "There's nothing wrong with having ambitious goals. You just need to temper them with physics and reality." Advocates say networked computers will be the most powerful weapon in the American arsenal. Fusing weapons, secret intelligence and soldiers in a global network - what they call net-centric warfare - will, they say, change the military in the way the Internet has changed business and culture. "Possibly the single most transforming thing in our force,'' Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has said, "will not be a weapons system, but a set of interconnections." The American military, built to fight nations and armies, now faces stateless enemies without jets, tanks, ships or central headquarters. Sending secret intelligence and stratagems instantly to soldiers in battle would, in theory, make the military a faster, fiercer force against a faceless foe. Robert J. Stevens, chief executive of the Lockheed Martin Corporation , the nation's biggest military contractor, said he envisioned a "highly secure Internet in which military and intelligence activities are fused," shaping 21st-century warfare in the way that nuclear weapons shaped the cold war. Every member of the military would have "a picture of the battle space, a God's-eye view," he said. "And that's real power." Pentagon traditionalists, however, ask if net-centric warfare is nothing more than an expensive fad. They point to the street fighting in Falluja and Baghdad, saying firepower and armor still mean more than fiber optic cables and wireless connections. But the biggest challenge in building a war net may be the military bureaucracy. For decades, the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines have built their own weapons and traditions. A network, advocates say, would cut through those old ways. The ideals of this new warfare are driving many of the Pentagon's spending plans for the next 10 to 15 years. Some costs are secret, but billions have already been spent. Providing the connections to run the war net will cost at least $24 billion over the next five years - more than the cost, in today's dollars, of the Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb. Beyond that, encrypting data will be a $5 billion project. Hundreds of thousands of new radios are likely to cost $25 billion. Satellite systems for intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and communications will be tens of billions more. The Army's program for a war net alone has a $120 billion price tag. Over all, Pentagon documents suggest, $200 billion or more may go for the war net's hardware and software in the next decade or so. "The question is one of cost and technology," said John Hamre, a former deputy secretary of defense, now president of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "We want to know all things at all times everywhere in the world? Fine," Mr. Hamre said. "Do we know what this staring, all-seeing eye is that we're going to put in space is? Hell, no." The military wants to know "everything of interest to us, all the time," in the words of Steven A. Cambone, the under secretary of defense for intelligence. He has told Congress that military intelligence - including secret satellite surveillance covering most of the earth - will be posted on the war net and shared with troops. John Garing, strategic planning director at the Defense Information Security Agency, now starting to build the war net, said: "The essence of net-centric warfare is our ability to deploy a war- fighting force anywhere, anytime. Information technology is the key to that." Military contractors - and information-technology creators not usually associated with weapons systems - formed a consortium to develop the war net on Sept. 28. The group includes an A-list of military contractors and technology powerhouses: Boeing ; Cisco Systems ; Factiva, a joint venture of Dow Jones and Reuters; General Dynamics; Hewlett-Packard ;Honeywell ;I.B.M. ; Lockheed Martin; Microsoft ; Northrop Grumman; Oracle ;Raytheon ; and Sun Microsystems . They are working to weave weapons, intelligence and communications into a seamless web. The Pentagon has tried this twice before. Its Worldwide Military Command and Control System, built in the 1960's, often failed in crises. A $25 billion successor, Milstar, was completed in 2003 after two decades of work. Pentagon officials say it is already outdated: more switchboard than server, more dial-up than broadband, it cannot support 21st-century technology. The Pentagon's scientists and engineers, starting four decades ago, invented the systems that became the Internet. Throughout the cold war, their computer power ran far ahead of the rest of the world. Then the world eclipsed them. The nation's military and intelligence services started falling behind when the Internet exploded onto the commercial scene a decade ago. The war net is "an attempt to catch up," Mr. Cerf said. It has been slowly evolving for at least six years. In 1999, Pentagon officials told Congress that "this monumental task will span a quarter-century or more." This year, the vision gained focus, and Pentagon officials started explaining it in some detail to Congress. Its scope was described in July by the Government Accountability Office, the watchdog agency for Congress. Many new multibillion-dollar weapons and satellites are "critically dependent on the future network," the agency reported. "Despite enormous challenges and risks - many of which have not been successfully overcome in smaller-scale efforts" like missile defense, "the Pentagon is depending on the GIG to enable a fundamental transformation in the way military operations are conducted." According to Art Cebrowski, director of the Pentagon's Office of Force Transformation, "What we are really talking about is a new theory of war." Linton Wells II, the chief information officer at the Defense Department, said net-centric principles were becoming "the center of gravity" for war planners. "The tenets are broadly accepted throughout the Defense Department," said Mr. Wells, who directs the Office of Networks and Information Integration. "Senior leadership can articulate them. We still have a way to go in terms of why we should spend X billion dollars on a certain program. In the fight between widgets and digits, widgets tend to win." He said $24 billion would be spent in the next five years to build new war net connections. "No doubt these are expensive," Mr. Wells said. "Technology developments always are." Advocates acknowledge that weaving American military and intelligence services into a unified system is a huge challenge. The military is filled with "tribal representatives behind tribal workstations interpreting tribal hieroglyphics," in the words of Gen. John Jumper, the Air Force chief of staff. "What if the machines talked to each other?" he asked. That is the vision of the new web: war machines with a common language for all military forces, instantly emitting encyclopedias of lethal information against all enemies. To realize this vision, the military must solve a persistent problem. It all boils down to bandwidth. Bandwidth measures how much data can flow between electronic devices. Too little for civilians means a Web page takes forever to load. Too little for soldiers means the war net will not work. The bandwidth requirements seem bottomless. The military will need 40 or 50 times what it used at the height of the Iraq war last year, a Rand Corporation study estimates - enough to give front-line soldiers bandwidth equal to downloading three feature- length movies a second. The Congressional Research Service said the Army, despite plans to spend $20 billion on the problem, may wind up with a tenth of the bandwidth it needs. The Army, in its "lessons learned" report from Iraq, published in May, said "there will probably never be enough resources to establish a complete and functioning network of communications, sensors, and systems everywhere in the world." The bottleneck is already great. In Iraq, front-line commanders and troops fight frequent software freezes. "To make net-centric warfare a reality," said Tony Montemarano, the Defense Information Security Agency's bandwidth expansion chief, "we will have to precipitously enhance bandwidth." The military must also change its own culture. For decades, the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines have built separate weapons, radios, frequencies and traditions. They guard their "rice bowls" - their turf - from rival services. But Mr. Rumsfeld's vision depends on interoperability: warfare using all four services in joint operations. In a net-centric world, "you would not have a Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines," but a unified force, said William Owens, a former vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. For the Pentagon's visionaries, Mr. Montemarano said, "the single biggest obstacle is a cultural one.'' "Breaking these rice bowls - that's a huge job." Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* 7) For the First Time Since Vietnam, the Army Prints a Guide to Fighting Insurgents By DOUGLAS JEHL and THOM SHANKER WASHINGTON November 13, 2004 http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/13/politics/13army.html?oref=login WASHINGTON, Nov. 12 - For the first time in decades, the Army has issued a field guide to counterinsurgency warfare, an acknowledgment that the kind of fighting under way in Iraq may become more common in the years ahead. The Army field manual on counterinsurgency operations is the first since the early Vietnam era, and the first ever intended for the kind of regular Army units now embroiled in battles in Iraq, as opposed to the Special Operations forces who have taken the lead in previous counterinsurgencies. Under orders issued in February, the manual was prepared on an accelerated basis by the Combined Arms Center in Fort Leavenworth, Kan., and was distributed to all officers, in Iraq and elsewhere, beginning last month. An introduction says the "aftermath of instability'' in Iraq that followed the toppling of Saddam Hussein's regime underscored the need for an updated Army guide to counterinsurgency warfare. Until now, formal American military doctrine for fighting insurgencies has been so limited that many Marines were deployed to Iraq with copies of the Marine Corps' "Small Wars Manual,'' issued in 1940. The most recent Army guides on the subject, written principally for Special Operations forces, were prepared in 1963 and 1965, in the early stages of the Vietnam War. Like the Army, the Marine Corps is also updating its manual. The new Army guide contains instructions on such matters as searching a family car and setting up a hasty checkpoint. Other passages address the role played by "transnational insurgents,'' like the foreign fighters in Iraq, and emphasize the role of intelligence, rather than Vietnam-era search and destroy missions, in finding insurgents. The guide also includes a stark warning about the dangers of prolonged counterinsurgency operations, saying that the longer American forces take the lead in such efforts, the greater the resentment they breed among the host-country population. "A long-term U.S. combat role may undermine the legitimacy of the H.N. government and risks converting the conflict into a U.S.- only war," the manual says, using an abbreviation for host nation. "That combat role can also further alienate cultures that are hostile to the U.S." In some ways, military officials said, the guide just reflects tactics, techniques and procedures that troops in Iraq and Afghanistan already use, such as armoring vehicles against improvised explosives. But for a hierarchical organization like the Army, the distribution of the guide is a sign of the importance being attached to the issue. Army officers who have recently returned from yearlong duty in Iraq applauded the doctrine, but said its methods were nothing new to field commanders, who have been employing and refining such tactics for months. The guide's distribution in October came nearly 18 months after the Iraq insurgency began in May 2003, following President Bush's declaration of an end to major combat operations. Army officers have acknowledged that the Army was ill-prepared to contend with the new environment. "The important point here is that the Army has again, a bit late, recognized the importance of counterinsurgency, and is working to improve its capability to fight and win low-intensity conflicts," said an Army officer who recently returned from Iraq and demanded anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the issue. The document is unclassified, but the Army has limited its distribution to Defense Department personnel, "to maintain operations security," the document says. A copy of the document, dated October 2004, was posted Thursday on a Web site run by the Federation of American Scientists. Officially, the document is a "field manual interim,'' a new designation that allows the Army to accelerate its normal schedule for preparing doctrine. The guide's principal author, Lt. Col. Jan Horvath of the Army, said in a telephone interview that it was completed in just five months; the Army usually insists on developing new doctrine over a period of three years. "The stunning victory over Saddam Hussein's army in 2003 validated U.S. conventional force T.T.P.," the document says, using an abbreviation for tactics, techniques and procedures. "But the ensuing aftermath of instability has caused review of lessons from the Army's historical experience and those of the other services and multinational partners." According to the field manual, known as F.M.I. 3-07.22, the impetus for its creation "came from the Iraq insurgency and the realization that engagements in the Global War on Terrorism (G.W.O.T.) would likely use counterinsurgency T.T.P.'s." It says its purpose is to review "what we know about counterinsurgency" and to explain "the fundamentals of military operations in counterinsurgency environment." Even before the document was published, military officers said that the Army's main training centers at Fort Polk, La., and Fort Irwin, Calif., had begun to consider lessons and comments from soldiers engaged in the Iraq counterinsurgency. One purpose for the manual, Colonel Horvath said, was to update archaic language and concepts. The "Small Wars Manual," which many Marines carried to Iraq, includes sections on the "management of animals'' like mules, and assertions like a warning that mixed-race societies are "always difficult to govern, if not ungovernable, owing to the absence of a fixed character.'' The Army did issue a manual in 1990, F.M. 3-20, on the subject of military operations in low-intensity conflict, and that document included a section on counterinsurgency. But Colonel Horvath said that his commanders, including Lt. Gen. William Wallace, a top Army commander during the invasion of Iraq who now heads the Combined Arms Center, had found it to be inadequate. Senior Army officials said that events on the ground in Iraq and in Afghanistan made it clear months ago that the service had to revamp its doctrine for fighting insurgents. "We needed to update the counterinsurgency doctrine," General Wallace said in an interview in late summer, as the document's authors were putting on the finishing touches. "That hadn't been looked at since the post-Vietnam era." General Wallace, who commanded the Army's V Corps during the Iraqi war, said that Army authors worked closely with the Marine Corps and with the British military, which has extensive counterinsurgency experience in places like Northern Ireland. But General Wallace cautioned that successful counterinsurgencies required calibrating the right degree of force with economic development and political institutions. "We've got to strike the right balance," General Wallace said. "Security has to be there for the economy and government to work. But having an economy and government is essential for security." Eric Schmitt contributed reporting for this article. Copyright 2004 The New York Times ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* 8) CRUSADES - NEW & OLD By Mumia Abu-Jamal [Col. Writ. 10/23/04] Copyright 2004 Shortly after 9-11, US President, George W. Bush, initially announced the beginning of a "crusade" against the forces that unleashed September 11th. Under criticism from his advisers, who said that the term evoked outrage in much of the Arab world, he relented, and the term was heard no more. While the word "crusade" may no longer be used in presidential speech, there can really be little doubt that it is precisely the concept of "crusade" that actuates many of the actions of the US government vis-Ã -vis the countries of the Middle East. Bush has spoken often of "remaking the face of the region." There is a reason why Arab countries and communities reacted with outrage and horror at the mere mention of the crusades; Arabs and Europeans view that past differently, because their respective cultures were in conflict then. The Europeans saw the Crusades as a noble assignment from the Popes to "liberate" Jerusalem from the hands of the "infidels", the Muslim Arabs and Moors. The Arabs saw the era as one of unrelenting bloodshed and cruelty at the hands of the Christians, and saw the dark days of European colonialism as an echo of that earlier period. For many Americans, the notion of "crusades", while not as loaded as either, evokes bright, shiny images of knights with crosses on their shields, defending the poor and the weak. Behind the various images of the crusades, however, lies its awful and bloody history, which British historian Edward Gibbon, in his classic The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire [Abridged], does not hesitate to relate. He is not one who recites the glories of these mass military campaigns. It, "...[Appear[s] to me," Gibbons writes, "that these 200 years of 'holy wars', have checked rather than forwarded the maturity of Europe" (691). Gibbons writes: The lives and labours of millions, which were buried in the East, would have been more profitably employed in the improvement of their native country: the accumulated stock of industry and wealth would have overflowed in navigation and trade; and the Latins would have been enriched and enlightened by a pure and friendly correspondence with the climates of the East. [691] The Crusades were not absolutely evil, he argues, in that they did away with another evil: the crusades unleashed an untold number of Europeans, who were tied to the soil as serfs. These people were thrown into the teeming armies of the crusades, and the costs of such ventures "dissipated" the estates of the barons, allowing the poor to agitate for some semblance of freedom, and some social standing free of the rapacious nobility. Gibbons reminds us that wars begin for many, various reasons; yet few of us can see their end. Surely, the nobles of church and state, who alone bore the stamp of "citizen" or "men," before the 200 years of war, could not foresee their dissipation, and loss of power and prestige afterwards. They saw only the promise of vast wealth, and the misty inheritances of martial glory. Yet, as ever, there are lessons in history. "War," the saying goes, "is the sport of kings." It is also, often, an engine of societal change, that transforms the nations that wage war, as often as the nations that are warred against. The first crusades weakened, rather than strengthened Europe, but this was lost to those ruling and wealthy classes, who could not see past their own avarice. We are told that these wars too, will, in the crippled words of Bush, "last for generations." None of us can see the beginning of an end. But, if history teaches us anything, it is that change is coming. It will change them; but assuredly, it will change us, as well. Copyright 2004 Mumia Abu-Jamal ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* 9) IS FASCISM POSSIBLE HERE? By Mumia Abu-Jamal [Col. Writ. 10/28/04] Copyright 2004 Fascism. The very word evokes dark, menacing images of troops, marching in lockstep, in support of a terrible, malevolent ideology. In a word, it suggests the followers of Mussolini in Italy, or Hitler in Germany. To most of us, its very mention suggests its foreign nature; its Otherness. Therein lies its danger. For, because it is seen as a foreign ideology, the inevitable idea arises: "It can't happen here." Those who say this, either don't know, or don't want to know, American history. They prefer the safe myths, to the ugly truths of how this country came to be what it is. What is fascism? In short, it is the merger of state and corporate interests. What is totalitarianism? On April 23rd, 1976, the U.S. Congress issued its Final Select Committee report, which charged: We have seen segments of our Government adopt tactics unworthy of a democracy and occasionally reminiscent of the tactics of totalitarian regimes. ... [T]he chief investigative branch of the federal government [FBI], which was charged by law with investigating crimes and preventing criminal conduct, itself engaged in lawless tactics and *responded to deep-seated social problems by fomenting violence and unrest.* [From Dr. Huey P. Newton, *War Against the Panthers: A Study of Repression in America* [Ph.D. Dissertation (New York: Harlem River Press, 1996), p. 110] Six months earlier, then-Sen. Walter Mondale (D-Minn.) would make similar comments as he opened hearings into the COINTELPRO revelations. On Nov. 19, 1975, he stated: .... Yesterday, this committee heard some of the most disturbing testimony that can be imagined in a free society. We heard evidence that for decades the institutions designed to enforce the laws and Constitution of our country have been engaging in conduct that violates the law and the Constitution. We heard that the FBI, which is part of the Department of Justice, took justice into its own hands by seeking to punish those with unpopular ideas. We learned that the chief law enforcement agency in the federal Government decided that it did not need laws to investigate and suppress the peaceful and constitutional activities of those whom it disapproved. Sen. Mondale added, on the floor of the Senate: We heard testimony that the FBI, to protect the country against those it believed had totalitarian political views, employed the tactics of totalitarian societies against American citizens. We heard that the FBI attempted to destroy one of our greatest leaders in the field of civil rights [here, he refers to Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.], and then replace him with someone of the FBI's choosing. [From: U.S. Senate, *Hearings Before the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations With Respect to Intelligence Activities:* [ (Vol.6)-F.B.I. (Wash., DC: U.S. Gov't Printing Office, 1976), p. 61.] The state waged war against its own alleged 'citizens', with impunity. But now, years after these hearings, thanks to the cleverly-named U.S. PATRIOT Act, what was illegal during the COINTELPRO era, is legal today. People who have opposed the Iraq War, or other actions of the Bush Regime, have been beaten, pepper-sprayed, framed, jailed, and tortured, in Los Angeles, New York City, Philadelphia, and beyond -- for following their alleged 'rights' under the 1st Amendment. They have been caged, and corralled into so-called 'Free Speech Zones!' Which almost literally begs the question: If cages are 'free speech zones', what do you call the huge tracts of land and air that are outside these cages? Non-free-speech zones? And virtually every judge who has been asked to protect the people's rights to protest and assemble, over the cop's 'right' to cage and repress, has gone the cops way. Fascism -- the merger of state and corporate power -- has made the struggle of workers for an 8-hour day, for the right to unionize, for vacation days, for collective bargaining, one stained with the blood of thousands of martyrs, martyrs for labor, like many of the members of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), known as the Wobblies. They were beaten, thrown off trains, jailed by the dozens, framed, and slain, for defending worker's rights. Fascism is more than a funny-sounding word; it is dyed deep into the fabric of American life; and creeps forward today, under cover of 'Law.' [*Sources*: Newton, H.P., *WATP*.; Donner, Frank. *The Age of Surveillance: The Aims and Methods of America's Political Intelligence System*. (NY: Vintage, 1981); McGuckin, Henry E., (Memoirs of a WOBBLY) (Chi.: Kerr, 1987).] Copyright 2004 Mumia Abu-Jamal ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* 10) It's time to take the "No Blood for Oil" slogan to the auto companies Rally Sunday, Nov. 21, 12:00 noon-1:30 p.m. Opening Day - San Francisco Auto Show SF Moscone Center, 747 Howard Dear Friends: One of the key ways to break the incentives for war and empire is to break America's addiction to oil. It's time to take the "No Blood for Oil" slogan to the auto companies and demand that they act now to dramatically reduce our oil dependence so that we aren't having to send US troops to Iraq, or West Africa, or Colombia. On Sunday, Nov 21, there will be a rally at the opening day of the SF Auto Show. A call to action is below. Please mark your calendars and please spread far and wide. Thanks! Peace Jason Mark Clean Car Campaigner Global Exchange Break America's Addiction to Oil! Jumpstart Ford and Declare Energy Independence! Rally at Opening Day of San Francisco Auto Show When: 12:00 Noon - 1:30 p.m., Sunday, November 21 Where: San Francisco Auto Show, SF Moscone Center, 747 Howard What: Rally, Leafleting and Street Theater Calling on Ford Motor Company to Break America's Oil Addiction Who: Global Exchange, Rainforest Action Network, Bluewater Network, SF Bike Coalition, and YOU. The United States is addicted to oil. Although less than 5 percent of the world's population, we consume 25 percent of the world's oil. This dependence on oil endangers our environment, weakens our economy, and undermines our national security. The quickest way to break our oil habit is by challenging Ford Motor Company to take immediate action to dramatically increase the fuel economy of its cars. According to the US EPA, Ford is the worst gas-guzzler in the auto industry, falling last place in fuel economy rankings for five years in a row. A great place to challenge Ford is at the wildly popular SF Auto Show. Attended by hundreds of thousands of people, the show is a critical venue for Ford to promote its products. When it comes to making sensible, fuel-efficient vehicles, Ford has have very little to brag about. And that means the auto shows offer a fantastic opportunity for concerned citizens to raise public awareness about the very real costs of our oil addiction. WHAT YOU CAN DO: 1) Come to the Auto Show rally on Sunday, Nov. 21 and join human rights activists, environmentalists, cyclists and others for a lively rally calling on Ford to break America's oil addiction. Add your voice to the call for energy independence. 2) Reduce your own oil consumption by biking more! It's fun and easier than you might think. A great way to start is by taking a FREE Bike Ed class offered by the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition. For more information & class schedules, see http://www.sfbike.org/edu For more information, contact Jason Mark at 415-558-9490 or jason@globalexchange.org Please act today to break our addiction to oil! ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* 11) 31 U.S. Troops Killed So Far in Fallujah By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS November 14, 2004 Filed at 11:14 a.m. ET NEAR FALLUJAH, Iraq (AP) -- The U.S. military's ground and air assault of Fallujah has gone quicker than expected, with the entire city occupied after six days of fighting, the Marine commander who planned the offensive said Sunday. The military said 31 Americans have been killed in the siege. Marine Maj. Gen. Richard Natonski said he and other commanders learned from April's failed three-week Marine assault on Fallujah, which was called off by the Bush administration after a worldwide outcry over civilians deaths. This time, the military sent in six times as many troops and 20 types of aircraft. Troops also faked attacks before the assault to confuse enemy fighters. ``Maybe we learned from April,'' Natonski said in an interview with The Associated Press. ``We learned we can't do it piecemeal. When we go in, we go all the way through. We had the green light this time and we went all the way. ``Had we done in April what we did now, the results would've been the same.'' Natonski spoke during a visit to the 1st Cavalry Division's 2nd Brigade, the unit charged with isolating Fallujah under a security cordon. More than 1,200 insurgents have been killed during the operation, he said. The offensive has killed at least 31 American troops and six Iraqi soldiers, said Lt. Gen. John Sattler, commander of the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force. The number of injured Americans was ``up in the high 200s,'' although some have returned to duty already, Sattler said. Rebel attacks elsewhere -- especially in the northern city of Mosul -- have forced the Americans to shift troops away from Fallujah. Exploiting the redeployment, insurgents stepped up attacks in areas outside Fallujah, including a bombing that killed two U.S. Marines on the outskirts of the former rebel bastion 40 miles west of Baghdad. On Sunday, Marines and Army units were still battling gritty bands of defenders scattered in buildings and bunkers across the Sunni Muslim stronghold. Behind them, Iraqi troops were enmeshed in the painstaking task of clearing weapons and fighters from every room of Fallujah's estimated 50,000 buildings. U.S. forces now occupy -- but have yet to subdue -- the entire city. It still could take several days of fighting to clear the final pockets of resistance, the military said. On Sunday, U.S. soldiers from Task Force 2-2 of the 1st Infantry Division discovered an immense series of underground bunkers linked by tunnels that insurgents stocked with medical supplies, a CNN correspondent embedded with the unit reported. Warplanes dropped four 2,000-pound bombs on the bunker network in the city's southeast corner, setting off 45 minutes of secondary explosions as weapons stockpiles detonated, CNN correspondent Jane Arraf said. Also, Marines reopened the bridge where the bodies of two American contractors killed by militants were strung up in March, sparking the earlier U.S. siege. ``This is a big event for us,'' Maj. Todd Des Grosseilliers, 41, of Auburn, Maine, said before Marines rolled back concertina wire and swept the bridge for booby traps. Also, Marines in Fallujah found the mutilated body of what they believe was a Western woman. The body was lying in the street covered with a blood-soaked cloth. A Marine officer speaking on condition of anonymity said he was ``80 percent sure'' it was a Western woman. Two foreign women were kidnapped last month -- Margaret Hassan, 59, the director of CARE International in Iraq and Teresa Borcz Khalifa, 54, a Polish -born longtime resident of Iraq. In Warsaw, the Polish Foreign Ministry said it was seeking more information. The Iraqi Red Crescent Society said another convoy would travel from Baghdad to Fallujah on Monday, carrying food and aid for about 2,000 families living in the area, director Fardous al-Ubaidi said. A convoy of four such vehicles arrived in Fallujah on Saturday. In central Buhriz, 25 miles northeast of Baghdad, demonstrators marched to protest the Fallujah offensive and denounce Iraq's interim prime minister, Ayad Allawi. Associated Press Television News footage showed some armed men, heads covered with black hoods and brandishing Kalashnikov rifles, among the marchers. The demonstrators, estimated by police to number about 70, carried banners calling Allawi a ``thug'' and ``traitor.'' ``Allawi, Fallujah will be your tomb!'' some chanted. ``You are a coward, an American agent!'' In Mosul, Iraq's third-largest city, militants attacked two police stations, killing at least six Iraqi National Guards and wounding three others, Iraqi officials said. One insurgent was killed and three others were wounded, they said. Iraqi security forces regained control of both stations, witnesses said. About 300 Iraqi National Guards and a battalion of police from Baghdad patrolled the streets in a visible show of force after an insurgent uprising believed to have been mounted in support of Fallujah's militants. Three days earlier, armed and masked militants stormed police stations, bridges and government buildings in Mosul as Iraqi police apparently failed to put up a fight. Mosul's police chief was fired after criticism that militants infiltrated police forces. Planning for Fallujah began in September, with Natonski given responsibility for the combat phase, said Lt. Col. Dan Wilson, a Marine planner with the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force. After troops uproot the insurgents, contractors are supposed to swarm into Fallujah to cart away rubble, repair buildings and fix the city's utilities, Wilson and Natonski said. The Iraqi government already has picked leaders for Fallujah, and thousands of Iraqi police and paramilitary forces have been recruited to impose order. Natonski described the six days of ground war as a ``flawless execution of the plan we drew up. We are actually ahead of schedule.'' Several pre-assault tactics made the battle easier than expected, he said. Insurgent defenses were weakened by bombing raids on command posts and safe houses. Air-dropped leaflets also may have demoralized some defenders and convinced some residents the city would be better off under government control, he said. In the days before the raid, ground troops feinted invasions, charging right up to Fallujah's edge in tanks and armored vehicles. Natonski said these fake attacks forced the insurgents to build up forces in the south and east, perhaps diverting defenders from the north, where six battalions of Army and Marine troops finally punched into the city Monday. The deceptive maneuvers also drew fire from defenders' bunkers, which were exposed and relentlessly bombed before the ground assault. ``We desensitized the enemy to the formations they saw on the night we attacked,'' Natonski said. Another key tactic was choking off the city, the responsibility of the 2nd Brigade of the Army's 1st Cavalry Division, Natonski said. That prevented insurgents from slipping out during the assault, although many, including top leaders like Jordanian Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Sheik Abdullah al-Janabi and Omar al-Hadid, are believed to have fled. ``We never expected them to be there. We're not after Zarqawi. We're after insurgents in general,'' Natonski said. Copyright 2004 The Associated Press ---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------* 12) Assemblyman Condemns Palestinian Art Show November 12, 2004 By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 9:31 p.m. ET WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. (AP) -- A Jewish assemblyman said Friday that an exhibit of Palestinian art and crafts, scheduled for display in a public building, should be canceled because it is anti-Israel and ``promotes terrorism and violence.'' Items to be shown include an Arab headdress trapped in a Star of David made of barbed wire, and a piece paying homage to ``Palestinian martyrs in the anti-Israel uprising that began in 2000.'' The curator of the exhibit said that while some of the art deals with Israel's military presence in the Palestinian territories and ``the apartheid-type life that Palestinians are forced to live under ... what comes through is the desire for a peaceful life.'' Westchester County's executive has demanded a preview of the exhibit before deciding whether it should be canceled. The exhibit, scheduled for Nov. 20 at the county center in White Plains, is entitled ``Made in Palestine.'' Assemblyman Ryan Karben, a Democrat from neighboring Rockland County, based his objections on artworks from another exhibit, also called ``Made in Palestine,'' that was on display at the Station museum in Houston last year. Those works are in storage, but their images will be shown as part of the White Plains display, said Nada Khader of WESPAC, a peace group that is sponsoring the display with the artists' group Al-Jisser (which means ``bridges''). Among other things in the Houston exhibit that Karber objects to are a reference to the creation of Israel in 1948 as a ``catastrophe,'' and works by an artist described in the Houston exhibit as ``a former general in the Palestinian Liberation Organization.'' ``Whether they are in a display case or on a projection screen, these divisive and anti-Israel pieces that glorify terrorism have no business being displayed,'' said Aaron Troodler, Karben's spokesman. Haifa Bint-Kadi, the artist who is curating the White Plains exhibit, said she was disappointed that Karben would ``make something divisive out of this, when what we're trying to do is get people to know one another rather than do harm to one another.'' UNITED FOR PEACE & JUSTICE | 212-868-5545 This email list is designed for posting news articles or event announcements of interest to UFPJ member groups. It is not a discussion list. To engage in online discussion of UFPJ matters, join our discussion list by sending a blank email to ufpj-disc-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
|
|